help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joubert, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hoerter, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joubert, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hoerter, J. A.

Biophys J, July 2000, p. 1-13, Vol. 79, No. 1

Evidence for Myocardial ATP Compartmentation from NMR Inversion Transfer Analysis of Creatine Kinase Fluxes

F. Joubert,* B. Gillet,dagger J. L. Mazet,* P. Mateo,* J.-C. Beloeil,dagger and J. A. Hoerter*

 *Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U-446, Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Cardiology, Université Paris-Sud, Chatenay Malabry, and  dagger Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire Biologique, ICSN, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

The interpretation of creatine kinase (CK) flux measured by 31P NMR magnetization transfer in vivo is complex because of the presence of competing reactions, metabolite compartmentation, and CK isozyme localization. In the isovolumic perfused rat heart, we considered the influence of both ATP compartmentation and ATP-Pi exchange on the forward (Ff: PCr right-arrow ATP) and reverse (Fr) CK fluxes derived from complete analysis of inversion transfer. Although Ff should equal Fr because of the steady state, in both protocols when PCr (inv-PCr) or ATP (inv-ATP) was inverted and the contribution of ATP-Pi was masked by saturation of Pi (sat-Pi), Ff/Fr significantly differed from 1 (0.80 ± 0.06 or 1.32 ± 0.06, respectively, n = 5). These discrepancies could be explained by a compartment of ATP (fATP) not involved in CK. Consistently, neglecting ATP compartmentation in the analysis of CK in vitro results in an underestimation of Ff/Fr for inv-PCr and its overestimation for inv-ATP. Both protocols gave access to fATP if the system was adequately analyzed. The fraction of ATP not involved in CK reaction in a heart performing medium work amounts to 20-33% of cellular ATP. Finally, the data suggest that the effect of sat-Pi might not result only from the masking of ATP-Pi exchange.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

The creatine kinase (CK) catalyzes the reversible exchange of high-energy phosphate:
<UP>PCr<SUP>2−</SUP></UP>+<UP>MgADP<SUP>−</SUP></UP>+<UP>H<SUP>+</SUP></UP> ⇄ <UP>Cr</UP>+<UP>MgATP<SUP>2−</SUP></UP>
Despite considerable efforts devoted to the study of the flux of this enzyme by 31P NMR spectroscopy, there is still some controversy about the equivalence of the various magnetization transfer techniques and about the physiological interpretation of the NMR measured CK fluxes. The development of transgenic mice with specific CK isoform knockout has renewed the interest in the analysis of CK flux (Van Dorsten et al., 1998).

The role of different CK isoforms in the myocardium is still under debate: a cytosolic CK working close to equilibrium might account for the replenishment of ATP stores upon ATP utilization and the energy diffusion across the cell. On the other hand, bound CK specifically localized close to sites of energy production and utilization might play a major role in myocardial energy transduction. Nevertheless, even if the bound isoforms have kinetics different from those of the cytosolic CK, the cell is in steady state, and PCr is only metabolized by CK. Therefore, both total CK fluxes (corresponding to the unidirectional flux of production and consumption of ATP by CK) measured by NMR should be equal.

The main problem in the interpretation of a magnetization transfer experiment in vivo arises from the oversimplification of a highly organized cellular system: in other words, the interpretation of data is always model dependent. Most of the work devoted to cardiac CK flux has been performed by saturation transfer technique (ST). Consistent data have been obtained for the determination of the forward CK flux PCr right-arrow ATP (Ff), whereas a large range of values has been reported in the literature for the reverse CK flux ATP right-arrow PCr (Fr) (see Table 1). When a discrepancy between Ff and Fr was observed, two main alternative hypotheses were proposed. First, the two-site model of CK reaction has been recognized as an oversimplification of the system: ATP is involved in other exchanges, mainly with Pi (Ugurbil et al., 1986; Spencer et al., 1988), but also with glycolytic metabolites (Matthews et al., 1982; Brindle, 1988). The second hypothesis is the presence of an ATP compartmentation initially suggested by Nunnally and Hollis (1979). The discrepancy between fluxes, which increases with cardiac performance (Koretsky et al., 1985), was further proposed to result from the presence of an additional exchange between either PCr and a small NMR-visible ATP pool (Korestky et al., 1985, 1986) or between PCr and a nonvisible nonsaturated ATP compartment (Zahler et al., 1987; Zahler and Ingwall, 1992).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1   Comparison of published values of the Ff/Fr ratio

Inversion transfer (IT) has mainly been performed in muscle by analyzing the initial rate of recovery, which allowed a simplification of the mathematical analysis and a reduction in experimental time (Hsieh and Balaban, 1988; McFarland et al., 1994). However, the complete analysis of the evolution of the magnetization of the inverted and noninverted species permits the determination in the same experiment of both Ff and Fr (Led and Gesmar, 1982). Furthermore, data can then be analyzed without imposing the equilibrium of CK on the system, while this simplification of the Bloch equations is usually applied in the analysis of ST. Such analysis of IT offers a definitive advantage over the other magnetization transfer techniques.

Using IT, we found unequal CK fluxes in myocardium. To interpret these data, we analyzed the consequences for the measured CK fluxes of the presence of an ATP pool not involved in the CK reaction (or in slow exchange), as earlier suggested by Meyer et al. (1982). We considered total cellular ATP and PCr to be fully NMR visible and disturbed by the inversion procedure. The Bloch equations were modified to take into account this additional compartment of ATP, in both cases of an inversion of PCr (inv-PCr) and of gamma ATP (inv-gamma ATP) (see section Theory).

Our aim was to explore the capacity of a full time-course analysis of inversion transfer to reveal experimentally both the specific contributions of ATP compartmentation and ATP-Pi exchange in the CK fluxes of a perfused heart. Based on in vitro simulation we show that the presence of an ATP compartment (not exchanging with PCr) is consistent with the flux discrepancies observed in situ. Moreover, under conditions designed to mask the influence of ATP-Pi exchange, this ATP compartment could be independently quantified in both inv-PCr and inv-gamma ATP protocols.


    THEORY
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Classical Bloch equations for chemical exchange (McConnell, 1958) had to be modified to account first for the fraction of ATP not involved in the CK reaction, fATP, and second for the involvement of ATP in other reactions. In the following sections we refer to a phosphorus species as a "site" and a kinetic compartment as a "compartment."

Model I: two-site two-compartment analysis: basic model

The CK reaction is considered as a two-site exchange of the 31P nucleus:
<UP>PCr</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> &ggr;<UP>ATP</UP>
Model I

where kf and kr are, respectively, the forward and reverse pseudo-first-order rate constants of the reaction. Considering the magnetization at equilibrium, MPCrinfinity and Mgamma ATPinfinity , the forward flux PCr right-arrow ATP and the reverse flux ATP right-arrow PCr are given respectively by
F<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>=k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB> · M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB> (1)

F<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>=k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB> · M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB> (2)
The evolution of magnetization is described by the modified Bloch equations (Ugurbil, 1985), where T1gamma ATP, T1PCr are the intrinsic relaxation parameters:
<UP>d</UP>M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>/<UP>d</UP>t=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUB><UP>1PCr</UP></SUB>)(M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>) (3)

<UP>+</UP>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>)

<UP>d</UP>M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>/<UP>d</UP>t=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUB><UP>1&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>)(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>) (4)

<UP>+</UP>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>(M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>)
The solutions of this system depend on the protocol of magnetic perturbation.

Time-dependent saturation transfer

Upon full saturation of gamma ATP (Mgamma ATP = 0), MPCr decreases because of chemical exchange between PCr and gamma ATP. Considering the equilibrium of CK, kf · MPCrinfinity  = kr · Mgamma ATPinfinity , Eq. 3, which describes the time evolution of MPCr becomes
M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>(t)=M<SUP><UP>ss</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>+(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUP><UP>ss</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>)<UP>exp</UP>[<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUB><UP>1PCr</UP></SUB>)t] (5)
where MPCrss = MPCrinfinity /(1 + kfT1PCr). From this experiment kf and T1PCr may be derived. Forward flux Ff is determined from the accurate knowledge of MPCrinfinity and Eq. 1.

Inversion transfer

After a selective inversion of either PCr or gamma ATP, the chemical exchange occurs between the two magnetizations. In this case, the solutions of Eq. 3 and 4 are given by the general expression (Led and Gesmar, 1982):
M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>(t)=M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>+C<SUB>1</SUB><UP>exp</UP>&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>t+C<SUB>2</SUB><UP>exp</UP>&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>t (6)

M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>(t)=M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>+C<SUB>3</SUB><UP>exp</UP>&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>t+C<SUB>4</SUB><UP>exp</UP>&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>t (7)
with
&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>=1/2{<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>+k<SUB><UP>1r</UP></SUB>)+[(k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>−k<SUB><UP>1r</UP></SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP>+4k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>]<SUP>1/2</SUP>}

&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>=1/2{<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>+k<SUB><UP>1r</UP></SUB>)−[(k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>−k<SUB><UP>1r</UP></SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP>+4k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>]<SUP>1/2</SUP>}
where
k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>=k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUB><UP>1PCr</UP></SUB> k<SUB><UP>1r</UP></SUB>=k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUB><UP>1&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>
and
C<SUB>1</SUB>={(&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>+k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>)(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>(0))

−k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>(0))}/(&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>−&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>)

C<SUB>2</SUB>={<UP>−</UP>(&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>+k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>)(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>(0))

+k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>(0))}/(&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>−&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>)

C<SUB>3</SUB>={<UP>−</UP>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>(0))−(&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>+k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>)

 · (M<SUP>∞</SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>(0))}/(&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>−&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>)

C<SUB>4</SUB>={k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>(M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>(0))+(&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>+k<SUB><UP>1f</UP></SUB>)

 · (M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>(0))}/(&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>−&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>)
From inversion of PCr, or of gamma ATP, the four parameters of the reaction, kf, kr, T1PCr, T1gamma ATP may be computed independently, and both Ff and Fr fluxes calculated from Eqs. 1. and 2.

Model II: two-site three-compartment analysis: modification accounting for a compartment of ATP not involved in CK


<UP>PCr</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>1</SUB> &ggr;ATP<SUB>2</SUB></UP>
Model II

In the case of two pools of ATP, one pool, ATP1 = (1 - fATP) · ATP, in fast exchange with PCr, and a second, ATP2 = fATP · ATP, not exchanging (or in slow exchange) with PCr, the evolution of each pools must be considered separately; the time evolution of ATP1 is described by Eq. 4, and that of ATP2 by
<UP>d</UP>M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>/<UP>d</UP>t=<UP>−</UP>(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>2</SUB></UP></SUB>)/T<SUB><UP>1&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB> (8)
The solutions of this new system (Eqs. 3, 4, and 8) depend on the type of magnetization transfer protocol. In time-dependent saturation transfer (TDST), neglecting ATP compartmentation will not affect Ff (measured by saturation of gamma ATP). Fr, measured by saturation of PCr, will also be correct, as pointed out earlier (Meyer et al., 1982; Spencer et al., 1988): the underestimation of kr (by 1 - fATP) is indeed exactly compensated for by an overestimation of the ATP content. However, in IT, the presence of an ATP compartment will affect the analysis of both PCr and gamma ATP inversion in a different way.

Inversion of PCr

Magnetization of ATP2, not initially disturbed, thus is constant during the experiment: dMgamma ATP2/dt = 0. The evolution of ATP magnetization, Mgamma ATP(t), depends only on Mgamma ATP1 and is still described by Eq. 7; that of PCr, MPCr(t), follows Eq. 6. Ff is still given by Eq. 1. However, because only the sum Mgamma ATP = Mgamma ATP1 + Mgamma ATP2 is experimentally observed, only an apparent reverse flux (kr · Mgamma ATPinfinity ) is accessible. The steady state is described by kf · MPCrinfinity  = kr · Mgamma ATP1infinity . Because Mgamma ATPinfinity  = Mgamma ATP1infinity /(1 - fATP), the ratio Ff/Fr equals (1 - fATP). Therefore, in an inv-PCr protocol, correct kinetic parameters can be obtained, and the measured Ff/Fr directly quantifies the fraction of ATP not involved in the CK reaction.

Inversion of gamma ATP

In this protocol, both gamma ATP1 and gamma ATP2 are inverted: MPCr(t) and Mgamma ATP1(t) are still described by Eqs. 6 and 7, but the evolution of Mgamma ATP must now include the evolution of Mgamma ATP2, described by
M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>(t)=M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>2</SUB></UP></SUB>+(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>(0)−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>2</SUB></UP></SUB>)<UP>exp</UP>[<UP>−</UP>t/T<SUB><UP>1&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>] (9)
The time evolution of Mgamma ATP is thus described by a triple exponential:
M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>(t)=M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>+C<SUB>3</SUB><UP>exp</UP>&lgr;<SUB>1</SUB>t+C<SUB>4</SUB><UP>exp</UP>&lgr;<SUB>2</SUB>t (10)

<UP>+</UP>(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>(0)−M<SUP><UP>∞</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>2</SUB></UP></SUB>)<UP>exp</UP>−(t/T<SUB><UP>1&ggr;ATP</UP><SUB><UP>2</UP></SUB></SUB>)
The parameters of the CK reaction, as well as T1gamma ATP2, can be obtained by fitting Mgamma ATP(t) by Eq. 10 and MPCr(t) by Eq. 6. Again, Ff/Fr gives (1 - fATP). Neglecting the contribution of Eq. 9 and performing a two-site analysis will induce errors in all parameters and thus in both fluxes. Notice that in this case, the ratio Ff/Fr will be overestimated.

Model III: three-site three-compartment analysis: modification accounting for the implication of ATP in other exchanges

In contrast to PCr which is only metabolized by CK in the cell, ATP is involved in many other cellular reactions. Because of the high activity of ATP synthesis and hydrolysis in muscle, the ATP-Pi exchange has been recognized as a possible main source of artifact in the determination of CK flux: a three-site three-compartment exchange model has been proposed (Ugurbil et al., 1986; Spencer et al., 1988):
<UP>PCr</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>&ggr;ATP</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>d′</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>d</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>P<SUB>i</SUB></UP>
Model III

In this frame, elimination of the effect of Pi right-arrow ATP exchange by a continuous saturation of Pi (sat-Pi) will reduce the model to a two-site two-compartment exchange (model I) described by a new set of equations analogous in form to Eqs. 3 and 4 (for a complete description, see Ugurbil, 1985):
<UP>d</UP>M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>/<UP>d</UP>t=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUB><UP>1PCr</UP></SUB>)(M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>) (11)

<UP>+</UP>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>)

<UP>d</UP>M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>/<UP>d</UP>t=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>+1/T<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>1&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>)(M<SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>−M<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>&ggr;ATP</UP></SUB>) (12)

<UP>+</UP>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>(M<SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>−M<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>PCr</UP></SUB>)
where M*PCr and M*gamma ATP are the steady-state magnetization under sat-Pi, and 1/T*1gamma ATP = kd + 1/T1gamma ATP

Model IV: three-site four-compartment analysis: modification accounting for both ATP compartmentalization and the implication of ATP in other exchanges

In the case of ATP compartmentation,
   <UP>PCr</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>1</SUB></UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>d′</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>d</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>P<SUB>i</SUB></UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>h</UP></SUB></SUB></LL><UL><SUB>k<SUB><UP>s</UP></SUB></SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>&ggr;ATP<SUB>2</SUB></UP>
Model IV

A complete description of the system in the absence of Pi saturation is given in the Appendix. With the saturation of Pi this model reduces to model II with modified intrinsic relaxation parameters, if the only consequence of sat-Pi is to mask the influence of the Pi right-arrow ATP exchange. Equation 12 applies to the evolution of Mgamma ATP1. The time evolution of Mgamma ATP2 is described as previously by model II and Eq. 8. Notice that the determination of Ff by the saturation of gamma ATP is the only experimental protocol that is not influenced by the presence of a Pi left-right-arrow ATP exchange and can thus be used as a reference for in vivo flux determination.

In summary, this formalism describes how to take into account the presence of an ATP compartment in the analysis of both inversion of PCr and gamma ATP and shows that both protocols can independently quantify an ATP compartment.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Enzyme solutions

Measurement of CK flux in vitro was performed using two concentric tubes (OD tube 1 = 8 mm, tube 2 = 20 mm). Both tubes contained solutions, the initial composition of which was (in mM) 10 Cr, 5.7 Mg, 1 dithiothreitol, 0.5 EGTA, 100 HEPES, and 15% D2O. ATP (5 mM), PCr (10 mM), and rabbit muscle creatine kinase (Boehringer) at a concentration of 800 IU/ml were added to tube 1. Variable concentrations of ATP ranging from 0 to 1.2 mM (corresponding to a fraction of ATP2 not involved in CK reaction ranging from 0 to 50% of the total ATP) were added to tube 2, which did not contain CK. T1gamma ATP2 stays constant and similar to T1gamma ATP1 in this protocol. The pH of the final solutions was adjusted with acetic acid at 7.1 at 30°C. The flux measurement was performed at 30°C. To evaluate the possibility of measuring T1gamma ATP2 in our in vitro system, a second series of experiments was performed in which tube 2 contained a fixed ATP concentration of 1 mM (corresponding to 45% of the total ATP), but its relaxation properties were modified by replacing H2O in the solution with various amounts of glycerol (from 15 to 70%) to change the viscosity of the solution.

Isolated perfused rat hearts

Animal experimentation was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Accords for Humane Treatment of Animals during Experimentation. Wistar male rats (350-450 g) were anesthetized with ethyl carbamate (2 g/kg), and hearts were perfused by the Langendorff technique at a constant flow of 13.5 ml·min-1 as previously described (Hoerter et al., 1988). Briefly, a latex balloon was inserted into the left ventricle (LV) and inflated with D2O to isovolumic conditions of work. Mean coronary pressure, LV systolic pressure (LVP), end diastolic pressure (EDP), and heart spontaneous frequency were continuously monitored on a computer (Compaq) via Statham gauges. The rate pressure product (RPP in 104·mmHg·beats· min-1) was used as an index of contractility reflecting the energetic demand. The perfusion solution contained (in mM) 124 NaCl, 6 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, 1.1 mannitol, 10 Na-acetate, and 20 HEPES and was oxygenated with 100% O2. The pHo was adjusted to 7.35 at 36.5°C. Hearts were freeze clamped at the end of the experiment to measure their ATP, PCr, and Cr contents (in nmol·mg·/prot.-1) (Hoerter et al., 1988). These values were used to calculate the metabolite concentrations during magnetization transfer. CK flux was expressed in mM·s-1 (assuming cytosolic H2O volume = 2.72 µl·mg/prot.-1).

NMR

31P NMR spectra were acquired on a Innova Varian with a 9.4-T wide-bore magnet in 8-mm- and 20-mm-diameter tubes for the in vitro analysis and in a 20-mm tube for the heart. We used a pulse angle of 80°, 4 K data point acquisition, a spectral width of 10,000 Hz, an acquisition time of 0.205 s, a repetition time of 10 s, zero filling to 8 K, and line broadening of 20 Hz. For all flux measurements, 32-scan spectra were acquired by blocs of eight scans cycling four times through the whole protocol. For the heart experiment, homogeneity was performed on the heart water, the frequency was locked on D2O contained in the LV balloon, and the 360° pulse duration was measured on the gamma ATP peak. After 20 min of equilibration, four partially saturated spectra (repetition time 2 s, number of scans 32) were acquired. The stability of the preparation was checked by comparing fully relaxed control spectra (repetition time 10 s) acquired before and after the magnetization transfer experiment; any heart showing more than 10% variation in its metabolite content was discarded. These controls were also used to check the complete recovery of magnetization after 10 s of mixing time during inversion protocols. In four hearts TDST of gamma ATP (Bittl and Ingwall, 1985) was performed as a reference for the determination of forward CK flux. Eight spectra were acquired with a duration of gamma ATP saturation ranging from 0 to 9 s (a 9-s irradiation at mirror frequency was used to test radiation spillover). The delays between pulses were adjusted to achieve a constant rate of recurrence of 10 s in each spectrum. Inversion recovery (IR) was used to measure T1gamma ATP in vitro (eight spectra, 16 scans, delays ranging from 0 to 10 s). The inversion transfer (IT) experiments were performed with a pulse sequence consisting of a frequency-selective sinc pulse (15 ms, bandwidth 300 Hz), a variable mixing time delay (0.2-10 s), a 80° read pulse, and a fixed 10-s delay to allow full relaxation before the next inversion. Each inversion transfer experiment required 26 spectra in vitro (total time 75 min) and 13 spectra for the heart (total time 75 min). Five hearts were used for each protocol of inversion of PCr (inv-PCr) or gamma ATP (inv-gamma ATP). The effect of a shorter repetition time of 4 s was additionally checked in four hearts (inv-PCr, n = 2; inv-gamma ATP, n = 2). In 10 other hearts inv-gamma ATP or inv-PCr was performed under continuous saturation of Pi. Although off-resonance effects of a sat-Pi protocol on PCr could not be checked directly by mirror irradiation, we considered as negligible the spillover of Pi saturation because similar irradiation applied at 2.4 ppm from PCr (chemical shift of Pi = 4.86 ppm from PCr) resulted in a ~3% decrease in PCr.

Analysis

In TDST protocols, the exponential decay of gamma ATP magnetization, estimated by peak areas, was analyzed to determine in the same experiment T1PCr and kf (Bittl and Ingwall, 1985). In IT experiments, the adjustment of experimental data with theoretical expression was performed using either the peak areas or the product of peak amplitudes by alpha , as described by Led and Gesmar (1982), which should address the total NMR visible cellular metabolites. alpha , the average ratio of peak area to amplitude, was measured for each heart (mean value 0.61 ± 0.02 and 1.50 ± 0.03, n = 10, for inv-PCr and inv-gamma ATP, respectively). The two analyses gave similar results; only the latter is shown here because it results in smaller data scattering. The evolution of the inverted and noninverted species was fitted to the solutions of Bloch equations, using the Levenberg-Marquardt method. Equations 6 and 7 were used for the two-site two-compartment analysis of inv-PCr and inv-gamma ATP protocol. The adjustable parameters in this analysis were kf, k1f, kr, k1r, and the magnetizations of PCr and ATP at t = 0 and t = infinity . Two-site three-compartment analysis of the inv-ATP experiment under saturation of Pi had to be performed by a three-exponential fit of Mgamma ATP using Eq. 10. However, because of the number of unknown parameters, the confidence interval for the parameters derived from this analysis was high both in vitro and in the myocardium. To improve this analysis, Ff and T1PCr measured in the inv-PCr experiment were imposed as fixed parameters (for justification see the Results).

All data were expressed as mean ± SE. Differences between groups were analyzed by t-test, paired t-test, or variance analysis and Student-Newman-Keuls test.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

In vitro validation of the model

Variation of fraction of the ATP (fATP) that does not participate in the CK reaction

To test the model in vitro, the fraction fATP of ATP not involved in the CK reaction was first varied from 0 to 0.5, while T1gamma ATP2 was kept constant (and equal to T1gamma ATP1).

Inversion of PCr. The parameters of the CK reaction kf, kr, T1PCr, and T1gamma ATP1 were first measured in the absence of compartmentalization (fATP = 0). As expected from the in vitro CK kinetics, Ff was equal to Fr. With the increase in fATP, the values of kf, kr, T1PCr, and T1gamma ATP1 remained constant as predicted by the theoretical development; their mean values were kf = 0.30 ± 0.01 s-1, kr = 0.57 ± 0.02 s-1, T1PCr = 4.2 ± 0.3 s, and T1gamma ATP1 = 2.4 ± 0.2 s. Fig. 1 a shows the evolution of the measured Ff and Fr as a function of fATP as well as their theoretical prediction. The Ff value remained constant (1.00 ± 0.04 MU·s-1). The observed increase in Fr (from 0.98 to 1.96 MU·s-1) was due solely to the overestimation of the ATP used in the flux calculation. As a result, the ratio Ff/Fr decreased from 1 to 0.5. Ff/Fr was a direct measure of (1 - fATP) as expected from the theory. Indeed, an excellent correlation was observed between the size of the ATP compartment imposed experimentally and its value as estimated by inv-PCr (r2 = 0.97).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   Influence of the presence of an ATP compartment on the in vitro determination of CK flux parameters by inversion transfer protocols. (a) Protocol of inversion of PCr. (b) Protocol of inversion of gamma ATP. Forward and reverse flux (top) as well as Ff/Fr ratio (bottom) were expressed as a function of ATP2 (as a percentage of total ATP) when the fraction of ATP not involved in CK (in tube2) was increased. Fluxes (shown in symbols) were computed by fitting experimental data to Eqs. 6 and 7. The continuous lines were obtained by fitting Eqs. 6 and 7 to kinetics reconstructed from the known fraction f in Eqs. 6 and 11. Input parameters: kf = 0.25 s-1, kr = 0.5 s-1, T1PCr = 3.5 s, T1gamma ATP1 = T1gamma ATP2 = 2.5 s. Neglecting the ATP compartmentalization in the analysis resulted in errors in flux determination and in Ff/Fr.

Inversion gamma ATP protocol. Likewise, in the absence of ATP compartmentation (fATP = 0), Ff and Fr were equal. When fATP increased, the two-site three-compartment analysis correctly estimated kr (0.56 ± 0.04 s-1), T1gamma ATP1 (2.6 ± 0.4 s), and T1gamma ATP2 (2.5 ± 0.5 s). The fraction fATP extracted from this analysis was well correlated with the size of the ATP compartment (r2 = 0.96; not shown). Neglecting ATP compartmentation (i.e., analyzing the data by the two-site two-compartment model I) did not allow a correct determination of the rate constants. As the fraction of ATP increased (Fig. 1 b), a rise was observed both in kf (from 0.28 s-1 to 0.73 s-1) and in Ff (from 1 to 1.77 MU·s-1). The rate constant kr decreased from 0.62 s-1 to 0.26 s-1. One should notice that in this analysis, no significant change could be experimentally detected in Fr (mean Fr = 0.98 ± 0.07 MU·s-1). This result suggests that the error made by neglecting fATP in the analysis was balanced by an underestimation of kr: i.e., the error in kr can be roughly estimated as (1 - fATP). The ratio Ff/Fr increased from 1 to 1.87 MU·s-1. Again, Scheme II was adequate to predict the measured Ff and Fr in inv-gamma ATP. No change were found in the values of T1PCr and T1gamma ATP1 (3.9 ± 0.4 s and 2.4 ± 0.2 s, respectively). Thus, in the case of ATP compartmentalization, an analysis using model I generated errors in the determination of the rate constants, of the forward flux, and of the ratio Ff/Fr, but provided a correct estimation of the reverse CK flux.

Variation of T1gamma ATP2 for a constant fraction fATP

As shown above, the two-site three-compartment analysis (model II) theoretically allows an estimation of T1gamma ATP2. To test the sensitivity of this determination, T1gamma ATP2 was modified by increasing the viscosity of solution with glycerol, keeping constant the fraction of ATP not involved in CK reaction (fATP = 0.45). Because of increased viscosity, T1gamma ATP2 decreased from 2.5 to 0.8 s, as measured by IR in the absence of CK. The values of T1gamma ATP2 obtained from the inv-gamma ATP protocol were in good correlation (r2 = 0.94, n = 5) with those measured by IR.

In conclusion, these in vitro data provided an experimental validation of the theoretical analysis used and showed that the presence of an ATP compartment, fATP, not involved in the CK reaction disturbed the measured kinetics in IT experiments in a predictable manner. In the case of this simple model, accurate estimation of fATP was obtained with inv-PCr. In the inv-ATP protocol, a two-site two-compartment analysis correctly measured Fr despite errors in all rate constants. The two-site three-compartment analysis, in addition to leading to a correct estimation of all kinetic parameters, provided an independent estimation of fATP and a measure of the intrinsic longitudinal relaxation of ATP in the compartment.

Application to the perfused rat heart

Characteristics of the hearts

In the various magnetization protocols hearts developed similar contractile performances; the mean pooled values were LVP = 148 ± 4 mm Hg, frequency = 271 ± 6 beats· min-1 and rate pressure product = 4.0 ± 0.1 × 104 mmHg · beats·min-1 (n = 24). No significant rise in end diastolic pressure occurred during the experiment. Metabolite concentrations during the magnetization transfer period were similar for all inversion protocols; the pooled values were ATP = 6.8 ± 0.3 mM, PCr = 12.3 ± 0.3 mM, Pi = 2.9 ± 0.2 mM, pHi = 7.09 ± 0.01 (PCr to ATP ratio = 1.96 ± 0.09). Creatine was 11.6 ± 0.3 mM and free ADP assuming CK equilibrium was 47 ± 2 µM (n = 24).

The parameters of the forward CK flux measured by time-dependent saturation of gamma ATP are shown in Table 2. Forward CK flux was 1.02 ± 0.04 MU·s-1 (7.3 ± 0.3 mM·s-1), and T1PCr was 3.2 ± 0.3 s (n = 4), in agreement with published data (Stepanov et al., 1997). Indeed, neither ATP compartmentalization nor ATP-Pi exchange should influence the determination of the forward flux parameters by TDST.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2   Parameters of the forward and reverse CK flux in perfused hearts: comparison of the protocols of time-dependent saturation transfer of gamma ATP, inversion transfer of PCr, and inversion transfer of gamma ATP analyzed in the two-site two compartment model I

Inversion transfer

An inversion PCr protocol is shown in Fig. 2 a as well as the time evolution of Mgamma ATP and MPCr in a typical heart (Fig. 2 b). The mean kf and forward CK flux measured by inv-PCr (0.55 ± 0.03 s-1 and 1.05 ± 0.06 MU·s-1 respectively) were similar to those measured by TDST (Table 2). Notice, however, that k1f was higher (and thus T1PCr was lower) in the inv-PCr protocol. The reverse flux was markedly larger than Ff, and thus the ratio Ff/Fr, 0.51 ± 0.04, was significantly lower than unity (p < 0.001). According to our in vitro approach, this suggests that 49% of cellular ATP did not participate in the CK reaction.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   Inversion of PCr in a representative heart. (a) Stacked plot of the spectra obtained for various times of mixing after the sinc pulse selectively inverting PCr (time of mixing in seconds on the right). The dotted line shows the equilibrium magnetization of the noninverted species expected in the absence of inversion. (b) Variation of PCr and ATP magnetizations (in magnetization units) as a function of the time of mixing.

Fig. 3 shows a typical inv-gamma ATP protocol. When analyzed in model I, the mean Ff appeared to be twice as high as the value determined by TDST or by inv-PCr protocol (Table 2). As a result, Ff/Fr, 1.80 ± 0.25, was significantly different from 1 (p < 0.01). Again, by analogy with the in vitro model overestimation of Ff/Fr could result from the presence of an ATP compartment. Table 3 presents the individual analysis in model I of each heart used in the inv-ATP protocol: the parameters of the reverse flux were determined with small confidence intervals (at most 15% on kr and k1r). Yet the insufficiency of this model was clearly shown by the impossibility of estimating T1PCr (in four of five inv-gamma ATP hearts, kf was >= k1f).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   Inversion of gamma ATP in a representative heart. Same legend as for Fig. 2. Transfer of magnetization between gamma - and beta ATP could not be demonstrated.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3   gamma ATP inversion transfer experiments in individual rat hearts: analysis in model I (two-site, two-compartment)

Hence, by comparison with the in vitro study, the results of both inv-PCr and inv-ATP protocols could be directly explained by the existence of a fraction of ATP that did not exchange with PCr through CK. However, the importance of this fraction and the impossibility of determining T1PCr by inv-gamma ATP suggest that the simple model II was not sufficient to describe myocardial CK flux.

Inversion transfer with saturation of Pi

Elimination of the effect of an ATP-Pi exchange was achieved by continuous saturation of Pi. Sat-Pi decreased the steady-state magnetization of both ATP and PCr (by 15 ± 1 and 14 ± 1%, respectively, n = 10) and affected CK kinetic parameters (Table 4).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4   Comparison of the parameters of forward and reverse CK fluxes measured in the perfused heart by inversion PCr and inversion of gamma ATP under continuous saturation of Pi magnetization

In inv-PCr, all parameters of the forward CK flux (kf and Ff), including k1f and T1PCr, were similar, in that protocol, to those measured by saturation of gamma ATP (Table 2). Thus TDST and PCr inversion transfer with saturation of Pi are fully equivalent for the detection of forward flux in myocardium. The ratio Ff/Fr (0.80 ± 0.06) was still significantly different from 1 (p < 0.05). According to our in vitro model, this suggests the existence of a 20% ATP compartmentalization.

In inversion of gamma ATP, a complex two-site, three-compartment analysis was required to account for the presence of ATP compartmentalization. Indeed, allowing all parameters to fit without constraints resulted in huge confidence intervals (for instance, ~200% on k1 determination). However, the mean values of the forward and reverse parameters obtained (data not shown) were not statistically different from those of Table 4, which presents the analysis performed by imposing the forward flux parameters. The observed ratio Ff/Fr (0.67 ± 0.11) still suggests the existence of a significant ATP fraction of 33%. Although this triple compartment analysis of inv-ATP was difficult in the heart, fATP was similar to that measured by inv-PCr. No significant difference was found in the apparent intrinsic relaxation time of ATP2 and ATP1; T1gamma ATP1 was also similar to that measured by inv-PCr protocol. Notice that with saturation of Pi, if the presence of the ATP compartment was neglected (i.e., analysis in model I), the mean Fr value (1.01 ± 0.07 MU·s-1), was similar to Ff obtained in inv-PCr, as also expected from the in vitro study, suggesting the relevance of the compartmentalization model.

Thus, under conditions supposed to mask the effect of the Pi right-arrow ATP transfer by a continuous saturation of Pi, the two inversion protocols independently revealed the existence of a significant ATP compartment (~20% of myocardial ATP) not involved in the CK reaction.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Ability of the different techniques to reveal ATP compartmentalization

As shown in vitro, a complete time analysis of the magnetization recoveries in an IT protocol is able to reveal the existence of an ATP compartment isolated from CK. As expected from the theory, neglecting ATP compartmentalization (i.e., performing the analysis in model I) resulted in an apparent flux discrepancy in both inv-PCr and inv-ATP protocols (an underestimation of Ff/Fr in the former and its overestimation in the latter; Fig. 1). The same behavior was observed in myocardium (Table 2), clearly confirming the insufficiency of the two-site, two-compartment exchange model to account for myocardial energy transfer.

The possibility of detecting an ATP compartment by NMR depends on the type of NMR transfer protocol (Table 1). For instance, when ATP Pi exchange was masked, flux discrepancy could not be evidenced by steady state or time-dependent saturation transfer (Ugurbil et al., 1986; Spencer et al., 1988). As discussed in the Theory section and previously reported (Bittl and Ingwall, 1985), such an ATP compartmentalization cannot be revealed by TDST. Furthermore, its effects will be minimized by an analysis of the initial rates of recovery in an IT or a 2D protocol, as easily demonstrated from the Bloch equations (Meyer et al., 1982; Korestky et al., 1985; DeFuria, 1985). Indeed, no discrepancy between the Ff and Fr has ever been revealed by initial rate analysis in muscle (Hsieh and Balaban, 1988; McFarland et al., 1994).

The results of magnetization transfer experiments are also highly dependent on the experimental conditions (Table 1). For example, in glucose substrate and basal working conditions, equal fluxes were observed by a complete analysis of inversion and by steady-state saturation transfer (Degani et al., 1985). The flux discrepancy, when observed, was suggested to be directly related to the level of cardiac performance (Koretsky et al., 1985); indeed both the ATP-Pi exchange and the amount of ATP present in the mitochondrial matrix (Soboll and Bunger, 1981) are directly related to work. Moreover, most authors, except the group of Ingwall (Bittl and Ingwall, 1985; Bittl et al., 1987; Spencer et al., 1988), observing that the flux discrepancy seen in vivo (Koretsky et al., 1986; Hsieh and Balaban, 1988; Mora et al., 1992) or in hearts using acetate or pyruvate (Nunally and Hollis, 1979; Matthews et al., 1982; Ugurbil et al., 1986; Zweier and Jacobus, 1987) disappeared with glucose utilization (Matthews et al., 1982; Ugurbil et al., 1986; Zweier and Jacobus, 1987), suggested that the contribution of contaminating reactions or ATP compartmentalization was masked by the higher CK flux observed in glucose. Last, various pulse protocols were used in the different studies. Mora et al. (1992), using a long repetition time of 10 s, allowing relaxation of each species, as in our work, could also reveal the apparent flux discrepancy. In contrast, when using a short repetition time of 4 s (similar to T1PCr), like that of Degani et al. (1985), we could no longer find evidence of the flux discrepancy (Ff/Fr was 1.04 in inv-PCr and 1.08 in inv-ATP, n = 2). This might suggest that some reaction contributing to the detected flux was eliminated by fast pulsing. Although the exact contributions of the various factors (work, substrate, pulse conditions) are difficult to appreciate, we believe that they may explain the impossibility of experimentally detecting the presence of an ATP compartment in some previous work.

We further demonstrated that when Pi magnetization was continuously saturated during inversion experiments, the parameters of forward CK flux were similar in protocols of inversion (Table 4) and saturation of gamma ATP (Table 2) and thus can be consistently determined. Absolute flux values (Table 5) were also similar to Ff previously measured by gamma ATP saturation (Koretsky et al., 1986; Ugurbil et al., 1986; Stepanov et al., 1997), in which neither ATP compartmentation nor ATP-Pi exchange induces errors in CK parameters. Although Koretsky et al. (1985) and Brindle (1988) previously suggested that the inversion and the saturation protocols differ in their capacity for CK flux detection, here we show that, when inversion was performed with saturation of Pi, the two techniques were equivalent for the detection of the forward flux. The advantage of the complete analysis of an IT experiment over the other experimental protocols is, however, its ability to quantify ATP compartmentalization by two independent methods (inv-PCr and inv-gamma ATP).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5   Summary of flux measurements in myocardium

Flux discrepancy observed with saturation of Pi can be understood in the hypothesis of an ATP compartmentalization

The origin of the observed discrepancy of forward and reverse flux has been alternately attributed to the existence of an ATP compartmentation (model II; Nunnally and Hollis, 1979), the exchange of ATP with species other than PCr (model III; Ugurbil et al., 1986; Spencer et al., 1988), or the influence of a small invisible ATP pool in saturation protocols (Koretsky et al., 1985; Zahler et al., 1987). We do not favor the last as the source of flux discrepancy observed in our inversion protocol. Indeed, in a saturation protocol, the influence of a small invisible ATP pool on the evolution of MPCr could be detected. However, in a pulse labeling technique like ATP inversion, the change in PCr magnetization being proportional to the size of the inverted compartment, such a small invisible ATP pool would have a minimal effect on the exchange, as discussed earlier (Koretsky et al., 1985; Brindle, 1988). Furthermore, this invisible ATP must be small because the ATP content of a normoxic heart is identical when measured by NMR or biochemistry (Humphrey and Garlick, 1991). Thus the exclusive hypothesis of an invisible ATP pool would not be able to account for our inversion data.

The continuous saturation of Pi resonance makes it possible to mask the influence of the ATP-Pi exchange on the measured CK kinetics (Ugurbil et al., 1986). We indeed observed a clear convergence between the data obtained in vitro and those obtained in perfused rat heart with sat-Pi. All data of both inv-ATP and inv-PCr protocols (Table 4) could thus be understood in the hypothesis of an ATP compartment that does not exchange with PCr in model II. This two-site, three-compartment model is a minimal model for cardiac CK explored with saturation of Pi, i.e., a model fitting the data with the smallest number of unknown parameters (two fluxes, one fraction of ATP and T1s).

How to understand the data obtained without saturation of Pi

Sat-Pi decreased the steady-state magnetization of both PCr and ATP by ~15%, as already observed (Ugurbil et al., 1986). Furthermore, sat-Pi affected kinetic parameters of the forward and reverse CK, as shown by comparison of Tables 4 and 2. Considering the only consequence of sat-Pi to be the masking of Pi right-arrow ATP exchange, it should be possible to theoretically reconstruct the data of Table 2 simply by adding the influence of this exchange to the experimental results of Table 4. The simulation (shown in the Appendix and Table 6) suggests that experimental data of Table 2 and the decrease in steady-state magnetization induced by Pi saturation were not fully described by the models considered. As already suggested in the analysis of saturation transfer protocol (Brindle, 1988), the mask of Pi right-arrow ATP exchange per se is not expected to have such an influence on CK flux determination. Moreover, the equivalent decrease in steady-state magnetizations MPCrinfinity and Mgamma ATPinfinity induced by sat-Pi was not anticipated (Table 6). This suggests that sat-Pi might not just eliminate the contribution of the ATP-Pi exchange, but might also affect other cellular reactions or metabolites implying PCr: an exchange between PCr and ATP2 appears to be a good candidate for contributing to the decreased MPCrinfinity . In conclusion, model IV should be refined to account for the results observed in the absence of Pi saturation.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6   Comparison of the change observed with saturation of Pi and the simulation of the effect of the ATP-Pi exchange

Physiological considerations and their expected NMR consequences

The model developed here allowed us to explain both inversion experiments with sat-Pi, suggesting that the system studied by NMR could be mimicked with the minimal simple assumption of an ATP not being involved in the CK reaction. Moreover, this fraction, 20-33% of total cellular ATP, was in the range of mitochondrial ATP content described in the literature for isolated cardiac mitochondria, isolated cardiac myocytes, or hearts performing medium work (Asimakis and Sordall, 1981; Soboll and Bunger, 1981; Geisbuhler et al., 1984). In the hypothesis of ATP2 localized in the mitochondrial matrix (ATP2 = ATPm), a more physiological scheme can be proposed. Indeed, we have not considered until now the NMR complexity arising from the specific localization of CK isoforms in myocardium (Nunnally and Hollis, 1979; Koretsky et al., 1985; Zahler et al., 1987), particularly the high proportion of mitochondrial CK (mito-CK congruent  20% of total CK) localized in the intermembrane space of mitochondria in the vicinity of translocase. Fig. 4, which schematizes the myocardial phosphorus exchanges, includes cytosolic and mitochondrial CK and the restriction of diffusion for CK metabolites, which separates their function.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   Schematic representation of myocardial CK. The model takes into account compartmentalization of mitochondrial CK isoenzyme (CKm) located in the intermembrane in the vicinity of translocase. CKc refers to both cytosolic and myofibrillar CK. Gray areas, metabolite compartment: Pi, ATP1, ATP2 and PCr. Subscript m relates to mitochondrial matrix, c to cytosol, and im to intermembrane space (between the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes). k, rate constants: kf and kr, CK flux of ATP and PCr synthesis, respectively. kt, rate constant of ATP efflux from mitochondrial matrix by adenine nucleotide translocase. The influx of ATP to the matrix was neglected because under high activation of mitochondrial respiration (i.e., when the heart works) the translocase predominantly extrudes ATP from the matrix to the mitochondrial intermembrane space. ks and kh, rate constants of mitochondrial ATP synthesis and hydrolysis, respectively. The presence of oxidative substrate (acetate or pyruvate) is well known to inhibit myocardial glycolytic ATP production in normoxia. Thus the Pi