help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published April 22, 2005. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.051417
© 2005 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.051417v1
89/1/452    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Clifford R. Robinson
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berger, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, C. R.

PROTEINS

Relating Surfactant Properties to Activity and Solubilization of the Human Adenosine A3 Receptor

Bryan W. Berger 1, Roxana Y. García 1, Abraham M. Lenhoff 1, Eric W. Kaler 1 and Clifford R. Robinson 1*

1 University of Delaware

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: robinson{at}dbi.udel.edu.

Submitted on August 13, 2004
Revised on October 11, 2004
Accepted on 4 April 2005


   Abstract
The effects of various surfactants on the activity and stability of the human adenosine A3 receptor (A3) were investigated. The receptor was expressed using stably transfected HEK293 cells at a concentration of 44 pmol functional receptor per milligram membrane protein and purified using over 40 different non-ionic surfactants. A strong correlation was observed between a surfactant's ability to remove A3 from the membrane and the ability of the surfactant to remove A3 selectively relative to other membrane proteins. The activity of A3 once purified also correlates well with the selectivity of the surfactant used. The effects of varying the surfactant were much stronger than those achieved by including A3 ligands in the purification scheme. Notably, all surfactants that gave optimal efficiency, selectivity and activity all fall within a narrow range of hydrophile-lipophile balance values. This effect may reflect the ability of the surfactant to pack effectively at the hydrophobic transmembrane interface. These findings emphasize the importance of identifying appropriate surfactants for a particular membrane protein, and offer promise for the development of rapid and efficient methods to facilitate membrane protein purification.

Key Words: G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB), membrane protein purification and stability, non-ionic surfactants, packing parameter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.