help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 27, 2005. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.060681
© 2005 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.060681v1
89/2/1165    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Charles B. Lindemann
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindemann, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lesich, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lindemann, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lesich, K. A.

MUSCLE AND CONTRACTILITY

The counter-bend phenomenon in dynein-disabled rat sperm flagella and what it reveals about the inter-doublet elasticity

Charles B. Lindemann 1*, Lisa J. Macauley 1 and Kathleen A. Lesich 1

1 Oakland University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lindeman{at}oakland.edu.

Submitted on February 4, 2005
Revised on March 14, 2005
Accepted on 12 May 2005


   Abstract
Rat sperm that have been rendered passive by disabling the dynein motors with 50 µM sodium metavanadate and 0.1 mM ATP exhibit an interesting response to imposed bending. When the proximal flagellum is bent with a microprobe, the portion of the flagellum distal to the probe contact point develops a bend in the direction opposite the imposed bend. This "counter-bend" is not compatible with a simple elastic beam. It can be satisfactorily explained by the sliding tubule model of flagellar structure, but only if there are permanent elastic connections between the outer doublets of the axoneme. The elastic component that contributes the bending torque for the counter-bend does not reset to a new equilibrium position following an imposed bend, but returns the flagellum to a nearly straight or slightly curved final position after release from the probe. This suggests it is based on fixed, rather than mobile, attachments. It is also disrupted by elastase or trypsin digestion, confirming that it is dependent on a protein linkage. Adopting the assumption that the elasticity is attributed to the nexin links that repeat at 96 nm intervals, we find an apparent elasticity for each link that ranges from 1.6 to 10 x 10-5 N/m. However, the elasticity is non-linear and does not follow Hooke's law, but appears to decrease with increased stretch. In addition, the responsible elastic elements must be able to stretch to more than ten times their resting length without breakage to account for the observed counter-bend formation. Elasticity created by some type of protein unfolding may be the only viable explanation consistent with both the extreme capacity for extension and the nonlinear character of the restoring force that is observed.

Key Words: Geometric Clutch, axoneme, flagellar stiffness, nexin links, outer doublets, radial spokes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Nicastro, C. Schwartz, J. Pierson, R. Gaudette, M. E. Porter, and J. R. McIntosh
The molecular architecture of axonemes revealed by cryoelectron tomography.
Science, August 18, 2006; 313(5789): 944 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.