help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on March 7, 2008.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.128017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.128017v1
94/11/4270    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goh, K.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goh, K.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-H.
Biophysical Journal 94:4270-4276 (2008)
© 2008 The Biophysical Society

Sustained Oscillations in Extended Genetic Oscillatory Systems

Kwang-Il Goh * {dagger}, Byungnam Kahng * and Kwang-Hyun Cho {ddagger}

* School of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; {dagger} Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul, Korea; and {ddagger} Department of Bio and Brain Engineering & KI for the BioCentury, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Kwang-Hyun Cho, Tel.: 82-42-869-4325; E-mail: ckh{at}kaist.ac.kr.

Various dynamic cellular behaviors have been successfully modeled in terms of elementary circuitries showing particular characteristics such as negative feedback loops for sustained oscillations. Given, however, the increasing evidences indicating that cellular components do not function in isolation but form a complex interwoven network, it is still unclear to what extent the conclusions drawn from the elementary circuit analogy hold for systems that are highly interacting with surrounding environments. In this article, we consider a specific example of genetic oscillator systems, the so-called repressilator, as a starting point toward a systematic investigation into the dynamic consequences of the extension through interlocking of elementary biological circuits. From in silico analyses with both continuous and Boolean dynamics approaches to the four-node extension of the repressilator, we found that 1), the capability of sustained oscillation depends on the topology of extended systems; and 2), the stability of oscillation under the extension also depends on the coupling topology. We then deduce two empirical rules favoring the sustained oscillations, termed the coherent coupling and the homogeneous regulation. These simple rules will help us prioritize candidate patterns of network wiring, guiding both the experimental investigations for further physiological verification and the synthetic designs for bioengineering.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.