help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published September 29, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.089441
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on December 15, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.089441v1
91/12/4611    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Comeau, J. W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Comeau, J. W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, P. W.

SPECTROSCOPY, IMAGING, OTHER TECHNIQUES

A Guide to Accurate Fluorescence Microscopy Colocalization Measurements

Jonathan W. D. Comeau 1, Santiago Costantino 1 and Paul W. Wiseman 1*

1 McGill University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.wiseman{at}mcgill.ca.

Submitted on May 17, 2006
Revised on July 10, 2006
Accepted on 1 September 2006


   Abstract
Biomolecular interactions are fundamental to the vast majority of cellular processes, and identification of the major interacting components is usually the first step towards an understanding of the mechanisms that govern various cell functions. Thus, statistical image analyses that can be performed on fluorescence microscopy images of fixed or live cells have been routinely applied for biophysical and cell biological studies. These approaches measure the fraction of interacting particles by analyzing dual-color fluorescence images for colocalized pixels. Colocalization algorithms have proven to be effective, although the dynamic range and accuracy of these measurements has never been well established. Spatial image cross-correlation spectroscopy (ICCS), which cross-correlates spatial intensity fluctuations recorded in images from two detection channels simultaneously, has also recently been shown to be an effective measure of colocalization as well. Through simulations, imaging of fluorescent antibodies adsorbed on glass and cell measurements, we show that ICCS performs much better than standard colocalization algorithms at moderate to high densities of particles, which are often encountered in cellular systems. Furthermore, it was found that the density ratio between the two labeled species of interest plays a major role in the accuracy of the colocalization analysis. By applying a direct and systematic comparison between the standard, fluorescence microscopy colocalization algorithm and spatial ICCS, we show regimes where each approach is applicable, and more importantly, where they fail to yield accurate results.

Key Words: Colocalization, accuracy, correlation coefficient, dynamic range, fluorescence microscopy, image cross-correlation spectroscopy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
F. Nadrigny, D. Li, K. Kemnitz, N. Ropert, A. Koulakoff, S. Rudolph, M. Vitali, C. Giaume, F. Kirchhoff, and M. Oheim
Systematic Colocalization Errors between Acridine Orange and EGFP in Astrocyte Vesicular Organelles
Biophys. J., August 1, 2007; 93(3): 969 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.