help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on January 11, 2008.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.122366
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.122366v1
94/8/3137    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S.-J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S.-J.
Biophysical Journal 94:3137-3149 (2008)
© 2008 The Biophysical Society

Electrostatic Free Energy Landscapes for DNA Helix Bending

Zhi-Jie Tan and Shi-Jie Chen

Department of Physics and Astronomy and Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Shi-Jie Chen, E-mail: chenshi{at}missouri.edu.

Nucleic acids are highly charged polyanionic molecules; thus, the ionic conditions are crucial for nucleic acid structural changes such as bending. We use the tightly bound ion theory, which explicitly accounts for the correlation and ensemble effects for counterions, to calculate the electrostatic free energy landscapes for DNA helix bending. The electrostatic free energy landscapes show that DNA bending energy is strongly dependent on ion concentration, valency, and size. In a Na+ solution, DNA bending is electrostatically unfavorable because of the strong charge repulsion on backbone. With the increase of the Na+ concentration, the electrostatic bending repulsion is reduced and thus the bending becomes less unfavorable. In contrast, in an Mg2+ solution, ion correlation induces a possible attractive force between the different parts of the helical strands, resulting in bending. The electrostatically most favorable and unfavorable bending directions are toward the major and minor grooves, respectively. Decreasing the size of the divalent ions enhances the electrostatic bending attraction, causing an increased bending angle, and shifts the most favorable bending to the direction toward the minor groove. The microscopic analysis on ion-binding distribution reveals that the divalent ion-induced helix bending attraction may come from the correlated distribution of the ions across the grooves in the bending direction.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.