help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 11, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.101246
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.101246v1
93/3/822    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Juranka, P. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Juranka, P. F

CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING

Nav channel mechanosensitivity: activation and inactivation accelerate reversibly with stretch

Catherine E. Morris 1* and Peter F Juranka 2

1 Ottawa Health Research Institute
2 Ottawa Health Research Inst

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cmorris{at}ohri.ca.

Submitted on November 15, 2006
Revised on January 2, 2007
Accepted on 13 March 2007


   Abstract
Voltage gated sodium channels (Nav) are modulated by many bilayer mechanical amphiphiles, but whether, like other voltage gated channels (Kv, HCN, Cav), they respond to physical bilayer deformations is unknown. We expressed human heart Nav1.5 pore ({alpha})-subunit in oocytes (where, unlike {alpha}Nav1.4, {alpha}Nav1.5 exhibits normal kinetics) and measured small macroscopic currents in cell-attached patches. Pipette pressure was used to reversibly stretch the membrane for comparison of INa(t) before/during/after stretch. At all voltages, and in a dose dependent fashion, stretch accelerated the INa(t) time course. The sign of membrane curvature was not relevant. Typical stretch stimuli reversibly accelerated both activation and inactivation by ~1.4-fold; normalization of peak INa(t) followed by temporal scaling (~1.30-1.85 -fold) resulted in full overlap of the stretch/no-stretch traces. Evidently the rate-limiting outward voltage sensor motion in the Nav1.5 activation path (as in Kv1; Laitko & Morris 2004, JGP) accelerated with stretch. Stretch-accelerated inactivation occurred even with activation saturated, so an independently stretch-modulated inactivation transition is also a possibility. Since Nav1.5 channel stretch modulation was both reliable and reversible, and required stretch stimuli no more intense than what typically activates putative mechanotransducer channels (e.g. stretch-activated TRPC1-based currents), Nav channels join the ranks of putative mechanotransducers. It is noteworthy that at voltages near the activation threshold, moderate stretch increased the peak INa amplitude ~1.5-fold. It will be important to determine if stretch-modulated Nav current contributes to cardiac arrhythmias, to mechanosensory responses in interstitial cells of Cajal, to touch receptor responses, and to neuropathic (i.e. hypermechanosensitive) and/or normal pain reception.

Key Words: bilayer mechanics,, lateral pressure profile,, mechanosensitive,, mechanotransduction, sodium channel,, stretch sensitive,







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.