The voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) is a
voltage-gated channel from the mitochondrial outer membrane. It has two
gating processes: one at positive potentials and the other at negative potentials. The energetics of VDAC gating are quite different when
measured in the presence or absence of an ion gradient. A positive
potential on the high-salt side results in channel closure at lower
transmembrane potentials. The midpoint potential
(V0) shifted from 25 to 5.7 mV, with an
activity gradient for KCl of 0.6 versus 0.06. The opposite occurred for
negative potentials on the high-salt side
(V0 shifted from
25 to
29 mV). Thus the salt gradient favored closure for one gating process and opening for
the other. These results could be explained if part of the electrochemical potential of the gradients present were transferred to
the gating mechanism. If the kinetic energy of the ion flow were
coupled to the gating process, the effects of the gradient would depend
on the mass and velocities of these ions. This was tested by using a
series of different salts (KCl, NaCl, LiCl, KBr, K acetate, Na
butyrate, and RbBr) under an identical activity gradient. The kinetic
energy correlated very well with the measured shifts in free energy of
the channel gating. This was true for both polarities. Thus the gating
of VDAC is influenced by ion flow. These results are consistent in sign
and direction with the voltage gating process in VDAC, which is
believed to involve the movement of a positively charged portion of the
wall of the channel out of the membrane.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Unlike transistors, voltage-gated channels
studied so far are strictly voltage-dependent devices. When a channel
protein changes its conformation (open-closed being the simplest case)
under a varying electric field, voltage dependence could arise if the structural change resulted in 1) charged domain moving relative to the
electric field or 2) a rotation of the dipole moment of the voltage
sensor domain relative to the electric vector. These two (nonexclusive)
processes would allow mechanical work to be performed on the protein by
the electric field. If these processes are coupled to a functional
change in the protein (e.g., the opening or closing of the channel),
then the protein domains involved form what is referred to as the
voltage sensor. Different types of voltage-sensing domains have been
proposed and/or reported (e.g., Catterall, 1986
; Merril and Cramer,
1990
; Thomas et al., 1993
; Colombini, 1994
), and they are presumed to
be strictly voltage sensitive.
This paradigm may not be totally correct for large channels like
porins, GAP junctions, or VDACs. These channels form aqueous pores that
are needed to facilitate the flow of large solutes (substrates,
nucleotides, etc.) across cell membranes. Thus channel closure involves
forming an obstruction against a solution that begins to have bulk
properties. Unlike the high-molecular-weight channels that form narrow
pores, some of these channels use 10 times less protein to form a much
larger aqueous pore, increasing the likelihood that the mechanical
properties of the fluid will influence the structure of the protein.
For VDAC, the voltage-sensing domain is also part of the wall of the
pore when the channel is in the open state (Peng et al., 1992
; Thomas
et al., 1993
). Thus flow within the channel would be in mechanical
contact with the voltage sensor domain.
VDAC has two voltage-gating processes: one observed at positive and the
other at negative potentials. Under the conditions generally used to
study these channels (reconstitution into membranes made from soybean
phospholipids), VDAC behaves symmetrically in that closure is observed
at both positive and negative potentials with virtually the same
steepness of voltage dependence (parameter n) and the same
magnitude of potential (V0). In the presence of an ion gradient, the gating processes shift. The gradient favors channel closure for one gating process and opening for the other. From
a thermodynamical point of view, this can only happen if there is a
transfer, or interaction, between the potential energy stored in the
ion gradient and the energetics of the gating mechanism. One possible
coupling could be the transfer of kinetic energy from the ion gradient
to the moving voltage sensor during channel opening and closure. This
was tested by using different permeant ions, and therefore different
hydrated masses and velocities, under a constant activity gradient. The
kinetic energies correlated very well with the energetics of the
gating. This effect cannot be explained by differences in ion
mobilities only. Likewise, water depletion from the channel lumen by an
osmotic effect of impermeant ions as it has been already shown for
polymers (Zimmerberg and Parsegian, 1986
) cannot account for our
results. It is thus concluded that the voltage sensor and therefore the
voltage gating of VDAC are sensitive to ion flow. Moreover, the
reported effect is consistent in sign and direction with the proposed
gating mechanism for VDAC, which involves the motion of a rather large
portion of the wall of the pore.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
The reconstitution system
Planar phospholipid membranes were formed according to the
method of Montal and Mueller (1972)
, modified as described (Colombini, 1987
). The membranes were formed across a 0.10-mm hole in a Saran partition separating two identical teflon hemichambers containing the
bathing solutions. The membrane was voltage clamped, and the current
across the membrane was recorded. Calomel electrodes were used to
interface with the aqueous solutions. After sufficient VDAC channels
had inserted into the membrane, the voltage gating was probed by using
slow (5.0 mHz) triangular voltage waves. Because the reopening of VDAC
is fast (submillisecond range), this allowed current recordings from a
channel population in quasithermodynamical equilibrium. Thus the
Boltzmann distribution may be used as has been done traditionally
(Ehrenstein et al., 1970
; Schein et al., 1976
):
|
(1)
|
where V is the transmembrane voltage;
V0 is the voltage at which half the channels are
open; n is the net effective gating valence (a measure of
the steepness of the voltage dependence); and R,
F, and T have their usual meanings. Because VDAC
channels are conductive in the "closed" state, the ratio of the
concentration of open to closed channels was determined as follows:
|
(2)
|
where G, Gmax, and
Gmin are, respectively, the conductance at any
voltage, the maximum conductance (all channels open), and the minimum
conductance (all channels closed). After substitution of Eq. 2 into Eq. 1 and taking the log transform, this linearized equation was used to
process the data and obtain n and V0:
|
(3)
|
A typical fit to the linearized data is shown in Fig.
1. The measured values of
V0 were corrected for electrode asymmetry and
the liquid junction potentials at the tip of the KCl salt bridges, by
subtracting the value of the reversal potential measured after the
membrane had broken, after correcting this value for the calculated
liquid junction across the hole, using the Nernst-Planck flux equation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1
Typical fits of data to the Boltzmann distribution.
These data were collected in the presence of a KCl gradient.
|
|
Determining the conductance/voltage relationship in the presence of a
salt gradient for channels whose closed state is not only conductive
but of opposite ion selectivity requires some care. A sample record is
shown in Fig. 2. Proceeding from left to right (following experimental time), the voltage increased to +56 mV
and then declined. As the voltage neared zero, channels began opening,
as evidenced by a deviation from linearity (this is very evident with
one or a few channels in the membrane). By about
20 mV, just about
all of the channels were open and a linear relationship was once again
obtained. At about
40 mV, the channels began to close. After the
voltage reached its lowest value (
64 mV) and began to rise, channels
reopened. They stayed open for a while until the voltage neared zero,
when they began to close. As the voltage became more positive, all of
the channels entered a closed state, resulting in a linear dependence
of current with voltage. Thus lines A and D indicate the
current/voltage relationship for the closed channels. Lines B and C
indicate the current/voltage relationship for the open channels.
Because the rates of channel closure are much slower than those for
channel opening (Colombini, 1979
), only transitions from line A to line
B and line D to line C were analyzed. Lines A and D served as the
baselines for the analyses, and the intersections between lines A and B
and lines C and D served as origins for the chord conductances. The
reversal potentials of the open channels are estimated from the
intercepts of lines B and C with the thin horizontal line that
designates zero current. The reversal potentials were best estimated
from single-channel or few-channel membranes. In some experiments, the
presence of large numbers of channels made it difficult to determine
the correct slope for lines corresponding to B and C. In such cases,
lines were drawn tangent to the data in the appropriate region and
intersecting the zero-current line at a previously determined reversal
potential.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 2
Current/voltage relationship of a multichannel membrane
in the presence of a salt gradient. The cis compartment
contained a LiCl activity of 0.60, whereas in the trans
compartment the activity was 0.060. Both compartments also contained
1.0 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MES, pH 5.8. The indicated voltage
refers to the cis (high salt) side. This voltage was
corrected for electrode asymmetry (see Materials and Methods). The
voltage was applied in the form of slow triangular waves (5.0 mHz, ±60
mV). Time proceeded in the direction indicated by the time arrow. The
thin horizontal line is the zero-current line. The lines labeled A-D
are discussed in Materials and Methods.
|
|
Solutions
For each salt considered, molal activity coefficients (Robinson
and Stokes, 1965
) were used to make solutions of 0.60 and 0.060 activity. These were used as our standard activity gradient for all of
the experiments (except for the urea experiments). Both solutions also
contained 1.0 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES)
to buffer at pH 5.8, and 1.0 mM CaCl2. For the urea gradient, concentrations of 1.2 and 0.12 M were used in the presence of
symmetrical 1.0 M KCl, 1.0 mM MES (pH 5.8), and 1.0 mM
CaCl2.
VDAC stocks
Mitochondrial membranes were isolated from a wall-less mutant of
Neurospora crassa as previously described (Mannella,
1982
). These were stored in dilute salt buffered at pH 7 and containing 15% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide. An aliquot was supplemented with Triton
X-100 to a final concentration of 1.0% (v/v) before use. Aliquots of
1-5 µl were stirred into the cis side of the experimental chamber, and channels inserted spontaneously.
 |
THEORY |
Estimation of drift kinetic energy due to solutes
A gradient of solute necessitates an opposite gradient for water.
If ideal behavior applied, these gradients would cancel out. However,
the degree of coupling of the movement of solutes (especially ions) to
the wall of the channel is unlikely to be identical to that of the
movement of water. Thus most experiments were performed in the presence
of almost identical water gradients, and thus this common effect was
neglected. Clearly, all observed effects include water flow, but
observed changes with different solutes reflect differences in the
properties of the solutes.
To calculate the kinetic energy of an ion drifting at its
terminal velocity through the VDAC channel, we started with
|
(4)
|
where v is the velocity. As VDAC is a large pore, the
permeant species are hydrated ions, so m is the hydrated
mass. The hydration numbers, taken from Robinson and Stokes (1965
, p.
62), are those estimated from diffusion measurements, as these should be the most relevant to current considerations.
Velocity is the product of mobility and the driving force:
|
(5)
|
and mobility is given by
|
(6)
|
where N is Avogadro's number,
0 is the
limiting equivalent conductivity for a single ion species (Robinson and
Stokes, 1965
), and z is the charge.
Therefore, Eq. 4 becomes
|
(7)
|
Because anions and cations are subjected to
different forces, they must be considered separately, and their effects
combined to yield an estimate of the kinetic energy that could be
contributed by the salt:
|
(8)
|
where the transference numbers, t+ and
t
, are
|
(9)
|
|
(10)
|
These come from the Nernst/Planck equation, and the
p's are the effective ion permeabilities within the channel
(see also Bockris and Reddy, 1973
, p. 419). E is the
reversal potential. By using these transference numbers, we are
compensating for the selectivity of the channel.
Phenomenologically, the driving force consists of two components, the
activity gradient and the voltage:
|
(11)
|
where da/dx can be taken as the difference
in the salt activity across the membrane (
a), divided by
an estimated thickness, x (we used 5 × 10
7 cm). Therefore Eq. 8 becomes
|
(12)
|
Comparison with experimental observations
The shifts in the voltage-dependent behavior of VDAC
channels in the presence of an ion gradient was observed as
shifts in V0, the voltage needed to close half
the channels. If the flow of ions is contributing to the energy
difference between the open and closed states, this should appear as a
new term in the numerator of the exponent in Eq. 1 as follows:
|
(13)
|
k is the factor that describes the coupling between the
ion flow and the gating system in VDAC. At the voltage at which half the channels are open (V = V0),
|
(14)
|
where nFV'0 is the value of the
energy difference between the states in the absence of an ion gradient.
The value measured in symmetrical 1.0 M KCl was used. By
subtracting this value, we can get at a value for the portion of
the drift kinetic energy at V0 that is coupled
to VDAC's gating mechanism. Note that the n value
calculated with Eq. 3 contains information relating to the voltage
dependence of the kinetic energy and thus is not the value for
n in Eq. 14. This value must reflect only the voltage dependence of the VDAC channel, and thus the value measured in the
absence of a salt gradient was used. Therefore, the value of
nFV0 on the left side of Eq. 14 consists of the
n value in symmetrical 1.0 M KCl, and the
V0 value measured in the presence of the
particular salt gradient.
There is some drift kinetic energy in symmetrical KCl due to the
electric field, but this effect should not lead to any asymmetry. Because of the channel's preference for anions, the drift kinetic energy should always favor the open state, i.e., interfere with channel
closure. Calculations show that because of the lack of a salt gradient
and the fact that the anions and cations act in opposite directions,
the calculated drift kinetic energy in symmetrical salt is small.
However, the calculated drift kinetic energy in the presence of a
gradient was corrected by the value in symmetrical KCl, for the numbers
to be comparable to the shifts in nFV0 (these were corrected for the value in symmetrical 1.0 M KCl (Eq. 14)). This
was a small correction.
When we compared the drift kinetic energy for gradients of different
ions, it was necessary to account in some way for the fact that
the single-channel conductances varied. This was done by multiplying
the result by the single-channel conductance in nS. This was also done
for the calculation of the kinetic energy for symmetrical 1.0 M KCl (4 nS).
Acetate and butyrate are partially protonated and form complexes with
the cations. The amounts in each form were calculated (see Table
1) from published stability constants
(Smith and Martell, 1976
), and all species were considered separately.
These had significant but small effects on the final results.
 |
RESULTS |
The G-V curve for VDAC is shifted laterally in the
presence of an ion gradient
When reconstituted into planar membranes made of
soybean phospholipids, VDAC displays two gating processes: one at
positive values and the second at negative values of the potential.
This causes the conductance/voltage curve to be bell-shaped around 0 mV (Fig. 3). The gating processes are
symmetrical, the gating valence (n) being very similar for
both, and the midpoint potential being the same but of opposite sign.
This is generally true when reconstituted into membranes consisting of
soybean phospholipids, regardless of the salt species. In pure lipids,
pronounced asymmetries are common, indicating the fundamental asymmetry
of individual VDAC channels.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 3
The voltage dependence of the conductance of VDAC at
low and high salt. In A, the aqueous phases were 1.0 M
KCl, 1.0 mM CaCl2, 5.0 mM MES (pH 5.8). This experiment was
courtesy of Xiaofeng Xu. In B, the solutions were 0.10 M
KCl, 1.0 mM CaCl2, 5.0 mM MES (pH 5.8).
|
|
In the presence of a salt gradient, the
conductance/voltage curve is no longer centered around 0 mV, but is
shifted in a direction favoring the closed state for one gating
mechanism and the open state for the other (Fig.
4). Thus, in the presence of an ion gradient, the work performed by (or on) the channel during the gating
is increased or decreased, depending on which of the two gating
processes is considered.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 4
Neurospora crassa VDAC open probability
as a function of the voltage. Conditions were 0.60 versus 0.060 activity of KCl (top), 0.60 versus 0.060 activity of KBr
(bottom), and 1.2 M versus 0.12 M urea in the presence
of symmetrical 1.0 M KCl (middle), across the membrane.
Both solutions also contained 1.0 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MES (pH
5.8). The data were obtained from records such as that shown in Fig. 2.
Only the parts of the current record where the channels were opening
were analyzed, and thus the data in the figure are a combination of
results from two adjacent records. See Materials and Methods for
details.
|
|
Simply lowering the salt concentration by 10-fold on both sides of the
membrane produces no pronounced effect (Fig. 3). Thus it is the
presence of the salt gradient that is causing the pronounced shifts in
the voltage needed to close the channels. If the direction of the
gradient is inverted, the shift is also inverted (Fig. 5), indicating that the source of the
asymmetry is not the equipment or the manner in which the membrane is
generated.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 5
Reversing the direction of the salt gradient results in
a reversed shift in the gating processes. In both experiments
(open and filled symbols) a salt gradient of KCl was
present (0.60 versus 0.060 activity). In the experiment illustrated
with the open symbols, the voltage was controlled on the high-salt
side, whereas for that illustrated by the filled symbols, the voltage
was controlled on the low-salt side (the opposite side was held at
virtual ground by the amplifier).
|
|
The shift is also observed in the presence of neutral lipids
(diphytanoyl PC). Thus surface charge effects are not the fundamental cause of the phenomenon.
The shifts vary, depending on the nature of the salt used. Table
2 summarizes results obtained using
various solutes. Note that, in all cases, a smaller negative potential
and a larger positive potential are needed to close half the
channels. The sign of the shift is consistent with the ion flow
influencing the gating process.
The differences induced by the ion gradients in the free energy of
VDAC gating correlate with the kinetic energy of the ionic drift
A great deal of evidence indicates that the voltage sensor of VDAC
is located on the inner wall of the channel in the open state and
translocates out of the channel during the gating process (Colombini,
1994
). The voltage sensor has a net positive charge and is driven by
the electric field to one membrane surface or the other, depending on
the sign of the applied potential. Thus the application of a positive
potential on the high-salt side would drive the sensor down the salt
gradient toward the low-salt side. In contrast, the application of a
negative potential would drive the sensor against the salt gradient.
These considerations raise the possibility that kinetic energy from the
flow of ions through the channel might be transferred to the sensor,
thus changing the relative energy level of the open state compared to
the closed state.
If there is a coupling between the ion flow and the movement of the
sensor, there should be a correlation between the shift in the energy
of the gating process and the kinetic energy of the salt flowing
through the channel. The effective drift kinetic energy is proportional
to the mass times the drift velocity squared (see Materials and
Methods). Thus this hypothesis was tested by using salts composed of
ions of different mobilities and masses (Table
4).
To estimate the kinetic energy according to Eq. 12, it was necessary to
estimate the transference numbers from the reversal potentials (Table
3). This varied, as expected, with the
salt used, but more importantly, the amount of conductance attributed to each ion depended strongly on the nature of the counterion. An
ion's permeability declines if it is paired with a less permeable or
less mobile counterion. This is a consequence of the large size of the
pore and the interaction among the multiple ions likely to be present
within the pore at any time.
The calculated drift kinetic energy (Table
5) is plotted versus the observed change
in the free energy difference between the open and closed states (Fig.
6). The difference in the magnitude of
the energies is at least partly explained by the fact that the kinetic
energy refers to one ion, and the ion flow through the channel is
~108 ions/s. The inorganic salts (plotted as
circles) form a reasonable straight line. The salts of acetate and
butyrate (triangles) seem to have a proportionately stronger
effect on VDAC.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 6
Correlation between the drift kinetic energy per ion
flowing through the channel, with the shift in the channel-gating
energetics measured in the presence of a 10-fold activity gradient. The
values are from Table 5: , inorganic salts; , salts of butyrate
and acetate; , urea.
|
|
The effects of the ion gradient are not attributable to a water
activity gradient, reversal potential, or differences in hydrostatic
pressure or ion mobilities
Urea was used as a control for the osmotic pressure difference
that exists when an ion gradient is present. Osmotic gradients have
been shown to give rise to streaming potentials in narrow channels due
to a coupling of water flow to ion flow (Rosenberg and Finkelstein,
1978
). For the highly cation-selective gramicidin channel, a 2 M urea
gradient produced a 2.5-mV streaming potential. With the lower
selectivity and large pore size of VDAC, such effects should be
trivial. Indeed, as seen by the inverted triangles, 1.2 M urea versus
0.12 M urea had no significant effect on the energetics of the channels
(Figs. 4 and 6). Being insensitive to the electrical component of the
driving force, it has a small calculated drift kinetic energy. Possible
confounding effects of urea on the activity of the otherwise
symmetrical KCl solution were dismissed, based on the observations of
Rosenberg and Finkelstein (1978)
.
No correlation could be found between the shift in the energetics of
VDAC gating and the salt mobilities or the channel reversal potential
for these salts (Fig. 7, A and
B). This indicates that differences in mobilities alone, and
therefore terminal velocity, cannot account for our results. The
hydrated masses of the permeant species have to be taken into account.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 7
Lack of correlation between the ion mobilities or the
measured reversal potentials with the shift in the energetics of
gating.
|
|
There is a correlation between the difference in the densities of the
solutions and the energy changes in VDAC (Fig.
8). Thus the possibility that this
density difference could result in the flow of solution through the
membrane and thus produce the observed results on VDAC was tested by
applying a hydrostatic pressure difference across the membrane. The
experiments were done in the presence of symmetrical 1.0 M KCl, but the
level of the solution on one side of the membrane was higher than the
other. A 0.5-2-mm difference in water pressure caused no reproducible
energy shifts in VDAC, as measured in the presence of symmetrical 1.0 M
KCl solution. These transmembrane hydrostatic pressures are far higher than the maximum 10% difference in density between the salt solutions in the presence of an ion gradient and a total water level above the
membrane between 0.1 and 0.5 mm (the levels were about equal).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 8
Correlation between difference in density between the
salt solutions on either side of the membrane and the shift in the
voltage-gating energetics of VDAC. The correlation coefficients are
0.89 and 0.3, respectively, for data for positive and negative free
energy change. The former is significant at the 99% confidence level;
the latter is not significant.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The large pores formed by VDAC channels may be able to hold as
many as 1000 water molecules. Hence it should not be surprising that
flow through these channels begins to resemble bulk flow. Just as the
flow of fluid through pipes transfers energy to the wall of the pipe
because of friction, the net flow of substances through the aqueous
pore of VDAC should transfer energy to the walls of the pore. In the
case of VDAC, there is strong evidence (Peng et al., 1992
; Thomas et
al., 1993
) that the domain of the protein whose movement is responsible
for voltage gating forms part of the wall of the pore. Of the 12
-strands and one
-helix believed to form the wall of the pore,
there is evidence (Peng et al., 1992
; Thomas et al., 1993
) that the
-helix and six of the
-strands are involved in this motion. This
motion has a major component normal to the plane of the membrane.
Therefore, collisions of moving ions within the pore should be able to
bias the motion.
The presence of a gradient of free energy in an aqueous solution of
ions results in a biasing of the otherwise random motion of the ions.
This biased motion results in a drift of the ions down their gradient
in free energy. This drift has an associated drift kinetic energy
(derived in the Theory section) that is transferred to the wall of the
channel or to the bulk phase as heat. We do not know what fraction of
the energy is imparted to the wall of the pore, but the total drift
kinetic energy is potentially very large. For example, in the case of
the KCl gradient,
28 mV on the high-salt side is needed to close half
the channels. Under these conditions, the calculated drift kinetic
energy for Cl
was 0.017 J/mol (that for K+ is
negligible under these conditions). Clearly, the collision of a single
Cl
ion would not be sufficient to favor the open
state by 750 J/mol. However, the combined effect of the flow, under
these conditions of ~4 × 108 ions/s would result in
a total drift kinetic energy of ~7000 kJ/s · mol.
Whether this is enough energy to account for the observed shift in the
energetics of the channel depends on how this cooperative effect could
come about. The residency time of an ion in VDAC is much shorter that
the estimated time for the channel to undergo a conformational change
(~1 µs). Thus, as ions flow through the pore, their collisions with
amino acid side chains extending into the pore could result in a
sustained mechanical stress that would either favor or disfavor channel
closure. In the current model, the hydrogen bonding that links the
-strands that form the mobile sensor to those in the rest of the
-barrel would need to be broken for gating to occur. The stress
induced by the ion flow could be manifested as a distortion in these
hydrogen bonds, thus favoring the motion. The opposite flow could make
it more difficult for the electric field to cause enough distortion of
these bonds and thus produce closure. It is interesting that in Fig. 6,
the drift kinetic energy seemed to be more effective (shallower slope)
at destabilizing the hydrogen bonds and inducing closure (negative free
energy change) than at stabilizing the open state (positive free energy
change).
It is worth considering the possibility that the aqueous medium plays a
role in transferring energy to the walls of the pore. In aqueous
solution (as opposed to vacuum), ions accelerate only very briefly when
a force is applied, reaching a terminal velocity because of friction
with the medium. The calculations of net kinetic energy do not take
into account the fact that energy, continuously imparted to the medium
because of friction, will cause the medium to have a net motion in the
direction of ion flow. The motion of the medium can also be transferred
to the walls of the pore. This energy transfer would be in addition to
that considered in the previous paragraph.
Because there is a gradient of water, there should be a tendency for
water to flow in the direction opposite that of solute flow. By using a
urea gradient, we showed that such a flow has no significant affect on
the gating process. This could be explained by a difference in the
effective coupling between water and ions and the walls of the channel.
Indeed, there is evidence that the aqueous content of the channel is
not uniform, but that a shell of water next to the channel wall may
behave differently from the water in the center of the pore (Zambrowicz
and Colombini, 1993
).
The hypothesis that ion flow through the channel imparts energy to the
voltage sensor of VDAC, and thus biases the voltage-gating process, was
tested by using ions of varying mobility and mass. A reasonable
correlation was obtained between the calculated drift kinetic energy of
the ions in the channel and the shift in free energy difference between
the open and closed states. No correlation was observed with other
properties of the ions, except for the density of the solution. The
possibility that pressure differences across the channel, due to
differences in the density of the solutions on either side of the
membrane, could be responsible for the observed changes in channel
properties, was tested by applying hydrostatic pressure differences
across the membrane. These had no reproducible effect. Under the
conditions studied, the drift kinetic energy per water molecule would
be less than 10
17 J/mol. Even considering that the water
concentration is two orders of magnitude higher than the salt
concentration, the kinetic energy is far too low, because the pressure
differences were very small (less than 10
4 atm).
Therefore, the only plausible cause for the shift in the energetics of
the channel is the kinetic energy imparted by the ionic flow.
The magnitude of this kinetic energy is influenced by a number of
factors, including the magnitude of the ion gradient and the mass and
mobility of the ions. Using estimated degrees of coupling from Fig. 6,
one can obtain theoretically expected shifts in the voltage dependence
of the open probability as a result of changing the drift kinetic
energy in various ways (Fig. 9). Although
the direction of the change is predictable, the magnitude of the change
and the shape of the curves hint at the underlying complexity.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 9
Theoretical calculations of the shifts in the voltage
dependence of the open probability caused by varying factors in the
theoretical equation. The general conditions are a KCl gradient with
activities at 0.6 and 0.06, and the potential refers to that on the
high-salt side. When the gradient was varied, the activity on the
high-salt side was increased. When the ion masses (in atomic mass
units) or mobilities (× 109 cm2 mol
J 1 s 1) were varied, the values for the
counter-ion were those of either K+ or
Cl , as appropriate. The factor k in
Eq. 13 was taken as 50,000 for negative potentials and
290,000 for positive potentials. (Values derived from Fig. 6.)
|
|
Experimentally, the situation is even more complex, because the open
probability is influenced by factors not included in the theory. The
scatter in the data in Fig. 6 could arise from different degrees of
coupling between ions and the protein's mobile domain, depending on
the chemical nature of the ion. The especially large divergences seen
with acetate and butyrate might arise from increased friction with the
walls of the pore. After all, butyrate and acetate are the only ions
with apolar regions. Perhaps these associate transiently with apolar
regions in the amino acid side chains that extend into the channel
(Fig. 10). Another factor may be that
impermeants favor channel closure by inducing a hydrostatic pressure
difference between the inside of the pore and the bulk solution. This
has been shown clearly by the use of dextran and polyethylene glycol
(Zimmerberg and Parsegian, 1986
). Partial effects could be induced by
the larger ions. In the closed state, the very low permeability of
anions may induce some hydrostatic pressure differences. Perhaps these
explain why butyrate and acetate have a much stronger effect on closing
the channels than expected from the kinetic energy calculations
(left side of Fig. 6).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 10
A schematic view of sections through the VDAC
channel, illustrating how kinetic energy could be transferred between
the flowing ions and the mobile sensor domain. A cross section through
VDAC's pore shows side chains (black) of the amino
acids lining the pore extending into the lumen, where they contribute
to the selectivity of the channel. The translocating ions
(gray) could collide with these side chains and transfer
some kinetic energy. In longitudinal section, the ion flow
(black arrows) is shown colliding, in part, with the
extended side chains driving the strand (the sensor) out of the
channel, resulting in the closed state.
|
|
The direction of the energetic shift resulting from the ion gradient is
consistent with the working model for VDAC gating (Fig.
11). The mobile, voltage-sensing domain
is a positively charged region (black region in the figure).
VDAC undergoes closure at both positive and negative potentials as a
result of the movement of this domain down the electrical gradient. The
closed state achieved with positive potentials is therefore
fundamentally different from that achieved with negative potentials. In
the presence of a salt gradient, application of a positive potential to
the high salt side would drive the sensor toward the low-salt side,
inducing closure. The salt gradient would favor this motion. Thus lower positive potentials should be needed to close the channel. The application of a negative potential would draw the sensor toward the
high-salt side. In this case, the ion flow would interfere with the
motion and favor the open state. Thus higher voltages should be needed
to close the channels. These expectations are exactly what was
observed, and therefore the observations are in harmony with the gating
mechanism developed to account for other experimental results
(Colombini, 1994
).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 11
The voltage gating mechanism for VDAC from the
literature (Colombini et al., 1996 ). The black region represents the
voltage sensor, the domain that moves in response to changes in
transmembrane potential. A positive potential on top drives the domain
downward, and vice versa. There are two different closed states: one
closed at negative potentials (closed-N), and the other at positive
potentials (closed-P). The dimensions indicated are the estimated pore
diameters in the open and closed states.
|
|
It is difficult to know how general these observations are and whether
they have any physiological significance. The list of membrane channels
that form large pores is growing (e.g., connexins, fusion pores,
protein translocation pores, some toxins like colicins, complement
attack complex, and bacterial porins). Only appropriate experiments
could test whether similar phenomena occur in these channels. There are
physiological conditions in which large ion gradients exist across
channels, yet to date we know of no report that attributes any effect
of ion flow (not simply ion binding or blockage) to the probability of
finding the channel in a particular conformation. Clearly, it is
crucial that the movement of the voltage sensor be somehow coupled to
the ion flow, and in some channels the sensor is believed to be distal
from the site of ion permeation. Whether this is a physiologically
relevant or general phenomenon or not, the observation of the coupling
of ion flow to gating of VDAC gives important insight into and
confirmation of the gating process in this channel.
This work was supported by ONR grant N00014-90-J-1024, by National
Institutes of Health Grant GM 35759, and JSM-RT Grant 69602 to MZ. MZ
is supported by the Belgian Ministry of Defence.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Martin Zizi, Department of Physiology,
K.U. Leuven Medical School, Campus Gasthuijsberg, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Tel.: 32-16-34-5728; Fax: 32-16-34-5991; E-mail: martin.zizi{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be.