| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUPRAMOLECULAR ASSEMBLIES |
1 Univ of texas
2 Univ of Texas
3 Charite, Berlin
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pawel.a.penczek{at}uth.tmc.edu.
Submitted on August 5, 2004
Revised on August 19, 2004
Accepted on 27 August 2004
| Abstract |
|---|
ring in comparison to a half of the 20S proteasome. The individual
subunits in the 16S precursor complex rotate with respect to their positions in the X-ray crystallographic structure of the fully assembled 20S. This rearrangement results in a movement of the catalytic residue threonine 1 from the protected location in 16S precursor complexes to a more exposed position in the 20S structure. Thereby, our findings provide a molecular explanation for the structural rearrangements necessary for the dimerization of two 16S precursor complexes and the subsequent final maturation to active 20S proteasomes
Key Words: Docking, Electron microscopy, Proteasome biogenesis, Single particle analysis, Structural analysis
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |