help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published March 13, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.125799
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on June 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.125799v1
94/12/4654    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camilloni, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tiana, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Camilloni, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tiana, G.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Urea and guanidinium chloride denature Protein L in different ways in molecular dynamics simulations

Carlo Camilloni 1, Alessandro Guerini Rocco 1, Ivano Eberini 1, Elisabetta Gianazza 1, Ricardo A Broglia 1 and Guido Tiana 1*

1 University of Milano

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tiana{at}mi.infn.it.

Submitted on November 15, 2007
Revised on December 15, 2007
Accepted on 12 February 2008


   Abstract
In performing protein-denaturation experiments, it is common to employ different kinds of denaturants interchangeably. We make use of molecular dynamics simulations of Protein L in water, in urea and in guanidinium chloride to investigate if there are any structural differences in the associated unfolding processes. The simulation of proteins in solutions of guanidinium chloride is complicated by the large number of charges involved, making it difficult to set up a realistic force field. Furthermore, at high concentrations of this denaturant the motion of the solvent slows down considerably. The simulations show that the unfolding mechanism depends on the denaturing agent: in urea the beta-sheet is destabilized first, while in guanidinium chloride it is the {alpha}-helix. Moreover, while urea interacts with the protein accumulating in the first solvation shell, guanidinium chloride displays a longer-range electrostatic effect which does not perturb the structure of the solvent close to the protein.

Key Words: denatured state, unfolding simulations




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
C. Camilloni, L. Sutto, D. Provasi, G. Tiana, and R. A. Broglia
Early events in protein folding: Is there something more than hydrophobic burst?
Protein Sci., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 1424 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.