help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on April 20, 2007.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.100586
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.100586v1
93/4/1312    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Légaré, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Légaré, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, B. R.
Biophysical Journal 93:1312-1320 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

The Role of Backscattering in SHG Tissue Imaging

François Légaré *, Christian Pfeffer {dagger} and Bjorn R. Olsen {dagger}

* Center for Nanoscale Systems, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and {dagger} Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. Christian P. Pfeffer, E-mail: christian_pfeffer{at}hms.harvard.edu.

We investigate the properties of second-harmonic generation (SHG) tissue imaging for the functional biological unit fascia, skeletal muscle, and tendon. Fascia and Achilles tendon primarily consist of similar collagen type I arrays that can be imaged using SHG microscopy. For muscle, it is the myosin molecules represented within the A bands. For fascia and tendon tissue samples, we observe, in addition to a stronger signal in forward images, vastly different features for the backward versus the forward images. In vivo as well as intact ex vivo thick tissue imaging requires backward detection. The obtained image is a result of the direct backward components plus a certain fraction of the forward components that are redirected (backscattered) toward the objective as they propagate within the tissue block. As the forward and the backward images are significantly different from each other for the imaged collagen type I tissue, it is crucial to determine the fraction of the forward signal that contributes to the overall backward signal. For intact ex vivo SHG imaging of Achilles tendon, we observe a significant contribution of forward features in the resulting image. For fascia, the connective tissue immediately surrounding muscle, we only observe backward features, due to low backscattering in muscle.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.