help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on June 1, 2007.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.108068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.108068v1
93/7/2457    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Finke, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Finke, J. M.
Biophysical Journal 93:2457-2471 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

Folding and Unfolding of {gamma}TIM Monomers and Dimers

Brijesh Patel and John M. Finke

Department of Chemistry, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to John M. Finke, Dept. of Chemistry, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309-4477. Tel.: 248-370-3088; E-mail: finke{at}oakland.edu.

Kinetic simulations of the folding and unfolding of triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) from yeast were conducted using a single monomer {gamma}TIM polypeptide chain that folds as a monomer and two {gamma}TIM chains that fold to the native dimer structure. The basic protein model used was a minimalist Go model using the native structure to determine attractive energies in the protein chain. For each simulation type—monomer unfolding, monomer refolding, dimer unfolding, and dimer refolding—thirty simulations were conducted, successfully capturing each reaction in full. Analysis of the simulations demonstrates four main conclusions. First, all four simulation types have a similar "folding order", i.e., they have similar structures in intermediate stages of folding between the unfolded and folded state. Second, despite this similarity, different intermediate stages are more or less populated in the four different simulations, with 1), no intermediates populated in monomer unfolding; 2), two intermediates populated with ß2ß4 and ß1ß5 regions folded in monomer refolding; 3), two intermediates populated with ß2ß3 and ß2ß4 regions folded in dimer unfolding; and 4), two intermediates populated with ß1ß5 and ß1ß5 + ß6 + ß7 + ß8 regions folded in dimer refolding. Third, simulations demonstrate that dimer binding and unbinding can occur early in the folding process before complete monomer-chain folding. Fourth, excellent agreement is found between the simulations and MPAX (misincorporation proton alkyl exchange) experiments. In total, this agreement demonstrates that the computational Go model is accurate for {gamma}TIM and that the energy landscape of {gamma}TIM appears funneled to the native state.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.