help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published January 4, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.117424
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.117424v1
94/7/2610    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Toole, M.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Toole, M.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. E.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

A Physical Model of Axonal Elongation: Force, Viscosity, and Adhesions Govern the Mode of Outgrowth

Matthew O'Toole 1, Phillip Lamoureux 1 and Kyle E. Miller 1*

1 Michigan State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kmiller{at}msu.edu.

Submitted on July 18, 2007
Revised on August 14, 2007
Accepted on 4 December 2007


   Abstract
Whether the axonal framework is stationary or moves is a central debate in cell biology. To better understand this problem we developed a mathematical model that incorporates force generation at the growth cone, the viscoelastic properties of the axon, and adhesions between the axon and substrate. Using force-calibrated needles to apply and measure forces at the growth cone, we used docked mitochondria as markers to monitor movement of the axonal framework. We found coherent axonal transport that decreased away from the growth cone. Based on the velocity profiles of movement, the force applied at the growth cone, and by varying the attachment of the axonal shaft to the coverslip, we estimate values for the axial viscosity of the axon (3.6 x 106 ± 2.4 x 106 Pa-s) and the friction coefficient for laminin / polyornithine based adhesions along the axon (9.6 x 103 ± 7.5 x 103 Pa-s). Our model suggests that whether axons elongate by tip growth or stretching depends on the level of force generation at the growth cone, the viscosity of the axon, and the level of adhesions along the axon.

Key Words: axonal transport, cytoskeleton, friction, substrate, tension, viscosity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.