This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplement All Versions of this Article: biophysj.107.114215v1 94/8/2965    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Duncan, S. L. Articles by Larson, R. G. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duncan, S. L. Articles by Larson, R. G.

Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Ronald G. Larson, Tel.: 734-936-0772; E-mail: rlarson{at}umich.edu.

Although pressure-area isotherms are commonly measured for lipid monolayers, it is not always appreciated how much they can vary depending on experimental factors. Here, we compare experimental and simulated pressure-area isotherms for dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) at temperatures ranging between 293.15 K and 323.15 K, and explore possible factors influencing the shape and position of the isotherms. Molecular dynamics simulations of DPPC monolayers using both coarse-grained (CG) and atomistic models yield results that are in rough agreement with some of the experimental isotherms, but with a steeper slope in the liquid-condensed region than seen experimentally and shifted to larger areas. The CG lipid model gives predictions that are very close to those of atomistic simulations, while greatly improving computational efficiency. There is much more variation among experimental isotherms than between isotherms obtained from CG simulations and from the most refined simulation available. Both atomistic and CG simulations yield liquid-condensed and liquid-expanded phase area compressibility moduli that are significantly larger than those typically measured experimentally, but compare well with some experimental values obtained under rapid compression.