help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published February 2, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.096891
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 15, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.096891v1
92/10/3407    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, H.
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, H.
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. H

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Dynamics of a Minimal Model of Interlocked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops of Transcriptional Regulation by CREB proteins

Hao Song 1, Paul D Smolen 1, Evyatar Av-Ron 1, Douglas A Baxter 1 and John H Byrne 1*

1 University of Texas Medical School at Houston

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.h.byrne{at}uth.tmc.edu.

Submitted on September 6, 2006
Revised on October 17, 2006
Accepted on 11 January 2007


   Abstract
CREB proteins are involved in transcriptional regulation in a number of cellular processes (e.g., neural plasticity and circadian rhythms). The CREB family contains activators and repressors that may interact through positive and negative feedback loops. These loops can be generated by auto- and cross-regulation of expression of CREB proteins, via CRE elements in or near their genes. Experiments suggest such feedback loops may operate in several systems (e.g., Aplysia and rat). To understand the functional implications of such feedback loops, which are interlocked via cross-regulation of transcription, a minimal model with a positive and negative loop was developed, and investigated using bifurcation analysis. Bifurcation analysis revealed diverse nonlinear dynamics (e.g., bistability, and oscillations). The stability of steady states or oscillations could be changed by time delays in the synthesis of the activator (CREB1) or of the repressor (CREB2). Investigation of stochastic fluctuations due to small numbers of molecules of CREB1 and CREB2 revealed a bimodal distribution of CREB molecules in the bistability region. The robustness of the stable HIGH and LOW states of CREB expression to stochastic noise differs, and a critical number of molecules was required to sustain the HIGH state for days or longer. Increasing positive feedback or decreasing negative feedback also increased the lifetime of the HIGH state, and persistence of this state may correlate with long-term memory formation. A critical number of molecules was also required to sustain robust oscillations of CREB expression. If a steady state was near a deterministic Hopf bifurcation point, stochastic resonance could induce oscillations. This comparative analysis of deterministic and stochastic dynamics not only provides insights into the possible dynamics of CREBs' regulatory motifs, but also demonstrates a framework for understanding other regulatory processes with similar network architectures.

Key Words: CREB, bifurcation, bistability, oscillation, stochastic, transcription







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.