| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, May 2001, p. 2221-2230, Vol. 80, No. 5
Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 USA
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Slow inactivation determines the availability of
voltage-gated sodium channels during prolonged depolarization. Slow
inactivation in hNaV1.4 channels occurs with a higher
probability than hNaV1.5 sodium channels; however, the
precise molecular mechanism for this difference remains unclear. Using
the macropatch technique we show that the DII S5-S6 p-region uniquely
confers the probability of slow inactivation from parental
hNaV1.5 and hNaV1.4 channels into chimerical
constructs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to test whether a specific region within DII S5-S6
controls the probability of slow inactivation. We found that
substituting V754 in hNaV1.4 with isoleucine from the
corresponding position (891) in hNaV1.5 produced
steady-state slow inactivation statistically indistinguishable from
that in wild-type hNaV1.5 channels, whereas other mutations
have little or no effect on slow inactivation. This result indicates
that residues V754 in hNaV1.4 and I891in
hNaV1.5 are unique in determining the probability of slow
inactivation characteristic of these isoforms. Exchanging S5-S6 linkers
between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels had no
consistent effect on the voltage-dependent slow time inactivation
constants [
(V)]. This suggests that the molecular structures
regulating rates of entry into and exit from the slow inactivated state
are different from those controlling the steady-state probability and
reside outside the p-regions.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The excitability of skeletal and cardiac muscle
is dependent upon the pool of available sodium channels as determined
by fast and slow inactivation. Slow inactivation is structurally,
pharmacologically, and kinetically distinct from fast inactivation
(Chandler and Meves, 1970
; Armstrong and Bezanilla, 1977
; Rudy, 1978
;
Starkus and Shrager, 1978
; Salgado et al., 1985
; West et al., 1992
;
Catterall, 1993
; Hartmann et al., 1994
; Patton et al., 1992
: Valenzuela
and Bennett, 1994
; Featherstone et al., 1996
; Vedantham and Cannon, 1998
). In contrast to fast inactivation, which develops in the millisecond time scale, slow inactivation operates in a time scale of
seconds or tens of seconds (Ruff et al., 1988
; Hille, 1992
; Ruff, 1996
;
Wang and Wang, 1997
), reflecting a unique physiological role for slow
inactivation. Site-directed substitution of the structures necessary
for fast inactivation, the IFM motif, does not prevent slow
inactivation (Featherstone et al., 1996
).
Studies have demonstrated that slow inactivation contributes to the
activity of voltage-gated sodium channels by regulating membrane
excitability, firing properties, and spike frequency adaptation (Ruff
et al., 1988
; Sawczuk et al., 1995
; Fleidervish et al., 1996
). It has
also been proposed that slow processes in sodium channel inactivation
might be a molecular memory mechanism that preserves traces of previous
activity (Toib et al., 1998
).
The properties of slow inactivation differ among sodium channel
isoforms. We and others have previously shown that slow inactivation in
cardiac sodium channels (hNaV1.5) (see Goldin et
al., 2000
) is less extensive and has slower rates than skeletal muscle
(hNaV1.4) sodium channels (Townsend and Horn,
1997
; Richmond et al., 1998
; O'Reilly et al., 1999
). Because of its
greater probability, slow inactivation in hNaV1.4
channels might have a significant role in skeletal muscle fatigue (Ruff
et al., 1988
). In contrast, less extensive slow inactivation in
hNaV1.5 channels may prevent the potential
rundown of cardiac muscle excitability during repetitive contractions
under normal physiological conditions.
Sodium channels have been cloned and the primary structure sequenced.
These channels consist of a large
-subunit (230-270 kDa) and
smaller (37-39 kDa)
-subunits (Rogart et al., 1989
; Trimmer et al.,
1989
; George et al., 1992
; Gellens et al., 1992
; also see the review by
Fozzard and Hanck, 1996
). The
-subunit consists of four homologous
domains (DI-DIV), and each domain contains six transmembrane segments
(S1-S6). The domains are arranged in a ring-shaped structure with the
ion permeation pathway in the center, which is believed to be formed by
the S5-S6 extracellular linkers (p-regions) of each domain (Sato et
al., 1998
). A number of reports indicate the importance of p-regions in
regulating slow inactivation (Cummins and Sigworth, 1996
; Hayward et
al., 1997
; Makita et al., 1996
; Wang and Wang, 1997
) in sodium
channels. hNaV1.4 and brain sodium channels
require the co-expression of
1-subunit for
normal gating (Isom et al., 1992
; Cannon et al., 1993
; Yang et al.,
1993
; Isom et al., 1994
; Patton et al., 1994
; Chen and Cannon, 1995
),
whereas the functional role of the
1-subunit in hNaV1.5 channels is less clear (Makita et al.,
1994
; McCormick et al., 1998
). Co-expression of the
1-subunit with hNaV1.4
channels stabilizes slow inactivation but has only a subtle effect on
slow inactivation in hNaV1.5 channels (Vilin et
al., 1999
). Thus, although these studies provide some information
about the molecular underpinnings of slow inactivation in sodium
channels, the precise mechanism of this biophysical process still
remains unclear.
Because the p-region structure of hNaV1.4
-subunit differs from that of hNaV1.5 (Trimmer
et al., 1989
; George et al., 1992
; Rogart et al., 1989
; Gellens et al.,
1992
), we previously explored whether transposing all four
hNaV1.5 S5-S6 extracellular linkers into a
hNaV1.4 backbone would confer
hNaV1.5-like steady-state slow inactivation
probability to the chimerical construct (Vilin et al., 1999
, 2000
). Our
results indicated that isoform-specific structural differences in one
or more S5-S6 linkers underlie at least some of the properties of slow
inactivation that differ between hNaV1.4 and
hNaV1.5 channels.
The goal of the present study was to more precisely account for the differences in slow inactivation between hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels by using hNaV1.4/hNaV1.5 channel chimeras with individually interchanged S5-S6 linkers from domains DI, DII, DIII, and DIV. Our results show non-equivalent contributions of single S5-S6 linkers in slow inactivation; the S5-S6 linker in domain II, but not in I, III, and IV, is crucial in controlling the steady-state probability of slow inactivation in both hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels. We also show that swapping a single residue in domain II S5-S6 linker produces isoform-specific probabilities of steady-state slow inactivation in the mutated hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels. We have therefore pinpointed, to the level of a single amino acid residue, the structural difference underlying the difference in slow inactivation probability between cardiac and skeletal muscle sodium channels.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular biology
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5
sodium channels were constructed as previously described (Featherstone
et al., 1996
; Richmond et al., 1998
). Chimeras were constructed as
follows. The domain II pore region in hNaV1.5
(residues 863-913) was replaced with the domain II pore region from
hNaV1.4 (residues 724-776, here called CSk2). The domain III pore region in hNaV1.5 (residues
1359-1443) was replaced with the domain III pore region from
hNaV1.4 (residues 1185-1268, here called CSk3).
In CP13, hH1 residues 864-871 were replaced with 725-734 of
hNaV1.4. In CP15, hH1 residues 864-887 were
replaced with 725-750 of hNaV1.4. Chimeras were
prepared using a modified, three-fragment polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) overlap extension method (Ho et al., 1989
). For each clone, a set
of six primers was used, four primers at the junctions of hNaV1.5 and hNaV1.4 and two
outer primers, in combination with the appropriate template cDNA,
hHla/pGEM3Z or hNaV1.4/pSP64T. The chimeric
full-length PCR fragment was prepared by overlapping the first two
fragments, an hNaV1.5 and an
hNaV1.4 fragment, and then overlapping this
fragment with the third hNaV1.5 fragment in a
separate amplification reaction. For CSk2, CP13, and CP15, an
EcoRI-SmaI fragment was replaced; for CSk3, a
NdeI-BstEII fragment was replaced. The mirror
chimeras, in which pore regions from hNaV1.5 were
transposed into hNaV1.4, were constructed as
previously described (Makita et al., 1996
). Specifically, these
chimeras included domain II p-region from hNaV1.5
transposed into hNaV1.4 (here called SkC2) and
the domain III p-region from hNaV1.5 transposed into hNaV1.4 (SkC3). Finally, p-regions from
domains I and IV were transposed from hNaV1.5
(residues 277-390 and 1683-1747) into hNaV1.4
(residues 277-424 and 1508-1573, here called SkC14), and p-regions
from domains I and IV were transposed from
hNaV1.4 into hNaV1.5
(called CSk14). The structure of all chimeras used in this study is
shown in Figs. 1 and 3. Other mutations, including I891V, V754I, and
A773S/A776S, were prepared with a two-fragment PCR overlap extension.
Equal volumes of
-mRNA (1 µg/µl) and
-mRNA (2 µg/µl) were
mixed together before injection.
Oocyte preparation and RNA injections
Stage V-VI oocytes were surgically removed from female
Xenopus laevis (Nasco, Modesto, CA),
enzymatically isolated, and maintained in culture for up to 14 days at
18°C as described (Vilin et al., 1999
). Approximately 24 h after
enzymatic treatment oocytes were individually injected with 27 nl of
mRNA, using a Drummond automatic injector. Before macropatch recording,
the vitelline membrane was manually removed from oocytes after a short
(2-3 min) exposure to a hyperosmotic solution containing (in mM): 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 20 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 400 mannitol, pH
7.4.
Electrophysiology
All macropatch recording was done in a chamber containing (in
mM): 9.6 NaCl, 88 KCl, 11 EGTA, 5 HEPES, pH 7.4. This solution was
intended to zero the oocyte membrane potential. Aluminosilicate patch
electrodes were pulled on a Sutter P-87 (Sutter Instruments, Novato,
CA), dipped in melted dental wax to reduce capacitance, thermally polished, and filled with (in mM): 96 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1.8 CaCl2, 5 HEPES,
pH 7.4. Electrophysiological recordings were made using an EPC-9
patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany), and digitized at 200 kHz via an ITC-16 interface (Instrutech, Great Neck, NY). Voltage
clamping and data acquisition were controlled via Pulse software (HEKA)
running on a G4 Power Macintosh. All data were software-low-pass
filtered at 5 kHz during acquisition. Experimental bath temperature was
maintained at 22 ± 0.2°C for all experiments using a
Peltier device controlled by an HCC-100A temperature controller
(Dagan, Minneapolis, MN). After seal formation, patches were left
on-cell for all recordings. Holding potential for all experiments was
100 mV. Leak subtraction was performed automatically by the software
using a p/4 protocol before the test pulse. Leak pulses alternated in
direction from a holding potential of
120 mV.
Data analysis
Analysis and graphing were done using PulseFit (HEKA) and Igor
Pro (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR), both run on a G4 Power Macintosh.
Time constants (
) for onset and recovery of fast and slow
inactivation were derived from single-exponential fitting to peak
current amplitude versus prepulse (or interpulse) duration using the
following equation:
|
(1) |
is the time constant (Vilin et al., 1999Steady-state slow inactivation data were fitted with a modified
Boltzmann function:
|
(2) |
All statistical values, both in the text and in the figures, are given as means ± SEM. Exponential or Boltzmann fits were performed for each individual data set to obtain mean ± SEM for the time constants, V1/2, and z. Statistical differences were derived from Student's t-test or, where indicated, Welch alternate t-test, with two-tailed p values using the Instat software package (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S5-S6 linkers in domain II determine the probability of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels
Several lines of research have suggested that slow inactivation gating in sodium channels may involve the conductance pathway. We therefore sought to elucidate the role of the p-regions (S5-S6 linkers) in slow inactivation of hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels. In Fig. 1, portions of hNaV1.4 channels are shown in blue and portions of hNaV1.5 channels are shown in red, and resulting chimeras are designated as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Fig. 2 demonstrates steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.4-hNaV1.5 pore chimeras, plotted as normalized current amplitude versus 60-s prepulse voltage. The inset in Fig. 2 shows the pulse protocol used to measure steady-state slow inactivation. The data sets in Fig. 2 were fitted (solid lines) with a modified Boltzmann function (Eq. 2) to determine the probability of slow inactivation at depolarized voltages, midpoint (V1/2) and slope factor (z). These results are summarized in Table 1. All panels in Fig. 2 also include fits to averaged steady-state slow inactivation data from hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (dashed and dotted lines, respectively).
|
|
The probability of slow inactivation in SkC14 in Fig. 2 A (filled circles, 80% ±3%, n = 8) is identical to hNaV1.4 (dashed line, 84% ± 5%, n = 10, p = 0.3). The probability of slow inactivation in CSk14 in Fig. 2 D (open circles, 50% ± 4.1%, n = 8) is statistically identical to hNaV1.5 channels (49% ± 3.6%, n = 12, p = 0.9). These results show that S5-S6 linkers in domains I and IV are not essential for controlling the probability of slow inactivation.
Fig. 2, B and E, demonstrate that domain II S5-S6
linkers, interchanged between hNaV1.4 and
hNaV1.5 channels, statistically (p
0.0001) affect the probability of slow
inactivation relative to wild-type hNaV1.4 and
hNaV1.5. In Fig. 2 B the probability in SkC2 reaches 52% (±4%, filled squares, n = 8)
versus 84% ± 5% in hNaV1.4. In Fig. 2
E the probability of slow inactivation in CSk2 is 73%
(±4.1%, open squares, n = 9) versus 49% ± 3.6% in
hNaV1.5.
In contrast to the striking effect of transposing domain II p-regions, replacements of DIII S5-S6 linkers in SkC3 (Fig. 2 C, filled triangles) and in CSk3 (Fig. 2 F, open triangles) do not significantly change slow inactivation relative to hNaV1.4 (p = 0.1) and hNaV1.5 (p = 1.0). Thus, these results show that DII S5-S6 linkers, but not DI, DIII, or DIV S5-S6 linkers, strongly affect the probability of slow inactivation in both hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium channels.
Data presented in Table 1 also demonstrate effects of interchanged
p-regions on the midpoint (V1/2) of
steady-state slow inactivation. DII and DIII S5-S6 chimeras produce
prominent effects on the midpoint (p < 0.05).
V1/2 value of steady-state
inactivation for hNaV1.4 is
81.3 mV (±4 mV,
n = 10). SkC2 and SkC3 chimeras alter
V1/2 values of steady-state
inactivation (
93.4 mV ± 1.7 mV, n = 8, and
56.4 mV ± 4.5 mV, n = 9, respectively). The
V1/2 values for CSk14 and CSk2
chimeras are not significantly different from that for
hNaV1.5 channels (p
0.05).
The steady-state slow inactivation curves have different
(p = 0.01) slope factors (z) in
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 sodium
channels (
1.8 ± 0.2 vs.
0.8 ± 0.3, n = 6-10; Table 1), suggesting a different slow inactivation voltage
sensitivity for these channels. Does a specific p-region also confer
the voltage sensitivity of steady-state slow inactivation? We compared
the z values of modified Boltzmann curves fit to
steady-state slow inactivation data. Our results, summarized in Table
1, indicate that S5-S6 linkers do not equally or predictably contribute
to the voltage sensitivity of steady-state slow inactivation. Thus,
slope factors were not significantly altered in chimeras SkC14 and SkC2
compared with hNaV1.4 (p > 0.05). The slope factor in CSk3 chimera significantly (p
0.05) differs from that of
hNaV1.5 channels (
2.1 ± 0.2, n = 7, vs.
0.8 ± 0.3, n = 6, respectively), whereas CSk14 and CSk2 chimeras have a significantly
smaller effect on the voltage sensitivity (p
0.05).
Site-directed mutations within the DII p-region alter the probability of steady-state slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels
The DII S5-S6 linkers in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 contain non-conserved regions and individual residues. We used chimerical constructs and site-directed mutagenesis to explore the ability of non-conserved residues to control the probability of slow inactivation. The structures of these chimeras are shown in Fig. 3.
|
We found that substitution of V754 in hNaV1.4
with the corresponding isoleucine from hNaV1.5
(V754I) significantly decreased the probability of slow inactivation
from ~80% to ~50% (p < 0.05, n = 6-10). In Fig. 4 A,
steady-state slow inactivation in V754I (filled circles,
n = 8) is compared with that in
hNaV1.5 (dotted line, n = 12) and
hNaV1.4 channels (open circles, n = 10). The probability of slow inactivation in V754I is statistically
indistinguishable from that in hNaV1.5 channels
(p = 0.80) but very different from hNaV1.4 (p < 0.001). The
reciprocal chimera in which I891 of hNaV1.5 was
replaced with the corresponding valine from
hNaV1.4 (I891V) also alters slow inactivation in
hNaV1.5. Because the I891V mutation appears to
shift the steady-state curve in the depolarized direction, an extended
range of prepulse voltages was applied (from
150 mV to 20 mV versus
prepulse from
150 mV to 0 mV in other experiments). Fig. 4
B shows steady-state slow inactivation in I891V (filled squares, n = 10), hNaV1.4 (dotted
line, n = 10), and hNaV1.5
channels (open squares, n = 12). Compared with
hNaV1.5 channels, I891V channels exhibit
significantly (p = 0.022) increased probability of slow
inactivation as determined from individual Boltzmann fits (49% ± 3.6% in hNaV1.5, n = 12, vs.
67% ± 7% in I891V, n = 10). To estimate the effect
of I891V on slow inactivation relative to
hNaV1.4, we compared probabilities of slow
inactivation in I891V and hNaV1.4 at prepulse
voltages from
20 mV to 0 mV using the alternate Welch
t-test for averaged sets of data with unequal standard
deviations. The table in Fig. 4 B demonstrates that
steady-state slow inactivation in I891V and
hNaV1.4 is similar at
20 mV and 0 mV
(p = 0.2) and different at
10 mV (p = 0.036). By contrast, the CP13, CP15, and A777S/A776S chimeras do not
alter the properties of steady-state slow inactivation (see Table 1).
|
Kinetics of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels are not dependent on the structure of p-regions
Do the S5-S6 extracellular linkers also confer the rates at which
sodium channels enter and exit the slow inactivated state? To answer
this question, we compared the voltage-dependent slow inactivation time
constants of onset and recovery in wild-type and chimeric channels in
Fig. 5, plotted as a function of prepulse voltage. The time constants were derived from single-exponential fits
to slow inactivation recovery and onset data (see Vilin et al., 1999
).
|
Exchange of S5-S6 linkers between hNaV1.4 and
hNaV1.5
-subunits produces neither a
discernable pattern of alterations in voltage dependency of slow
inactivation time constants [
(V)] nor a consistent resemblance to
the
(V) characteristics of parental channels. Although most chimeras
exhibit slow inactivation time constants (
s)
different from those in wild-type channels at certain voltages (Fig.
B-F), only
s in SCk14
chimera (Fig. 5 A) are obviously smaller than in
hNaV1.4 channels.
s in
V754I (Fig. 6 A) and I891V (Fig. 6 B) channels remain similar to those in
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clarifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the divergent
properties of slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 and
hNaV1.5 will help elucidate the
structure/function relations in these channels. We have previously
demonstrated that replacing all p-regions in hNaV1.4
-subunit with the p-regions from
hNaV1.5
-subunit brings the probability of
slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 to that in
hNaV1.5, indicating that the pore regions might
underlie at least some of the inherent differences between
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5
channels (Vilin et al., 1999
). We have now systematically studied the
role of single p-regions (S5-S6 linkers) from each domain of
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5
-subunits in regulating slow inactivation. Only the domain II S5-S6
linker was found to confer the probability of slow inactivation from
parental channels into chimeric constructs (Fig. 2, B and
E). S5-S6 linkers in domains DI, DIII, and DIV failed to
significantly alter the probability slow inactivation compared with
wild-type channels (Fig. 2, A, C, D,
and F), showing that the p-regions in
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5
channels do not have identical roles in slow inactivation. We further
report the striking result that a single mutation, V754I, is capable of
producing steady-state slow inactivation in
hNaV1.4 indistinguishable from that in
hNaV1.5 (Fig. 4 A). Isoleucine 891 in
hNaV1.5 DII S5-S6, corresponding to V751 in
hNaV1.4, produces a similar effect on steady-state slow inactivation (Fig. 4 B), although we find
that the lower plateau of steady-state slow inactivation in
hNaV1.5 I891V is shifted to more depolarized
potentials. From these results, it appears that V754 and I891 are
essential for determining the difference in probability of slow
inactivation between cardiac and skeletal muscle sodium channels.
In contrast to the relatively clear role of the DII p-region in
regulating the probability of slow inactivation, effects of single
S5-S6 linkers on slow inactivation time constants are less easily
interpreted. SkC2, V754I, and I891V chimeras most closely resemble slow
inactivation time constants of those in hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (Figs. 5 B and
Fig. 6), whereas all other pore chimeras have generally smaller slow
inactivation time constants, compared with
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5
channels (Fig. 5), especially for SkC14 (Fig. 5 A). The lack
of a clear correlation between the structure of p-regions and slow
inactivation time constants suggests that the S5-S6 linkers of
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 do not directly determine the voltage-dependent rates of slow inactivation. According to the results shown in Fig. 5, it is plausible that the
kinetic properties of slow inactivation in sodium channels do not arise
from the structure of the p-regions, but rather may be dependent on
other voltage-sensitive structures, such as the S4 transmembrane
segments, as has been proposed elsewhere (Kontis and Goldin, 1997
). The
absence of a predictable relationship between the steady-state
probability and the kinetics of slow inactivation is further
complicated by the previous observation that slow inactivation cannot
be adequately described using a simple, two-state model (Featherstone
et al., 1996
).
Our results are consistent with other reports showing that p-regions
are involved in slow inactivation gating in sodium channels. First,
structural alterations within sodium channel p-regions and their close
proximity affect slow inactivation (Cummins and Sigworth, 1996
; Hayward
et al., 1997
; Wang and Wang, 1997
). Second, changes in ionic
environment affect slow inactivation in sodium channels; low external
[Na+] accelerates entry into the slow
inactivated state, slows the rate of recovery from slow inactivation,
and increases the probability of slow inactivation (Townsend and Horn,
1997
). These data suggest that the sodium channel p-regions may have
dual roles as both the conductance pore (Catterall, 1993
, Fozzard and
Hanck, 1996
; Marban et al., 1998
) and as the slow inactivation gate.
In addition to the p-regions, other sodium channel structures have also
been shown to affect slow inactivation in sodium channels, indicating
that slow inactivation gating is realized through complex, voltage-dependent interactions between disparate structures. The domain
III-IV cytoplasmic linker, responsible for fast inactivation in sodium
channels (West et al., 1992
; Patton et al., 1994
) has been demonstrated
to limit the probability of slow inactivation in both cardiac (Richmond
et al., 1998
) and skeletal muscle channels (Featherstone et al., 1996
).
We have also shown preliminary evidence that substitution of glutamate
1314 with glutamine in the DIII-IV linker decreases the probability of
slow inactivation in hNaV1.4 channels (Spackman
et al., 2000
). In addition, the role of S4 voltage sensors in sodium
channel slow inactivation gating has been hypothesized (Bezanilla et
al., 1982
; Rayner and Starkus 1989
; Ruben et al., 1992
) and
experimentally confirmed (Kontis and Goldin, 1997
; Mitrovic et al.,
2000
).
The pore-forming structures and S4 segments are important components
underlying slow C- and P-type inactivation in Shaker K+ channels (Hoshi et al., 1990
; Yellen et al.,
1994
; Liu et al., 1996
; Kiss et al., 1999
, Loots and Isacoff, 2000
).
Certain point mutations in the K+ channel pore
region block the potassium current and affect slow inactivation,
additionally indicating that at least the outer pore of potassium
channels is also functioning as slow inactivation gates (Yang et al.,
1997b
; Yellen et al., 1994
; Liu et al., 1996
). In contrast to
the ball-and-chain mechanism of N-type inactivation (Hoshi et
al., 1991
), C- and P-type inactivation is produced by pore occlusion
via a series of movements within the p-region (Boland et al., 1994
; Liu
et al., 1996
; Cha and Bezanilla, 1997
), which are presumably driven by
the S4 voltage sensors (Loots and Isacoff, 1999
, 2000
).
It seems that slow inactivation in sodium channels is also produced by
conformational changes in the
-subunit through the combined movement
of S4 voltage sensors and p-regions. It is easy to imagine that
movements within the p-regions could convert the channel into a
non-conducting state and reduce the number of available channels during
a 60-s depolarizing pulse (Ruff, 1996
; Townsend and Horn, 1997
).
Consequently, the probability of slow inactivation might be determined
by the greater (in hNaV1.4) or lesser (in hNaV1.5) flexibility or mobility of a particular
p-region, or differential interactions between the pore and the other
channel structures that directly or indirectly control slow
inactivation. This speculation is supported by the observation that
exchanging the DII S5-S6 linker between two channel isoforms confers
the parental channel properties of steady-state slow inactivation into
the chimeric construct (Fig. 2, B and E). Our
observation that a single residue within the DII S5-S6 region regulates
the steady-state probability of slow inactivation in
hNaV1.4 and hNaV1.5 channels (Fig. 4) is also consistent with this idea.
Our data do not provide any evidence that p-regions are directly
involved in the regulation of slow inactivation time constants, but
rather suggest that other voltage-dependent structures play a role in
this process. It was recently demonstrated that covalent binding of
sodium (2-sulfonatoethyl)methanethiosulfonate to a cysteine,
substituted for the third arginine in the domain IV S4 voltage sensor,
increases the rate of entering the slow inactivated state at
depolarized voltages and decreases the rate of leaving this state at
hyperpolarized voltages (Mitrovic et al., 2000
). These data show that
S4 voltage sensors, or at least the S4 segment from the domain IV, can
affect the kinetics of slow inactivation in sodium channels.
Additionally, we have shown preliminary data that charge
neutralizations (R219C and K228C) in the DI S4 segment alter the
apparent voltage dependence of steady-state slow inactivation (Vilin et
al., 2000
). Thus, because the DIV S4 voltage sensor participates in
coupling both activation and deactivation with fast inactivation (Ji et
al., 1996
; Cha et al., 1999
; Groome et al., 1999
, 2000
; Sheets et al.,
2000
), the role of the S4s in slow inactivation is particularly
interesting as a possible mechanism of coupling between fast and slow
gating transitions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Drs. Brett Adams and Tim Gilbertson for their editorial comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant NS29204 to P.C.R.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication 15 December 2000 and in final form 16 February 2001.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Peter C. Ruben, Department of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5305. Tel.: 435-797-2490; Fax: 435-797-1575; E-mail: pruben{at}biology.usu.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit by co-expression with a human brain
subunit.
Pflügers Arch.
423:155-157
-subunit: a deletion analysis.
Pflügers Arch.
431:186-195
1 subunit of the rat brain sodium channel.
Science.
256:839-842
1 subunit mRNA expressed in adult human skeletal muscle, heart, and brain is encoded by a single gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:7571-7578
1 subunit induced gating modulation in voltage-dependent Na+ channels.
J. Neurosci.
16:7117-7127
1 subunit.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:3954-3962
1 subunit modifies activation and inactivation gating of multiple sodium channel
subunit.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:17649-17655
-chymotrypsin.
Biophys. J.
67:161-171
-subunit in rat skeletal muscle is selectively associated with the tetrodotoxin-sensitive
-subunit isoform.
Neuron.
11:915-922
Biophys J, May 2001, p. 2221-2230, Vol. 80, No. 5
© 2001 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/01/05/2221/10 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Szendroedi, W. Sandtner, T. Zarrabi, E. Zebedin, K. Hilber, S. C. Dudley Jr., H. A. Fozzard, and H. Todt Speeding the Recovery from Ultraslow Inactivation of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels by Metal Ion Binding to the Selectivity Filter: A Foot-on-the-Door? Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4209 - 4224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Rush, T. R. Cummins, and S. G. Waxman Multiple sodium channels and their roles in electrogenesis within dorsal root ganglion neurons J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Xiong, Y. Z. Farukhi, Y. Tian, D. DiSilvestre, R. A. Li, and G. F. Tomaselli A conserved ring of charge in mammalian Na+ channels: a molecular regulator of the outer pore conformation during slow inactivation J. Physiol., November 1, 2006; 576(3): 739 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Filatov, M. J. Pinter, and M. M. Rich Resting Potential-dependent Regulation of the Voltage Sensitivity of Sodium Channel Gating in Rat Skeletal Muscle In Vivo J. Gen. Physiol., July 25, 2005; 126(2): 161 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Filatov and M. M. Rich Hyperpolarized shifts in the voltage dependence of fast inactivation of Nav1.4 and Nav1.5 in a rat model of critical illness myopathy J. Physiol., September 15, 2004; 559(3): 813 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Sandtner, J. Szendroedi, T. Zarrabi, E. Zebedin, K. Hilber, I. Glaaser, H. A. Fozzard, S. C. Dudley, and H. Todt Lidocaine: A Foot in the Door of the Inner Vestibule Prevents Ultra-Slow Inactivation of a Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 66(3): 648 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Zebedin, W. Sandtner, S. Galler, J. Szendroedi, H. Just, H. Todt, and K. Hilber Fiber type conversion alters inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium currents in murine C2C12 skeletal muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): C270 - C280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kanai, S. Hirose, H. Oguni, G. Fukuma, Y. Shirasaka, T. Miyajima, K. Wada, H. Iwasa, S. Yasumoto, M. Matsuo, et al. Effect of localization of missense mutations in SCN1A on epilepsy phenotype severity Neurology, July 27, 2004; 63(2): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Kass Sodium Channel Inactivation Goes with the Flow J. Gen. Physiol., June 28, 2004; 124(1): 7 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||