help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on March 7, 2008.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.121335
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.121335v1
94/12/4605    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapustina, M.
Right arrow Articles by Elston, T. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kapustina, M.
Right arrow Articles by Elston, T. C.
Biophysical Journal 94:4605-4620 (2008)
© 2008 The Biophysical Society

Mechanical and Biochemical Modeling of Cortical Oscillations in Spreading Cells

Maryna Kapustina *, Gabriel E. Weinreb *, Nancy Costigliola *, Zenon Rajfur *, Ken Jacobson * {dagger} and Timothy C. Elston {ddagger}

* Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, {dagger} Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and {ddagger} Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. T. Elston, E-mail: telston{at}amath.unc.edu; or Dr. G. Weinreb, E-mail: weinreb{at}med.unc.edu.

Actomyosin-based cortical contractility is a common feature of eukaryotic cells and is involved in cell motility, cell division, and apoptosis. In nonmuscle cells, oscillations in contractility are induced by microtubule depolymerization during cell spreading. We developed an ordinary differential equation model to describe this behavior. The computational model includes 36 parameters. The values for all but two of the model parameters were taken from experimental measurements found in the literature. Using these values, we demonstrate that the model generates oscillatory behavior consistent with current experimental observations. The rhythmic behavior occurs because of the antagonistic effects of calcium-induced contractility and stretch-activated calcium channels. The model makes several experimentally testable predictions: 1), buffering intracellular calcium increases the period and decreases the amplitude of cortical oscillations; 2), increasing the number or activity of stretch activated channels leads to an increase in period and amplitude of cortical oscillations; 3), inhibiting Ca2+ pump activity increases the period and amplitude of oscillations; and 4), a threshold exists for the calcium concentration below which oscillations cease.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.