help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vilin, Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ruben, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vilin, Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ruben, P. C.

Biophys J, May 2001, p. 2221-2230, Vol. 80, No. 5

A Single Residue Differentiates between Human Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Na+ Channel Slow Inactivation

Yuriy Y. Vilin, Esther Fujimoto, and Peter C. Ruben

Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 USA


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Slow inactivation determines the availability of voltage-gated sodium channels during prolonged depolarization. Slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 channels occurs with a higher probability than hNaV1.5 sodium channels; however, the precise molecular mechanism for this difference remains unclear. Using the macropatch technique we show that the DII S5-S6 p-region uniquely confers the probability of slow inactivation from parental hNaV1.5 and hNaV1.4 channels into chimerical constructs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to test whether a specific region within DII S5-S6 controls the probability of slow inactivation. We found that substituting V754 in hNaV1.4 with isoleucine from the corresponding position (891) in hNaV1.5 produced steady-state slow inactivation statistically indistinguishable from that in wild-type hNaV1.5 channels, whereas other mutations have little or no effect on slow inactivation. This result indicates that residues V754 in hNaV1.4 and I891in hNaV1.5 are unique in determining the probability of slow inactivation characteristic of these isoforms. Exchanging S5-S6 linkers between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels had no consistent effect on the voltage-dependent slow time inactivation constants [tau (V)]. This suggests that the molecular structures regulating rates of entry into and exit from the slow inactivated state are different from those controlling the steady-state probability and reside outside the p-regions.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The excitability of skeletal and cardiac muscle is dependent upon the pool of available sodium channels as determined by fast and slow inactivation. Slow inactivation is structurally, pharmacologically, and kinetically distinct from fast inactivation (Chandler and Meves, 1970; Armstrong and Bezanilla, 1977; Rudy, 1978; Starkus and Shrager, 1978; Salgado et al., 1985; West et al., 1992; Catterall, 1993; Hartmann et al., 1994; Patton et al., 1992: Valenzuela and Bennett, 1994; Featherstone et al., 1996; Vedantham and Cannon, 1998). In contrast to fast inactivation, which develops in the millisecond time scale, slow inactivation operates in a time scale of seconds or tens of seconds (Ruff et al., 1988; Hille, 1992; Ruff, 1996; Wang and Wang, 1997), reflecting a unique physiological role for slow inactivation. Site-directed substitution of the structures necessary for fast inactivation, the IFM motif, does not prevent slow inactivation (Featherstone et al., 1996).

Studies have demonstrated that slow inactivation contributes to the activity of voltage-gated sodium channels by regulating membrane excitability, firing properties, and spike frequency adaptation (Ruff et al., 1988; Sawczuk et al., 1995; Fleidervish et al., 1996). It has also been proposed that slow processes in sodium channel inactivation might be a molecular memory mechanism that preserves traces of previous activity (Toib et al., 1998).

The properties of slow inactivation differ among sodium channel isoforms. We and others have previously shown that slow inactivation in cardiac sodium channels (hNaV1.5) (see Goldin et al., 2000) is less extensive and has slower rates than skeletal muscle (hNaV1.4) sodium channels (Townsend and Horn, 1997; Richmond et al., 1998; O'Reilly et al., 1999). Because of its greater probability, slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 channels might have a significant role in skeletal muscle fatigue (Ruff et al., 1988). In contrast, less extensive slow inactivation in hNaV1.5 channels may prevent the potential rundown of cardiac muscle excitability during repetitive contractions under normal physiological conditions.

Sodium channels have been cloned and the primary structure sequenced. These channels consist of a large alpha -subunit (230-270 kDa) and smaller (37-39 kDa) beta -subunits (Rogart et al., 1989; Trimmer et al., 1989; George et al., 1992; Gellens et al., 1992; also see the review by Fozzard and Hanck, 1996). The alpha -subunit consists of four homologous domains (DI-DIV), and each domain contains six transmembrane segments (S1-S6). The domains are arranged in a ring-shaped structure with the ion permeation pathway in the center, which is believed to be formed by the S5-S6 extracellular linkers (p-regions) of each domain (Sato et al., 1998). A number of reports indicate the importance of p-regions in regulating slow inactivation (Cummins and Sigworth, 1996; Hayward et al., 1997; Makita et al., 1996; Wang and Wang, 1997) in sodium channels. hNaV1.4 and brain sodium channels require the co-expression of beta 1-subunit for normal gating (Isom et al., 1992; Cannon et al., 1993; Yang et al., 1993; Isom et al., 1994; Patton et al., 1994; Chen and Cannon, 1995), whereas the functional role of the beta 1-subunit in hNaV1.5 channels is less clear (Makita et al., 1994; McCormick et al., 1998). Co-expression of the beta 1-subunit with hNaV1.4 channels stabilizes slow inactivation but has only a subtle effect on slow inactivation in hNaV1.5 channels (Vilin et al., 1999). Thus, although these studies provide some information about the molecular underpinnings of slow inactivation in sodium channels, the precise mechanism of this biophysical process still remains unclear.

Because the p-region structure of hNaV1.4 alpha -subunit differs from that of hNaV1.5 (Trimmer et al., 1989; George et al., 1992; Rogart et al., 1989; Gellens et al., 1992), we previously explored whether transposing all four hNaV1.5 S5-S6 extracellular linkers into a hNaV1.4 backbone would confer hNaV1.5-like steady-state slow inactivation probability to the chimerical construct (Vilin et al., 1999, 2000). Our results indicated that isoform-specific structural differences in one or more S5-S6 linkers underlie at least some of the properties of slow inactivation that differ between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels.

The goal of the present study was to more precisely account for the differences in slow inactivation between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels by using hNaV1.4/hNaV1.5 channel chimeras with individually interchanged S5-S6 linkers from domains DI, DII, DIII, and DIV. Our results show non-equivalent contributions of single S5-S6 linkers in slow inactivation; the S5-S6 linker in domain II, but not in I, III, and IV, is crucial in controlling the steady-state probability of slow inactivation in both hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels. We also show that swapping a single residue in domain II S5-S6 linker produces isoform-specific probabilities of steady-state slow inactivation in the mutated hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels. We have therefore pinpointed, to the level of a single amino acid residue, the structural difference underlying the difference in slow inactivation probability between cardiac and skeletal muscle sodium channels.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular biology

hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels were constructed as previously described (Featherstone et al., 1996; Richmond et al., 1998). Chimeras were constructed as follows. The domain II pore region in hNaV1.5 (residues 863-913) was replaced with the domain II pore region from hNaV1.4 (residues 724-776, here called CSk2). The domain III pore region in hNaV1.5 (residues 1359-1443) was replaced with the domain III pore region from hNaV1.4 (residues 1185-1268, here called CSk3). In CP13, hH1 residues 864-871 were replaced with 725-734 of hNaV1.4. In CP15, hH1 residues 864-887 were replaced with 725-750 of hNaV1.4. Chimeras were prepared using a modified, three-fragment polymerase chain reaction (PCR) overlap extension method (Ho et al., 1989). For each clone, a set of six primers was used, four primers at the junctions of hNaV1.5 and hNaV1.4 and two outer primers, in combination with the appropriate template cDNA, hHla/pGEM3Z or hNaV1.4/pSP64T. The chimeric full-length PCR fragment was prepared by overlapping the first two fragments, an hNaV1.5 and an hNaV1.4 fragment, and then overlapping this fragment with the third hNaV1.5 fragment in a separate amplification reaction. For CSk2, CP13, and CP15, an EcoRI-SmaI fragment was replaced; for CSk3, a NdeI-BstEII fragment was replaced. The mirror chimeras, in which pore regions from hNaV1.5 were transposed into hNaV1.4, were constructed as previously described (Makita et al., 1996). Specifically, these chimeras included domain II p-region from hNaV1.5 transposed into hNaV1.4 (here called SkC2) and the domain III p-region from hNaV1.5 transposed into hNaV1.4 (SkC3). Finally, p-regions from domains I and IV were transposed from hNaV1.5 (residues 277-390 and 1683-1747) into hNaV1.4 (residues 277-424 and 1508-1573, here called SkC14), and p-regions from domains I and IV were transposed from hNaV1.4 into hNaV1.5 (called CSk14). The structure of all chimeras used in this study is shown in Figs. 1 and 3. Other mutations, including I891V, V754I, and A773S/A776S, were prepared with a two-fragment PCR overlap extension. Equal volumes of alpha -mRNA (1 µg/µl) and beta -mRNA (2 µg/µl) were mixed together before injection.

Oocyte preparation and RNA injections

Stage V-VI oocytes were surgically removed from female Xenopus laevis (Nasco, Modesto, CA), enzymatically isolated, and maintained in culture for up to 14 days at 18°C as described (Vilin et al., 1999). Approximately 24 h after enzymatic treatment oocytes were individually injected with 27 nl of mRNA, using a Drummond automatic injector. Before macropatch recording, the vitelline membrane was manually removed from oocytes after a short (2-3 min) exposure to a hyperosmotic solution containing (in mM): 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 20 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 400 mannitol, pH 7.4.

Electrophysiology

All macropatch recording was done in a chamber containing (in mM): 9.6 NaCl, 88 KCl, 11 EGTA, 5 HEPES, pH 7.4. This solution was intended to zero the oocyte membrane potential. Aluminosilicate patch electrodes were pulled on a Sutter P-87 (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA), dipped in melted dental wax to reduce capacitance, thermally polished, and filled with (in mM): 96 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1.8 CaCl2, 5 HEPES, pH 7.4. Electrophysiological recordings were made using an EPC-9 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany), and digitized at 200 kHz via an ITC-16 interface (Instrutech, Great Neck, NY). Voltage clamping and data acquisition were controlled via Pulse software (HEKA) running on a G4 Power Macintosh. All data were software-low-pass filtered at 5 kHz during acquisition. Experimental bath temperature was maintained at 22 ± 0.2°C for all experiments using a Peltier device controlled by an HCC-100A temperature controller (Dagan, Minneapolis, MN). After seal formation, patches were left on-cell for all recordings. Holding potential for all experiments was -100 mV. Leak subtraction was performed automatically by the software using a p/4 protocol before the test pulse. Leak pulses alternated in direction from a holding potential of -120 mV.

Data analysis

Analysis and graphing were done using PulseFit (HEKA) and Igor Pro (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR), both run on a G4 Power Macintosh. Time constants (tau ) for onset and recovery of fast and slow inactivation were derived from single-exponential fitting to peak current amplitude versus prepulse (or interpulse) duration using the following equation:
I=I<SUB><UP>SS</UP></SUB>+a<SUB>1</SUB><UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>t/&tgr;), (1)
where I is current amplitude, ISS is the steady-state current or asymptote (plateau amplitude), a1 is the amplitude at time t = 0 (time of peak current), and tau  is the time constant (Vilin et al., 1999).

Steady-state slow inactivation data were fitted with a modified Boltzmann function:
I/I<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>=(I<SUB>1</SUB>−I<SUB>2</SUB>)/[(1+<UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>ze<SUB><UP>o</UP></SUB>(V<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>−V<SUB>1/2</SUB>))/(kT)]+I<SUB>2</SUB> (2)
where Imax is the maximum peak current measured, I1 and I2 are the maximum and minimum values in the fit, Vm is the prepulse potential, V1/2 is the midpoint voltage of the steady-state slow inactivation curve, eo is an elementary charge, z is apparent valence (slope factor), k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is absolute temperature. The maximum probability of slow inactivation was measured as I/Imax at the most depolarized voltage of the steady-state curve. For brevity, we refer to the maximum probability of steady-state slow inactivation as, simply, probability of slow inactivation.

All statistical values, both in the text and in the figures, are given as means ± SEM. Exponential or Boltzmann fits were performed for each individual data set to obtain mean ± SEM for the time constants, V1/2, and z. Statistical differences were derived from Student's t-test or, where indicated, Welch alternate t-test, with two-tailed p values using the Instat software package (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

S5-S6 linkers in domain II determine the probability of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels

Several lines of research have suggested that slow inactivation gating in sodium channels may involve the conductance pathway. We therefore sought to elucidate the role of the p-regions (S5-S6 linkers) in slow inactivation of hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels. In Fig. 1, portions of hNaV1.4 channels are shown in blue and portions of hNaV1.5 channels are shown in red, and resulting chimeras are designated as described in Materials and Methods.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   Schemes of hNaV1.4-hNaV1.5 pore chimeras.

Fig. 2 demonstrates steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.4-hNaV1.5 pore chimeras, plotted as normalized current amplitude versus 60-s prepulse voltage. The inset in Fig. 2 shows the pulse protocol used to measure steady-state slow inactivation. The data sets in Fig. 2 were fitted (solid lines) with a modified Boltzmann function (Eq. 2) to determine the probability of slow inactivation at depolarized voltages, midpoint (V1/2) and slope factor (z). These results are summarized in Table 1. All panels in Fig. 2 also include fits to averaged steady-state slow inactivation data from hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (dashed and dotted lines, respectively).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   Alterations in domain DI-DIV pore regions lead to changes in slow inactivation in sodium channel chimeras. (A-C) Steady-state slow inactivation in SkC14 (, n = 8), SkC2 (black-square, n = 8), and SkC3 (black-triangle, n = 9), respectively; (D-F) Steady-state slow inactivation for CSk14 (open circle , n = 8), CSk2 (, n = 9), and CSk3 (triangle , n = 7), respectively. In all graphs steady-state inactivation is plotted as average normalized current amplitude versus 60-s prepulse voltage. Mean ± SEM data were fitted with a modified Boltzmann function. Dotted lines represent modified Boltzmann fits to averaged steady-state slow inactivation probabilities in hNaV1.4(A-C) and hNaV1.5 (D-F) sodium channels. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences in depolarized probabilities of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 compared with SkC2 (p < 0.0001) and slow inactivation in hNaV1.5 compared with CSk2 sodium channels (p < 0.0001).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1   Slow inactivation parameters for hNaV1.4, hNaV1.5, and hNaV1.4-hNaV1.5 chimeras

The probability of slow inactivation in SkC14 in Fig. 2 A (filled circles, 80% ±3%, n = 8) is identical to hNaV1.4 (dashed line, 84% ± 5%, n = 10, p = 0.3). The probability of slow inactivation in CSk14 in Fig. 2 D (open circles, 50% ± 4.1%, n = 8) is statistically identical to hNaV1.5 channels (49% ± 3.6%, n = 12, p = 0.9). These results show that S5-S6 linkers in domains I and IV are not essential for controlling the probability of slow inactivation.

Fig. 2, B and E, demonstrate that domain II S5-S6 linkers, interchanged between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels, statistically (p <=  0.0001) affect the probability of slow inactivation relative to wild-type hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5. In Fig. 2 B the probability in SkC2 reaches 52% (±4%, filled squares, n = 8) versus 84% ± 5% in hNaV1.4. In Fig. 2 E the probability of slow inactivation in CSk2 is 73% (±4.1%, open squares, n = 9) versus 49% ± 3.6% in hNaV1.5.

In contrast to the striking effect of transposing domain II p-regions, replacements of DIII S5-S6 linkers in SkC3 (Fig. 2 C, filled triangles) and in CSk3 (Fig. 2 F, open triangles) do not significantly change slow inactivation relative to hNaV1.4 (p = 0.1) and hNaV1.5 (p = 1.0). Thus, these results show that DII S5-S6 linkers, but not DI, DIII, or DIV S5-S6 linkers, strongly affect the probability of slow inactivation in both hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels.

Data presented in Table 1 also demonstrate effects of interchanged p-regions on the midpoint (V1/2) of steady-state slow inactivation. DII and DIII S5-S6 chimeras produce prominent effects on the midpoint (p < 0.05). V1/2 value of steady-state inactivation for hNaV1.4 is -81.3 mV (±4 mV, n = 10). SkC2 and SkC3 chimeras alter V1/2 values of steady-state inactivation (-93.4 mV ± 1.7 mV, n = 8, and -56.4 mV ± 4.5 mV, n = 9, respectively). The V1/2 values for CSk14 and CSk2 chimeras are not significantly different from that for hNaV1.5 channels (p >=  0.05).

The steady-state slow inactivation curves have different (p = 0.01) slope factors (z) in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels (-1.8 ± 0.2 vs. -0.8 ± 0.3, n = 6-10; Table 1), suggesting a different slow inactivation voltage sensitivity for these channels. Does a specific p-region also confer the voltage sensitivity of steady-state slow inactivation? We compared the z values of modified Boltzmann curves fit to steady-state slow inactivation data. Our results, summarized in Table 1, indicate that S5-S6 linkers do not equally or predictably contribute to the voltage sensitivity of steady-state slow inactivation. Thus, slope factors were not significantly altered in chimeras SkC14 and SkC2 compared with hNaV1.4 (p > 0.05). The slope factor in CSk3 chimera significantly (p <=  0.05) differs from that of hNaV1.5 channels (-2.1 ± 0.2, n = 7, vs. -0.8 ± 0.3, n = 6, respectively), whereas CSk14 and CSk2 chimeras have a significantly smaller effect on the voltage sensitivity (p >=  0.05).

Site-directed mutations within the DII p-region alter the probability of steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels

The DII S5-S6 linkers in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 contain non-conserved regions and individual residues. We used chimerical constructs and site-directed mutagenesis to explore the ability of non-conserved residues to control the probability of slow inactivation. The structures of these chimeras are shown in Fig. 3.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   Structure of DII S5-S6 mutants. Residues contributed to the structure of hNaV1.4 DIIS5-S6 and hNaV1.5 DIIS5-S6 shown with plain and boxed symbols, respectively.

We found that substitution of V754 in hNaV1.4 with the corresponding isoleucine from hNaV1.5 (V754I) significantly decreased the probability of slow inactivation from ~80% to ~50% (p < 0.05, n = 6-10). In Fig. 4 A, steady-state slow inactivation in V754I (filled circles, n = 8) is compared with that in hNaV1.5 (dotted line, n = 12) and hNaV1.4 channels (open circles, n = 10). The probability of slow inactivation in V754I is statistically indistinguishable from that in hNaV1.5 channels (p = 0.80) but very different from hNaV1.4 (p < 0.001). The reciprocal chimera in which I891 of hNaV1.5 was replaced with the corresponding valine from hNaV1.4 (I891V) also alters slow inactivation in hNaV1.5. Because the I891V mutation appears to shift the steady-state curve in the depolarized direction, an extended range of prepulse voltages was applied (from -150 mV to 20 mV versus prepulse from -150 mV to 0 mV in other experiments). Fig. 4 B shows steady-state slow inactivation in I891V (filled squares, n = 10), hNaV1.4 (dotted line, n = 10), and hNaV1.5 channels (open squares, n = 12). Compared with hNaV1.5 channels, I891V channels exhibit significantly (p = 0.022) increased probability of slow inactivation as determined from individual Boltzmann fits (49% ± 3.6% in hNaV1.5, n = 12, vs. 67% ± 7% in I891V, n = 10). To estimate the effect of I891V on slow inactivation relative to hNaV1.4, we compared probabilities of slow inactivation in I891V and hNaV1.4 at prepulse voltages from -20 mV to 0 mV using the alternate Welch t-test for averaged sets of data with unequal standard deviations. The table in Fig. 4 B demonstrates that steady-state slow inactivation in I891V and hNaV1.4 is similar at -20 mV and 0 mV (p = 0.2) and different at -10 mV (p = 0.036). By contrast, the CP13, CP15, and A777S/A776S chimeras do not alter the properties of steady-state slow inactivation (see Table 1).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   V754I and I891V mutations alter the steady-state probability of slow inactivation. (A and B) Steady-state slow inactivation in V754I (, n = 8) and I891V (black-square, n = 10), respectively. Broken lines represent modified Boltzmann fits to averaged steady-state slow inactivation probabilities in hNaV1.5 (A) and hNaV1.4 (B) sodium channels. open circle  and , averaged steady-state slow inactivation data for hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5, respectively. In all graphs, steady-state inactivation is plotted as average normalized current amplitude versus 60-s prepulse voltage. Mean ± SEM data were fitted with a modified Boltzmann function (------). The table in A compares steady-state inactivation in I891V versus hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 at voltages from -20 mV to 0 mV. The table in B compares steady-state inactivation in I891V versus hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 at voltages ranged from -20 mV to 0 mV. Asterisks denote statistically significant probabilities of steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 compared with V754I (p < 0.0001) and slow inactivation in hNaV1.5 compared with I891V sodium channels (p = 0.02).

Kinetics of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels are not dependent on the structure of p-regions

Do the S5-S6 extracellular linkers also confer the rates at which sodium channels enter and exit the slow inactivated state? To answer this question, we compared the voltage-dependent slow inactivation time constants of onset and recovery in wild-type and chimeric channels in Fig. 5, plotted as a function of prepulse voltage. The time constants were derived from single-exponential fits to slow inactivation recovery and onset data (see Vilin et al., 1999).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5   Interchanged p-regions accelerate slow inactivation time constants in hNaV1.4-hNaV1.5 pore chimeras. (A-C) Averaged time constants for slow inactivation in SkC14 (, n = 5-8), SkC2 (black-square, n = 4-7), and SkC3 (black-triangle, n = 4-7), respectively. (D-F) Averaged time constants for slow inactivation in CSk14 (open circle , n = 4-7), CSk2 (, n = 5-12), and CSk3 (triangle , n = 5-7), respectively. Time constants derived from single-exponential fits to slow inactivation recovery and slow inactivation onset data (not shown) obtained using the set of protocols as shown at the bottom. In all graphs the slow inactivation time constants are plotted versus 60-s prepulse voltage. Broken lines represent the averaged slow inactivation time constants in hNaV1.4 (A-C) and hNaV1.5 (D-F) sodium channels. All values represent mean ± SEM.

Exchange of S5-S6 linkers between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 alpha -subunits produces neither a discernable pattern of alterations in voltage dependency of slow inactivation time constants [tau (V)] nor a consistent resemblance to the tau (V) characteristics of parental channels. Although most chimeras exhibit slow inactivation time constants (tau s) different from those in wild-type channels at certain voltages (Fig. B-F), only tau s in SCk14 chimera (Fig. 5 A) are obviously smaller than in hNaV1.4 channels. tau s in V754I (Fig. 6 A) and I891V (Fig. 6 B) channels remain similar to those in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6   Voltage dependency of slow inactivation time constants in V754I and I891V channels. (A and B) Averaged time constants for slow inactivation in V754I (, n = 6-8) and I891V (black-square, n = 5-7), respectively. Time constants derived from single-exponential fits to slow inactivation recovery and slow inactivation onset data (not shown) were obtained using the set of protocols as shown in Fig. 5. In all graphs the slow inactivation time constants are plotted versus 60-s prepulse voltage. Broken lines represent the averaged slow inactivation time constants in hNaV1.4 (A) and hNaV1.5 (B) sodium channels. All values represent mean ± SEM.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Clarifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the divergent properties of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 will help elucidate the structure/function relations in these channels. We have previously demonstrated that replacing all p-regions in hNaV1.4 alpha -subunit with the p-regions from hNaV1.5 alpha -subunit brings the probability of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 to that in hNaV1.5, indicating that the pore regions might underlie at least some of the inherent differences between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (Vilin et al., 1999). We have now systematically studied the role of single p-regions (S5-S6 linkers) from each domain of hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 alpha -subunits in regulating slow inactivation. Only the domain II S5-S6 linker was found to confer the probability of slow inactivation from parental channels into chimeric constructs (Fig. 2, B and E). S5-S6 linkers in domains DI, DIII, and DIV failed to significantly alter the probability slow inactivation compared with wild-type channels (Fig. 2, A, C, D, and F), showing that the p-regions in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels do not have identical roles in slow inactivation. We further report the striking result that a single mutation, V754I, is capable of producing steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 indistinguishable from that in hNaV1.5 (Fig. 4 A). Isoleucine 891 in hNaV1.5 DII S5-S6, corresponding to V751 in hNaV1.4, produces a similar effect on steady-state slow inactivation (Fig. 4 B), although we find that the lower plateau of steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.5 I891V is shifted to more depolarized potentials. From these results, it appears that V754 and I891 are essential for determining the difference in probability of slow inactivation between cardiac and skeletal muscle sodium channels.

In contrast to the relatively clear role of the DII p-region in regulating the probability of slow inactivation, effects of single S5-S6 linkers on slow inactivation time constants are less easily interpreted. SkC2, V754I, and I891V chimeras most closely resemble slow inactivation time constants of those in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (Figs. 5 B and Fig. 6), whereas all other pore chimeras have generally smaller slow inactivation time constants, compared with hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (Fig. 5), especially for SkC14 (Fig. 5 A). The lack of a clear correlation between the structure of p-regions and slow inactivation time constants suggests that the S5-S6 linkers of hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 do not directly determine the voltage-dependent rates of slow inactivation. According to the results shown in Fig. 5, it is plausible that the kinetic properties of slow inactivation in sodium channels do not arise from the structure of the p-regions, but rather may be dependent on other voltage-sensitive structures, such as the S4 transmembrane segments, as has been proposed elsewhere (Kontis and Goldin, 1997). The absence of a predictable relationship between the steady-state probability and the kinetics of slow inactivation is further complicated by the previous observation that slow inactivation cannot be adequately described using a simple, two-state model (Featherstone et al., 1996).

Our results are consistent with other reports showing that p-regions are involved in slow inactivation gating in sodium channels. First, structural alterations within sodium channel p-regions and their close proximity affect slow inactivation (Cummins and Sigworth, 1996; Hayward et al., 1997; Wang and Wang, 1997). Second, changes in ionic environment affect slow inactivation in sodium channels; low external [Na+] accelerates entry into the slow inactivated state, slows the rate of recovery from slow inactivation, and increases the probability of slow inactivation (Townsend and Horn, 1997). These data suggest that the sodium channel p-regions may have dual roles as both the conductance pore (Catterall, 1993, Fozzard and Hanck, 1996; Marban et al., 1998) and as the slow inactivation gate.

In addition to the p-regions, other sodium channel structures have also been shown to affect slow inactivation in sodium channels, indicating that slow inactivation gating is realized through complex, voltage-dependent interactions between disparate structures. The domain III-IV cytoplasmic linker, responsible for fast inactivation in sodium channels (West et al., 1992; Patton et al., 1994) has been demonstrated to limit the probability of slow inactivation in both cardiac (Richmond et al., 1998) and skeletal muscle channels (Featherstone et al., 1996). We have also shown preliminary evidence that substitution of glutamate 1314 with glutamine in the DIII-IV linker decreases the probability of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 channels (Spackman et al., 2000). In addition, the role of S4 voltage sensors in sodium channel slow inactivation gating has been hypothesized (Bezanilla et al., 1982; Rayner and Starkus 1989; Ruben et al., 1992) and experimentally confirmed (Kontis and Goldin, 1997; Mitrovic et al., 2000).

The pore-forming structures and S4 segments are important components underlying slow C- and P-type inactivation in Shaker K+ channels (Hoshi et al., 1990; Yellen et al., 1994; Liu et al., 1996; Kiss et al., 1999, Loots and Isacoff, 2000). Certain point mutations in the K+ channel pore region block the potassium current and affect slow inactivation, additionally indicating that at least the outer pore of potassium channels is also functioning as slow inactivation gates (Yang et al., 1997b; Yellen et al., 1994; Liu et al., 1996). In contrast to the ball-and-chain mechanism of N-type inactivation (Hoshi et al., 1991), C- and P-type inactivation is produced by pore occlusion via a series of movements within the p-region (Boland et al., 1994; Liu et al., 1996; Cha and Bezanilla, 1997), which are presumably driven by the S4 voltage sensors (Loots and Isacoff, 1999, 2000).

It seems that slow inactivation in sodium channels is also produced by conformational changes in the alpha -subunit through the combined movement of S4 voltage sensors and p-regions. It is easy to imagine that movements within the p-regions could convert the channel into a non-conducting state and reduce the number of available channels during a 60-s depolarizing pulse (Ruff, 1996; Townsend and Horn, 1997). Consequently, the probability of slow inactivation might be determined by the greater (in hNaV1.4) or lesser (in hNaV1.5) flexibility or mobility of a particular p-region, or differential interactions between the pore and the other channel structures that directly or indirectly control slow inactivation. This speculation is supported by the observation that exchanging the DII S5-S6 linker between two channel isoforms confers the parental channel properties of steady-state slow inactivation into the chimeric construct (Fig. 2, B and E). Our observation that a single residue within the DII S5-S6 region regulates the steady-state probability of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (Fig. 4) is also consistent with this idea.

Our data do not provide any evidence that p-regions are directly involved in the regulation of slow inactivation time constants, but rather suggest that other voltage-dependent structures play a role in this process. It was recently demonstrated that covalent binding of sodium (2-sulfonatoethyl)methanethiosulfonate to a cysteine, substituted for the third arginine in the domain IV S4 voltage sensor, increases the rate of entering the slow inactivated state at depolarized voltages and decreases the rate of leaving this state at hyperpolarized voltages (Mitrovic et al., 2000). These data show that S4 voltage sensors, or at least the S4 segment from the domain IV, can affect the kinetics of slow inactivation in sodium channels. Additionally, we have shown preliminary data that charge neutralizations (R219C and K228C) in the DI S4 segment alter the apparent voltage dependence of steady-state slow inactivation (Vilin et al., 2000). Thus, because the DIV S4 voltage sensor participates in coupling both activation and deactivation with fast inactivation (Ji et al., 1996; Cha et al., 1999; Groome et al., 1999, 2000; Sheets et al., 2000), the role of the S4s in slow inactivation is particularly interesting as a possible mechanism of coupling between fast and slow gating transitions.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Drs. Brett Adams and Tim Gilbertson for their editorial comments on the manuscript.

This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant NS29204 to P.C.R.

    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication 15 December 2000 and in final form 16 February 2001.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Peter C. Ruben, Department of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5305. Tel.: 435-797-2490; Fax: 435-797-1575; E-mail: pruben{at}biology.usu.edu.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Biophys J, May 2001, p. 2221-2230, Vol. 80, No. 5
© 2001 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/01/05/2221/10  $2.00



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. Szendroedi, W. Sandtner, T. Zarrabi, E. Zebedin, K. Hilber, S. C. Dudley Jr., H. A. Fozzard, and H. Todt
Speeding the Recovery from Ultraslow Inactivation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels by Metal Ion Binding to the Selectivity Filter: A Foot-on-the-Door?
Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4209 - 4224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Rush, T. R. Cummins, and S. G. Waxman
Multiple sodium channels and their roles in electrogenesis within dorsal root ganglion neurons
J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
W. Xiong, Y. Z. Farukhi, Y. Tian, D. DiSilvestre, R. A. Li, and G. F. Tomaselli
A conserved ring of charge in mammalian Na+ channels: a molecular regulator of the outer pore conformation during slow inactivation
J. Physiol., November 1, 2006; 576(3): 739 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
G. N. Filatov, M. J. Pinter, and M. M. Rich
Resting Potential-dependent Regulation of the Voltage Sensitivity of Sodium Channel Gating in Rat Skeletal Muscle In Vivo
J. Gen. Physiol., July 25, 2005; 126(2): 161 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
G. N. Filatov and M. M. Rich
Hyperpolarized shifts in the voltage dependence of fast inactivation of Nav1.4 and Nav1.5 in a rat model of critical illness myopathy
J. Physiol., September 15, 2004; 559(3): 813 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
W. Sandtner, J. Szendroedi, T. Zarrabi, E. Zebedin, K. Hilber, I. Glaaser, H. A. Fozzard, S. C. Dudley, and H. Todt
Lidocaine: A Foot in the Door of the Inner Vestibule Prevents Ultra-Slow Inactivation of a Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 66(3): 648 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
E. Zebedin, W. Sandtner, S. Galler, J. Szendroedi, H. Just, H. Todt, and K. Hilber
Fiber type conversion alters inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium currents in murine C2C12 skeletal muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): C270 - C280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. Kanai, S. Hirose, H. Oguni, G. Fukuma, Y. Shirasaka, T. Miyajima, K. Wada, H. Iwasa, S. Yasumoto, M. Matsuo, et al.
Effect of localization of missense mutations in SCN1A on epilepsy phenotype severity
Neurology, July 27, 2004; 63(2): 329 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
R. S. Kass
Sodium Channel Inactivation Goes with the Flow
J. Gen. Physiol., June 28, 2004; 124(1): 7 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]