This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published All Versions of this Article: biophysj.107.105007v1 93/4/1380    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Resnick, A. Articles by Hopfer, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Resnick, A. Articles by Hopfer, U.

Force-Response Considerations in Ciliary Mechanosensation

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Andrew Resnick, Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106. Tel.: 216-368-6899; Fax: 216-368-4223; E-mail: andy.resnick{at}case.edu.

Considerable experimental evidence indicates that the primary, nonmotile cilium is a mechanosensory organelle in several epithelial cell types. As the relationship between cellular responses and nature and magnitude of applied forces is not well understood, we have investigated the effects of exposure of monolayers of renal collecting duct chief cells to orbital shaking and quantified the forces incident on cilia. An exposure of 24 h of these cells to orbital shaking resulted in a decrease of amiloride-sensitive sodium current by 60% and ciliary length by 30%. The sensitivity of the sodium current to shaking was dependent on intact cilia. The drag force on cilia due to induced fluid flow during orbital shaking was estimated at maximally 5.2 x 10^–3 pN at 2 Hz, 4 times that of thermal noise. The major structural feature of cilia contributing to their sensitivity appears to be ciliary length. As more than half of the total drag force is exerted on the ciliary cap, one function of the slender stalk may be to expose the cap to greater drag force. Regardless, the findings indicate that the cilium is a mechanosensory organelle with a sensitivity much lower than previously recognized.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Poelmann, K. Van der Heiden, A. Gittenberger-de Groot, and B. P. Hierck Deciphering the Endothelial Shear Stress Sensor Circulation, March 4, 2008; 117(9): 1124 - 1126. [Full Text] [PDF]