help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on June 30, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.089490
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.089490v1
91/5/L51    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Paci, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Paci, E.
Biophysical Journal 91:L51-L53 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Prediction of the Translocation Kinetics of a Protein from Its Mechanical Properties

Daniel K. West * {dagger}, David J. Brockwell {dagger} and Emanuele Paci *

* School of Physics and Astronomy, and {dagger} Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

Correspondence: Address reprint requests and inquiries to E. Paci, E-mail: e.paci{at}leeds.ac.uk.

Proteins are actively unfolded to pass through narrow channels in macromolecular complexes that catalyze protein translocation and degradation. Catalyzed unfolding shares many features that characterize the mechanical unfolding of proteins using the atomic force microscope (AFM). However, simulations of unfolding induced by the AFM and when a protein is translocated through a pore suggest that each process occurs by distinct pathways. The link, if any, between each type of unfolding, therefore, is not known. We show that the mechanical unfolding energy landscape of a protein, obtained using an atomistic molecular model, can be used to predict both the relative mechanical strength of proteins when unfolded using the AFM and when unfolded by translocation into a pore. We thus link the two processes and show that the import rate through a pore not only depends on the location of the initiation tag but also on the mechanical properties of the protein when averaged over all the possible geometries that are relevant for a given translocation initiation site.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.