help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 16, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.120923
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.120923v1
95/4/2017    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chesnick, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chesnick, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, K.

SPECTROSCOPY, IMAGING, OTHER TECHNIQUES

Magnetic Resonance Microscopy of Collagen Mineralization

Ingrid E. Chesnick 1, Jeffrey T. Mason 2, Anthony A. Giuseppetti 3, Naomi Eidelman 3 and Kimberlee Potter 1*

1 Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
2 Armed Forces Institue of Pathology
3 American Dental Association

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: potterk{at}afip.osd.mil.

Submitted on August 30, 2007
Revised on October 26, 2007
Accepted on 21 April 2008


   Abstract
A model mineralizing system was subjected to magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM), to investigate how water proton transverse (T2) relaxation times and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) can be applied to monitor collagen mineralization. In our model system, a collagen sponge was mineralized with polymer-stabilized amorphous calcium carbonate. The lower hydration and water proton T2 values of collagen sponges during the initial mineralization phase were attributed to the replacement of the water within the collagen fibrils by amorphous calcium carbonate. The significant reduction in T2 values by day 6 (p < 0.001) was attributed to the appearance of mineral crystallites, that were also detected by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. In the second phase, between days 6 and 13 days, MRM properties appear to plateau as amorphous calcium carbonate droplets begin to coalesce within the intrafibrillar space of collagen. In the third phase, after day 15, the amorphous mineral phase crystallized, resulting in the reduction in the absolute intensity of the collagen diffraction pattern. We speculate that MTR values for collagen sponges, with similar collagen contents, increased from 0.25 ± 0.02 for controls strips to a maximum value of 0.31 ± 0.04 at day 15 (p = 0.03) because mineral crystals greatly reduce the mobility of the collagen fibrils.

Key Words: X-ray diffraction, biomineralization, calcite, collagen mineralization, magnetic resonance microscopy, scanning electron microscopy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.