| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY |
1 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
2 Dept. Physiology & Biophysics, SUNY at Stony Brook, NY 11790
3 Institute of Physiology, Universitaet Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: weingart{at}pyl.unibe.ch.
Submitted on February 28, 2006
Revised on April 2, 2006
Accepted on 2 June 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
j,substate, were unevenly distributed between the main state and the residual state conductance
j,main state = 141 pS,
j,residual state = 21 pS). Activation of the first subgate reduced the channel conductance by ~30%, activation of subsequent subgates resulted in conductance decrements of 10-15% each. Current transitions between the states were fast (<2 ms). Substate events were usually demarcated by transitions from and back to the main state; transitions among substates were rare. Hence, subgates are recruited simultaneously rather than sequentially. The incidence of substate events was larger at larger gradients of Vj. Frequency and duration of substate events increased with increasing number of synchronously activated subgates. Our mathematical model, which describes the operation of gap junction channels, was expanded to include channel substates. Based on the established Vj-sensitivity of
j,main state and
j,residual state, the simulation yielded unique functions
j,substate = f(Vj) for each substate. Hence, the spacing of subconductance levels between the channel main state and residual state were uneven and characteristic for each Vj.
Key Words: channel substates, connexin30, electrophysiology, gap junction
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |