This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplement All Versions of this Article: biophysj.106.084426v1 91/4/1336    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, W. Articles by Howe, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, W. Articles by Howe, J. R.

The Relationship between Agonist Potency and AMPA Receptor Kinetics

Wei Zhang ^*, Antoine Robert ^*, Stine B. Vogensen  and James R. Howe ^*

^* Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8066; and Department of Medicinal Chemistry, the Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to James R. Howe, Dept. of Pharmacology, Yale University, SHM B-251, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520-8066. Tel.: 203-737-2398; Fax: 203-785-7670; E-mail: james.howe{at}yale.edu.

AMPA-type glutamate receptors are tetrameric ion channels that mediate fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the mammalian brain. When agonists occupy the binding domain of individual receptor subunits, this domain closes, triggering rearrangements that couple agonist binding to channel opening. Here we compare the kinetic behavior of GluR2 channels activated by four different ligands, glutamate, AMPA, quisqualate, and 2-Me-Tet-AMPA, full agonists that vary in potency by up to two orders of magnitude. After reduction of desensitization with cyclothiazide, deactivation decays were strongly agonist dependent. The time constants of decay increased with potency, and slow components in the multiexponential decays became more prominent. The desensitization decays of agonist-activated currents also contained multiple exponential components, but they were similar for the four agonists. The time course of recovery from desensitization produced by each agonist was described by two sigmoid components, and the speed of recovery varied substantially. Recovery was fastest for glutamate and slowest for 2-Me-Tet-AMPA, and the amplitude of the slow component of recovery increased with agonist potency. The multiple kinetic components appear to arise from closed-state transitions that precede channel gating. Stargazin increases the slow kinetic components, and they likely contribute to the biexponential decay of excitatory postsynaptic currents.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Menuz, J. L. O'Brien, S. Karmizadegan, D. S. Bredt, and R. A. Nicoll TARP Redundancy Is Critical for Maintaining AMPA Receptor Function J. Neurosci., August 27, 2008; 28(35): 8740 - 8746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Zhang, Y. Cho, E. Lolis, and J. R. Howe Structural and Single-Channel Results Indicate That the Rates of Ligand Binding Domain Closing and Opening Directly Impact AMPA Receptor Gating J. Neurosci., January 23, 2008; 28(4): 932 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]