| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUPRAMOLECULAR ASSEMBLIES |
1 Ben Gurion University
2 University of California, Santa Barbara
3 University of California, Davis
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: safinya{at}mrl.ucsb.edu.
Submitted on October 31, 2007
Revised on December 13, 2007
Accepted on 29 February 2008
| Abstract |
|---|
NL, the complexes show dramatic DNA compaction, down to essentially close packed DNA arrays with a DNA interaxial spacing dDNA = 25 Å. A gradual increase in
NL does not lead to a continuous increase in dDNA as observed for DNA complexes of monovalent CLs. Instead, distinct spacing regimes exist, with sharp transitions between them. Three packing states have been identified: (i) close packed, (ii) condensed, but not close packed, with dDNA = 27-28 Å, and (iii) an expanded state, where dDNA increases gradually with
NL. Based on our experimental and computational results, we conclude that the DNA condensation is mediated by the multivalent cationic lipids, which assemble between the negatively charged DNA rods. Quite remarkably, the computational results show that the less tightly packed structure in regime (ii) is thermodynamically more stable than the close packed structure in regime (i). Accordingly, the constant DNA spacing observed in regime (ii) is attributed to lateral phase coexistence between this stable CL-DNA complex and neutral membranes. This finding may explain the reduced TE measured for such complexes: Transfection involves endosomal escape and disassembly of the complex, and these processes are inhibited by the high thermodynamic stability. Our results, which demonstrate the existence of an inverse correlation between the stability and transfection activity of lamellar CL-DNA complexes are, therefore, consistent with a recently proposed model of cellular entry.
Key Words: X-ray scattering, coarse-grained simulations, electrostatic interactions, gene therapy, lipid-DNA complexes, structure-function relationship
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |