help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 25, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.105189
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.105189v1
93/5/1442    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wierzbicki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Madura, J. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wierzbicki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Madura, J. D

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Antifreeze Proteins at the Ice/Water Interface: Three calculated discriminating properties for orientation of Type I proteins

Andrzej Wierzbicki 1, Pranav Dalal 2, Thomas E. Cheatham, III 3, Jared E. Knickelbein 4, Tony Haymet 5 and Jeffry D Madura 4*

1 University of South Alabama
2 DeShaw
3 University of Utah
4 Duquesne University
5 Scripps Institution of Oceanography

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: madura{at}duq.edu.

Submitted on January 23, 2007
Revised on February 13, 2007
Accepted on 4 April 2007


   Abstract
Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) protect many plants and organisms from freezing in low temperatures. Of the different AFPs, the most studied AFP Type I from winter flounder is used in the current computational studies to gain molecular insight into its adsorption at the ice/water interface. Employing molecular dynamics simulations, we calculate the free energy difference between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic faces of the protein interacting with ice. Furthermore, we identify three properties of Type I "antifreeze" proteins that discriminate among these two orientations of the protein at the ice/water interface. The three properties are: the "surface area" of the protein,; a measure of the interaction of the protein with neighboring water molecules as determined by the number of hydrogen bond count, for example; and the sidechain orientation angles of the threonine residues. All three discriminants are consistent with our free energy results which clearly show that the hydrophilic protein face orientations towards the ice/water interface, as hypothesized from experimental and ice/vacuum simulations, is incorrect, while supporting the hydrophobic protein face orienting towards the interface. The adsorption free energy is calculated to be 2-3 kJ/mol.

Key Words: Ice/water interface, antifreeze proteins, hydrophobic, modeling, potential of mean force




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
N. Pertaya, C. B. Marshall, Y. Celik, P. L. Davies, and I. Braslavsky
Direct Visualization of Spruce Budworm Antifreeze Protein Interacting with Ice Crystals: Basal Plane Affinity Confers Hyperactivity
Biophys. J., July 1, 2008; 95(1): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.