help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on June 8, 2007.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.098236
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.098236v1
93/7/2562    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stibius, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sneppen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stibius, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sneppen, K.
Biophysical Journal 93:2562-2566 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

Modeling the Two-Hybrid Detector: Experimental Bias on Protein Interaction Networks

Karin B. Stibius * {dagger} and Kim Sneppen *

* Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; and {dagger} Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Karin B. Stibius, E-mail: karin_stibius{at}hotmail.com.

This work was done to investigate the two-hybrid experiment for finding protein-protein interactions to explain the asymmetry found in the experimental data, and to help screen the data for high confidence interactions. By looking at the bait-prey experimental setup the resulting protein interaction network can be examined as a directed network (bait -> prey). We have investigated two possible scenarios for the asymmetry in the directed network by developing a biochemical model for the protein-DNA and protein-protein bindings inside the living yeast. One scenario assumes a background activity of bait proteins acting even without the prey, the other scenario explores the asymmetry in the chemistry associated with the bait being automatically located in the right position on the DNA. We conclude that the latter model gives the best description of the observed asymmetry.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Feldman, A. Rzhetsky, and D. Vitkup
Network properties of genes harboring inherited disease mutations
PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4323 - 4328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.