help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published January 16, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.123182
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.123182v1
94/8/3323    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, F.
Right arrow Articles by McNally, J. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, F.
Right arrow Articles by McNally, J. G

CELL BIOPHYSICS

Evidence for a common mode of transcription factor interaction with chromatin as revealed by improved quantitative FRAP

Florian Mueller 1, Paul Wach 2 and James G McNally 1*

1 NCI/NIH
2 Graz University of Technology

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcnallyj{at}exchange.nih.gov.

Submitted on October 2, 2007
Revised on November 4, 2007
Accepted on 11 December 2007


   Abstract
How site-specific transcription factors scan the genome to locate their target sites is a fundamental question in gene regulation. The in vivo binding interactions of several different transcription factors with chromatin have been investigated recently using quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). These analyses have yielded significantly different estimates of both the binding rates and the number of predicted binding states of the respective transcription factors. We show here that these discrepancies are not due to fundamental differences among the site-specific transcription factors, but rather arise from errors in FRAP modeling. The two principal errors are a neglect of diffusion's role and an oversimplified approximation of the photobleach profile. Accounting for these errors by developing a revised FRAP protocol eliminates most of the previous discrepancies in the binding estimates for the three different transcription factors analyzed here. The new estimates predict that for each of the three transcription factors, ~75% of the molecules are freely diffusing within the nucleus, while the remainder is bound with an average residence time of ~2.5 s to a single type of chromatin binding site. Such consistent predictions for three different molecules suggest that many site-specific transcription factors may exhibit similar in vivo interactions with native chromatin.

Key Words: FRAP, chromatin, modeling, reaction diffusion, transcription factor







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.