help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, W. G.

Biophys J, May 2000, p. 2201-2221, Vol. 78, No. 5

The Probability of Quantal Secretion Near a Single Calcium Channel of an Active Zone

M. R. Bennett,* L. Farnell,dagger and W. G. Gibsondagger

 *The Neurobiology Laboratory, Institute for Biomedical Research, Department of Physiology, and  dagger The School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

A Monte Carlo analysis has been made of calcium dynamics and quantal secretion at microdomains in which the calcium reaches very high concentrations over distances of <50 nm from a channel and for which calcium dynamics are dominated by diffusion. The kinetics of calcium ions in microdomains due to either the spontaneous or evoked opening of a calcium channel, both of which are stochastic events, are described in the presence of endogenous fixed and mobile buffers. Fluctuations in the number of calcium ions within 50 nm of a channel are considerable, with the standard deviation about half the mean. Within 10 nm of a channel these numbers of ions can give rise to calcium concentrations of the order of 100 µM. The temporal changes in free calcium and calcium bound to different affinity indicators in the volume of an entire varicosity or bouton following the opening of a single channel are also determined. A Monte Carlo analysis is also presented of how the dynamics of calcium ions at active zones, after the arrival of an action potential and the stochastic opening of a calcium channel, determine the probability of exocytosis from docked vesicles near the channel. The synaptic vesicles in active zones are found docked in a complex with their calcium-sensor associated proteins and a voltage-sensitive calcium channel, forming a secretory unit. The probability of quantal secretion from an isolated secretory unit has been determined for different distances of an open calcium channel from the calcium sensor within an individual unit: a threefold decrease in the probability of secretion of a quantum occurs with a doubling of the distance from 25 to 50 nm. The Monte Carlo analysis also shows that the probability of secretion of a quantum is most sensitive to the size of the single-channel current compared with its sensitivity to either the binding rates of the sites on the calcium-sensor protein or to the number of these sites that must bind a calcium ion to trigger exocytosis of a vesicle.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

The discovery of the synaptic vesicle associated proteins that are involved in exocytosis, such as the SNAP receptors synaptotagmin and synaptobrevin and the soluble N-ethyl maleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein (SNAPs) syntaxin and SNAP 25, have greatly changed the conceptual framework within which quantal transmission can now be considered (Südhof, 1995). Indeed, synaptotagmin may well be the calcium sensor that triggers transmitter release on the arrival of an action potential (Brose et al., 1992). Of particular interest has been the discovery of a tight coupling between the voltage-dependent calcium channel that gates the entry of calcium for triggering exocytosis (whether N-type or P/Q-type) and a complex consisting of syntaxin and synaptotagmin (O'Connor et al., 1993; Yoshida et al., 1992; el Far et al., 1995; Martin-Moutot et al., 1996). The existence of a secretory unit of this kind has important implications for quantal transmission (Bennett, 1996). It is natural to associate a secretory unit with the concept of the "calcium microdomain," the region of high calcium concentration of the order of 100 µM that is calculated to occur within a distance ~25-50 nm from an open calcium channel (Simon and Llinás, 1985; Zucker and Fogelson, 1986). It has been suggested that these are the distances to be expected between the calcium channel and the calcium sensor among the vesicle associated proteins, probably synaptotagmin, although there is no direct evidence for these conjectures at this time (Yoshikami et al., 1989; Stanley, 1993).

There is evidence that secretory units significantly increase the efficiency of transmission at some synapses. Only one calcium channel need open in the avian ciliary ganglion terminal for a quantum of transmitter to be released, indicating that the calcium within a single microdomain is sufficient to trigger secretion (Stanley, 1993). Uncoupling the connection of domains II and III of the alpha I subunit of the N-type channel with syntaxin/SNAP 25 in the secretory unit leads to fragmentation of the units in motor nerve terminals, with a consequent 25% drop in evoked quantal release (Rettig et al., 1997). In addition, the observation that relatively slow calcium chelators such as ethylene glucol-bis(beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) do not affect transmission at motor nerve terminals, whereas a fast chelator such as 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester (BAPTA) does (Robataille et al., 1993), suggests that it is the high and relatively fast calcium transient in the microdomains that is responsible for triggering exocytosis in motor nerve terminals. Furthermore, the results of voltage clamp studies of transmitter release in the stellate ganglion of the squid indicate that single nonoverlapping calcium microdomains exist in the terminals, presumably within secretory units (Augustine et al., 1991). It would seem, then, that the calcium in microdomains of secretory units in both preganglionic and motor nerve terminals is dominant for triggering secretion. The importance attached to calcium in microdomains has prompted the present study.

A Monte Carlo description is given of the spatial distribution of calcium ions after they move out of an open channel and bind to the fixed and mobile buffers in region of domains after the opening of the channel. Calculations are given for channels having the properties of N-type calcium channels and opening spontaneously or under an action potential. These results are compared with the solutions of the transport equations that describe the buffered diffusion of calcium in the presence of rapid stationary and mobile calcium buffers (Wagner and Keizer, 1994). They are also compared with two approximations to the solutions, namely the rapid buffering approximation (Wagner and Keizer, 1994; Smith et al., 1996; Smith, 1996) and the linearized steady-state approximation (Neher, 1986; Pape et al., 1995; Naraghi and Neher, 1997). In addition, an analysis is given of the calcium changes in the volume of a varicosity or bouton in the presence of an indicator consequent on the opening of a single calcium channel, either spontaneously or under an action potential, and these results compared with those obtained from calculations that use deterministic equations to describe calcium movements in terminals (Sinha et al., 1997). Finally, the most appropriate set of parameters arrived at for the description of calcium dynamics in a microdomain is used in a Monte Carlo analysis of the probability of quantal release from vesicles. These are arranged in different spatial arrays about a channel and open either spontaneously or under an action potential.

A subsequent paper (Bennett et al., 2000) gives a Monte Carlo analysis of the probability of quantal release for the case where many secretory units are present at a nerve terminal and a number of their associated calcium channels open upon the arrival of a nerve impulse.

    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

In this section we outline the theory of calcium diffusion and buffering in a three-dimensional space, and then describe how this system can be simulated numerically using a Monte Carlo approach. The use of Monte Carlo methods in the context of transmitter release, diffusion, and binding was pioneered by Bartol et al. (1991) and subsequently applied in a number of related studies (Faber et al., 1992; Bennett et al., 1995b,c, 1996, 1997b, 1998). The following adapts the method to the case of calcium entering via a single channel, then diffusing and interacting with both fixed and mobile buffers, and binding to vesicle associated proteins. The region considered is a cubical box with 1-µm sides (Fig. 1). The plasmalemma is represented by the 1 µm × 1 µm base, lying in the xy plane, and calcium ions enter via a channel situated at the center of this plane. The other sides of the box represent the membrane walls of the terminal, and all six sides can contain calcium pumps that are incorporated into the Monte Carlo scheme as described below.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   The Monte Carlo simulation uses a cubic box with 1-µm side length. The plasmalemma is represented by the 1 µm × 1 µm base; calcium ions enter via a channel situated in the center of the base. Calcium pumps are situated on all six walls of the box.

The Monte Carlo simulation method is an alternative to solving the reaction-diffusion equations, which are deterministic differential equations giving the temporal and spatial dependence of the average concentrations of the free calcium and of the various buffer complexes that may be present. A detailed comparison between the differential equation and the Monte Carlo approaches for the case of transmitter diffusion and binding has been given by Bartol et al. (1991) and many of the same arguments apply in the present case. In particular, the Monte Carlo approach is closer to the physical situation in that it gives some indication of the size of the stochastic fluctuations that are likely to occur. These can be very significant in the neighborhood of an open channel, where although the average calcium concentration can reach the order of 100 µM, this relatively high concentration is due to the presence of only a few calcium ions in a small volume. (In fact, for a concentration of 100 µM a cubic box with 100-nm sides would contain only ~60 ions.)

Calcium channels

Calcium channels in the plasmalemma can undergo either spontaneous or evoked opening. In the spontaneous case, a channel opens for a certain time T and during this time admits a constant current ic; thus the input calcium current is a rectangular pulse. If the channel is assumed to have only two states, open and closed, then T is exponentially distributed (Bennett et al., 1995c, 1997a); that is, it has the density function
f<SUB>T</SUB>(t)=&agr;e<SUP><UP>−&agr;t</UP></SUP>, t>0 (1)
where alpha  is a constant. Thus T has mean and standard deviation equal to 1/alpha .

For the case of evoked release under an action potential, calcium channels open at different times for different durations, with therefore different driving forces on the calcium entry through the channels. A quantitative description of this has been given in the case of N-type calcium channels (Bennett et al., 1997a; see especially Fig. 4 in that paper). There, the way in which a single channel opens under a Hodgkin-Huxley action potential was investigated in detail with the opening and closing times, topen and tclose, being modeled as nonhomogeneous Poisson processes with rate parameters that depend on the action potential, and hence are functions of time (compare Clay and DeFelice, 1983). The single-channel calcium current, ic(t), was also expressed as a function of the potential. The total charge q that enters through a single channel during the course of an action potential can be found as
q=<LIM><OP>∫</OP></LIM>i<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>(t)g(t)dt=<LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL><UP>t<SUB>open</SUB></UP></LL><UL><UP>t</UP><SUB><UP>close</UP></SUB></UL></LIM>i<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>(t)dt, (2)
where g(t) is 1 if the channel is open and 0 otherwise; the second expression follows upon the assumption that a given channel opens at most once during the course of a single action potential. (Simulations showed that multiple openings were rare: Bennett et al., 1997a.)

Differential equations for calcium diffusion and buffering

The conventional way to characterize calcium diffusion and buffering is via differential equations that describe the spatial and temporal evolution of the various ionic and molecular species present. The buffering is assumed to be governed by the reaction
<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>+<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>, (3)
where Ca2+ represents free calcium ions, Bi represents unbound buffer molecules, and CaBi represents calcium bound to buffer; i = f for fixed buffer and i = m for mobile buffer. The system is then governed by the equations (see, for example, Wagner and Keizer, 1994; Naraghi and Neher, 1997):
<FR><NU>∂[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUB><UP>Ca</UP></SUB>∇<SUP>2</SUP>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]−k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]+k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>] (4)

−k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]+k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]+&sfgr;(t)&dgr;(r),

 <FR><NU>∂[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUB><UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB></SUB>∇<SUP>2</SUP>[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]−k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]+k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>], (5)

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUB><UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB></SUB>∇<SUP>2</SUP>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]+k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]−k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>], (6)

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]+k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>], (7)

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]−k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>], (8)
where sigma (t) is the calcium source density, assumed to be at the origin [delta (r) is a Dirac delta function] and Dalpha are the various diffusion coefficients. These equations can be solved directly, using suitable numerical techniques (see, for example, Smith et al., 1996). Also, a number of approximations have been developed. One of these, the rapid buffering approximation (Wagner and Keizer, 1994; Smith et al., 1996; Smith, 1996) utilizes the fact that the buffering kinetics act on a time scale that is much faster than the time scale for diffusion (see Appendix A), leading to the conclusion that the reaction described by Eq. 3 rapidly attains equilibrium, so that
[<UP>CaB</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>]=<FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>][<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</DE></FR>, (9)
where [Bi]T = [Bi] + [CaBi] is the total buffer concentration and Ki = ki-/ki+ is the dissociation constant for buffer i. Use of this approximation enables the set of Eqs. 4-8 to be replaced by a single differential equation describing the transport of calcium (Wagner and Keizer, 1994) and this has advantages for numerical solution (Smith et al., 1996) and for mathematical analysis (Smith, 1996).

A second approximation, valid for small calcium entry in the presence of a large concentration of mobile buffer, is the linearized steady-state approximation first given by Neher for the case where [Bm] and [CaBm] are assumed constant (Neher, 1986) and later generalized to include the diffusion of Bm (Stern, 1992; Pape et al., 1995; Naraghi and Neher, 1997). This approximation gives the leading term in a perturbation expansion, the unperturbed state being the equilibrium state before calcium entry influx. It leads to the steady state calcium concentration being given by (Pape et al., 1995; Naraghi and Neher, 1997)
[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]=c<SUB>0</SUB>+<FR><NU>&sfgr;</NU><DE>2&pgr;D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> e<SUP><UP>−r/&lgr;</UP></SUP>+<FR><NU>&sfgr;</NU><DE>2&pgr;D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU>&lgr;<SUP>2</SUP></NU><DE>&lgr;<SUP><UP>2</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> (1−e<SUP><UP>−r/&lgr;</UP></SUP>), (10)
where c0 triple-bond  [Ca2+]0 is the background calcium level, sigma  is the constant source density, assumed to be into a hemisphere, lambda  is a space constant given by 1/lambda 2 = 1/lambda c2 + 1/lambda m2 where lambda c = <RAD><RCD><IT>D</IT><SUB>c</SUB>/<IT>k</IT><SUB>m</SUB><SUP>+</SUP>[B<SUB>m</SUB>]<SUB>0</SUB></RCD></RAD> is the characteristic length for binding of diffusing calcium, and lambda m = <RAD><RCD><IT>D</IT><SUB>m</SUB>/<IT>(k</IT><SUB>m</SUB><SUP>+</SUP><IT>c<SUB>0</SUB> + k<SUB>−</SUB>)</IT></RCD></RAD> is the corresponding quantity for the mobile buffer (Dc triple-bond  DCa, Dm triple-bond  DBm). If lambda c lambda m, the last term in Eq. 10 can be neglected and lambda  can be replaced by lambda c in the second term, which recovers the earlier expression of Neher (1986).

Monte Carlo method

The following sections give details of the Monte Carlo simulation scheme. This is implemented via a computer program written in Fortran and run on a Digital Alpha workstation. The pseudo-code used is given in Appendix B.

Diffusion of calcium

In the Monte Carlo method, the motion of each individual calcium ion is followed as it diffuses inside the terminal. The motion is not followed at the level of the actual Brownian motion but at a coarser level, using a timestep Delta t (of the order of 1 µs) during which the ion is assumed to move in a straight line. The distance travelled is a random variable that depends on Delta t and on the diffusion coefficient Dc triple-bond  DCa.

The equation for unrestricted diffusion in three-dimensional space is
<FR><NU>∂c</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>∇<SUP>2</SUP>c=D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB><FENCE><FR><NU>∂<SUP>2</SUP>c</NU><DE>∂x<SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR>+<FR><NU>∂<SUP>2</SUP>c</NU><DE>∂y<SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR>+<FR><NU>∂<SUP>2</SUP>c</NU><DE>∂z<SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR></FENCE>, (11)
where c triple-bond  c(x, y, z, t) is the density of the diffusing particles at point (x, y, z) at time t. From this, it follows that if a particle starts from the origin at time t = 0 and reaches the point (X, Y, Z) at time t, then each Cartesian coordinate X, Y, Z is an identically distributed Gaussian random variable with density function
f<SUB><UP>W</UP></SUB>(w, t)=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE><RAD><RCD>4&pgr;D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>t</RCD></RAD></DE></FR> e<SUP><UP>−w<SUP>2</SUP>/4D<SUB>c</SUB>t</UP></SUP>, (12)
where W = X, Y or Z and w = x, y, or z, respectively. The average distance travelled parallel to any coordinate axis in time t is E(|W|) = 2<RAD><RCD><IT>D</IT><SUB>c</SUB><IT>t/&pgr;</IT></RCD></RAD>, so in time Delta t the average increment in any coordinate is
<A><AC>L</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>=<RAD><RCD>4D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t/&pgr;</RCD></RAD>. (13)
The actual increment L = |W| in each coordinate can be found by generating random numbers using the distribution in Eq. 12. It is convenient to relate this to the random variable U, uniformly distributed on (0, 1), by L = <RAD><RCD><IT>4D</IT><SUB>c</SUB><IT>&Dgr;t</IT></RCD></RAD> erf-1(U), where erf-1 is the inverse error function. A practical formula, based on dividing the distribution into 100 bins of equal probability, is (Bartol et al., 1991)
L=<RAD><RCD>4D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t</RCD></RAD> <UP>erf</UP><SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP>((j−0.5)/100), (14)
where j takes integer values uniformly distributed on [1, 100]. This method has been used in the calculations presented here. For species other than free calcium, Dc is to be replaced by the appropriate diffusion coefficient in the above formulas.

For the single calcium channel considered here, calcium entry is assumed to take place at the origin into the half-space z > 0; the number of Ca2+ entering during each timestep Delta t can be calculated from the single-channel current ic using the fact that a calcium current of 1 pA corresponds to ~3120 Ca2+/ms. In each time interval Delta t the x, y, and z coordinates of each calcium ion in the system are updated by adding ±L to each coordinate where + or - is chosen at random (with equal probability), and the values for L are generated as described above. That is, in the time interval Delta t the ion moves, in a straight line, from position (x, y, z) to position (x + Delta x, y + Delta y, z + Delta z), where the increments Delta x, Delta y, and Delta z are chosen from the distribution with density function (Eq. 12). The major part of the calculation is now bookkeeping: at the end of each timestep the current coordinates of each calcium ion are recorded and then used as the initial conditions for the next step. The simplest case is when the ion remains inside the terminal during the timestep so the new coordinates can be immediately recorded. If the ion's displacement during Delta t is such that it would cross a wall of the terminal, then it is assumed to undergo specular reflection; that is, the motion parallel to the wall is unchanged but the component perpendicular to the wall is reversed. Other possibilities concern the interaction with buffers and indicators, the effect of ionic pumps in the terminal walls, and the binding of calcium ions to vesicle-associated proteins at the plasmalemma. The incorporation of each of these effects into the Monte Carlo scheme is described below.

It should be mentioned that although background calcium of concentration c0 = [Ca2+]0 is present throughout the system, it is not explicitly included in the Monte Carlo calculation, which involves only excess calcium. Thus, the calculations involve [Ca2+]excess given by
[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB>=[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>actual</UP></SUB>−c<SUB>0</SUB> (15)
where [Ca2+]actual is the actual concentration. Allowance for this use of excess calcium is made when required, as described in the sections below.

Fixed buffer

The fixed buffer is taken to be distributed uniformly with density [Bf]T throughout the volume under consideration. The calcium ions bind reversibly to the buffer molecules according to Eq. 3 with i = f. Some of the initial fixed buffer molecules bind to the background calcium present in the terminal; using the steady-state form of Eq. 7 with [Ca2+] = c0 and [Bf] = [Bf]excess, where [Bf]excess is the residual fixed buffer concentration, gives -kf+c0[Bf]excess + kf-[CaBf] = 0. But [Bf]excess = [Bf]T - [CaBf], leading to
[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>K<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>+c<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR>, (16)
where Kf = kf-/kf+. (For the values of Kf and c0 given in Table 1 below, [Bf]excess is ~99% of [Bf]T.) In order to incorporate the fixed buffer into the Monte Carlo scheme, we first divide the total volume into equal cubes of volume Delta V such that each cube contains one buffer molecule and the overall density is [Bf]T = 1/Delta V. A number of these molecules, chosen at random, are assumed to be bound to background calcium so that the remaining unbound buffer molecules have density [Bf]excess, as given by Eq. 16. The background bound buffer molecules are assumed to remain bound and so effectively no longer enter into the computation; in addition, as discussed above under calcium diffusion, only excess calcium ions are considered in the Monte Carlo simulation. It is estimated that the total error introduced by this joint approximation is <1% for the parameters used in the calculations reported here (see Appendix A). At each timestep Delta t suppose that a calcium ion in a cube containing an unbound buffer molecule binds to that molecule with probability p+. Then the average number of bindings in time Delta t in that cube will be [Ca2+]excessDelta V p+; but from Eq. 3 this average is also given by kf+[Ca2+]excessDelta t, leading to an expression for the binding probability p+ in terms of the forward binding rate kf+:
p<SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>=k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>[B<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t. (17)
It is assumed that unbinding is a Poisson process with rate constant kf-, so the bound buffer molecules unbind in timestep Delta t with probability p- given by Bartol et al., 1991
p<SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>=1−<UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t)≈k<SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t. (18)
(For the parameter values given in Table 1, p+ approx  0.11 and p- approx  0.004.)


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1   Values of the parameters used in the numerical calculations

Mobile buffer

The mobile buffer is taken to be initially distributed uniformly throughout the volume under consideration with density [Bm]T. The calcium ions bind reversibly to the buffer molecules according to Eq. 3 with i = m. The principal difference to the fixed buffer case is that now, as well as the calcium ions diffusing, both the buffer molecules Bm and the bound molecules CaBm diffuse. Theoretically, the Monte Carlo scheme could be modified to keep track of all these species, but this would both slow the calculation and the additional bookkeeping needed would limit the size of system that could be simulated. Therefore, an approximate scheme has been implemented based on dividing the space into equal cubic cells that each contain the same number of mobile buffer molecules. Again, an adjustment must be made for binding to the background calcium, and this reduces the initial density from [Bm]T to [Bm]excess given by (cf. Eq. 16)
[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+c<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR>. (19)
(See Appendix A for a discussion of the accuracy of this approximation.) It is now assumed that binding probabilities are uniform over each cubic cell and proportional to the number of unbound mobile buffer molecules in that cell. A crucial further assumption is that both unbound (Bm) and bound (CaBm) molecules diffuse at the same rate, so that the total buffer concentration ([Bm] + [CaBm]) remains uniform throughout the whole volume, and hence the average number of unbound plus bound buffer molecules in each cell remains constant. (The assumption that both the free and the complexed form of a buffer species have the same diffusion coefficient is also made by Klingauf and Neher, 1997.) If fluctuations about this average are neglected, then it is sufficient to track the bound molecules (CaBm), updating their positions at each timestep using increments from the distribution (Eq. 12), but with Dc replaced by DBm. Each time the count of CaBm molecules within a cell changes (by binding, unbinding, or diffusion of CaBm from one cell to another) the population of that cell is recomputed, so that ([Bm] + [CaBm]) remains constant. In this way, it is not necessary to explicitly follow the diffusion of the unbound buffer molecules Bm. The binding probabilities are immediately adjusted when the cell population changes, and this may occur several times in the same timestep. For a given cell, this probability is (compare Eq. 17)
p<SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>=&lgr;k<SUP><UP>+</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>[<UP>B</UP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t, (20)
where lambda  is the ratio of unbound to total mobile buffer molecules in that cell. The unbinding probability is again given by Eq. 18. This method of handling the mobile buffer involves little more bookkeeping than was required for the calcium alone, the main addition being a table of cell populations. (The good agreement obtained between the Monte Carlo calculations and calculations based on the differential equation approach, see Fig. 5 below, indicates that this approximation is justified.)

This approximate treatment of the mobile buffer does lead to some small inaccuracies, particularly in [CaBm]. If the cubic cells are made too large, then the assumption of uniform binding probabilities in each cell is not valid; however, making the cells too small encounters the problem that each cell must contain an integral number of molecules. Thus a compromise must be found; in the calculations reported here, the cubes have sides of ~50 nm and each contains about seven buffer molecules. Calculations are also performed using the indicators fura-2 and furaptra; these are treated in the same way as the mobile buffer, using the appropriate diffusion and binding rates (see Table 1).

Calcium pumps

At the plasmalemma and at any other terminal boundary the diffusing molecules are mirror-reflected as described above (unless they bind to vesicles or pumps, as described below). In a number of calculations, a cubic box with 1-µm sides is used to represent the terminal, and all its sides are reflecting walls. In other calculations, where only effects near the plasmalemma are being considered, the volume considered is a cube with 1-µm sides, but only the side representing the plasmalemma is a reflecting wall; the other sides are transparent, and once a molecule passes through them it is lost and no longer included in the bookkeeping.

Calcium pumps occur both in the plasmalemma and in the other walls of the terminal. The pumping is represented as a "tunneling" process in which the cytoplasmic calcium ion first binds (irreversibly) to the pump, and then upon unbinding is ejected from the terminal:
(<UP>Ca</UP>)<SUB><UP>cyt</UP></SUB>+P <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL><SUB>k<SUB>1</SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> CaP <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL><SUB>k<SUB>2</SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> (<UP>Ca</UP>)<SUB><UP>ext</UP></SUB>+P. (21)
This process must now be incorporated into the Monte Carlo scheme. Following Bartol et al.'s treatment of receptor and of esterase binding, it is assumed that the membrane walls are "tiled" with squares of side length 1/<RAD><RCD>&sfgr;<SUB>P</SUB></RCD></RAD>, where sigma P is the pump density and that each square contains one pump. To bind to an available pump a calcium ion must first hit the square containing that pump; this will be determined by the line joining its position at the beginning and at the end of the interval Delta t. Assuming that it hits, it will then bind with a probability p+, which is related to the corresponding binding rate k1 by (cf. Bartol et al., 1991, Eq. 6a)
p<SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>=k<SUB>1</SUB>&sfgr;<SUB><UP>P</UP></SUB><RAD><RCD><FR><NU>&pgr;&Dgr;t</NU><DE>D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB></DE></FR></RCD></RAD>. (22)
If the ion fails to bind, or if it hits a square where the pump molecule is already bound, then it undergoes specular reflection, as described above. The unbinding probability per timestep does not depend on the calcium diffusion and is simply given by
p<SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>=1−<UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>k<SUB>2</SUB>&Dgr;t)≈k<SUB>2</SUB>&Dgr;t. (23)
The rate coefficients k1 and k2 are not directly measurable. To get estimates it is necessary to relate them to the usual parameters describing lumped calcium extrusion through a plasma membrane. The standard expression for the flux due to pumping is -VP[Ca2+]actual/(KP + [Ca2+]actual), where VP and KP are constants (Sala and Hernandez-Cruz, 1990; Kargacin and Fay, 1991; Nowycky and Pinter, 1993). If we assume that there is also a constant inward leak that just balances the pump at the resting calcium level c0, then [Ca2+]excess satisfies
<FR><NU>d[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP><FR><NU><A><AC>V</AC><AC>ˆ</AC></A><SUB><UP>P</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB></NU><DE>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB>+<A><AC>K</AC><AC>ˆ</AC></A><SUB><UP>P</UP></SUB></DE></FR>, (24)
where &Vcirc;P = VPKP/(KP + c0) and &Kcirc;P = KP + c0. This can be related to the Monte Carlo scheme by applying the Michaelis-Menten approximation to Eq. 21 (e.g., Murray, 1993), leading to the following expression for the rate of calcium extrusion:
<FR><NU>d[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP><FR><NU>k<SUB>2</SUB>&sfgr;<SUB><UP>P</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB></NU><DE>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>excess</UP></SUB>+k<SUB>2</SUB>/k<SUB>1</SUB></DE></FR>, (25)
where [Ca2+]excess is the excess calcium concentration inside the terminal, defined by Eq. 15. Comparing Eq. 25 with Eq. 24 gives k2 = &Vcirc;P/sigma P and k1 = k2/&Kcirc;P. Note that in the above way of assigning parameter values the pump density, sigma P, is, within reasonable limits, an arbitrary parameter. Once sigma P has been given a value, k1 and k2 are then chosen to give the desired pumping rate.

Vesicles and exocytosis

The standard assumption will be that calcium ions bind to the vesicle-associated proteins according to the scheme (Heidelberger et al., 1994; Heinemann et al., 1994)
S<SUB>0</SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>&ngr;<SUB>1</SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>4&mgr;<SUB>1</SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> S<SUB>1</SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>2&ngr;<SUB>2</SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>3&mgr;<SUB>2</SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> S<SUB>2</SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>3&ngr;<SUB>3</SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>2&mgr;<SUB>3</SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> S<SUB>3</SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>4&ngr;<SUB>4</SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>&mgr;<SUB>4</SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> S<SUB>4</SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL><SUB>&bgr;</SUB></UL></LIM> S<SUB><UP>ex</UP></SUB>, (26)
where Si, i = 1, ..., 4 denotes the state with i sites occupied, Sex denotes the state with four sites occupied after the conformational change, µi(t) (nu i(t)) are the rates of attachment (detachment) of a calcium ion at the ith step, and beta (t) is the rate for the final step. These attachment rates µi are taken to be proportional to the excess calcium concentration at the position of the vesicle-associated protein, and the detachment rates nu i are taken to be constants, independent of time:
&mgr;<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>=k<SUP><UP>a</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>c(r, t); &ngr;<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>=k<SUP><UP>d</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>; i=1,…, 4, (27)
and the conformational change rate beta  is taken to be a time-independent constant. A further simplification is to assume no cooperativity in binding or unbinding, in which case kia = ka and kid = kd, i = 1, ... , 4. The above single-affinity scheme for the binding of calcium to the vesicle-associated proteins has been used to describe calcium-dependent exocytosis at synapses formed by goldfish retinal bipolar cells (Heidelberger et al., 1994) and bovine chromaffin cells (Heinemann et al., 1994). A more complex scheme may be used in which the binding sites have different affinities, although an investigation of such kinetics indicates that the results obtained for the probability of secretion are not much different from those for the single-affinity case (see Fig. 7 in Bennett et al., 1997a).

To incorporate this into the Monte Carlo scheme, we again follow Bartol et al.'s treatment of receptor binding and assume that the plasmalemma is "tiled" with squares whose size is determined by the geometric placement and the density of the vesicle array being modeled. The vesicle binding site is represented as a disk of radius rV placed at the center of selected tiles. To bind, a calcium ion must first hit the disk [which will be determined by whether its free path during the interval Delta t would pass through the tile, this path being the straight line from point (x, y, z) to point (x + Delta x, y + Delta y, z + Delta z)]; it will then bind with probability p+, which is related to the corresponding forward binding rate k+ by (compare Eq. 22):
p<SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB></NU><DE>a<SUB><UP>V</UP></SUB></DE></FR> <RAD><RCD><FR><NU>&pgr;&Dgr;t</NU><DE>D<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB></DE></FR></RCD></RAD>, (28)
where aV = pi rV2 is the area of the vesicle disk. If it does not bind it is reflected in the usual way. The binding probabilities change according to how many calcium ions are already bound; for the binding of the ith calcium ion, where i = 1, ... , 4, p+ is given by Eq. 28 with k+ = (5 - i)ka.

The unbinding per timestep does not depend on the calcium concentration and is given by (cf. Eq. 18)
p<SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>=1−e<SUP><UP>−k_&Dgr;t</UP></SUP>≈k<SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>&Dgr;t, (29)
where k- = ikd, i = 1, ... , 4 is the relevant rate constant. The conformation change is treated using a similar formula.

Other schemes have also been proposed with different Ca2+ stoichiometries, requiring the binding of either three or two Ca2+ before the final conformational change leading to exocytosis (Heinemann et al., 1993; 1994). These will be used as a comparison with the four-binding case given by Eq. 26.

Parameter choice

The main parameter values used in the calculations are listed in Table 1. Some comments on these choices can be found in the Discussion section.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

The Monte Carlo results are divided into two main sections. The first of these is concerned with establishing the calcium transients that occur immediately about a single open N-type calcium channel; in addition, the transients of free calcium and of indicator calcium in the volume of a varicosity or bouton are considered. The second section is concerned with using the information provided by the previous section to establish how a calcium transient at a secretory unit triggers vesicle exocytosis following an action potential, when these vesicles are arranged in different configurations with respect to the channel.

In all cases the terminal contains a mobile buffer with the characteristics of calmodulin and a fixed buffer with the characteristics of calbindin (see Table 1). In addition, a calcium indicator is sometimes present, which is either furaptra, representative of a low-affinity indicator, or fura-2, representative of a high-affinity indicator. Unless otherwise mentioned, all values of free calcium and of calcium bound to the various buffers are the means of at least five trials, where each trial is a Monte Carlo simulation using the same parameters and initial conditions, but different random numbers. If standard deviations are also given, then at least 10 trials were used. (The expression <RAD><RCD>∑<SUB>i</SUB><IT>(X</IT><SUB>i</SUB> − <IT><A><AC>X</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>)/n</IT></RCD></RAD> is used for the standard deviation; the alternative expression involving n - 1 in place of n will give values differing by at most 5%, and this difference would be undetectable on the graphs.)

Calcium microdomains

Spontaneous opening

The properties of N-type calcium channels indicate that at the resting potential the average open time of a channel is 0.2 ms and passes a current of ~2 pA (Bennett et al., 1997a). However, it is the longer and much less frequent open times of ~0.8 ms that are likely to have a major effect on triggering exocytosis. Monte Carlo simulations have been performed to obtain the concentration profile of calcium about a single spontaneously opening N-type calcium channel with each of these sets of characteristics. The Monte Carlo scheme gives the coordinates of each calcium ion, free or bound, at each time step, and these can be converted to concentrations using appropriate binning. To show the change of concentration with distance from the release site the bins were chosen to be hemispherical shells of radius r and thickness Delta r (=20 µm); at a given time the numbers of each species of particle in a shell (r, r + Delta r) are counted and then converted to a number density by dividing by the shell volume 2pi rDelta r, and finally to a concentration using the fact that 1 µM corresponds to ~600 molecules per µm3. The results are shown in Fig. 2, A and B in normal coordinates and in Fig. 2, C and D using logarithmic ordinates. At the end of the 0.2-ms open time of the channel there is a high concentration of calcium bound to the fixed buffer in the immediate vicinity of the channel, about 327 µM, which decays approximately biexponentially with length constants of ~144 nm over the first 100 nm and then 33 nm over the next 200 nm (Fig. 2, Ac and Cc). In contrast, there is a much smaller amount of calcium bound to the mobile buffer near the channel, ~100 µM, which also decays away biexponentially with length constants of ~88 nm and then 38 nm (Fig. 2, Ab and Cb). These effects of the fixed and free buffer ensure a relatively steep gradient of free calcium near the channel that falls off from a concentration of 277 µM within 10 nm of the channel with a length constant of ~33 nm (Fig. 2, Aa and Ca). Similar results are found for the case in which the channel opens for longer times, such as 0.8 ms (Fig. 2, B and D). The main difference is that the buffers retain more calcium for greater distances from the channel than in the shorter opening time case (compare Fig. 2 Ab with 2 Bb and 2 Ac with 2 Bc). Even so, the slope of the free calcium at 30 nm from the channel remains steeper for the former case (compare Fig. 2 Aa with 2 Ba). However, the free calcium concentration within 10-20 nm of the channel is about the same at the end of the shorter opening time and the longer opening time, because in the latter case there has been sufficient time for the endogenous buffers to exert considerable effect on the free calcium at this distance. The standard deviations in the extent of free calcium ~30 nm from the channels are very large, and amount to about half the mean (Fig. 2, Aa and Ba). Thus, even for a nonstochastically opening channel, there will be large fluctuations in the calcium concentration at distances from the channel mouth at which calcium-sensor proteins for exocytosis are expected to be found.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   The mean and standard deviation of the spatial calcium concentration profile near a single spontaneously opening channel at the end of the open time of the channel. The channel opens deterministically and admits a constant current. The calculations are performed using the Monte Carlo scheme, which gives the position of each calcium ion at each time step; these positions are converted to densities using hemispherical bins of 20-nm thickness. (A) Results for the average open time of an N-type channel of 0.2 ms (see Fig. 5 A in Bennett et al., 1995a) with a current of 2 pA; the time course of this current is shown as an inset in Aa. (B) Results for a relatively long open time of 0.8 ms and current of 2 pA; the time course is shown as an inset in Ba. In each case, panels a-c give the concentrations of free calcium ([Ca2+]), of calcium bound to the mobile buffer ([CaBm]), and the calcium bound to the fixed buffer ([CaBf]), respectively. (C) and (D) show the corresponding results using log ordinates. The parameters used in the calculations are given in Table 1. In each graph, the heavy line shows the mean concentration (in µM) and the thin lines show one standard deviation away from the mean; these are the result of 10 Monte Carlo simulations, each run starting from the same initial conditions with the same calcium influx (but using different random numbers).

Evoked opening

For the case of evoked opening the total charge that enters through a single channel is given by Eq. 2. A histogram showing the results of 5000 simulations of a single channel under a Hodgkin-Huxley action potential is given in Fig. 3. The charge turns out to be approximately exponentially distributed; as calculated from the simulation results, it has mean 0.52 pA · ms (=0.52 × 10-15 Coulombs) and standard deviation 0.50 pA · ms. (That the charge should be exponentially distributed is not obvious. For the spontaneous case, the charge through a single channel is indeed exponentially distributed, but this is a direct consequence of the exponentially distributed channel open time and the constant current through it: see Fig. 5 A in Bennett et al., 1995a. For the evoked case, there is a complicated interplay between open time, which is not exponentially distributed, and nonconstant single channel current.) The mean open duration for an N-type calcium channel under an action potential is 0.84 ms (see Fig. 4 B in Bennett et al., 1997a); given that the average charge is 0.52 pA · ms, then the average current is 0.62 pA. However, as in the spontaneous case, it is the longer and less frequent open times that are likely to be important in triggering exocytosis, so consideration has also been given to an open time of 1.0 ms and a charge of 1.5 pA · ms, giving an average current of 1.5 pA.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   Frequency distribution of the total calcium charge that passes through a single N-type channel when it opens under an action potential. The total charge that enters during a single action potential is found using Eq. 2, where the opening and closing times, topen and tclose, and the single-channel current, ic(t), are calculated as in Bennett et al. (1997a). The histogram shows the frequency of occasions during five thousand action potentials at which a particular charge (pA · ms) is passed by the channel. (1 pA · ms = 10-15 Coulombs and corresponds to the charge on 3120 calcium ions.) The histogram is well-fitted by an exponential distribution with mean 0.52 and standard deviation 0.50 pA · ms.

The free calcium about a channel opening under an action potential with these two sets of characteristics (namely 0.62 pA for 0.84 ms and 1.5 pA for 1.0 ms) have therefore been computed using Monte Carlo simulation. Fig. 4 shows that the longer duration opening channel has much greater free calcium within 30 nm of the channel (Fig. 4 Ba) than does the shorter duration opening channel (Fig. 4 Aa), because the former passes 4680 calcium ions and the latter only 1625 ions. As in the spontaneous case, the standard deviations in the amount of free calcium near the channels are at least half of the mean (Fig. 4, Aa and Ba), indicating that considerable fluctuations in quantal release from impulse to impulse may be expected on the basis of the fluctuations in the amount of calcium that reaches the calcium sensor proteins for exocytosis.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   As for Fig. 2, except that the single channel now opens under an action potential. (A) Results for the average open time of an N-type channel of 0.84 ms (see Fig. 4 B in Bennett et al., 1997a) with a current of 0.62 pA. (B) Results for a relatively long open time of 1.0 ms and current of 1.5 pA according to the mean charge in Fig. 3.

Rapid buffering and linearized diffusion approximation

Fig. 5 shows the levels of free calcium and of calcium bound to the fixed and mobile buffers as functions of distance from a channel that passes 2 pA of current and opens for 0.8 ms; the profiles are shown at the end of the opening period. The heavy solid lines are the averages of 10 Monte Carlo simulations. (Compare Fig. 2 B, which shows the same results together with standard deviations.) The broken lines come from solving the deterministic differential Eqs. 4-8, which in this case reduce to one spatial dimension because spherical symmetry allows the Laplacian operator to be simplified to nabla 2 = partial 2/partial r2 + (2/r)partial /partial r, where r is the radial coordinate. The method used is basically that given in the Appendix of Smith et al. (1996), except that a fourth-order Runge-Kutta routine is used for the time (Press et al., 1989). Agreement is excellent except for short distances, where the Monte Carlo simulations indicate that large fluctuations occur (see Fig. 2 B for standard deviations). There is also some discrepancy in [CaBm] at distances >100 nm (Fig. 5 B); this can be traced to an inherent limitation in the approximation made in treating the mobile buffer in the Monte Carlo simulation (see the Methods section for a discussion of this).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5   Comparison between the Monte Carlo (MC) calculation of the calcium profile near a single channel opening spontaneously (continuous heavy lines) and the results using the deterministic differential Eqs. 4-8 (dashed lines). Also shown are the results obtained using the rapid buffering approximation (RBA) given by Eq. 9 (dotted lines), and in A the thin continuous line is calculated using the linearized steady-state approximation (LSS) given by Eq. 10. Calculations are for the long open time of an N-type channel of 0.8 ms with a current of 2 pA. A-C give the concentrations of free calcium ([Ca2+]), of calcium bound to the mobile buffer ([CaBm]), and of calcium bound to the fixed buffer ([CaBf]), respectively. The parameters used in the calculations are given in Table 1. Log ordinates.

Also shown (dotted lines) are the results obtained using the rapid buffering approximation (Eq. 9) (Wagner and Keizer, 1994; Smith et al., 1996). Because in the present case the buffer kinetics are fast compared to the diffusion, it is expected that this approximation will be good (see Appendix A), and this is indeed borne out by the results (Fig. 5). Somewhat surprising, however, is that the linearized steady-state approximation (Pape et al., 1995; Naraghi and Neher, 1997), as given by Eq. 10, gives an accurate representation of the free calcium profile at distances <~100 nm (Fig. 5 A, thin continuous line); this approximation is derived under the condition that the mobile buffer is far from saturation, which is not the case here. (See Fig. 5 B; the total mobile buffer concentration is only 100 µM.)

Ca2+ transients of a varicosity or bouton

The question arises as to whether it is possible to detect the changes in calcium concentration in the entire volume of a varicosity or bouton when a calcium channel opens either spontaneously or under an action potential. Monte Carlo calculations have been made of calcium transients for the average open times of both the spontaneous and evoked opening of a calcium channel. The channel is placed in the center of one of the six walls of a cubic volume with 1-µm side (Fig. 1), these being the approximate dimensions of small varicosities and boutons. In this case it is important to allow for the action of calcium pumps, as the only way that calcium ions can be removed from this volume, after being released from the endogenous buffers, is through such a mechanism. To this end we have modeled such pumps so that they may be included in the Monte Carlo simulations and distributed them over all six walls of the cubic volume (see Methods). Fig. 6 A shows the results for the spontaneous opening (0.2 ms and 2 pA), and Fig. 6 B those for the evoked opening (0.84 ms and 0.62 pA), for the case where no indicator is present. In each case, curve a gives the mean and standard deviation of the free calcium, b gives the calcium bound to the fixed buffer, and c gives the calcium bound to the endogenous mobile buffer. As only the number of free calcium ions and those attached to buffer within the 1 µm3 volume are determined, spatial inhomogeneities in the concentration of these throughout the volume during the first few milliseconds after channel closure are not considered. Upon channel closure, there is a rapid decrease in free calcium (over microseconds), as it is bound principally to the fixed buffer (Fig. 6). Thereafter, the decline in free calcium is primarily due to the calcium ions released from the buffers finding the pumps on the walls of the 1 µm3 volume. This free calcium falls to within 1/e of its initial value in ~15 ms (Fig. 6), a time that is mostly governed by the probability that once an ion hits the wall of the volume it will be extruded by a pump.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6   The mean and standard deviation of the calcium concentration in a cubic volume of 1 µm3 about a single channel in a varicosity or bouton. The concentration is averaged over the whole cubic volume. (A) Results for the average spontaneous open time of an N-type channel of 0.2 ms with a current of 2 pA. (B) Results for the average evoked open time of an N-type channel of 0.84 ms with a current of 0.62 pA. In each case, curves a-c give the concentrations of free calcium ([Ca2+]), of calcium bound to the mobile buffer ([CaBm]), and the calcium bound to the fixed buffer ([CaBf]), respectively. In each graph the heavy line shows the mean concentration (in µM) and the thin lines show one standard deviation away from the mean. Log ordinates.

Effect of buffers and indicators on Ca2+

The above calculations have all been made using the standard characteristics of the endogenous buffers given in Table 1. In this section consideration is given to the effects of varying the parameters of the mobile and fixed buffers as well as those of the indicator concentration when furaptra is used as the indicator. The case for which Monte Carlo simulations have been carried out is that of a spontaneously opening channel (0.8 ms and 2 pA), which gives the calcium transients in a varicosity or bouton of volume 1 µm3 shown in Fig. 6. The temporal characteristics of the signal for calcium bound to furaptra, together with the peak free calcium transient, have been calculated in each case.

Fig. 7 shows the results of varying the characteristics of the mobile buffer and indicator on the time at half-peak of [CaBi] (Fig. 7, A and B). A 100-fold increase in [Bm]T produces only a threefold increase in the half-time of the [CaBi] signal (Fig. 7 A); similar increases in km+ or Km of the mobile buffer produce only about a twofold decrease in the half-time of the [CaBi] transient (Fig. 7 A). There is only a very small standard deviation about these mean values, so that they have not been included in the graph. Less than a threefold change occurs in the half-time of the [CaBi] as the result of a 100-fold increase in the values of [Bi]T and its ki+ or Ki values (Fig. 7 B); again there is very little variability associated with these values.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7   The effect of mobile buffer and indicator parameters on the half-time of the transient for calcium bound to the indicator furaptra ([CaBi]), upon the opening of a spontaneous calcium channel (0.8 ms and 2 pA) in a bouton or varicosity of volume 1 µm × 1 µm × 1 µm. Results from Monte Carlo simulations are given for a range of parameter values for mobile buffer (Bm) and for indicator (Bi). (A) The parameter values of the mobile buffer ([Bm]T; Km; km+) were changed while all other parameters were maintained at their standard values (Table 1). (B) The parameter values of the indicator ([Bi]T; Ki; ki+) were changed while all other parameters were maintained at their standard values (Table 1). Calcium pumps were present in the walls of the volume under consideration, as outlined in the Methods section.

Fig. 8 shows the results in the case of varying the characteristics of the fixed buffer and indicator concentration on the time at half-peak of [CaBi] (Fig. 8, A and B). A 10-fold change in the values of [Bf]T and its kf+ can produce very significant changes (of the order of 10-fold), in the half-time of the [CaBi] transient, at the standard values for the Bm buffer and of furaptra given in Table 1; there is only a very small variation about these mean values (Fig. 8 A). There is only a small change in the half-time of the [CaBi] with a 100-fold change in the values of [Bi], with again very little variation associated with these values, [Bf] being kept at its standard value given in Table 1 (Fig. 8 B). These calculations show that the characteristics of the [CaBi] transient are relatively little affected by changes in the parameters of the mobile buffer or the indicator compared with changes in the fixed buffe