help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published September 22, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.087114
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on December 15, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.087114v1
91/12/4392    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miedema, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nonner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miedema, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nonner, W.

CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING

Ca2+ selectivity of a chemically modified OmpF with reduced pore volume

Henk Miedema 1, Maarten Vrouenraets 1, Jenny Wierenga 1, Bob Eisenberg 2, Dirk Gillespie 2, Wim Meijberg 1 and Wolfgang Nonner 3*

1 Biomade Technology Foundation
2 Rush University Medical Center
3 University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wnonner{at}chroma.med.miami.edu.

Submitted on April 13, 2006
Revised on May 19, 2006
Accepted on 7 September 2006


   Abstract
We studied an E. coli OmpF mutant ('LECE') containing both an EEEE-like locus, typical of Ca2+ channels, and an accessible and reactive cysteine. After chemical modification with the cysteine-specific, negatively charged (-1e) reagents MTSES or glutathione, this LECE mutant was tested for Ca2+ vs. alkali metal selectivity. Selectivity was measured by conductance and zero-current potential. Conductance measurements showed that glutathione modified LECE had reduced conductance at Ca2+ mole fractions <10-3. MTSES modified LECE did not. Apparently, the LECE protein is (somehow) a better Ca2+ chelator after the modification with the larger glutathione. Zero-current potential measurements revealed a Ca2+ vs. monovalent cation selectivity that was highest in the presence of Li+ and lowest in the presence of Cs+. Our data clearly show that after the binding of Ca2+ the LECE pore (even with the bulky glutathione present) is spacious enough to allow monovalent cations to pass. Theoretical computations based on DFT/PNP theory and a reduced pore model suggest a functional separation of ionic pathways in the pore, one that is specific for small and highly charged ions, and one that accepts preferentially large ions such as Cs+.

Key Words: Ca2+ channel, Ca2+ selectivity, MTSES, OmpF, glutathione, pore volume




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Gillespie and D. Boda
The Anomalous Mole Fraction Effect in Calcium Channels: A Measure of Preferential Selectivity
Biophys. J., September 15, 2008; 95(6): 2658 - 2672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
R. Roth, D. Gillespie, W. Nonner, and R. E. Eisenberg
Bubbles, Gating, and Anesthetics in Ion Channels
Biophys. J., June 1, 2008; 94(11): 4282 - 4298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Eisenberg
Engineering channels: Atomic biology
PNAS, April 29, 2008; 105(17): 6211 - 6212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Gillespie
Energetics of Divalent Selectivity in a Calcium Channel: The Ryanodine Receptor Case Study
Biophys. J., February 15, 2008; 94(4): 1169 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Boda, W. Nonner, M. Valisko, D. Henderson, B. Eisenberg, and D. Gillespie
Steric Selectivity in Na Channels Arising from Protein Polarization and Mobile Side Chains
Biophys. J., September 15, 2007; 93(6): 1960 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.