help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published November 19, 2004. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.051268
© 2004 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.051268v1
88/3/2206    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antov, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Korenstein, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antov, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Korenstein, R.

CELL BIOPHYSICS

ELECTROENDOCYTOSIS: EXPOSURE OF CELLS TO PULSED LOW ELECTRIC FIELDS ENHANCES ADSORPTION AND UPTAKE OF MACROMOLECULES

Yulia Antov 1, Alexander Barbul 1, Hila Mantsur 1 and Rafi Korenstein 1*

1 Tel-Aviv University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: korens{at}post.tau.ac.il.

Submitted on August 12, 2004
Revised on September 8, 2004
Accepted on 22 October 2004


   Abstract
The present study demonstrates alteration of cell surface, leading to enhanced adsorption of macromolecules (BSA, dextran and DNA), following the exposure of cells to unipolar pulsed low electric fields (LEF). Modification of the adsorptive properties of the cell membrane also stems from the observation of LEF-induced cell-cell aggregation. Analysis of the adsorption isotherms of BSA-FITC to the surface of COS 5-7 cells reveals that the stimulated adsorption can be attributed to LEF-induced increase in the capacity of both specific and non-specific binding. The enhanced adsorption was consequently followed by increased uptake. At 20V/cm the maximal binding and subsequent uptake of BSA-FITC attached to specific sites are 6.5 and 7.4 folds higher than in controls, respectively. The non-specific LEF-induced binding and uptake of BSA are 34 and 5.2 folds higher than controls. LEF-enhanced adsorption is a temperature independent process, while LEF-induced uptake is a temperature dependent one which is abolished at 4°C. The stimulation of adsorption and uptake is reversible, revealing similar decay kinetics at room temperature. It is suggested that electrophoretic segregation of charged components in the outer leaflet of the cell membrane is responsible for both enhanced adsorption and stimulated uptake via changes of the membrane elastic properties which enhance budding and fission processes.

Key Words: adsorption and uptake kinetics, albumin binding, cell aggregation, clathrin dependent and independent pathways, endocytosis, temperature dependence




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. Henshaw, B. Mossop, and F. Yuan
Relaxin treatment of solid tumors: effects on electric field-mediated gene delivery
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2008; 7(8): 2566 - 2573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.