| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, February 1999, p. 593-594, Vol. 76, No. 2
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
An inclusion, like an integral membrane protein,
necessarily perturbs local ordering of the bilayer in its
vicinity. It is then a natural thought for a physicist to
consider the indirect interaction between nearby inclusions
induced by overlap of the perturbed regions of the bilayer.
Such a phenomenon is familiar in simple or complex fluids including
liquid crystals, or in any other ordered system perturbed by the
presence of a surface or an impurity.
Although general principles may be straightforward, in the case of
membranes the molecular detail of the perturbation at the site of the
inclusion is complicated. Theoretical work in the past has concentrated
on a particular choice from a possible range of effects, resulting in
rather unrealistic models. In this issue of Biophysical
Journal, May and Ben-Shaul (1999) How does an inclusion perturb the structure of the bilayer matrix?
During the early 1970s, as bilayer membranes gradually became better
understood, different approximate pictures emerged as
useful. On a shorter length scale it is appropriate to consider a
molecular picture in which the membrane interior consists of partially
ordered chains. On length scales much larger than the average diameter
of a lipid molecule, a very useful approximation is to describe
membranes as continuous elastic sheets.
These views of the unperturbed bilayer membrane structure are naturally
reflected in different models for the interaction between inclusions.
Earlier models were more oriented toward a short-range view, where a
perturbation is a local change in lipid ordering. More recently,
continuum-elasticity theories appropriate for large length scales have
dominated in published studies.
The models also depend, of course, on what is assumed to be the
mechanism of the perturbation. There is no universal answer, but the
two most important factors are the shape of the inclusion and the
extent of its hydrophobic surface. The hydrophobic regions of a protein
and the bilayer may match in thickness. If shape of the inclusion is
cylindrical, the perturbation is restricted to short-range local change
in lipid ordering and will be small (Shen et al., 1998 When an inclusion is wedge-shaped and the hydrophobic regions match,
curvature-elastic deformation is dominant and the simpler continuum
model may be applicable. Corresponding to this deformation, the
standard result is that elastic potential energy between two inclusions
decreases with distance d as
d When the extents of the hydrophobic regions of the membrane and
inclusion do not match, the deformation also leads to local stretching
(or shortening) and tilt of the chains. Another normally neglected
factor is that major or minor lipid components of a bilayer may have
their own preferred shapes, described macroscopically through the
concept of spontaneous curvature. All these effects can no longer be
treated in a macroscopic continuum theory, so molecular modeling
becomes indispensable.
May and Ben-Shaul (1999) The ultimate test of a model is prediction of system behavior. The
present work offers examples of protein-protein interaction weakened by
tilt that need to be explored experimentally. More conclusive here is
related recent work by May and Ben-Shaul (1997) An accurate description of a bilayer membrane is more easily
accomplished than a similar description of the aqueous electrolyte at
the membrane or macromolecular surface. It would be very useful to have
molecular expressions of comparable accuracy for the free energy of the
aqueous phase. In the last two years, even this goal has begun to
appear closer with the introduction of ingenious new models for the
hydrophobic part of the free energy of interaction between solutes
(Garde et al., 1996
![]()
ARTICLE
present a model and a
calculation based on all aspects of molecular rearrangement at the
contact between an inclusion and the lipid matrix. The result is a
realistic description with predictive capability and, thus, amenability
to experimental testing.
).
4. But in a very recent complete
investigation, Kim et al. (1998)
find a surprising result: When more
than two proteins are present, simpler pairwise theories are misleading
because nonpairwise attractive forces are strong. For some five or more
proteins, these forces can prevail and lead to the formation of
stable aggregates.
have now presented a realistic model of
lipid- protein interaction, showing that in principle every effect is important and cannot be discarded without a quantitative argument. The starting position is the free energy expression, based on
the understanding of self-assembling phospholipid structures accumulated over the years by many workers including the present authors. The free energy, which is formally a continuum theory, is
expressed through molecular interaction parameters. This combination provides tractable formalism, which leads to valuable results for both
the interaction between inclusions and the phase behavior of
protein-lipid mixtures.
on lipid-DNA
aggregates. The work was performed in a similar spirit, with the
electrostatic part of the free energy described by the Poisson-Boltz-mann equation. The theory has successfully predicted that hexagonally packed complexes of DNA with cationic lipids will be
increasingly stable as spontaneous curvature of the lipid tends to
negative values and bending rigidity is small. Recent experimental work
on cationic liposome-DNA complexes (Koltover et al., 1998
) found that
hexagonal complexes do indeed form in either of two ways: by adding to
liposomes helper lipid-promoting negative curvature (dioleoyl
phosphatidylethanolamine), or by adding cosurfactant-reducing membrane
rigidity (hexanol). In this example biophysical insight is particularly
important because hexagonally packed complexes are very effective as
transfecting vehicles delivering extracellular DNA across the membrane.
). When such a description is fully accomplished,
the art of biophysical prediction will become more useful and prevalent.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication 4 December 1998 and in final form 9 December 1998.
Dr. Marcelja's current address: Department of Applied Mathematics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra 0200 Australia.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
-HII transition.
Biophys. J.
76:751-767[Abstract/Full Text].
Biophys J, February 1999, p. 593-594, Vol. 76, No. 2
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/02/593/02 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Constantin, G. Brotons, A. Jarre, C. Li, and T. Salditt Interaction of Alamethicin Pores in DMPC Bilayers Biophys. J., June 1, 2007; 92(11): 3978 - 3987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |