| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Department of Psychology and
Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Stan Schein, University of California, Los Angeles, Dept. of Psychology, Franz Hall, Rm. 8522, Mailcode 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563. Tel.: 310-825-0505; Fax: 310-206-5895; E-mail: schein{at}ucla.edu.
A rod transmits absorption of a single photon by what appears to be a small reduction in the small number of quanta of neurotransmitter (Qcount) that it releases within the integration period (
0.1 s) of a rod bipolar dendrite. Due to the quantal and stochastic nature of release, discrete distributions of Qcount for darkness versus one isomerization of rhodopsin (R*) overlap. We suggested that release must be regular to narrow these distributions, reduce overlap, reduce the rate of false positives, and increase transmission efficiency (the fraction of R* events that are identified as light). Unsurprisingly, higher quantal release rates (Qrates) yield higher efficiencies. Focusing here on the effect of small changes in Qrate, we find that a slightly higher Qrate yields greatly reduced efficiency, due to a necessarily fixed quantal-count threshold. To stabilize efficiency in the face of drift in Qrate, the dendrite needs to regulate the biochemical realization of its quantal-count threshold with respect to its Qcount. These considerations reveal the mathematical role of calcium-based negative feedback and suggest a helpful role for spontaneous R*. In addition, to stabilize efficiency in the face of drift in degree of regularity, efficiency should be
50%, similar to measurements.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |