help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhabotinsky, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhabotinsky, A. M.

Biophys J, November 2000, p. 2211-2221, Vol. 79, No. 5

Bistability in the Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase-Phosphatase System

Anatol M. Zhabotinsky

Department of Chemistry and Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110 USA


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A mathematical model is presented of autophosphorylation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMKII) and its dephosphorylation by a phosphatase. If the total concentration of CaMKII subunits is significantly higher than the phosphatase Michaelis constant, two stable steady states of the CaMKII autophosphorylation can exist in a Ca2+ concentration range from below the resting value of the intracellular [Ca2+] to the threshold concentration for induction of long-term potentiation (LTP). Bistability is a robust phenomenon, it occurs over a wide range of parameters of the model. Ca2+ transients that switch CaMKII from the low-phosphorylated state to the high-phosphorylated one are in the same range of amplitudes and frequencies as the Ca2+ transients that induce LTP. These results show that the CaMKII-phosphatase bistability may play an important role in long-term synaptic modifications. They also suggest a plausible explanation for the very high concentrations of CaMKII found in postsynaptic densities of cerebral neurons.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is the most studied experimental model of memory (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; Huang et al., 1996; Malenka and Nicoll, 1999). Experimental data suggest that LTP relates to intermediate memory, which can be rewritten, as shown by phenomena of depotentiation and long-term depression (Linden, 1994; Bear and Malenka, 1994; Bear, 1996). Because memories of such type often consist of bistable elements, it is natural to ask whether some of the biophysical and biochemical systems, which participate in LTP, can operate as bistable switches. Lisman (1985) suggested that elements of the synaptic memory can use bistability of protein phosphorylation, and analyzed a bistable system that consisted of a protein kinase capable of intermolecular autocatalytic autophosphorylation and a phosphatase that dephosphorylates the kinase.

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) may be a key component of such a bistable molecular switch. It is known that autophosphorylation of CaMKII results in Ca2+/CaM-independent (autonomous) kinase activity (Braun and Schulman, 1995; Hanson and Schulman, 1992; Soderling, 1995). During induction of LTP, short-term high elevations of Ca2+ concentration produce autophosphorylation of CaMKII that lasts 30 min or longer (Fukunaga et al., 1993, 1995; Miller and Kennedy, 1986; Ouyang et al., 1997). As long as CaMKII remains autophosphorylated it is able to phosphorylate the LTP related targets, such as AMPA receptors (Barria et al., 1997), even after the return of [Ca2+] to its resting level (Lisman et al., 1997).

Although a crucial role of CaMKII autophosphorylation in induction of LTP is widely accepted, its participation in maintenance of LTP remains controversial (Giese et al., 1998; Kennedy, 1998; Lisman, 1994; Lisman et al., 1997). To prove the latter, it is necessary to show that a permanent level of autonomous activity of CaMKII lasts in the involved synapses as long as LTP does. Some indirect supporting evidence exists. Zhao et al. (1999) have found that a lasting increase in the in vivo phosphorylation level of CaMKII accompanies long-term memory in chicks. Also, it seems almost evident that long-term autophosphorylation of CaMKII should be connected with some specific structures in neurons. The basal autonomous CaMKII activity constitutes ~5% of the maximum activity in neurons, while it is only ~0.03% in the purified enzyme (Hanson and Schulman, 1992). This relatively high level of autonomous activity cannot be maintained in cytosol of neurons, where protein phosphatase activity is relatively high and essentially Ca2+-independent (Strack et al., 1997). Thus, it takes only several minutes to dephosphorylate CaMKII added to cell extracts from the hippocampal CA1 region (Fukunaga et al., 2000). The postsynaptic densities (PSD) (Harris and Kater, 1994; Ziff, 1997) are the structures that could maintain high levels of CaMKII autophosphorylation because protein phosphatase activity in PSD is Ca2+-dependent in vivo and should be rather low at the resting level of Ca2+ (Mulkey et al., 1994; Strack et al., 1997). Indeed, ~10% of CaMKII remained phosphorylated in the total PSD fraction when isolation was done in the presence of inhibitors of protein phosphatases (Strack et al., 1997).

In view of these data, it is of interest to determine whether CaMKII autophosphorylation can be bistable in a wide range of [Ca2+] and whether such bistability can play a role in LTP.

Several mathematical models have been developed to study the dynamics of CaMKII autophosphorylation in response to variations of intracellular calcium concentration (Lisman and Goldring, 1988; Michelson and Schulman, 1994; Matsushita et al., 1995; Dosemeci and Albers, 1996; Coomber, 1998; Kubota and Bower, 1999). They showed a strong dependence of the level of autophosphorylation on the amplitude and duration of Ca2+ pulses. Recently, Okamoto and Ichikawa (2000) have demonstrated that CaMKII autophosphorylation is bistable in their model when [Ca2+] varies from 0.28 to 0.33 µM. This range is quite narrow and does not include the resting Ca2+ concentration.

Here, I develop a simple model of autophosphorylation of CaMKII in the presence of a phosphatase. I show that if the total concentration of CaMKII subunits is significantly higher than the phosphatase Michaelis constant, two stable steady states of CaMKII autophosphorylation can be found over a wide range of concentrations of the intracellular calcium. This range includes the resting Ca2+ concentration, and is wide enough to ensure that the background firing activity cannot induce transition from the low- to the high-phosphorylated states of CaMKII. I demonstrate that Ca2+ transients that induce such transitions are in the same range of amplitudes and frequencies as the Ca2+ transients that induce LTP. Moreover, concentrations of CaMKII, which are necessary to produce such a bistability, are shown to be of the same order of magnitude as the values found in the postsynaptic density. These results show that the CaMKII-phosphatase bistability can play an important role in the long-term synaptic modifications. They also suggest a plausible explanation for the very high concentrations of CaMKII found in postsynaptic densities of cerebral neurons.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Model

It is known that autophosphorylation of Thr286 in alpha -subunits of CaMKII results in Ca2+/CaM-independent (autonomous) kinase activity (Hanson and Schulman, 1992). The autophosphorylation is an intraholoenzyme, intersubunit process (Hanson et al., 1994; Mukherji and Soderling, 1994). CaMKII consists of 8-12 subunits that form a petal structure (Hanson and Schulman, 1992). During autophosphorylation, one subunit acts as a catalyst and another as a substrate. Either binding of Ca2+/calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM) or phosphorylation of Thr286 is necessary for activation of the catalytic subunit. The substrate subunit must also bind Ca2+/CaM to be phosphorylated (Hanson et al., 1994).

Here I use a model with many simplifications. I ignore any difference between alpha - and beta -subunits. Binding of ATP to a subunit does not appear explicitly in the model. Binding of Ca2+/CaM and phosphatase to a subunit is independent of the state of other subunits. Activation of subunits by Ca2+ obeys the Hill equation. Binding of phosphatase to a phosphorylated subunit and the rate of dephosphorylation is independent of binding of Ca2+/CaM. I consider catalytic activities of the unphosphorylated subunit bound to Ca2+/CaM and the phosphorylated subunit as being equal.

I use a model with asymmetric interaction of the neighbor subunits as proposed by Hanson and Schulman (1992). Essentially, their model is a ring along which autophosphorylation propagates in one direction. I use a model with 10 subunits in simulations and, in what follows, all the coefficients related to the number of subunits in a holoenzyme correspond to the 10-subunit model. Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the first two steps of autophosphorylation of a holoenzyme with six subunits. The left column presents initiation of autophosphorylation. After two neighbor subunits bind (Ca2+)4CaM, designated C, the first subunit phosphorylates the second one in the clockwise direction. The following scheme corresponds to the initiation step:
4<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>+<UP>CaM</UP> ⇄ <UP>C</UP> (1)

<UP>P</UP><SUB>0</SUB>+<UP>C</UP> ⇄ <UP>P</UP><SUB>0</SUB><UP>C</UP> (2)

<UP>P</UP><SUB>0</SUB><UP>C</UP>+<UP>C</UP> ⇄ <UP>P</UP><SUB>0</SUB><UP>C</UP><SUB>2</SUB> (3)

<UP>P</UP><SUB>0</SUB><UP>C</UP><SUB>2</SUB> → <UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB><UP>C</UP><SUB>2</SUB> (4)
Here P0 is the unphosphorylated holoenzyme and P1 is the 1-fold phosphorylated holoenzyme. I describe the (Ca2+)4CaM activation of subunits by the empirical Hill equation:
F=<FR><NU>([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP></NU><DE>1+([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP></DE></FR> (5)
Here F is the fraction of subunits bound to (Ca2+)4CaM and KH1 = [Ca2+]50 is the calcium Hill constant of CaMKII. The probability of (Ca2+)4CaM binding to two neighbor subunits is low when [Ca2+] is significantly less than KH1. In this case, the rate of the initiation step is:
v<SUB>1</SUB>=<FR><NU>10k<SUB>1</SUB>([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>8</SUP><UP>P</UP><SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE>(1+([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP>)<SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> (6)
Here k1 is the rate constant of Reaction 4, 10 is the statistical factor.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   Schematic of the first two steps of autophosphorylation of CaMKII holoenzyme. C designates the Ca2+/calmodulin complex, P is orthophosphate.

The middle and right columns in Fig. 1 present two routes of propagation of autophosphorylation. Autonomous activity of the CaMKII is usually 60-80% of the (Ca2+)/CaM-dependent activity (Hanson and Schulman, 1992). I assume here that catalytic activity of the autophosphorylated subunit does not depend on binding of (Ca2+)4CaM. This means that I neglect differences between the middle and right columns, and in this case the rate of propagation of autophosphorylation depends only on the following reactions:
<UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB>+<UP>C</UP> ⇄ <UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB><UP>C</UP> (7)

<UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB><UP>C</UP> → <UP>P</UP><SUB>2</SUB> (8)
Correspondingly, the rate of the second autophosphorylation step is:
V<SUB>2</SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB>1</SUB>([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP><UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB></NU><DE>1+([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP></DE></FR> (9)
Here k1 is the rate constant of Reaction 8, which is the same as of Reaction 4.

In the absence of dephosphorylation, the subsequent steps of propagation of autophosphorylation are identical to the first one because there is always only one autophosphorylating pair in which the unphosphorylated subunit is adjacent to the phosphorylated neighbor in the clockwise direction. However, protein phosphatases dephosphorylate subunits at random. As a result, there is a random distribution of phosphorylated and unphosphorylated subunits in the holoenzyme. I assume that all distinguishable configurations of subunits in the holoenzyme with a given number of phosphorylated subunits exist with equal probabilities. In this case, the effective number of autophosphorylating pairs is:
w<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>=w<SUB>10−<UP>i</UP></SUB>= <FR><NU><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>1</LL><UL><UP>i</UP></UL></LIM> jm<SUB><UP>j</UP></SUB></NU><DE><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>1</LL><UL><UP>i</UP></UL></LIM> m<SUB><UP>j</UP></SUB></DE></FR>, (10)
where mj is number of distinguishable configurations with j autophosphorylating pairs.

Values of wi are: w1 = w9 = 1.0, w2 = w8 = 1.8, w3 = w7 = 2.3, w4 = w6 = 2.7, w5 = 2.8.

Then, the rate of autophosphorylation of holoenzymes with i phosphorylated subunits is:
V<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>=v<SUB>2</SUB>w<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>, (11)
where
v<SUB>2</SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB>1</SUB>([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP></NU><DE>1+([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>1</SUB>)<SUP>4</SUP></DE></FR> (12)
is the per-site rate of propagation of autophosphorylation.

Dephosphorylation of subunits proceeds according to the Michaelis-Menten scheme:
<UP>SP</UP>+<UP>E</UP> ⇄ <UP>SPE</UP> → <UP>E</UP>+<UP>S</UP> (13)
Here S is an unphosphorylated subunit and SP is a phosphorylated one. Accordingly, the rate of dephosphorylation of holoenzymes with i phosphorylated subunits is:
V<SUB>−<UP>i</UP></SUB>=v<SUB>3</SUB>i<UP>P</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>, (14)
where
v<SUB>3</SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB>2</SUB>e<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>M</UP></SUB>+ <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>1</LL><UL>10</UL></LIM> i<UP>P</UP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (15)
is the per-subunit rate of dephosphorylation, ep is the concentration of the active protein phosphatase, and k2 and KM are the catalytic and the Michaelis constants, respectively.

Four protein phosphatases dephosphorylate CaMKII-P: PP1, PP2A, PP2C (Strack et al., 1997), and a specific CaMKII phosphatase (Ishida et al., 1998; Kitani et al., 1999). According to Strack et al. (1997), activity of PP1 is 20% and PP2A is 60% of the total phosphatase activity in cytosol and, correspondingly, 50% and 8% in PSD. PP1 is the only protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates CaMKII in PSD according to Strack et al. (1997) and Yoshimura et al. (1999).

Activity of PP1 can be controlled by Ca2+/CaM via inhibitor I, calcineurin (CaN), and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) (Shenolikar and Nairn, 1991; Mulkey et al., 1994). PKA phosphorylates inhibitor 1 (I1) and calcineurin dephosphorylates it (Shenolikar and Nairn, 1991). The Hill number for Ca2+ activation of CaN is ~3 (Stemmer and Klee, 1994). Phosphorylated inhibitor-1 (I1P) deactivates PP1 with KI = 1 nM (Endo et al., 1996). The corresponding scheme is:
<AR><R><C><UP>I</UP>1+<UP>PKA</UP></C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>I</UP>1 · <UP>PKA</UP> → <UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP></C></R><R><C>3<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>+<UP>CaM</UP></C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>C</UP><SUB>3</SUB></C></R><R><C><UP>CaN</UP>+<UP>C</UP><SUB>3</SUB></C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>CaN</UP> · <UP>C</UP><SUB>3</SUB></C></R><R><C><UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP>+<UP>CaN</UP> · <UP>C</UP><SUB>3</SUB></C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP> · <UP>CaN</UP> · <UP>C</UP><SUB>3</SUB> → <UP>I</UP>1</C></R><R><C><UP>SP</UP>+<UP>PP</UP>1</C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>SP</UP> · <UP>PP</UP>1 → <UP>PP</UP>1+<UP>S</UP></C></R><R><C><UP>PP</UP>1+<UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP></C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>PP</UP>1 · <UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP></C></R><R><C><UP>SP</UP> · <UP>PP</UP>1+<UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP></C><C>⇄</C><C><UP>SP</UP> · <UP>PP</UP>1 · <UP>I</UP>1<UP>P</UP></C></R></AR> (16)
I assume that the concentration of free I1 is constant and much less than KM of PKA, and the concentration of free I1P is much less than KM of CaN.

The complete model of autophosphorylation of CaMKII in the presence of Ca2+-dependent PP1 is:
<AR><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C><UP>−</UP>v<SUB>1</SUB>+v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>1</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>v<SUB>1</SUB>−v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB>−v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB>+2v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>2</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB>−2v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>2</SUB>−1.8v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>2</SUB>+3v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>3</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>3</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>1.8v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>2</SUB>−3v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>3</SUB>−2.3v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>3</SUB>+4v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>4</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>4</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>2.3v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>3</SUB>−4v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>4</SUB>−2.7v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>4</SUB>+5v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>5</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>5</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>2.7v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>4</SUB>−5v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>5</SUB>−2.8v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>5</SUB>+6v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>6</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>6</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>2.8v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>5</SUB>−6v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>6</SUB>−2.7v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>6</SUB>+7v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>7</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>7</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>2.7v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>6</SUB>−7v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>7</SUB>−2.3v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>7</SUB>+8v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>8</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>8</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>2.3v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>7</SUB>−8v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>8</SUB>−1.8v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>8</SUB>+9v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>9</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>9</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>1.8v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>8</SUB>−9v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>9</SUB>−v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>9</SUB>+10v<SUB>3</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>10</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>dP</UP><SUB>10</SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C>v<SUB>2</SUB><UP>P</UP><SUB>9</SUB>−v<SUB>3</SUB>10<UP>P</UP><SUB>10</SUB></C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>d</UP>e<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB></NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C><UP>−</UP>k<SUB>3</SUB>Ie<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>+k<SUB>4</SUB>(e<SUB><UP>p</UP>0</SUB><UP>−</UP>e<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>)</C></R><R><C><FR><NU><UP>d</UP>I</NU><DE><UP>d</UP>t</DE></FR></C><C>=</C><C><UP>−</UP>k<SUB>3</SUB>Ie<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>+k<SUB>4</SUB>(e<SUB><UP>p</UP>0</SUB><UP>−</UP>e<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>)+v<SUB><UP>PKA</UP></SUB>I<SUB>0</SUB><UP>−</UP> <FR><NU>v<SUB><UP>CaN</UP></SUB>([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>2</SUB>)<SUP>3</SUP>I</NU><DE>1+([<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]/K<SUB><UP>H</UP>2</SUB>)<SUP>3</SUP></DE></FR></C></R></AR> (17)
Here Pi is the concentration of the i-fold phosphorylated CaMKII holoenzyme, ep is the concentration of PP1 not bound to I1P, ep0 is the total concentration of PP1, I is the concentration of free I1P, and I0 is the concentration of free I1; v1, v2, and v3 are given by the rate Eqs. 6, 12, and 15; k3 and k4 are, respectively, the association and dissociation rate constants of the PP1 · ·I1P complex; VCaN = VCaN/KM2, VCaN is the activity, KM2 is the Michaelis constant, and KH2 is the Hill constant of CaN, vPKA = VPKA/KM3; VPKA and KM3 are the activity and the Michaelis constant of PKA.

During propagation of autophosphorylation I neglect the initiation terms because the probability of (Ca2+)4CaM binding to two neighbor subunits is very low when [Ca2+] is significantly less than [Ca2+]50.

I use a model with a Ca2+-independent protein phosphatase in some simulations. Inhibitor 1 is washed out during isolation of PSD. To simulate suggested in vitro experiments with isolated PSD, I set I0 = 0 in Eq. 17. This results in ep = ep0, and is equivalent to elimination of the two last equations in Eq. 17 and treating ep as a parameter in the remaining equations. I also use this truncated model to simulate kinetics of autophosphorylation and dephosphorylation of CaMKII in cytosol, where 80% of the phosphatase activity is Ca2+-independent, and I can neglect the Ca2+ dependence of the remaining 20%. Table 1 gives the values of parameters used in the simulations.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1   Parameters used in the model (Eq. 17)

Calcium signaling

In the time-dependent simulations, I use Ca2+ dynamics generated by a simple protocol for induction of LTP, which is a single tetanus with frequencies of excitation varying from 5 to 100 Hz, and duration in the range from 1 to 1800 s (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; Huang et al., 1996). Ca2+ response to a single depolarization pulse is modeled by an instant elevation and the following exponential decay. I assume a simple summation of Ca2+ pulses during periodic excitation (Helmchen et al., 1996):
[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]=[<UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB><UP>rest</UP></SUB>+A <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>1</LL><UL><UP>n</UP></UL></LIM> <UP>exp</UP>(−i&cjs1134;(f&tgr;)) (18)
Here [Ca2+]rest is the resting concentration of Ca2+, A is the amplitude of a single Ca2+ pulse, f is the frequency of excitation, tau  is the relaxation time of Ca2+ decay, and n is the number of pulses in the tetanus. I use the following values of the parameters: [Ca2+]rest is 0.1 µM, tau  is 0.2 s (Helmchen et al., 1996; Magee and Johnston, 1997; Majewska et al., 2000). I take A equal to 0.4 µM to simulate background firing. To induce LTP, EPSPs and action potentials must coincide in time. In this case, amplitudes of the single Ca2+ pulses become rather large (Yuste et al., 1999). I use A equal to 1.0 µM to simulate induction of LTP.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fig. 2 shows how the steady-state values of the total concentration of phosphorylated subunits of CaMKII depend on the concentration of Ca2+. In the shaded area of the region of bistability, three steady states correspond to each [Ca2+]. The top and bottom steady states are stable and the middle one is unstable. Arrows show directions of evolution of the system in time at constant concentrations of Ca2+. A is the static [Ca2+]-threshold for down-switching, and B is the up-switching static threshold. These thresholds are boundaries of the bistability region.



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   Bistability of the steady-state concentrations of phosphorylated subunits of CaMKII. In the shadowed bistability region, the top and bottom branches of the steady-state curve consist of the stable steady states (), while the middle branch consists of the unstable steady states (open circle ). Arrows show directions of evolution of the system in time at constant concentrations of Ca2+. A is the static [Ca2+]-threshold for down-switching, and B is the up-switching static threshold. Parameters (in µM): KH2 = 0.7, KM = 0.4, ek = 20.0, ep0 = 0.05, I0 = 0.1.

Fig. 3 shows how boundaries of the region of bistability depend on various parameters of the system. Fig. 3 A displays the bistability domain in the plane concentration of CaMKII (ek) versus [Ca2+] at two values of KM. One can see that the bistability region shrinks considerably when ek decreases. Also, when KM increases, the right boundary of domain shifts significantly to the left, while the left boundary moves only slightly at low values of ek. Fig. 3 B shows in more detail how the region of bistability diminishes when KM increases. If ek equals 1 µM, bistability vanishes when KM is larger than 12 µM. Fig. 3 C shows positions of the bistability domain in the plane concentration of PP1 (ep0) versus [Ca2+] at two values of ek. The domain boundaries shift to the right when ep0 increases or ek decreases. Fig. 3 demonstrates that ek must exceed 10 µM, and KM must be significantly lower than 1 µM to obtain a bistability range that includes the resting value of the intracellular [Ca2+] and is wide enough to prevent induction of LTP by random fluctuations of Ca2+ concentration.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   Effect of parameters on size and position of the bistability domain. The lines on left correspond to the down-switching thresholds and the lines on right correspond to the up-switching threshold as shown in Fig. 2. Parameters (in µM): KH2 = 1.4, I0 = 0.1. (A) The (ek, [Ca2+])-plane(ep0 = 0.3 µM): solid lines, KM = 0.4 µM; broken lines, KM = 10.0 µM. (B) The (KM, [Ca2+])-plane (ep0 = 0.3 µM): solid lines, ek = 20.0 µM; broken lines, ek = 1.0 µM. (C) The (ep0, [Ca2+])-plane (KM = 0.4 µM): solid lines, ek = 20.0 µM; broken lines, ek = 1.0 µM.

Fig. 4 A shows positions of the bistability domain in the plane (ep0, [Ca2+]) at three values of the calcium Hill constant of calcineurin (KH2). One can see that activity of PP1 has to decrease with decreasing KH2 in order to obtain a proper Ca2+ range of bistability; if KH2 equals 1.4 µM, ep0 must be ~0.3 µM, if KH2 equals 0.7 µM, ep0 must be ~0.05 µM, and if KH2 equals 0.3 µM, ep0 must be below 0.01 µM. Fig. 4 B shows the bistability domain in the plane: (ep0, KH2) at the resting Ca2+ concentration equal to 0.1 µM. It demonstrates that the domain is quite large at ek = 20 µM and becomes very small when ek = 1.0 µM.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   Dependence of the bistability domain on the calcium Hill constant of calcineurin and concentration of PP1. Parameters (in µM): KM = 0.4, I0 = 0.1. (A) Effect of KH2 on position of the bistability domain in the (ep0, [Ca2+])-plane: ek = 20.0; dotted lines, KH2 = 1.4 µM; solid lines, KH2 = 0.7 µM; broken lines, KH2 = 0.3 µM. (B) The bistability domains in the (ep0, KH2)-plane at the resting Ca2+ concentration equal 0.1 µM: solid lines, ek = 20.0 µM; broken lines, ek = 1.0 µM.

Fig. 5 shows kinetics of autophosphorylation during tetanic excitation. During the 10 Hz tetanus (Fig. 5 A), the average concentration of Ca2+ is well below KH1, and it takes almost 60 s to reach the level of total autophosphorylation of 70 µM, which eventually leads to transition to the top steady state. At this set of parameters, 15 min of excitation at 5 Hz cannot induce transition from the bottom to the top steady state. Fig. 5 B demonstrates that the system needs 1 s to reach the level of 92 µM during the 100 Hz tetanus, when the constant component of [Ca2+] is 19.5 µM.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5   Kinetics of autophosphorylation during tetanic excitation. Parameters (in µM): KM = 0.4, ek = 20.0, I0 = 0.1. (A) The 10 Hz, 60 s tetanus; the top plot shows the Ca2+ transient, the bottom plot displays the total concentration of phosphorylated subunits versus time; parameters (in µM): KH2 = 1.4, ep0 = 0.3. (B) The 100 Hz, 1 s tetanus; parameters (in µM): KH2 = 0.7, ep0 = 0.1. Initial conditions correspond to the low steady state at [Ca2+] = 0.1 µM.

In both cases shown in Fig. 5, the concentration of autophosphorylated subunits continues to rise after the end of excitation, but very slowly. At the resting concentration of Ca2+, the system is almost "frozen" because activity of CaMKII is extremely low. Fig. 6 A demonstrates that it takes >500 days to reach the stationary level of 186 µM. However, brain in vivo is not in a steady state, a permanent background firing (BF) is always present, and affects almost every neuron. I model BF by a permanent periodic firing with a low amplitude and frequency of 5 Hz, which corresponds to the major Fourier component of BF found in vivo (Karnup, 1996). Fig. 6 B shows that BF greatly accelerates the approach to the top phosphorylated state, which now takes only ~12 h. At the same time, this BF is unable to switch the system from the low to high states of autophosphorylation, but only insignificantly elevates the concentration of phosphorylated subunits in comparison with the low steady-state level. Fig. 6 B also demonstrates that BF can maintain the system in the top phosphorylated state even if the Ca2+ threshold for down-switching (0.15 µM in this case) is above the resting Ca2+ concentration (0.1 µM).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6   Kinetics of transition to the stationary high-phosphorylated state after tetanic excitation. (A) Autophosphorylation in the autonomous model (ep0 = 0.04 µM). (B) Acceleration of transition in the model with background firing (ep0 = 0.1 µm). Parameters (in µM): KH2 = 0.7, KM = 0.4, ek = 20.0, I0 = 0.1. Initial conditions correspond to the low steady state at [Ca2+] = 0.1 µM.

The dynamic up-switching threshold of autophosphorylation depends on amplitude and duration of Ca2+ transients and can be characterized by an amplitude-duration function analogous to the classical strength-duration curve for the firing threshold (Noble and Stein, 1966). However, there have been only a few attempts to directly control amplitude and duration of the intracellular Ca2+ transients in neurons (Yang et al., 1999). In most of the experiments, the frequency and duration of stimulation are the controlled parameters during induction of LTP (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993). Fig. 5 demonstrates that the shape of Ca2+ transients varies greatly with the frequency and duration of stimulation. Therefore, it is more convenient to plot the threshold curve directly in the frequency-duration plane (Fig. 7). One can see that with decreasing frequency duration of the threshold tetanus increases sharply; the duration threshold is ~0.12 s at 100 Hz, and ~25 min at 5 Hz.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7   The dynamic up-switching threshold plotted in the plane frequency versus duration of tetanic stimulation. Parameters (in µM): KH2 = 1.4, KM = 0.4, ek = 20.0, ep0 = 0.3, I0 = 0.1.

Fig. 8 demonstrates how mutations can affect bistability in our model. Substituting alanine in place of Thr35 eliminates inhibitor 1 phosphorylation by PKA and its phosphatase inhibitor activity (Endo et al., 1996). In this case, the term vPKAI0 is equal to zero in the model. Fig. 8 A shows that the bistability region shifts toward higher concentrations of Ca2+, and the down-switching static threshold now becomes 1.26 µM. Fig. 8 B demonstrates that after the end of 100 Hz, 1 s tetanus, the systems drops to the low-phosphorylated state within one hour, contrary to behavior of the "wild type" system shown in Fig. 6 B.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8   Dynamics of autophosphorylation in the system with a mutant inhibitor 1 (vPKA = 0.0). (A) The steady-state characteristic of the system. (B) Kinetics of autophosphorylation induced by 100 Hz, 1 s excitation in the model with background firing. Parameters (in µM): KM = 0.4, ek = 20.0, ep0 = 0.1. Initial conditions correspond to the low steady state at [Ca2+] = 0.1 µM.

Fig. 9 illustrates feasible in vitro experiments that could confirm the existence of such bistability. These can be done with isolated PSD, where I1 is washed out and PP1 becomes Ca2+-independent (Strack et al., 1997; Yoshimura et al., 1999). Fig. 9 A shows the steady-state curve of the system with I0 equal to zero. The system moves along a loop of hysteresis, when [Ca2+] gradually changes. When [Ca2+] increases, the system moves along the ABCDE path; when [Ca2+] decreases, the path is EDFBA. Fig. 9 B demonstrates the dynamics of transitions between steady states, which follow sub and superthreshold step-wise changes in [Ca2+]. When [Ca2+] jumps from 1.3 µM to 1.8 µM, the concentration of autophosphorylated subunits increases only slightly (A), because the system remains on the bottom branch of the curve shown in Fig. 9 A; when [Ca2+] jumps from 1.3 µM to 2.2 µM, the system transits to the top steady state (B). When [Ca2+] is switched from 2.3 µM to 1.8 µM, the system moves to a new steady state on the top branch of the curve (C); when [Ca2+] jumps from 2.3 µM to 1.5 µM, the system transits to the bottom branch of the curve (D).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9   Hysteresis and switching in the system with the Ca2+-independent protein phosphatase in vitro. (A) The steady-state curve with the hysteretic loop (BCDF). Arrows show direction of movement when [Ca2+] slowly increases or decreases (B) Transients after sub- and superthreshold shifts of [Ca2+]: A, the systems remains on the bottom branch of the bistability curve when [Ca2+] jumps from 1.3 µM to 1.8 µM; B, when [Ca2+] jumps from 1.3 µM to 2.2 µM, the system transits to the top steady state; C, when [Ca2+] is switched from 2.3 µM to 1.8 µM, the system moves to a new steady state on the top branch of the curve; D, [Ca2+] jumps from 2.3 µM to 1.5 µM, and the system transits to the bottom branch of the curve. Parameters (in µM): KM = 0.4, ek = 20.0, ep0 = 0.3, I0 = 0.0.

Finally, I show that the model correctly describes kinetics of autophosphorylation of CaMKII in cytosol of neurons. In cytosol, at least 80% of the protein phosphatase activity is Ca2+-independent, the principal phosphatase is PP2A, and the concentration of CaMKII is one order of magnitude lower than in PSD (Strack et al., 1997). Fig. 10 displays behavior of the model with the Ca2+-independent phosphatase and parameters that correspond to the cytosolic system. Fig. 10 A demonstrates that bistability is absent in this case. Fig. 10 B shows that during the 100 Hz, 1 s tetanus, the concentration of phosphorylated subunits reaches ~4.6 µM, and drops below 0.4 µm in <10 min.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 10   Dynamics of autophosphorylation of CaMKII in cytoplasm (k3 = 0.0). (A) The steady state characteristic is single valued. (B) Kinetics of autophosphorylation induced by 100 Hz, 1 s tetanus. Parameters (in µM): KM = 15.0, ek = 1.0, ep0 = 0.05. Initial conditions correspond to the low steady state at [Ca2+] = 0.1 µM.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recently, all-or-none potentiation was found at CA3-CA1 synapses in hippocampus (Petersen et al., 1998). This bistability of synaptic strength may depend on bistability of phosphorylation of participating receptors and anchoring proteins, which, in turn, may depend on bistability of activity of a major protein kinase at the resting [Ca2+]. Bistability of autonomous activity of CaMKII has been analyzed previously. However, Lisman (1985) did not consider the effect of Ca2+, and Lisman and Goldring (1988) assumed propagation of autophosphorylation to be Ca2+-independent. Okamoto and Ichikawa (2000) have found bistability at Ca2+ concentrations that are significantly higher than the resting [Ca2+] and did not study bistability in the vicinity of the latter.

My simulations show that two stable steady states of autophosphorylation of CaMKII can arise in the Ca2+ concentration range that includes the resting [Ca2+] if the concentration of CaMKII is very high and the phosphatase activity is Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent. These conditions are found in PSD. In cytoplasm, the concentration of CaMKII is relatively low and the protein phosphatase activity is essentially Ca2+-independent. In this case, according to the model, the bistability region is either shifted strongly to the right of the resting concentration of Ca2+, or absent, and the phosphorylated fraction of CaMKII should decay to a very low level after concentration of Ca2+ drops to the resting value. The last result corresponds to the experimental observations. Thus, according to the model, high levels of autophosphorylation can be maintained at the resting concentration of Ca2+ only in PSD. The model also shows that stimulation protocols, which induce LTP, switch the system from the low-phosphorylated to the high-phosphorylated state, while background firing is unable to switch. However, background firing can maintain the system in the top phosphorylated state even if the Ca2+ threshold for down-switching is above the resting Ca2+ concentration.

The existence of bistability of the CaMKII autophosphorylation in PSD can be tested in in vitro experiments. If one would maintain isolated PSDs in a medium with ATP and gradually change the Ca2+ level in both directions, hysteresis should be observed, approximately as shown in Fig. 9 A. The addition of inhibitor 1 should shift the bistability region to lower concentrations of Ca2+ and make it wider.

Experiments with transgenic animals can provide evidence that such bistability plays a role in the maintenance of LTP. It is known that substituting alanine in place of Thr35 eliminates inhibitor 1 phosphorylation by PKA and its phosphatase inhibitor activity (Endo et al., 1996). According to the model, such a mutation should prevent autophosphorylation of CaMKII at resting [Ca2+] (Fig. 8); that could down-regulate or eliminate LTP.

Bistability is a robust phenomenon in this model. It persists even when any parameter in the model varies by an order of magnitude, or more. However, the parameters significantly affect the position and extent of the Ca2+ range of bistability (Figs. 3 and 4 A). Where possible, I use parameter values estimated from available experimental data.

Values of [Ca2+]50 from 0.7 to 4 µM have been reported for Ca2+/calmodulin activation of CaMKII (Fährmann et al., 1998; Gupta et al., 1992; Kennedy et al., 1983; Kuret and Schulman, 1984). De Koninck and Schulman (1998) have shown that the dissociation constant of Ca2+/calmodulin from the unphosphorylated alpha -subunit of CaMKII is ~0.08 µM. One can estimate that [Ca2+]50 varies from 2 to 8 µM, when the concentration of free calmodulin varies from 40 to 0.2 µM (Huang et al., 1981; Cohen and Klee, 1988). I have chosen KH1 = 4 µM.

The Hill number for Ca2+ activation of calcineurin is 3 ± 0.1, and [Ca2+]50 can vary from 0.6 to 1.4 µM, when Ca2+/calmodulin activates purified calcineurin in the presence of 6 µM of Mg2+. When [Mg2+] decreases, [Ca2+]50 also decreases (Stemmer and Klee, 1994). I ran simulations with KH2 equal to 0.3, 0.7, and 1.4 µM.

The Michaelis constants of PP1 for phosphoproteins vary from 0.21 to 6.8 µM (Johansen and Ingebritsen, 1987), and from 3.8 to 31 µM for catalytic subunit of PP2A (Bialojan and Takai, 1988). I could not find direct data for dephosphorylation of CaMKII. I assume that the Michaelis constants of these phosphatases with CaMKII as a substrate are of the same order of magnitude as for the other phosphoproteins.

The average concentration of the alpha -subunits of CaMKII is ~10 µM in forebrain according to Erondu and Kennedy (1985), McNeil and Colbran (1995), and Strack et al. (1997). Our estimation of this concentration in PSD is 80 µM on the basis of data published by Suzuki et al. (1994), and 200 µM according to data presented by Strack et al. (1997). The total phosphatase activity toward CaMKII in homogenates of hippocampus is ~0.1 µM · s-1 (Fukunaga et al., 2000).

I chose the value of k1 according to Hanson et al. (1994). I made reasonable estimates of parameters involved in the Ca2+ regulation of the protein phosphatase activity. It is worth mention that the results of simulations are insensitive to absolute values of these parameters as long as they are not too small, and their ratios are kept constant.

Here I use a rather simplified model. The scheme of autophosphorylation is strictly valid only if [Ca2+] is significantly less than KH1. However, [Ca2+] becomes much higher than KH1 during high-frequency stimulation. For assurance, I have run several simulations with an extended model that included additional terms in the autophosphorylation scheme. The difference in results was <10%.

I also neglect any binding of the CaMKII holoenzymes to PSD. However, the accumulation of CaMKII in PSD is a result of such binding. It was shown that CaMKII can bind to the C-terminal tails of subunits of the NMDA receptor in PSD (Gardoni et al., 1999; Leonard et al., 1999; Strack and Colbran, 1998). To be kept in PSD, CaMKII must be either autophosphorylated (Gardoni et al., 1999; Strack and Colbran, 1998; Strack et al., 1997; Yoshimura et al., 1999), or bound to Ca2+/CaM (Shen and Meyer, 1999). One can see that these requirements are the same as for the CaMKII activation. This means that the catalytic and autoinhibitory domains of the CaMKII subunits must dissociate before binding to PSD, and suggests that one of these domains binds the NMDA receptor or another anchor protein. There are two variants, if only one subunit participates in binding. If the catalytic site remains active in the bound state and can interact with its neighbor in the clockwise direction, the bound subunit will become the initiation point of autophosphorylation. As a result, autophosphorylation can proceed faster in comparison with the unbound holoenzyme. However, if the catalytic site becomes incapacitated, the rate of autophosphorylation will decrease approximately twofold. In these two cases, there is a moderate quantitative change in the dynamics of the system due to the binding, and the results remain valid. However, autophosphorylation is severely hindered if the holoenzyme binds two or more anchor sites. In this case, the bistability region shifts to much higher concentrations of Ca2+, and the physiological importance of bistability becomes doubtful.

The very high concentration of CaMKII in PSD can be a result of translocation of CaMKII from cytosol during high elevations of [Ca2+] (Shen and Meyer, 1999; Strack et al., 1997). The preliminary simulations with a two-compartment model show that this translocation affects the characteristics of bistability only if the Ca2+-dependence of CaMKII activity is quite different in cytoplasm and PSD.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation Chemistry Division and the W. M. Keck Foundation. I thank J. Lisman and N. Otmakhov for numerous fruitful discussions and M. Dolnik for help with numerical calculations.

    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication 20 September 1999 and in final form 15 August 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Anatol M. Zhabotinsky, Department of Chemistry, Brandeis University, 415 South St., Waltham, MA 02454-9110. Tel.: 781-736-2531; Fax: 781-736-2516; E-mail:zhabotinsky{at}brandeis.edu.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES