help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on October 6, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.093351
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.093351v1
92/1/192    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamasaki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamasaki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, K.
Biophysical Journal 92:192-200 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

Mechanism of the Difference in the Binding Affinity of E. coli tRNAGln to Glutaminyl-tRNA Synthetase Caused by Noninterface Nucleotides in Variable Loop

Satoshi Yamasaki *, Shugo Nakamura *, Tohru Terada {dagger} and Kentaro Shimizu *

* Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, and {dagger} Agricultural Bioinformatics Research Unit, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to S. Nakamura, E-mail: shugo{at}bi.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) distinguish their cognate tRNAs from many other kinds of tRNAs, despite the very similar tertiary structures of tRNAs. Many researchers have supported the view that this recognition is achieved by intermolecular interactions between tRNA and ARS. However, one of the aptamers of Escherichia coli glutamine specific tRNA, var-AGGU, has a higher affinity to ARS than the wild-type, although the sequence difference only lies in the variable loop located on the opposite side of the binding interface with ARS. To understand the reason for the difference in affinity, we did molecular dynamics simulations on tRNAs and their complexes with ARS. We calculated the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding free energy with the molecular mechanics-Poisson-Boltzmann/surface area method and found that the entropic difference plays an important role in the difference in binding free energies. During the molecular dynamics simulations, dynamic rearrangements of hydrogen bonds occurred in the tertiary core region of the wild-type tRNA, whereas they were not observed in the free var-AGGU simulation. Since the internal mobility was suppressed upon complex formation with ARS, the entropy loss in the wild-type was larger than that of the aptamer. We therefore concluded that the sequence difference in the variable loop caused the difference in the internal mobility of the tertiary core region tRNAs and led to the difference in the affinity to ARS through the entropy term.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.