| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SPECTROSCOPY, IMAGING, OTHER TECHNIQUES |
1 Unitat de Biofisica. Departament de Bioquimica i Biologia Molecular. Universitat Autonoma Barcelona
2 Unitat de Biofisica. Departament de Bioquimica i Biologia Molecular. Universitat Autonma Barcelona
3 Institute de Biologie et Technologies-Saclay,Service de Bioenergetique.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ndave{at}imim.es.
Submitted on June 20, 2007
Revised on July 16, 2007
Accepted on 24 October 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
helices, forming an average angle of about 26° with the membrane normal in substrate-free medium. Examination of the deconvoluted linear dichroism spectra in H2O and in D2O makes apparent two populations of
helices differing by their tilt angle (helices types I and II). Moreover, the average helical tilt angle significantly varies upon substrate binding: it is increased upon Na+ binding, while it decreases upon subsequent melibiose binding in the presence of Na+. In contrast, melibiose binding in the presence of H+ causes virtually no change in the average tilt angle. The data also suggest that the two helix populations change their tilting and H/D exchange level in different ways depending on the bound substrate(s). Notably, cation binding essentially influences type I helices, whereas melibiose binding modifies the tilting of both helix populations.
Key Words: ATR-FTIR, MelB, alfa-helices, membrane transporter, polarization, secondary structure orientation
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |