help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published January 30, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.120493
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.120493v1
94/11/4282    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, R.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenberg, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, R.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenberg, B.

CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING

Bubbles, Gating, and Anesthetics in Ion Channels

Roland Roth 1, Dirk Gillespie 2, Wolfgang Nonner 3 and Bob Eisenberg 4*

1 Max-Planck Institut für Metallforschung, Heisenbergstraße 3, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
2 Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Parkway, Chicago IL 60612
3 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 3
4 Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Parkway, Chicago IL 60612 USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: beisenbe{at}rush.edu.

Submitted on August 27, 2007
Revised on September 27, 2007
Accepted on 16 January 2008


   Abstract
We suggest that bubbles are the bistable hydrophobic gates responsible for the on-off transitions of single channel currents. In this view, many types of channels gate by the same physical mechanism -- dewetting by capillary evaporation -- but different types of channels use different sensors to modulate hydrophobic properties of the channel wall and thereby trigger and control bubbles and gating. Spontaneous emptying of channels has been seen in many simulations. Because of the physics involved, such phase transitions are inherently sensitive, unstable threshold phenomena difficult to simulate reproducibly and thus convincingly. We present a thermodynamic analysis of a bubble gate using morphometric density functional theory of classical (not quantum) mechanics. Thermodynamic analysis of phase transitions is generally more reproducible and less sensitive to details than simulations. Anesthetic actions of inert gases -- and their interactions with hydrostatic pressure (e.g., nitrogen narcosis) -- can be easily understood by actions on bubbles. A general theory of gas anesthesia may involve bubbles in channels. Only experiments can show whether, or when, or which channels actually use bubbles as hydrophobic gates: direct observation of bubbles in channels are needed. Existing experiments show thin gas layers on hydrophobic surfaces in water and suggest that bubbles nearly exist in bulk water.

Key Words: anesthesia, bubble, gating, hydrophobic, xenon




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner
Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Eisenberg
Engineering channels: Atomic biology
PNAS, April 29, 2008; 105(17): 6211 - 6212.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.