This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: biophysj.106.082891v1 91/7/2451    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, X. Articles by Zhou, H.-X. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, X. Articles by Zhou, H.-X.

Similarity and Difference in the Unfolding of Thermophilic and Mesophilic Cold Shock Proteins Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Xiaoqin Huang ^* and Huan-Xiang Zhou ^* 

^* Institute of Molecular Biophysics and School of Computational Science and Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Huan-Xiang Zhou, Tel.: 850-645-1336; Fax: 850-644-7244; E-mail: zhou{at}sb.fsu.edu.

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to unfold a homologous pair of thermophilic and mesophilic cold shock proteins at high temperatures. The two proteins differ in just 11 of 66 residues and have very similar structures with a closed five-stranded antiparallel ß-barrel. A long flexible loop connects the N-terminal side of the barrel, formed by three strands (ß1–ß3), with the C-terminal side, formed by two strands (ß4–ß5). The two proteins were found to follow the same unfolding pathway, but with the thermophilic protein showing much slower unfolding. Unfolding started with the melting of C-terminal strands, leading to exposure of the hydrophobic core. Subsequent melting of ß3 and the ß-hairpin formed by the first two strands then resulted in unfolding of the whole protein. The slower unfolding of the thermophilic protein could be attributed to ion pair formation of Arg-3 with Glu-46, Glu-21, and the C-terminal. These ion pairs were also found to be important for the difference in folding stability between the pair of proteins. Thus electrostatic interactions appear to play similar roles in the difference in folding stability and kinetics between the pair of proteins.