help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published August 10, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.112367
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 15, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.112367v1
93/10/3340    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Emil Alexov
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brock, K.
Right arrow Articles by Alexov, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brock, K.
Right arrow Articles by Alexov, E.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Optimization of electrostatic interactions in protein-protein complexes

Kelly Brock 1, Kemper Talley 1, Kacey Coley 1, Petras Kundrotas 2 and Emil Alexov 2*

1 South Carolina Governor School for Science and Mathematics
2 Clemson University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ealexov{at}clemson.edu.

Submitted on May 8, 2007
Revised on June 4, 2007
Accepted on 25 June 2007


   Abstract
In this paper we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 360 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes (ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the dataset we calculated the total electrostatic energy of the binding and its two components, Coulombic and reaction field energy. It was found that in a vast majority of the cases (more than 90 %), the total electrostatic component of the binding energy was unfavorable. At the same time, the Coulombic component of the binding energy was found to favor the complex formation while the reaction field component of the binding energy opposed the binding. It was also demonstrated that the components in a wild-type (WT) structure are optimized/anti-optimized with respect to the corresponding distributions, arising from random shuffling of the charged side chains. The degree of this optimization was assessed through the Z-score of WT energy in respect to the random distribution. It was found that the Z-scores of Coulombic interactions peek at a considerably negative value for all 658 cases considered while the Z-score of the reaction field energy varied among different types of complexes. All these findings indicate that the Coulombic interactions within WT protein-protein complexes are optimized in order to favor the complex formation while the total electrostatic energy predominantly opposes the binding. This observation was used to discriminate WT structures among sets of structural decoys and showed that the electrostatic component of the binding energy is not a good discriminator of the WT, while Coulombic or reaction field energies perform better depending of the decoy set used.

Key Words: Binding energy, Decoy ranking, Electrostatics, Poisson-Boltzmann equation, Protein-protein complexes







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.