help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on January 16, 2008.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.123182
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.123182v1
94/8/3323    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, F.
Right arrow Articles by McNally, J. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, F.
Right arrow Articles by McNally, J. G.
Biophysical Journal 94:3323-3339 (2008)
© 2008 The Biophysical Society

Evidence for a Common Mode of Transcription Factor Interaction with Chromatin as Revealed by Improved Quantitative Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching

Florian Mueller * {ddagger}, Paul Wach {dagger} and James G. McNally *

* Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and {dagger} Institute of Medical Engineering and {ddagger} Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to James G. McNally, E-mail: mcnallyj{at}exchange.nih.gov.

How site-specific transcription factors scan the genome to locate their target sites is a fundamental question in gene regulation. The in vivo binding interactions of several different transcription factors with chromatin have been investigated recently using quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). These analyses have yielded significantly different estimates of both the binding rates and the number of predicted binding states of the respective transcription factors. We show here that these discrepancies are not due to fundamental differences among the site-specific transcription factors, but rather arise from errors in FRAP modeling. The two principal errors are a neglect of diffusion's role and an oversimplified approximation of the photobleach profile. Accounting for these errors by developing a revised FRAP protocol eliminates most of the previous discrepancies in the binding estimates for the three different transcription factors analyzed here. The new estimates predict that for each of the three transcription factors, ~75% of the molecules are freely diffusing within the nucleus, whereas the remainder is bound with an average residence time of ~2.5 s to a single type of chromatin binding site. Such consistent predictions for three different molecules suggest that many site-specific transcription factors may exhibit similar in vivo interactions with native chromatin.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.