help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published August 5, 2005. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.063909
© 2005 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.063909v1
89/4/2574    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teif, V. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teif, V. B.

NUCLEIC ACIDS

Ligand-induced DNA condensation: choosing the model

Vladimir B. Teif 1*

1 Natl. Acad. Sci. (Belarus) and CEA/Saclay (France)

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vlad_teif{at}yahoo.com.

Submitted on April 1, 2005
Revised on May 9, 2005
Accepted on 18 July 2005


   Abstract
We test and compare different models for ligand-induced DNA condensation. Using 14C labelled spermidine3+, we measure the binding to condensed DNA at micromolar to molar polyamine concentrations. DNA aggregates at a critical polyamine concentration. Spermidine3+ binding becomes highly cooperative at the onset of aggregation. At higher concentrations spermidine3+ binding to condensed DNA reaches a plateau with the degree of binding equal to 0.7 (NH4+ / PO3-). Condensed DNA exists in a wide range of spermidine concentrations with the roughly constant degree of ligand binding. At greater concentrations the degree of binding increases again. Further spermidine penetration between the double helices causes DNA resolubilization. We show that a simple two-state model without ligand-ligand interactions predicts qualitatively the reentrant aggregation-resolubilization behavior and the dependence on the ligand, Na+ and DNA concentrations. However, such models are inconsistent with the cooperative ligand binding to condensed DNA. Including the contact or long-range ligand-ligand interactions improves the coincidence with the experiments, if binding to condensed DNA is slightly more cooperative then to the starting DNA. For example, in the contact interaction model it is equivalent to an additional McGhee-von Hippel cooperativity parameter of about 2. Possible physical mechanisms for the observed cooperativity of ligand binding are discussed.

Key Words: DNA condensation, aggregation, cooperative binding, ligand-DNA interaction, phase transition, spermidine




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. Wang, M. Law, J. Duhamel, and P. Chen
Interaction of a Self-Assembling Peptide with Oligonucleotides: Complexation and Aggregation
Biophys. J., October 1, 2007; 93(7): 2477 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. B. Teif
General transfer matrix formalism to calculate DNA-protein-drug binding in gene regulation: application to OR operator of phage {lambda}
Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): e80 - e80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.