help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maravall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Svoboda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maravall, M.
Right arrow Articles by Svoboda, K.

Biophys J, May 2000, p. 2655-2667, Vol. 78, No. 5

Estimating Intracellular Calcium Concentrations and Buffering without Wavelength Ratioing

M. Maravall, Z. F. Mainen, B. L. Sabatini, and K. Svoboda

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724 USA

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

We describe a method for determining intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]) from single-wavelength fluorescence signals. In contrast to previous single-wavelength calibration methods, the proposed method does not require independent estimates of resting [Ca2+] but relies on the measurement of fluorescence close to indicator saturation during an experiment. Consequently, it is well suited to [Ca2+] indicators for which saturation can be achieved under physiological conditions. In addition, the method requires that the indicators have large dynamic ranges. Popular indicators such as Calcium Green-1 or Fluo-3 fulfill these conditions. As a test of the method, we measured [Ca2+] in CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices using Oregon Green BAPTA-1 and 2-photon laser scanning microscopy (BAPTA: 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid). Resting [Ca2+] was 32-59 nM in the proximal apical dendrite. Monitoring action potential-evoked [Ca2+] transients as a function of indicator loading yielded estimates of endogenous buffering capacity (44-80) and peak [Ca2+] changes at zero added buffer (178-312 nM). In young animals (postnatal days 14-17) our results were comparable to previous estimates obtained by ratiometric methods (Helmchen et al., 1996, Biophys. J. 70:1069-1081), and no significant differences were seen in older animals (P24-28). We expect our method to be widely applicable to measurements of [Ca2+] and [Ca2+]-dependent processes in small neuronal compartments, particularly in the many situations that do not permit wavelength ratio imaging.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

The spatial and temporal dynamics of intracellular free calcium ([Ca2+]) are crucial to many aspects of neuronal function. Neuronal excitation produces Ca2+ influx into the cytoplasm, where Ca2+ drives many intracellular signal transduction cascades. In addition, the measurement of [Ca2+] has been used to report on membrane excitation (Regehr et al., 1989; Jaffe et al., 1992; Helmchen et al., 1996; Schiller et al., 1997; Svoboda et al., 1999) and synaptic activation (Muller and Connor, 1991; Murphy et al., 1994; Yuste and Denk, 1995; Denk et al., 1995; Koester and Sakmann, 1998; Mainen et al., 1999b) in small neuronal compartments that are inaccessible to other experimental techniques. Techniques for quantifying [Ca2+] in small structures are therefore of great interest in neurobiology.

The most popular approach to measuring intracellular free [Ca2+] has been ratiometric imaging using the UV-excited [Ca2+] indicator Fura-2 (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985) and its relatives. With this method, [Ca2+] is calculated from a ratio of fluorescences at two excitation wavelengths, R = Flambda 1/Flambda 2. Taking this ratio facilitates quantitative measurement of [Ca2+] by canceling out optical pathlength, excitation intensity, and detector efficiency. The well-known calibration equation (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985) is
<FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FENCE><FR><NU>R−R<SUB><UP>min</UP></SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>−R</DE></FR></FENCE><FENCE><FR><NU>S<SUB><UP>f2</UP></SUB></NU><DE>S<SUB><UP>b2</UP></SUB></DE></FR></FENCE> (1)
where Rmin and Rmax are the ratios at zero and saturating [Ca2+] and Sf2/Sb2 is the ratio of calcium-free over calcium-bound fluorescence intensities at lambda 2. The derivation of [Ca2+] thus depends on four parameters that have to be independently calibrated. Using indicators such as Indo-1 (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985), it is also possible to use emission wavelength ratioing.

Several factors conspire to make ratiometric imaging in small structures difficult, especially in intact tissues. Dual-excitation sources are difficult and expensive to implement in laser scanning microscopy, as in two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) (Denk et al., 1990; Denk and Svoboda, 1997). The small and noisy fluorescence signals measured from small compartments produce even noisier dual-wavelength ratios, making [Ca2+] estimation prone to considerable errors. In addition, with Fura-2, the need to work with UV excitation light is disadvantageous because it is absorbed by living tissue, producing autofluorescence and photodamage.

Visible-light indicators such as the 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA)-based indicators Oregon Green BAPTA-1 (OGB-1), Calcium Green 1 (Haugland, 1996), Fluo-3 (Minta et al., 1989), and their relatives have thus become increasingly popular. Upon binding to Ca2+, these dyes increase their quantum efficiency without a shift in absorption spectra. The ratios of brightnesses of the calcium bound and unbound forms can be very large (>10), providing the large signal-to-noise ratios required for [Ca2+] imaging in small neuronal structures, such as dendritic spines and axon terminals (Murphy et al., 1994; Yuste and Denk, 1995; Koester and Sakmann, 1998; Mainen et al., 1999b; Schiller et al., 1998). These indicators are well suited to 2PLSM imaging in intact tissue (Yuste and Denk, 1995; Koester and Sakmann, 1998; Mainen et al., 1999b) and even in vivo (Svoboda et al., 1997, 1999).

Available visible light indicators do not allow wavelength ratioing (Minta et al., 1989; Tsien and Waggoner, 1995). Instead, signals resulting from [Ca2+] changes (Delta [Ca2+]) are typically expressed as ratios of fluorescence changes over baseline fluorescence, (f - fo)/fo. As with wavelength ratio measurements, (f - fo)/fo is independent of dye concentration, optical path length, excitation intensity, and detector efficiency. However, (f - fo)/fo is a sublinear function of Delta [Ca2+]: large changes in [Ca2+] saturate the indicator (Minta et al., 1989; Tsien and Waggoner, 1995; O'Malley et al., 1999). Additionally, (f - fo)/fo depends on baseline [Ca2+], [Ca2+]0.

A variety of methods have been devised to translate single-wavelength fluorescence into [Ca2+]. For example, Delta [Ca2+] per action potential was estimated in presynaptic terminals in the cerebellum (Regehr and Atluri, 1995) and the frog tectum (Feller et al., 1996). This calibration is based on the fact that each action potential in a train that saturates the Ca2+ indicator contributes the same Delta [Ca2+]. The curve describing the saturation can be used to extract Delta [Ca2+] per action potential. However, this scheme requires assumptions about resting [Ca2+] or separate ratiometric measurements of this quantity. Similar requirements are shared by other methods (Minta et al., 1989; Jaffe et al., 1992; Lev-Ram et al., 1992; O'Malley, 1994; Schiller et al., 1995; Lau et al., 1999). Kao et al. (1989) introduced a variation on this approach that requires the use of Ca2+ ionophores, which is irreversible and impractical in intact tissue. An interesting alternative employed in frog muscle fibers used simultaneous absorption and fluorescence measurements to estimate resting [Ca2+] (Harkins et al., 1993; Kurebayashi et al., 1993). However, absorbance measurements are not practical at the length scale of subneuronal compartments, especially in intact tissue.

We describe an alternative approach that is particularly useful for measurements in small structures and is most easily implemented by using high-affinity indicators with a large dynamic range. It involves the calibration of a smaller number of parameters than previous methods and does not require prior assumptions or calibration of resting [Ca2+]. Moreover, it naturally yields estimates of resting [Ca2+] in addition to estimates of Delta [Ca2+]. The key parameter that needs to be determined as part of an experiment is the fluorescence at saturating [Ca2+]. The method also relies on estimates of the dynamic range and dissociation constant of the indicator; these are properties of the indicator and need not be repeated for every experiment. We introduce a practical procedure for evaluating these parameters under physiologically reasonable conditions with high-affinity, large dynamic range indicators such as OGB-1. We also discuss how the resulting estimates of [Ca2+] are robust in the face of small errors in parameter calibration (Appendix B). The method provides a practical way to measure absolute resting [Ca2+] and [Ca2+] transient amplitudes in CA1 pyramidal neurons, as well as to compute Ca2+ buffering capacity in these neurons.

    THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLUORESCENCE AND [Ca2+]
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

The relationship between single-wavelength fluorescence and [Ca2+] (Tsien, 1989) is straightforward to compute when Ca2+ is in equilibrium with an indicator (>2 ms; Sabatini and Regehr, 1998). The relationship between free [Ca2+] and the concentration of Ca2+ bound to the fluorophore, [FCa], is given by the law of mass action:
[<UP>FCa</UP>]=<FR><NU>[<UP>F</UP>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</DE></FR>. (2)
Fluorescence for a single-wavelength dye can be written as f = SF[F] + SFCa[FCa] = SF[F]T + (SFCa - SF)[FCa], where SF and SFCa are coefficients describing the brightnesses of the indicator's unbound and bound forms, and [F]T is its total concentration. Because fluorescence intensities at maximum and minimum [Ca2+] are given by fmax = SFCa[F]T and fmin = SF[F]T, respectively, it follows that [Ca2+] can be expressed as (Tsien, 1989)
<FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>f−f<SUB><UP>min</UP></SUB></NU><DE>f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>−f</DE></FR>. (3)
This relationship is difficult to use in practice, mainly because fmin cannot be evaluated in situ under the same conditions as the measurements of interest, because it requires the reduction of resting [Ca2+] (O'Malley et al., 1999). Furthermore, it is not clear where experimental measurements fall within the range of the indicator: the fluorescence at rest, f0, can differ from fmin in an uncontrolled way. The reason for this is that cellular resting [Ca2+] levels appear to vary widely (20-200 nM) (Nakajima et al., 1993) and depend on the state and type of the cell and the quality of the recording (Kennedy and Thomas, 1996; O'Malley et al., 1999). Such resting levels are far from negligible for high-affinity calcium indicators (KD approx  200 nM), typically making f0 much larger than fmin.

However, Eq. 3 becomes more illuminating if it is recast in terms of the indicator's dynamic range, Rf = fmax/fmin.
<FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>f/f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>−1/R<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB></NU><DE>1−f/f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB></DE></FR>. (4)
For indicators with a large dynamic range the exact value of Rf is insignificant, because the term 1/Rf will typically be much smaller than f/fmax. This situation applies for Fluo-3 (Rf approx  50-200, KD approx  500 nM; Harkins et al., 1993) and for Fluo 4 (Rf approx  85-100, KD approx  300 nM, unpublished data) and is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1 A. Thus for Fluo-3 and similar indicators an estimate of fmax will suffice to measure absolute [Ca2+]. For indicators with more modest dynamic ranges, such as OGB-1, Rf does have to be considered and must be estimated in situ (Fig. 1 B). However, the dynamic range is a property of the indicator and as such does not depend on resting [Ca2+] and other factors that may vary between cells. Therefore it need not be determined in every experiment. This also holds for the indicator dissociation constant. Also, the dependence of Eq. 4 on the fluorescence f is only through its ratio with fmax, eliminating dependences on absolute fluorescence (and hence dye concentration, optical path length, excitation intensity, and detector efficiency).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   Schematic representation of [Ca2+] estimation based on measurements of Rf and fmax. (A) Relationship between fluorescence (f/fmax) and [Ca2+] (units of KD). The case of very large Rf is illustrated, approximating the properties of Fluo-3. For a good lot of Fluo-3 Rf approx  100-200 in vitro (Harkins et al., 1993) and perhaps 40% less in cytoplasm (O'Malley et al., 1999). Solid line, Rf = 50; long dashed line, Rf = 200. (B) Determination of [Ca2+]0 from resting fluorescence f0 (rescaled from A). The gray zone indicates the range of possible values of [Ca2+]0 based on the uncertainty in Rf. Note that [Ca2+]0 can be determined to ~10% precision, even while Rf is subject to a variation of a factor of 4. (C) Same determination, for the case of intermediate Rf, illustrated for Rf and KD approximating the properties of OGB-1: according to our measurements Rf approx  8.5 in cuvette and >5.7 in situ (solid line, Rf = 5.7; long dashed line, Rf = 8.5). The gray zone indicates the possible values of [Ca2+]0 based on the uncertainty in Rf. Compared to the uncertainty in absolute [Ca2+] (~40%), the fractional error in the estimation of Delta [Ca2+] (arrows) from Delta f triple-bond  (f - f0) is much smaller, <10%; it is indicated by the difference in the lengths of arrows.

Changes in [Ca2+], Delta [Ca2+] triple-bond  [Ca2+- [Ca2+]0, associated with changes in fluorescence from baseline, delta f triple-bond  (f - f0)/f0, are given by
<FR><NU>&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB></NU><DE>f<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR> (1−R<SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>) <FR><NU>&dgr;f</NU><DE>(&dgr;f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>−&dgr;f)&dgr;f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB></DE></FR>. (5)
Compared to Eq. 4, Eq. 5 depends even more weakly on Rf and is thus more robust against uncertainties in this quantity (see Appendix B). This is illustrated in Fig. 1 C, where [Ca2+] and Delta [Ca2+] are "computed" geometrically.

Quantitation of [Ca2+] and of Delta [Ca2+] based on Eqs. 4 and 5 depends on calibration of the parameters Rf and delta fmax, and of the dissociation constant KD (which enters only as a scaling factor). delta fmax depends on factors that may vary between neurons, in particular resting [Ca2+], [Ca2+]0. Its dependence on [Ca2+]0 is reflected in the equation
&dgr;f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>(1−R<SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>)</NU><DE>R<SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB>/K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>, (6)
which follows directly from the relationship between fluorescence and [Ca2+], assuming that true saturation is reached. Inverting the relationship between delta fmax and [Ca2+]0 provides a useful way to estimate resting [Ca2+]:
<FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>(1−R<SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>)</NU><DE>&dgr;f<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB></DE></FR>−R<SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>. (7)

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

Brain slice preparation and recording conditions

Hippocampal slices were prepared from juvenile rats (postnatal age (PND) 14-30 days) in accordance with animal care and use guidelines of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. The brain was removed, sections of brain containing the hippocampus were blocked, and 300-µm-thick slices were cut on a Vibratome (TPI, St. Louis, MO). These procedures were carried out with the brain submerged in a chilled (2-5°C) cutting solution bubbled with carbogen (95% O2/5% CO2). The cutting solution contained (in mM) 110 choline chloride, 25 NaHCO3, 25 D-glucose, 11.6 Na ascorbate, 7 MgSO4, 3.1 Na pyruvate, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, and 0.5 CaCl2. Slices were then transferred to a submerged holding chamber containing normal artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF), incubated at 35°C for 30-60 min, and then held at room temperature until used. The composition of the normal ACSF was (in mM) 127 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 25 D-glucose, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, and 1.25 NaH2PO4. Experiments were performed at 35 ± 1°C. Patch electrodes (3-5 MOmega ) were filled with a solution containing (in mM) 135 K methylsulfonate, 10 HEPES, 10 Na phosphocreatine, 4 MgCl2, 4 Na2ATP, 0.4 NaGTP. Oregon Green BAPTA-1 or Magnesium Green (MG) (both 100 µM; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were added to the internal solution; occasionally pipettes were tip-loaded with indicator-free solution to prevent dye leakage into the extracellular medium.

Two-photon imaging and electrophysiology

We used a custom-built 2PLSM (Mainen et al., 1999a). A Ti:sapphire laser (Tsunami; Spectra Physics, Mountain View, CA) pumped by a 10-W argon ion laser (Millenia X; Spectra Physics) was tuned to lambda  approx  810 nm and delivered ~100-fs pulses at 80 MHz. The scanning mirrors (model 6800; Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, MA) were imaged into the backfocal plane of the objective (60×, NA 0.9; Zeiss, Jena, Germany) by a scan lens and the microscope tube lens (both from Zeiss). Fluorescence was detected in epifluorescence and transfluorescence (through an oil-immersion condenser, NA 1.4; Zeiss) modes using photomultiplier tubes (R3896; Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) and combined using a summing amplifier. Laser-scanning differential interference contrast (DIC) was implemented by the addition of a dichroic mirror and a photodiode in the transfluorescence path. Image acquisition was controlled by custom software (Ray Stepnoski, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies).

Whole-cell recordings were obtained under visual guidance, using infrared DIC optics and a CCD camera. Dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons were imaged 30-70 µm from the soma. Action potentials were evoked in current clamp mode, using brief (4 ms) current pulses. Electrophysiological data acquisition was performed using an AD-DA board (PCI-MIO-16E-4) and custom software written in LabView (both from National Instruments, Austin, TX) and in Igor (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR). Fluorescence images were analyzed using custom software written in IDL (Research Systems, Boulder, CO) and Igor. Typically line scan images were collected at 500 Hz.

Fluorescence measurements started ~2 min after break-in and ended when loading approached a steady state ~40 min later. Dye loading was monitored by measuring resting fluorescence, f0. Steady state was reached when the intracellular dye concentration equilibrated with the pipette concentration. Slice drift caused loss of focus and slight decreases in f0, which were corrected by refocusing during experiments. These decreasing values of f0 were ignored when exponential fits to the loading time course were made.

During each measurement trial of action potential-evoked calcium transients, f0 was determined by averaging fluorescence over at least 128 ms. Peak amplitudes of fluorescence transients were calculated by averaging over 15 ms after the stimulus, or over a 100-120-ms plateau in the case of saturating transients evoked by trains. The background signal was mainly due to photomultiplier tube dark currents and autofluorescence and was subtracted. Fluorescence time series were extracted by averaging across the remaining spatial dimension of the line scan image of the apical dendrite.

Parameter calibration

Estimation of [Ca2+] from fluorescence demands calibration of the parameters Rf, KD, and delta fmax (Eqs. 4 and 5). Rf and KD are properties of the indicator in a particular environment and are not expected to vary across cells. It has been pointed out that Rf may be smaller in cells than in measurement cuvettes, perhaps because of interactions between the indicator and cytoplasmic proteins (Harkins et al., 1993; O'Malley et al., 1999); it should also be noted that the dynamic range may vary from batch to batch for some indicators (Harkins et al., 1993). Similarly, the dissociation constant, KD, may be affected by the environment (Busa, 1992). It is therefore important to estimate these parameters in a medium that is as close as possible to the cytoplasmic environment.

Rf and KD were determined in a cuvette fluorometer at 35°C, pH 7.3, using calibration solutions prepared according to standard procedures (Tsien and Pozzan, 1989). [Ca2+] was clamped by EGTA (10 mM) or BAPTA (5 mM) for OGB, and by HEDTA (10 mM) in the case of Magnesium Green (MG). Solutions contained a small amount of indicator (5 µM, or 10 µM for MG) and (in mM) 135 K methylsulfonate, 10 HEPES, and 4 MgCl2, which is identical to the electrode solution. Free [Ca2+] was computed using the MaxChelator program (Bers et al., 1994) (http://www.stanford.edu/~cpatton/maxc.html). Measurements performed with BAPTA and EGTA buffering produced consistent results. In all cases where comparisons have been made, cuvette measurements of Rf have been seen to provide an upper bound on Rf in the cell (Harkins et al., 1993; O'Malley et al., 1999).

Lower bounds on the intracellular Rf were obtained in cultured rat hippocampal slices (P7, 3-5 days in vitro) because in this preparation healthy neurons can be found close to the surface of the slice, allowing more efficient exchange of extracellular solutions. Whole-cell recordings were performed in normal ACSF until dye loading reached steady state, at which point fmax was measured. ACSF was then replaced by zero-[Ca2+] ACSF containing 10 mM EGTA, which clamped [Ca2+], causing a decrease in f0. After reaching steady state, the resting fluorescence corresponding to minimal resting [Ca2+], f0min, was measured, and an estimate of the dynamic range was computed as Rf approx  fmax/f0min. Because intracellular [Ca2+] could not be fully clamped to zero with this method, this estimate was taken as a lower bound on Rf complementary to the upper bound from cuvette measurements. No attempts were made to estimate KD in situ.

Intracellular estimates of delta fmax were made during experiments by transiently flooding neurons with Ca2+ by stimulation with rapid trains of action potentials (APs). During AP trains fluorescence transient amplitudes due to successive APs diminished as fluorescence increased. After several APs a saturating fluorescence plateau was reached, suggesting saturation of the Ca2+ indicator. To test for indicator saturation, fluorescence transients produced by trains at several different frequencies were compared. In a regime far from indicator saturation, the plateau fluorescence at a given AP frequency would be proportional to that frequency, following Delta [Ca2+] (Regehr et al., 1994; Helmchen et al., 1996); in contrast, if the indicator was in fact saturated, then plateau fluorescence would be independent of frequency. Typical trains lasted for 360 ms and had frequencies of 56-83 Hz. To check whether the underlying [Ca2+] accumulations increased in proportion to AP frequency, experiments were repeated under identical conditions with the low-affinity indicator MG, which has a dissociation constant almost two orders of magnitude larger than OGB-1 (Haugland, 1996).

Errors quoted denote SEM unless specified otherwise.

Single-compartment model of calcium dynamics

To derive estimates of cellular buffer capacities, we used a simple one-compartment model of cellular [Ca2+] dynamics (Neher and Augustine, 1992; Helmchen et al., 1996). [Ca2+] transients produced by brief, small Ca2+ currents, such as those produced by single action potentials (at time t = tAP), reach peak values:
&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]≡[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>](t<SUB><UP>AP</UP></SUB>)−[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB>=<FR><NU>&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></NU><DE>(1+&kgr;<SUB><UP>B</UP></SUB>+&kgr;<SUB><UP>F</UP></SUB>)</DE></FR>. (8)
Here Delta [Ca2+]T is the total Ca2+ influx due to a single action potential, and kappa B and kappa F are the endogenous and added buffer capacities, defined as
&kgr;<SUB><UP>X</UP></SUB>=<FENCE><FR><NU>∂[<UP>XCa</UP>]</NU><DE>∂[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><UP>rest</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>K<SUP>(<UP>X</UP>)</SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>[<UP>X</UP>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></NU><DE>(K<SUP>(<UP>X</UP>)</SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR>. (9)
Buffer capacities give the ratio of calcium sequestered by a buffer over calcium that remains free upon a rise in [Ca2+]. Here we used the differential form of these quantities (Neher and Augustine, 1992),
&kgr;<SUB><UP>X</UP></SUB>=<FENCE><FR><NU>&Dgr;[<UP>XCa</UP>]</NU><DE>&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]</DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><UP>transient</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>K<SUP>(<UP>X</UP>)</SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>[<UP>X</UP>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></NU><DE>(K<SUP>(<UP>X</UP>)</SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB>)(K<SUP>(<UP>X</UP>)</SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>peak</UP></SUB>)</DE></FR>. (10)

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

To estimate [Ca2+], equations were formulated expressing [Ca2+]0 and Delta [Ca2+] in terms of fluorescence and Rf, KD, and delta fmax (Eqs. 5 and 6). The determination of these parameters can be constrained sufficiently well to allow accurate measurement of [Ca2+]. We tested this method by measuring [Ca2+]0 and the amplitudes of action potential-evoked dendritic [Ca2+] transients in CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites as a function of added buffer capacity.

Parameter calibration

Indicator parameters Rf and KD were calibrated in vitro under conditions mimicking those of experiments (pipette intracellular solution, 35°C, pH 7.3). Rf was also estimated intracellularly.

The properties of OGB-1 are summarized in Table 1. (Similar cuvette measurements carried out for OGB-2 gave the following values in intracellular solution: KD = 295 ± 13 nM and Rf congruent  16 ± 0.5, n = 8.) Because intracellular measurements (Rf approx  4.3-5.7) necessarily gave a lower bound for Rf, we concluded that the true cytoplasmic value for the dynamic range of the indicator was above the higher of these values, in the range Rf approx  5.7-8.5.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1   Properties of the indicator Oregon green BAPTA-1

The dissociation constant of MG was 50 times larger than that of OGB-1: KD = 10 ± 2 µM (n = 4).

2PLSM fluorescence imaging in CA1 apical dendrites

CA1 pyramidal cells were loaded with OGB-1 via patch pipette (Fig. 2 A). One or two minutes after break-in, the proximal apical dendrite was visible in the 2PLSM image (Fig. 2 B). To image fluorescence with good time resolution in the dendrite, we used line scan imaging (Fig. 2 C). We then averaged across a window along the spatial axis of the image to arrive at a fluorescence time series (Fig. 2 D). Single action potentials evoked by somatic current injections caused fluorescence changes due to Ca2+ influx through voltage-sensitive calcium channels (Markram et al., 1995). The rise time of single-AP fluorescence changes was <2 ms, while the decay time was in the range of 50-500 ms, depending on indicator concentration (Markram et al., 1995; Helmchen et al., 1996); decay times became longer as Ca2+ was increasingly buffered.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   2PLSM imaging in brain slices. (A) CA1 pyramidal neuron labeled with 100 µM OGB-1 imaged at the end of an experiment. The white square on the apical dendrite indicates the approximate location of the region where measurements were carried out. (B) Close-up of proximal apical dendrite from a CA1 neuron; the white line indicates the position of the line scan. (C) Line-scan image, showing a transient fluorescence increase due to calcium influx evoked by a single action potential. The white line indicates the size of the averaging window for the fluorescence time series. (D) Fluorescence averaged across the dendrite as a function of time.

Saturating fluorescence transients

To estimate delta fmax, we relied on the fact that rapid trains of APs produce large [Ca2+] accumulations and that these accumulations increase with AP frequency (Helmchen et al., 1996; Regehr et al., 1994). We confirmed these findings under our experimental conditions, using fluorescence measurements with the low-affinity indicator MG. Because this indicator's KD is ~50-fold higher than that of OGB-1, it responds linearly to [Ca2+] changes over a much wider range. Indeed, MG fluorescence transient amplitudes increased with AP frequency up to at least 83 Hz (Fig. 3 A), approximately in a linear fashion (Fig. 3 B). This confirmed that [Ca2+] accumulations continue to grow with AP frequency.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   Fluorescence transients (delta f triple-bond  (f - f0)/f0) in response to trains of action potentials. (A) Dendritic fluorescence transients evoked by AP trains at different frequencies: lowest to highest, 50 Hz, 62.5 Hz, 83.3 Hz. Dendrites were loaded with Magnesium Green (MG) (a1) (traces averaged over 14 trials) or with OGB-1 (a2) (traces averaged over five trials). a2 indicates how OGB-1 levels delta fplt were determined, by averaging over saturated (plateau) portion of transients. (B) Fluorescence transient amplitudes as a function of frequency (from A). , MG, n = 4; diamond , OGB-1, n = 4. MG levels are peak fluorescence. For OGB-1, plateau levels delta fplt were computed as indicated in a2. To compare trends, transients were normalized to the levels evoked by 50-Hz stimulation. Peak fluorescence levels as measured with MG increased approximately linearly over the range of frequencies sufficient to saturate OGB-1 saturation. (C) Fluorescence levels for OGB-1 plotted against levels for MG (proportional to Delta [Ca2+]). Levels for MG were normalized to levels evoked by 50-Hz trains, as for B. Fit was made to a known hyperbolic saturating relationship. OGB-1 fluorescence levels were then normalized to asymptotic value of fit, delta fasympt. Normalized levels therefore indicate fractional saturation for each point. Horizontal error bars indicate the SEM of normalized fluorescence (n = 4); vertical error bars are the quadratic sum of normalized fluorescence SEM (n = 4) and standard error of hyperbolic fit.

To estimate the maximum OGB-1 fluorescence transient, delta fmax, during experiments, we measured fluorescence changes produced by the large [Ca2+] accumulations evoked by rapid trains of APs. We attempted to determine whether indicator saturation was in fact reached during these trains by measuring fluorescence levels reached at peak [Ca2+] for several AP frequencies. In contrast to the MG transients, transients obtained with OGB-1 saturated at a steady-state or plateau level, delta fplt, over the same range of frequencies (Fig. 3, A and B), implying that OGB-1 was close to saturation.

However, OGB-1 fluorescence transients due to successive action potentials in a train could still be resolved, even at the highest stimulation frequencies (Fig. 3 A; see also Fig. 4 C, inset). Fluorescence transient peaks following APs were ~4% higher than the corresponding average plateau fluorescence, delta fplt, implying that delta fplt remained under delta fmax, even at the highest frequencies probed. To assess the quality of our estimate of delta fmax we thus performed additional analyses.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   Time course of OGB-1 loading and amplitudes of fluorescence transients in a proximal apical dendrite. (A) The baseline fluorescence (f0) was measured every 15 s. Occasionally the image was refocused to compensate for drift of the brain slice. The upper envelope of f0 was fit with an exponential time course (solid curve). The loading time constant for this cell was 9.2 min. (B) Fluorescence transients (delta f) evoked by single action potentials at different times after break-in (averages of three to four trials; times are indicated in D). Decreasing transient amplitudes and increasing durations reflect the buffering of Ca2+ by increasing concentrations of [Ca2+] indicator. (C) Fluorescence transients evoked by AP trains in early (c1) and late (c2) phases of loading (indicated in D). Transient amplitudes remained constant, reflecting constant [Ca2+]0 (Eq. 6). Transients due to differing stimulation frequencies (20 APs, 56 Hz; 24 APs, 67 Hz) are superimposed. The inset in c1 shows fluorescence transients evoked (the larger) by the first AP in the train, and (the smaller) by an AP after plateau was reached. (D) Amplitudes of fluorescence transients as a function of loading time. Single action potential transients () decreased as a function of time. Transients evoked by trains (measured at plateaus; 56 Hz, diamond ; 67 Hz, ) remained constant as a function of time.

One approach made use of the data of Fig. 3, A and B, which imply that changes in MG fluorescence are proportional to Delta [Ca2+] over the range of frequencies used in our experiments. We used this relationship to quantify the degree of OGB-1 saturation. As expected, plotting OGB-1 fluorescence amplitudes against MG fluorescence amplitudes gave a hyperbolic relationship, because MG fluorescence is a measure of Delta [Ca2+]. A hyperbolic fit provided an estimate of the degree of saturation corresponding to a particular frequency across cells (Fig. 3 C). We define the degree of saturation at frequency nu  as x = 100 × delta fplt/delta fmax, such that x ranges from 0% (linear regime) to 100% (complete saturation). For the maximum frequency used in these experiments (83 Hz), x = 89 ± 3% (n = 4). For typical frequencies (67 Hz), x = 87 ± 3% (n = 4).

A second independent approach allowed us to estimate the degree of saturation reached for each experiment by making use of the proportionality of peak [Ca2+] accumulation to AP frequency (Fig. 3 B). This proportionality implies that the ratio of [Ca2+] accumulations produced at AP frequencies nu 2 and nu 1 is nu 2/nu 1. Under conditions close to indicator saturation, the corresponding ratio of fluorescence plateaus, Q triple-bond  (delta fplt)nu 2/(delta fplt)nu 1, is not equal to nu 2/nu 1: it is close to but not quite equal to 1 (Q < ~1). Supposing nu 2 is the higher frequency, its degree of saturation can be expressed (Appendix A) as
x=100×<FR><NU>1−Q&ngr;<SUB>1</SUB>/&ngr;<SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE>1−&ngr;<SUB>1</SUB>/&ngr;<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR>. (11)
With full saturation, the ratio of plateaus at different frequencies would by definition be Q = 1, implying x = 100% also. In contrast, averaging over the highest AP frequencies used in our experiments (n = 13 cells), we found x = 85 ± 4%, in agreement with the previous estimate involving OGB-1 transients versus MG transients (which does not require assuming proportionality to frequency). Using Eq. 11, it was possible to estimate the true maximum fluorescence transient as delta fmax = delta fplt × 100/x for each neuron. The results in the remainder of the paper were computed using this correction.

[Ca2+] in CA1 pyramidal neurons

Fluorescence measurements began approximately 2 min after break-in. As found previously (Helmchen et al., 1996), baseline fluorescence intensity then increased with the concentration of intracellular dye until it reached a steady state (Fig. 4 A) (with a time constant of 12.5 ± 2.3 min; n = 7).

Transients evoked by single action potentials were measured during dye loading. As predicted by Eq. 8, transient amplitudes decreased with time as the added buffer capacity increased (Fig. 4 B), while their durations increased (see also Helmchen et al., 1996). Maximum fluorescence was also measured during dye loading (Table 2). If the action potential trains actually saturated the indicator, the saturating fluorescence ratio, delta fmax triple-bond  (fmax - f0)/f0, was expected not to vary with loading because it is independent of [F]T (Eq. 6). For many cells (n = 15 out of n = 28) we in fact found a constant delta fmax over 35-50 min (Fig. 4 C). In contrast, delta f evoked by single APs always decreased with increasing added buffer capacity (Fig. 4 D).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2   [Ca2+] regulation in the apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons

However, in some neurons baseline fluorescence did not appear to reach steady state (Fig. 5 A), and delta fmax decreased with time (Fig. 5 B). Because of the dependence of delta fmax on [Ca2+]0 and on Rf, it is likely that this effect was due either to an increase in [Ca2+]0 or to photodamage producing increased baseline fluorescence (and a degradation of Rf) (Koester et al., 1999). We were able to distinguish between these possibilities because changes in [Ca2+]0 are unlikely to be local, while photodamage is spatially highly restricted (Koester et al., 1999), enabling recovery of delta fmax by moving to adjacent positions on the dendrite (Fig. 5 C). The constancy of delta fmax during an experiment could thus be used as a check on [Ca2+]0 maintenance and cell health.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5   Changes in fluorescence as markers of resting [Ca2+]0 and cell health. (A) Time course of resting fluorescence. After ~40 min of loading no steady state had been reached. (B) Amplitudes of fluorescence transients (same cell). Single-AP transients () decreased with loading, as did transients evoked by trains at two different frequencies (56 Hz, diamond ; 67 Hz, ), suggesting an increase in resting [Ca2+] (Eq. 6). (C) As in B, for a different cell. After delta fmax decreased, imaging in an adjacent dendritic region (~5 µm from the first point; indicated by arrow) recovered the signal. This suggested that the local drop in delta fmax was due to local photodamage while [Ca2+]0 remained constant.

Resting calcium concentration

Using Eq. 7, we found [Ca2+]0 to be in the range of 37 ± 5 nM (Rf approx  5.7) to 54 ± 5 nM (Rf approx  8.5) (n = 12). Classifying cells by postnatal age of animal (two groups: PND 14-17 and PND 24-28) did not reveal significant differences in resting [Ca2+]. For the younger rats, [Ca2+]0 = 36 ± 5 nM (Rf = 5.7) to 53 ± 5 nM (Rf = 8.5) (n = 9), while for the older animals [Ca2+]0 = 40 ± 22 nM (Rf = 5.7) to 57 ± 23 nM (Rf = 8.5) (n = 3).

Endogenous buffer capacity

The peak amplitude of action potential-evoked [Ca2+] transients has an inverse dependence on kappa F, the added indicator buffer capacity (Eq. 8). This reflects the increasing buffering of Ca2+ by the added indicator. To estimate the endogenous buffer capacity kappa B, we inverted this relationship:
&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUP><UP>−1</UP></SUP>(t=t<SUB><UP>AP</UP></SUB>)=<FR><NU>1+&kgr;<SUB><UP>B</UP></SUB></NU><DE>&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></DE></FR>+<FR><NU>&kgr;<SUB><UP>F</UP></SUB></NU><DE>&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>T</UP></SUB></DE></FR>, (12)
plotted inverse [Ca2+] transient amplitudes against kappa F, and fit straight lines to these data (Fig. 6). The intercept with the horizontal axis gave an estimate of kappa B (Helmchen et al., 1996). Averaged over cells (n = 7), values were kappa B = 65 ± 15 (Rf = 5.7) or kappa B = 57 ± 13 (Rf = 8.5). Classifying neurons according to age, we found the buffering capacity in those from older animals (PND 24-28) to be smaller than for younger rats (PND 14-17): for the former (n = 3), kappa B = 48 ± 20 (Rf = 5.7) or kappa B = 41 ± 17 (Rf = 8.5), while for the latter (n = 4) kappa B = 78 ± 23 or kappa B = 68 ± 20 for Rf = 5.7 and Rf = 8.5, respectively. However, the difference between age groups was not significant (p > 0.05; Welch-Student t-test).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6   Estimating the endogenous buffer capacity. (A) Inverse single-AP peak [Ca2+] transient increase, Delta [Ca2+]-1, versus added buffer capacity, kappa F, for a cell from a young animal. Endogenous capacity was computed from the fit's intersection with the x axis and was between kappa B = 106 ± 10 (r = 0.92) (computed with Rf = 5.7) and kappa B = 93 ± 9 (r = 0.92) (Rf = 8.5). (B) As in A, for a cell from an older animal. Endogenous capacity was between kappa B = 78 ± 2 (r = 0.96) (Rf = 5.7) and kappa B = 68 ± 2 (r = 0.96) (Rf = 8.5) based on fit to the early part of the experiment (open circle ). Note the pronounced convexity in the curve and the increased slope of later points (), suggesting a decrease in the amplitudes of the Ca2+ current.

Action potential-evoked [Ca2+] transients

The size of the [Ca2+] transients induced by an action potential in the apical dendrite in the absence of an indicator can be inferred from the relationship between Delta [Ca2+]-1 and kappa F, by extrapolating the fits to kappa F = 0 (Fig. 6). Delta [Ca2+] averaged over all neurons (n = 7) was Delta [Ca2+] = 235 ± 57 nM for Rf = 5.7 and Delta [Ca2+] = 251 ± 61 nM for Rf = 8.5. Differences in buffer capacity between younger and older animals were not found to be significant: For PND 14-17, Delta [Ca2+] = 227 ± 65 nM (Rf = 5.7), Delta [Ca2+] = 243 ± 70 nM (Rf = 8.5) (n = 4), while for PND 24-28, Delta [Ca2+] = 245 ± 138 nM (Rf = 5.7), Delta [Ca2+] = 262 ± 148 nM (Rf = 8.5) (n = 3). A summary of the data presented in this section is contained in Table 2.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

Because of signal-to-noise ratio considerations, high-affinity [Ca2+] indicators with large dynamic ranges are especially well suited for [Ca2+] estimation in small neuronal compartments (Muller and Connor, 1991; Murphy et al., 1994; Yuste and Denk, 1995; Denk et al., 1995; Koester and Sakmann, 1998; Mainen et al., 1999b). Based on the fluorescence signal evoked by a stimulus, it is often of interest to compute an experimental measure proportional to the corresponding evoked Delta [Ca2+]. The fractional fluorescence change delta f triple-bond  (f - f0)/f0 has this property, but only in the linear regime of the indicator ([Ca2+] KD). High-affinity indicators show sublinear delta f even when challenged with modest [Ca2+] transients (cf. Fig. 1). Additional problems with measurement of delta f are encountered during prolonged experiments: delta f might decrease simply because f0 increases, because of small changes in resting [Ca2+], or because of photodamage (Koester et al., 1999) or bleaching. Furthermore, for a given Ca2+ current and resting [Ca2+], delta f decreases with increasing indicator concentration, because of Ca2+ buffering.

We have described a method (Eqs. 4, 5, and 7) to correct for the nonlinear response of a Ca2+ indicator to obtain accurate estimates of Delta [Ca2+] and absolute [Ca2+]. This method relies on information gained by measuring the maximum relative fluorescence level in the structure of interest, delta fmax, during an experiment. The calculation of [Ca2+] requires estimates of two additional parameters: the dissociation constant, KD, and the dynamic range, Rf, of the indicator. Because the calibration parameters are properties of an indicator and would not be expected to vary across cells of a given type, they do not need to be evaluated during every experiment. Nevertheless, because these parameters may be sensitive to the nature of the intracellular environment, it is important to consider sources of error in calibrations based on estimates of Rf and KD (Appendix B).

Parameter calibration and robustness of the method

We estimated a lower bound for the dynamic range of Oregon Green BAPTA-1 in CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices, comparing fmax with minimum fluorescence levels obtained by washing in an extracellular solution containing zero [Ca2+] and high EGTA. Our results gave a bound equal to ~50-70% of the value of Rf measured in vitro, which is consistent with previous experiments conducted with other Ca2+ indicators (O'Malley et al., 1999; Harkins et al., 1993). Because our procedure did not allow us to clamp intracellular [Ca2+] to zero, intracellular values of Rf may be closer to the in vitro estimate of 8.5; in any case Rf is constrained between 5.7 and 8.5.

Importantly, the estimates of Delta [Ca2+] obtained with our method were quite insensitive to the exact value used for Rf. For example, our estimates of the amplitude of single action potential [Ca2+] transients at zero added buffer (cf. Helmchen et al., 1996) varied by less than 10% over the range Rf approx  5.7-8.5 (for an interpretation see Fig. 1 B). Our estimates of absolute [Ca2+] were less robust, varying by up to ~40% in the range Rf approx  5.7-8.5 (Eq. 11). These variations are predicted by error propagation analysis (Appendix B).

We estimated the dissociation constant of the indicator, KD, in intracellular solution but not in intact cells. This quantity may be quite different in the intracellular environment: a correction of >30% is expected (Minta et al., 1989). Because KD appears only as a scale factor in all relevant equations (Eqs. 4, 5, and 7), this correction would apply directly to all [Ca2+] estimates and our derivations of kappa B. A similar scaling factor applies to measurements with ratiometric indicators.

With the method presented, the fluorescence at saturating [Ca2+], fmax, is measured periodically during each experiment at the same position where [Ca2+] measurements are being obtained. In most neurons, this can be achieved by eliciting trains of action potentials to flood the neuron with Ca2+ entering through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Figs. 3 and 4).

Because of the weak dependence of fluorescence on [Ca2+] at large concentrations (where [Ca2+] KD) (Fig. 1), even relatively high-frequency action potential trains (67 Hz) produced only ~70-90% saturation in our experiments in CA1 dendrites. This relatively large variation in saturation level may partly reflect differences in action potential-evoked [Ca2+] transients, depending on distance from the soma (range 30-70 µm; Regehr et al., 1989; Magee and Johnston, 1997; Svoboda et al., 1999). Thus estimates of [Ca2+] based simply on the plateau fluorescence reached during a high-frequency train may result in relatively large measurement errors (up to ~30% for the measurements presented here; see also Appendix B). These errors grow as f approaches fmax. However, the estimate can be improved considerably if fluorescence transients are measured at more than one frequency, allowing extrapolation to true delta fmax. This necessitates making an assumption about the true nature of AP-evoked Delta [Ca2+]. For instance, our technique relies on the proportionality of [Ca2+] increases to AP frequency (Eq. 11), which was verified by parallel measurements with the low-affinity indicator MG.

However, saturation can be verified even in cases where this assumption does not hold. Assume, for instance, that [Ca2+] accumulations evoked by each action potential in a train have equal sizes at different frequencies. (Although this assumption is similar to the one above, it does not imply a constant Ca2+ removal rate.) The assumption would be invalid if Ca2+ influx suffered from greater rundown at higher frequencies, but can be tested by comparing fluorescence transients elicited by individual action potentials at the beginning and at the end of an AP train. This alternative assumption also allows extrapolation to true delta fmax. For instance, using it we recomputed the level of saturation for the AP train-evoked transients shown in Fig. 4, which are 89% saturated, assuming proportionality to frequency as described above. This compares to a value of 93%, using the assumption just introduced, in approximate agreement. Therefore our method does not require proportionality between [Ca2+] accumulations and AP frequency.

Measurements of intracellular Ca2+ levels and regulation

In addition to permitting accurate calibration of [Ca2+] and Delta [Ca2+], measurements of saturating fluorescence transients during an experiment have other benefits. For example, for healthy neurons with constant [Ca2+]0, the ratio of saturating fluorescence transient over resting fluorescence, delta fmax, should remain constant, independent of changes in indicator concentration. We found this behavior in most neurons over periods of up to 1 h (see, e.g., Fig. 4). However, other neurons showed a decreasing delta fmax, suggesting an increasing resting [Ca2+] (Fig. 5). This could be distinguished from subcellular compartmentalization of indicator or photoinduced changes in fluorescence (Konig et al., 1999; Koester et al., 1999) by verifying whether transient size varied as the imaging region was moved to an adjacent position along the dendrite (Fig. 5 C).

Measurements of [Ca2+] regulation in hippocampal pyramidal cells reported in this paper are mostly similar to values previously reported with ratiometric indicators. The range of [Ca2+]0 was 32-59 nM, at the low end of the range reported in cultured neurons (Nakajima et al., 1993), and distributed over a narrower range, perhaps reflecting our method's accuracy. Single action potential [Ca2+] transients were, on average, around 250 nM, somewhat higher than previous pyramidal cell estimates (Helmchen et al., 1996). Dendritic intracellular buffer capacity (kappa B) had a mean of ~60, slightly smaller than in previous measurements (Helmchen et al., 1996). In some neurons, plots of inverse Delta [Ca2+] versus added buffer capacity showed a distinct late convex upswing (Fig. 6 B), without changes in delta fmax, suggesting a late decrease in total calcium current. There were no statistically significant differences in resting [Ca2+], average [Ca2+] transient size per action potential, or buffering capacity between animals of different age groups (PND 14-17 and PND 24-28).

    APPENDIX A: ESTIMATING SATURATION BY COMPARING FLUORESCENCE PLATEAUS EVOKED AT DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES (DERIVATION OF EQ. 11)
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN...
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

At the steady-state [Ca2+] plateau evoked by an AP train at sufficiently high frequency (Regehr et al., 1994; Helmchen et al., 1996), the change in fluorescence from rest increases with the change in calcium bound to dye:
&Dgr;f<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB> ∝ <FENCE><FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB></DE></FR>−<FR><NU>[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE>

=<FR><NU>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB></NU><DE>(K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB>)(K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB>)</DE></FR>. (A1)
Consequently, the ratio Q of fluorescence plateaus generated at two different frequencies nu 2 and nu 1 (nu 2 > nu 1) is
 Q≡<FR><NU>(&Dgr;f<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>/f<SUB>0</SUB>)<SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE>(&Dgr;f<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>/f<SUB>0</SUB>)<SUB>1</SUB></DE></FR>

=<FR><NU>(&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>)<SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE>(&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>)<SUB>1</SUB></DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+(&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>)<SUB>1</SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>+(&Dgr;[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB><UP>plt</UP></SUB>)<SUB>2</SUB>+[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP><UP>2+</UP></SUP>]<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE>. (A2)