help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published September 8, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.084293
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.084293v1
91/11/4180    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandit, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Skolnick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandit, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Skolnick, J.

PROTEINS

TASSER-Lite: An automated tool for protein comparative modeling

Shashi Bhushan Pandit 1, Yang Zhang 2 and Jeffrey Skolnick 1*

1 Georgia Institute of Technology
2 The University of Kansas

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: skolnick{at}gatech.edu.

Submitted on March 1, 2006
Revised on May 11, 2006
Accepted on 22 August 2006


   Abstract
The present study involves the development of a rapid comparative modeling tool for homologous sequences by extension of TASSER methodology, developed for tertiary structure prediction. This comparative modeling procedure was validated on a representative benchmark set of proteins in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) composed of 901 single domain proteins (41-200 residues) having sequence identities between 35-90% with respect to the template. Using a Monte Carlo, MC, search scheme with the length of runs optimized for weakly/non-homologous proteins, TASSER often provides appreciable improvement in structure quality over the initial template. However, on an average, this requires ~29 hours of CPU time per sequence. Since homologous proteins are unlikely to require the extent of conformational search as weakly/nonhomologous proteins, TASSER's parameters were optimized to reduce the required CPU time to ~17 min, while retaining TASSER's ability to improve structure quality. Using this optimized TASSER (TASSER-Lite), we find an average improvement in the aligned region of ~10% in root-mean-square deviation, RMSD, from native over the initial template. Comparison of TASSER-Lite with widely used comparative modeling tool MODELLER showed that TASSER-Lite yields final models that are closer to the native. TASSER-Lite, is provided on the web at (http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/skolnick/webservice/tasserlite/index.html).

Key Words: protein modeling, protein tertiary structure, threading




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. Zhou and J. Skolnick
Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction Using Chunk-TASSER
Biophys. J., September 1, 2007; 93(5): 1510 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.