help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published April 4, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.125005
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.125005v1
95/3/1393    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaus, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Borisy, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaus, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Borisy, G. G.

CELL BIOPHYSICS

Performance of a population of independent filaments in lamellipodial protrusion

Thomas E. Schaus 1* and Gary G. Borisy 2

1 Northwestern Medical School
2 Marine Biological Lab.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tschaus{at}northwestern.edu.

Submitted on November 1, 2007
Revised on November 28, 2007
Accepted on 20 March 2008


   Abstract
Actin polymerization is responsible for moving a wide variety of loads, from the protrusion of membrane-bound filopodia and lamellipodia of immune, cancer, and other motile cells, to the propulsion of some intra-cellular pathogens. A universal explanation of the forces and velocities generated by these systems has been hampered by a lack of understanding in how a population of independent filaments pushes these loads. Protrusion of a lamellipodium by the very filaments supporting the membrane load is thought to operate by the Brownian ratchet mechanism, with overall organization governed by the dendritic-nucleation / array-treadmilling model. We have incorporated these two models into a 2-D, stochastic computer model of lamellipodial protrusion, and studied how force and velocity generation varied under different assumptions. Performance is very sensitive to the extent to which the work of protrusion is shared among individual polymerization events within the filament population. Three identified mechanisms promote this "work-sharing:" (a) Most systems, including lamellipodia, utilize a self-organizing distribution of filament-load distances which serves to decrease the effective size of a monomer and dramatically improve performance. (b) A flexible membrane allows for consistent performance over large lamellipodial widths. (c) Finally, very flexible filaments are capable of sharing work very uniformly and therefore of near-perfect theoretical performance. Transient tethering to the lamellipodial membrane limits their efficacy, however, and mandates a minimum filament stiffness. Overall, we estimate lamellipodia to operate with 40 nm bending-length filaments and low characteristic tether forces. Modeled lamellipodia exhibit sigmoidal force-velocity relationships and share the work of protrusion only moderately well among filaments, performing at approximately one-half of theoretical force and velocity maximums. At this level of work-sharing, the natural monomer size is optimal for generating velocity.

Key Words: actin, energetics, force-velocity, lamellipodium, membrane protrusion, stochastic







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.