help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published March 9, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.103580
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.103580v1
92/11/3862    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jonathan D Hirst
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melville, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Hirst, J. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melville, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Hirst, J. D

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

The structural determinants of macrolide-actin binding: in silico insights

James L Melville 1, Iain H Moal 1, Charles Baker-Glenn 1, Peter E Shaw 1, Gerald Pattenden 1 and Jonathan D Hirst 1*

1 University of Nottingham

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jonathan.hirst{at}nottingham.ac.uk.

Submitted on December 22, 2006
Revised on January 26, 2007
Accepted on 6 February 2007


   Abstract
By the use of X-ray structures and flexible docking we have developed the first in silico ligand-based view of the structural determinants of the binding of small molecule mimics of gelsolin, natural products bound to actin. Our technique highlights those residues on the actin binding site forming important hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions with the ligands. Significantly, through the flexible docking of toxin fragments, we have also identified potential residues on the actin binding site that have yet to be exploited. Guided by these observations, we have demonstrated that kabiramide C can be modified to produce a structure with a predicted binding energy increased by 20%, while the molecular weight is reduced by 20%, clearly indicating the potential for future elaboration of structures targeting this important component of the cytoskeleton.

Key Words: actin, docking, macrolides, natural products, toxins







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.