help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published November 2, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.110171
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on February 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.110171v1
94/4/1252    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anishkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sukharev, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anishkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sukharev, S.

CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING

Characterization of the resting MscS: modeling and analysis of the closed bacterial mechanosensitive channel of small conductance

Andriy Anishkin 1, Bradley Akitake 2 and Sergei Sukharev 2*

1 University of Maryland, College Park
2 University of Maryland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sukharev{at}umd.edu.

Submitted on April 3, 2007
Revised on May 4, 2007
Accepted on 10 October 2007


   Abstract
Channels from the MscS family are adaptive tension-activated osmolyte release valves that regulate turgor in prokaryotes and volume in plant chloroplasts. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS has provided a starting point for detailed descriptions of its mechanism. However, solved in the absence of the lipid bilayer, this structure may deviate from a native conformation. In this study we utilized molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and a new iterative 'extrapolated motion' protocol to pack the splayed peripheral TM1 and TM2 transmembrane helices along the central TM3 shaft. This modification restored the tension transmission route between the membrane and the channel gate. We also modeled the structure of the 26-amino acid N-terminal segments that were unresolved in the crystals. The resulting compact conformation, which we believe approximates the closed resting state of MscS, matches the hydrophobic thickness of the lipid bilayer with arginines 46, 54 and 74 facing the polar lipid head groups. The pore-lining helices in this resting state feature alternative kinks near the conserved G121 instead of G113 as observed in the crystal structure and the transmembrane barrel remains stable in extended MD simulations. Further analysis of the dynamics of the pore constriction revealed several moderately asymmetric and largely dehydrated states. Biochemical and patch-clamp experiments with engineered double-cysteine mutants demonstrated cross-linking between predicted adjacent residue pairs, which formed either spontaneously or under moderate oxidation. The L72C-V99C bridge linking more peripheral TM2 to TM3 caused a shift of channel activation to higher pressures. TM3 to TM3 cross-links through the A84C-T93C, S95C-I97C and A106C-G108C cysteine pairs were shown to lock MscS in a non-conductive state. Normal channel activity in these mutants could be recovered upon disulfide reduction with DTT. These results confirmed our modeling predictions of a closed MscS channel featuring a TM3 barrel that largely resembles the crystal conformation though with more tightly packed peripheral helices. From this closed-resting conformation the TM3 helices must expand to allow for channel opening.

Key Words: MD simulations, crystal structure, mechanosensitive channel, patch-clamp, transmembrane helices




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
A. Anishkin, K. Kamaraju, and S. Sukharev
Mechanosensitive Channel MscS in the Open State: Modeling of the Transition, Explicit Simulations, and Experimental Measurements of Conductance
J. Gen. Physiol., July 1, 2008; 132(1): 67 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.