| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


Departments of * Medicine (Cardiology),
Physiology, and
Physiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Zhilin Qu, PhD, Dept. of Medicine (Cardiology), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, BH-307 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095. Tel.: 310-794-6050; Fax: 310-206-9133; E-mail: zqu{at}mednet.ucla.edu.
Spatial dispersion of refractoriness, which is amplified by genetic diseases, drugs, and electrical and structural remodeling during heart disease, is recognized as a major factor increasing the risk of lethal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Dispersion forms the substrate for unidirectional conduction block, which is required for the initiation of reentry by extrasystoles or rapid pacing. In this study, we examine theoretically and numerically how preexisting gradients in refractoriness control the vulnerable window for unidirectional conduction block by a single premature extrasystole. Using a kinematic model to represent wavefront-waveback interactions, we first analytically derived the relationship (under simplified conditions) between the vulnerable window and various electrophysiological parameters such as action potential duration gradients, refractoriness barriers, conduction velocity restitution, etc. We then compared these findings to numerical simulations using the kinematic model or the Luo-Rudy action potential model in a one-dimensional cable of cardiac cells. The results from all three methods agreed well. We show that a critical gradient in action potential duration for conduction block can be analytically derived, and once this critical gradient is exceeded, the vulnerable window increases proportionately with the refractory barrier and is modulated by conduction velocity restitution and gap junctional conductance. Moreover, the critical gradient for conduction block is higher for an extrasystole traveling in the opposite direction from the sinus beat than for one traveling in the same direction (e.g., an epicardial extrasystole versus an endocardial extrasystole).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. de Diego, R. K. Pai, A. S. Dave, A. Lynch, M. Thu, F. Chen, L.-H. Xie, J. N. Weiss, and M. Valderrabano Spatially discordant alternans in cardiomyocyte monolayers Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1417 - H1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Qu, A. Garfinkel, and J. N. Weiss Vulnerable Window for Conduction Block in a One-Dimensional Cable of Cardiac Cells, 2: Multiple Extrasystoles Biophys. J., August 1, 2006; 91(3): 805 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |