help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouawad, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guilbert, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mouawad, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guilbert, C.

Biophys J, June 2002, p. 3224-3245, Vol. 82, No. 6

New Insights into the Allosteric Mechanism of Human Hemoglobin from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Liliane Mouawad, David Perahia, Charles H. Robert, and Christophe Guilbert

Laboratoire de Modélisation et Ingénierie des Protéines, Institut de Biochimie et de Biophysique Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8619, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay cedex, France


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

It is still difficult to obtain a precise structural description of the transition between the deoxy T-state and oxy R-state conformations of human hemoglobin, despite a large number of experimental studies. We used molecular dynamics with the Path Exploration with Distance Constraints (PEDC) method to provide new insights into the allosteric mechanism at the atomic level, by simulating the T-to-R transition. The T-state molecule in the absence of ligands was seen to have a natural propensity for dimer rotation, which nevertheless would be hampered by steric hindrance in the "joint" region. The binding of a ligand to the alpha  subunit would prevent such hindrance due to the coupling between this region and the alpha  proximal histidine, and thus facilitate completion of the dimer rotation. Near the end of this quaternary transition, the "switch" region adopts the R conformation, resulting in a shift of the beta  proximal histidine. This leads to a sliding of the beta -heme, the effect of which is to open the beta -heme's distal side, increasing the accessibility of the Fe atom and thereby the affinity of the protein. Our simulations are globally consistent with the Perutz strereochemical mechanism.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

Human hemoglobin (Hb A) is an allosteric oxygen-binding protein that adopts two distinct conformations: the low-affinity deoxygenated T state and the high-affinity fully liganded R state. A mechanism for the transition from one conformation to the other upon ligand binding has been proposed by Perutz (1970), Perutz et al. (1998), and Baldwin and Chothia (1979). In this mechanism, the binding of a ligand to one subunit modifies the position of the proximal histidine (F8) with respect to the heme, inducing a movement of the FG segment (the segment that connects helices F and G), which forms a part of the alpha 1beta 2 interface. The adjustment of this interface causes dimer rotation and modifies the network of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges at the alpha 1beta 2 interface. This decreases the strain on the proximal histidine of the facing subunit and modifies the ligand accessibility to the heme iron atom in the beta  subunit by "opening" its distal side. These structural modifications result in an increase of the protein affinity. The Perutz mechanism provides the best framework for understanding much of the experimental results on oxygen binding, although several points remain unclear. One is the role played by the alpha 1beta 1 interface. This interface is not referred to in this mechanism, but several experimental results (Levy et al., 1992; Tsai et al., 1999, 2000; Mihailescu and Russu, 2001) suggest that its role is not negligible. There is also an aspect of the proposed mechanism that is difficult to explain, in that the binding of ligand to the alpha  subunits is supposed to induce the quaternary transition, as is seen experimentally in solution (Ogawa and Shulman, 1972; Fujii et al., 1993; Kiger et al., 1993; Unzai et al., 1998), whereas the conformational changes seen in these subunits are minimal as compared to the beta  chains.

A tremendous number of experiments have been carried out to study the allosteric transition and to try to trap intermediate structures along this path. Most solution studies suggest that, under physiological conditions, Hb passes through a quaternary R-like intermediate state (Ogawa and Shulman, 1972; Murray et al., 1988; Eaton et al., 1991; Henry et al., 1997). However, crystal structures of partly liganded Hb have indicated a quaternary T-like structure (Luisi and Shibayama, 1989; Luisi et al., 1990; Waller and Liddington, 1990; Liddington et al., 1992; Bruno et al., 2000), but this may reflect the experimental constraints (such as the presence of allosteric effectors, low temperature, etc.). It also might be noted that even a fully liganded Hb has been crystallized in the T structure under certain conditions (Paoli et al., 1996). Moreover, a mutant carbonmonoxyHb (Hb Ypsilanti, beta 99Aspright-arrowTyr) (Smith et al., 1991), and a wild-type carbonmonoxyHb (R2) that was crystallized at low salt concentration (Silva et al., 1992) were first described as being in an intermediate state between T and R. However, computer simulations, based on docking and distance calculations, suggested that it is instead the R form that is intermediate between T and R2 (Srinivasan and Rose, 1994), or between T and Hb Y (Janin and Wodak, 1993).

Only a few molecular simulations have been carried out for Hb because of its large size, which makes them very time-consuming. Thus, some simulations have been done with only a part of the protein, such as the alpha  subunit (Gelin et al., 1983), the alpha 1beta 2 interface (Gao et al., 1989), or the alpha 1beta 1 dimer (Ramadas and Rifkind, 1999), or by using a rigid-body docking approach (Janin and Wodak, 1985). However, in the last decade, increases in the power of computers have made it possible to study the entire protein (Shibayama et al., 1995b; Mouawad and Perahia, 1996; Kim et al., 2001). Still, to our knowledge, no simulation of the transition path of Hb by molecular dynamics (MD) has been published.

The problem with studying large-scale conformational transitions by traditional molecular dynamics is that, even in very long simulations, the transition will occur rarely, if at all. Different methods have been introduced to attack this problem. One approach involves generating an initial guess for a trajectory leading from the starting to the final conformation, and then optimizing this trajectory to obtain the best transition pathway (Elber and Karplus, 1987; Ulitsky and Elber, 1990; El-Kettani and Durup, 1992; Fischer and Karplus, 1992; Olender and Elber, 1996; Ulitsky and Shalloway, 1997; Huo and Straub, 1997; Zaloj and Elber, 2000). This approach requires the generation of a large number of intermediate structures in the initial trajectory to properly sample the conformational space. The computational penalty associated with optimizing such a large number of intermediate structures simultaneously can be limiting for a large protein such as Hb. A second class of approaches is sequential, i.e., it involves inducing the transition in a single molecule simulation from one conformational state to the other (Harvey and Gabb, 1993; Schlitter et al., 1994; Guilbert et al., 1995; Csajka and Chandler, 1998; Zuckerman and Woolf, 1999; Geissler and Chandler, 2000). In most of these latter methods, the length of the simulation, or the number of the intermediate structures, is predetermined, which may constitute a difficulty for large proteins where some readjustments can be harder to attain than initially estimated.

We present here the first MD simulations of the T-to-R transition in human Hb. For this we used a combination of MD with the path exploration by distance constraint method (PEDC) (Guilbert et al., 1995). The value of this method is that it is sequential but without predetermination of the length of the simulation, and also that it gives the possibility of simulating a pathway by MD (i.e., not only by energy minimization) at ambient temperature in presence of the solvent. This method consists of the addition to the potential energy of a constraint term that forces the protein (in our case the deoxygenated T-state Hb A) to approach a reference conformation (here, the fully oxygenated R-state Hb A), by decreasing the mass-weighted root-mean-square (mrms) deviation between the two conformations by a series of displacements, each consisting of several picoseconds of MD (here ~10 ps, see Methods). Two separate trajectories (TrajI and TrajII) of 200 ps each, corresponding to 16 intervals of displacement, were performed to bring deoxygenated hemoglobin from the T state to the R state.

The simulated pathways made it possible to predict the presence of transient events, especially at the alpha 1beta 1 interface, and resulted in a mechanism consistent with the Perutz stereochemical mechanism, but with a different chronology of events. This mechanism makes clearer the difference in roles played by the alpha  and beta  subunits in Hb affinity and cooperativity.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

Description of the method

The PEDC method (Guilbert et al., 1995), which we implemented in the CHARMM program (Brooks et al., 1983), involves the addition of three constraint terms to the potential energy usually used in MD simulations. The main constraint is the distance constraint potential, Vdist, which forces the system toward a given mrms deviation from a reference, whereas the other two terms, Vtrans and Vrot prevent the system from satisfying the distance constraint by overall translation or rotation, respectively. The distance constraint potential Vdist is harmonic,
V<SUB><UP>dist</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB><UP>dist</UP></SUB></NU><DE>2</DE></FR> (d<SUP><UP>R</UP></SUP>−d<SUP><UP>0</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>)<SUP><UP>2</UP></SUP>.
Here kdist is the force constant, dR the mrms between the system and the reference structure R, and d<UP><SUB>J</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> the target mrms that the system must ideally reach in a discrete displacement phase J. To explore the transition pathway between the initial structure I and the reference structure R, each displacement phase J involves decreasing d<UP><SUB>J</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> by a value Delta d and carrying out MD or energy minimization (EM) runs. Thus, step by step, the system reaches the reference structure by the least energetically costly path consistent with the constraints.

However, this harmonic potential, which is very satisfactory for EM, is less suitable for MD. Indeed, driving the system toward the reference structure requires a relatively large force constant for the constraint potential, which may restrain the normal fluctuations of the system. We therefore adopted a flat-bottomed-well potential. Thus, in this study, Vdist was of the form (Fig. 1),
V<SUB><UP>dist</UP></SUB>=

<FENCE><AR><R><C><UP>½k</UP><SUB><UP>dist</UP></SUB>(d<SUP><UP>R</UP></SUP>−(d<SUP>0</SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>−&dgr;d))<SUP>2</SUP></C><C><UP>d</UP><SUP><UP>R</UP></SUP>< (d<SUP><UP>0</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>−&dgr;d)</C></R><R><C><UP>0 </UP></C><C>(<UP>d</UP><SUP><UP>0</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>−&dgr;d)≤d<SUP><UP>R</UP></SUP>≤(d<SUP><UP>0</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>+&dgr;d),</C></R><R><C><UP>½k</UP><SUB><UP>dist</UP></SUB>(d<SUP><UP>R</UP></SUP>−(d<SUP><UP>0</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>+&dgr;d))<SUP>2</SUP></C><C><UP>d</UP><SUP><UP>R</UP></SUP>>(d<SUP><UP>0</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>J</UP></SUB>+&dgr;d)</C></R></AR></FENCE>
The width of the flat bottom of the well, 2delta d, was set at a value a little larger than the average rms fluctuations of hemoglobin at 300 K, i.e., 2delta d = 0.8 Å. The force constant, which, in the case of a harmonic potential, must be small to prevent damping of the fluctuations, should, in the case of the flat-bottomed-well potential, be very large to confine the system to the well. We used kdist = 106 kcal/mol/Å2. Such a large value does not perturb the system when it is inside the desired well, but is nevertheless not suitable for displacement of the system from one well to another, because it will induce large forces. Hence, the displacement phase is divided into two parts: the driving phase, in which the force constant is increased gradually from 200 to 106 kcal/mol/Å2 (see the transition pathways in the Procedure) to move the system into the energy well, and the confinement phase, in which MD is carried out using the constraint (Vdist) described above, with a force constant equal to 106 kcal/mol/Å2, to keep the system within the well.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   (A) Schematic representation of the spherical iso-mrms surfaces defined by the PEDC procedure with respect to the R structure. The PEDC constraint (i.e., the flat-bottomed-well potential) is shown centered at the starting T structure (J = 0, black) and at an intermediate mrms target d<UP><SUB>J</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (here J = 1, gray). The width of the well 2delta d equalled 0.8 Å in our simulations, and the displacement step Delta d = 0.3 Å until J = 5, at which point it was reduced to 0.15 Å. (B) The procedure for displacement from one interval to the next (J - 1 to J) consists of a driving phase, in which the force constant is increased gradually from 200 to 106 kcal/mol/Å2 (see text), to allow the structure to be brought smoothly into the next potential well (centered on d<UP><SUB>J</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP>) for the confinement phase. At the end of interval J - 1, the structure may be either outside (A) or inside (B) the confinement region J because of the overlap of the wells. In the second case (B), the energy of constraint during the driving phase will already be zero, as was seen at the beginning of TrajI.

Procedure

This study was carried out on hemoglobin in a box of water with periodic boundary conditions.

The force field

The force field parameters were set as follows: the QUANTA/CHARMm21 parameter set for extended atoms (with polar hydrogens explicitly represented) was used for amino acids and TIP3 water, and the all-hydrogens CHARMM22 parameter set was used for heme, to prevent artefactual distortions of this prosthetic group.

The water box

It was important to choose the truncation functions for electrostatic and van der Waals energies that yielded a radial distribution function of water g(r) that best fitted experimental data. Several MD trajectories of 10 ps each were calculated for boxes of water of different dimensions, with different combinations of truncation functions and cutoff distances. The combination that yielded the best radial distribution of water was the shift function for electrostatic energy with a cutoff distance of 11 Å and the switch function for the van der Waals energy with cuton and cutoff values of 10.5 and 11 Å, respectively. The water box considered was cubic, with the length of each side equal to the largest diameter of the protein in either state plus two times the cutoff distance. Thus, the length of the side of the box was 92 Å. Such dimensions were necessary to prevent direct interactions between the protein (or even the first layer of water) and its images, because movements of large amplitude were expected to be observed. This water box was constructed and equilibrated at 300 K. In all that follows, the MD was carried out in a microcanonical ensemble (constant volume and energy) with the Verlet algorithm (Verlet, 1967); the time step was equal to 1 fs with the use of the SHAKE algorithm (Ryckaert et al., 1977) applied to all covalent bonds involving hydrogen atoms. Because water molecules are considered explicitly, the value of the dielectric constant was set equal to 1.

The protein

The structure of the deoxy T-state Hb A used in this study was derived from PDB (Bernstein et al., 1977) entry 2HHB (Fermi et al., 1984). A rigorously symmetric mean structure was generated for both dimers to start the simulations, as described in Mouawad and Perahia (1996). In the oxy R state of Hb A, the PDB structure designated 1HHO (Shaanan, 1983) shows only one dimer, the other being obtained by symmetry. We point out that symmetry was not maintained artificially in the MD calculations and the structure was therefore free to evolve in a different way for each dimer. In both T and R structures the tautomeric forms of the histidines were assigned in a way that favored the formation of hydrogen bonds. None of them was protonated.

The potential energy of the protein was slightly minimized in vacuum, using the conjugate gradient algorithm of CHARMM, to eliminate unfavorable interactions due to crystal imprecision. In the first 300 steps, harmonic constraints (not to be confused with PEDC constraints) were applied to heavy atoms to allow smooth minimization without any abrupt deviations from the crystal structure. The harmonic force constant was decreased every 50 steps, taking the values of 250, 100, 50, 25, 10, and 5 kcal/mol/Å2. We then carried out free minimization for 300 steps.

The protein in the water box

Hemoglobin, along with the crystallographic water molecules, was immersed in the center of the water box. All water molecules that overlapped either protein or crystallographic water molecules (i.e., distance between heavy atoms less than 2.8 Å) were deleted, leaving a system of 66,723 atoms, 5,598 of which corresponded to the protein itself.

The protein's temperature was close to 0 K because its energy was minimized, whereas the temperature of the water was 300 K. To homogenize the system, the protein was fixed and the temperature of water was decreased to 0 K in 5 ps. The whole system was then heated to 300 K in 50-K intervals over 7 ps. This procedure was applied to both T and R structures. The oxygen ligands were kept in the heating phase for the R-state structure.

The resulting R structure was used as the reference R in the PEDC method to compute the transition pathway. For comparison, two transition pathways were calculated; both used the same reference structure and started from the same minimized T structure but were heated with different Gaussian assignments of velocities. We refer here to these two trajectories as I and II.

The transition pathways

The same procedure was applied for both trajectories. The system was equilibrated at 300 K for 10 ps, then the mrms between the obtained structure of Hb in the T-state and the reference structure in the R-state was calculated: mrms(I) = 3.15 Å and mrms(II) = 3.05 Å, (the mrms between the T and R crystal structures is 2.66 Å). The oxygen molecules (O2) of the reference (R) were not taken into account.

Then followed 10 ps of productive dynamics simulations in which the PEDC constraints were applied to maintain the structure at approximately the same mrms distance from the reference (Fig. 1). However, because the protein was always inside the flat bottom of the potential well during these simulations and therefore did not "feel" the constraint at all, this phase of the calculations, which we will call displacement 0 (J = 0, where d<UP><SUB>0</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (I) = 3.15 Å and d<UP><SUB>0</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (II) = 3.05 Å), can be seen as an unconstrained productive MD and considered as a free dynamics phase. Throughout the procedure, the PEDC constraints (Vdist, Vtrans, and Vrot) were applied only to protein atoms; the force constants to prevent overall translation and rotation were ktrans = 500 kcal/mol/Å2 and krot = 10-10 kcal/mol/Å2, respectively, and the width of the potential well 2delta d = 0.8 Å.

For the first displacement (J = 1), the mrms was decreased by Delta d = 0.3 Å, such that d<UP><SUB>1</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (I) = 2.85 Å and d<UP><SUB>1</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (II) = 2.75 Å. The driving phase involved 1.2 ps of simulation during which kdist took the values of 200, 500, 1000, 5000, 104, and 106 kcal/mol/Å2, changing every 200 fs, to bring the protein into the potential well centered on d<UP><SUB>1</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP>. The confinement phase that followed consisted of 9 ps of productive MD under PEDC constraints with kdist = 106 kcal/mol/Å2 to maintain the protein within the flat-bottomed potential well reached during the driving phase. The same procedure was repeated through the fifth displacement (J = 5) (i.e., d<UP><SUB>5</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (I) = 1.65 Å and d<UP><SUB>5</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (II) = 1.55 Å). Beyond this point, it became more difficult to displace the system, i.e., the driving-phase constraint energy increased significantly compared to the previous steps, although it was still no larger than 0.14 kcal/mol per degree of freedom of the protein. Thus, we modified the value of Delta d from 0.3 to 0.15 Å for subsequent displacements, the rest of the procedure remaining the same. Throughout both trajectories, the PEDC constraint energy in the confinement phase (as opposed to the driving phase) was maximally 10-3 kcal/mol per degree of freedom of the protein, when the system reached one of the walls of the well. Thus, 16 displacement phases (or intervals) were used to bring the protein within delta d of the R state (d<UP><SUB>16</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (I) = d<UP><SUB>16</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> (II) = 0 Å). Each trajectory, including the 7 ps of the heating phase, totaled 200 ps and required 1100 hours cpu on a CRAY C98.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

In a MD simulation, the movements of the protein appear rather chaotic. Thus, we considered significant only the results relative to events taking place in both dimers (although not necessarily at the same time) and in both trajectories. The time indicated throughout the article refers to our simulation time, and not to the real time of the T-R transition, because the dynamics were carried out under constraints.

Potential energy profile

It is difficult to straightforwardly calculate an energy profile of the transition pathway of a protein calculated by MD in explicit solvent. The strategy generally used is to apply an implicit solvent model to configurations of the protein taken from the trajectories (Duan et al., 1998). We present in this section the potential energy profile of Hb in which the solvent effects are taken into account by using a distance-dependent dielectric constant. Such an implicit solvent representation can overestimate electrostatic energies, but our purpose here is only to present a rough estimation of the potential energy along the transition trajectories to see whether the use of PEDC has introduced artefactual energy barriers.

In Fig. 2, we can observe that, for both trajectories, the potential energy of the protein is almost stable until ~57 ps (corresponding to the end of displacement J = 3), at which point it starts to increase, reaching a plateau at ~100 ps (end of J = 7). The large energy difference between these two points is mainly due to the overestimation of electrostatics as mentioned above. At the end of the trajectories (t > 165 ps, corresponding to the last 3 intervals of displacements), one can see that, in each driving phase leading to the next interval (see Methods), the potential energy of the protein increases and then decreases as it relaxes during the confinement phase. At this stage of the trajectories, it would appear that the confinement phase is not long enough to allow a complete relaxation of the protein. However, this is of no consequence for the structural analyses that follow, because, in the last three displacements (J = 14-16) the protein is already within fluctuation distance from the reference structure.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   Potential energy of the protein alone calculated with a distance-dependent dielectric constant. The results are presented for all instantaneous structures along TrajI in black and TrajII in gray. For the abscissa, a double graduation is adopted: simulation time (t) in ps, and J, the number of intervals of displacement. In this and all following figures, the results are shown starting from the end of the 7-ps heating phase.

Global analysis

Analysis of the structural modifications along the trajectories showed that the T-R transition could be divided into two major steps: the first step involving the quaternary transition (i.e., the rotation of one alpha beta dimer with respect to the other), and the second step being the tertiary transition (i.e., the internal modifications of each alpha  or beta  chain to give the R-state). Indeed, as shown in Fig. 3, the rotation of the dimers was almost completed (i.e., dimer rotation angle theta  relative to R reduced almost to 0°) when the rms deviation of the subunits from their tertiary R structures started to decrease---at 67 ps (beginning of interval J = 5) for the alpha  chains and a bit later (77 ps, beginning of interval J = 6) for the beta  chains. However, this does not mean that the chains behaved as rigid bodies in the first part of the transition. Indeed their rms with respect to the T structure increased from the beginning of the transition, but their internal modifications did not start to bring them close to the R structure until the quaternary transition was almost completed.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   (A) The dimer rotation angle theta , defined as the angle required to superimpose dimer alpha 2beta 2 of a given structure of human hemoglobin on that of the R state structure after initially superimposing their alpha 1beta 1 dimers. (B) Calpha atom rms deviation for each alpha  chain along the trajectory from the alpha  chain in the R structure after their superimposition (alpha 1, black; alpha 2, gray). (C) Same as in (B) for the beta  chains (beta 1, black; beta 2, gray).

In TrajI, rotation of the dimers started spontaneously. The system did not feel the energy of constraint in the first displacement (J = 1, 27 ps < t <=  37 ps) because it had already reached the first intermediate mrms window in the unconstrained step (J = 0). In addition, for the next displacement (J = 2), the energy of constraint to bring the system into the window (see Fig. 1) did not exceed 7 kcal/mol. This constraint energy, which is global (i.e., not localized in any particular part of the protein) represented a negligible perturbation for the protein as it corresponded to less than one thousandth of its total energy (4 × 10-4 kcal/mol per degree of freedom), and it lasted less than half a picosecond. This shows that the quaternary transition may take place easily in the T state, confirming the results obtained previously by normal-mode (NM) calculations, which yielded a single low-energy mode corresponding mainly to the quaternary rotation (Mouawad and Perahia, 1996).

In contrast, in TrajII, in the free dynamics phase (J = 0, 17 ps < t <=  27 ps), dimer rotation began in the opposite direction from that required for the R structure. Thus, in the first displacement phase (J = 1), constraint was necessary to bring the structure closer to the reference. Indeed, in this trajectory, the energy of constraint was greater than zero during the whole driving phase (1.2 ps), although with a maximum of only about 10-3 kcal/mol per degree of freedom. However, as seen in Fig. 2, for both TrajI and TrajII, the overall energy profile, up to ~60 ps, is essentially flat.

Movement of the helices

Visually, it is clear that the axis of rotation of one dimer is very close and parallel to the axis of its alpha G helix (Fig. 4). This was confirmed by projection of the axis of the alpha G helix onto the rotation axis of the corresponding dimer. This projection, after normalization of the two vectors, was close to unity along both trajectories.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   Representation of the alpha 1beta 1 dimer in the T (white) and R (gray) structures after superimposition of their alpha 2beta 2 dimers. Near coincidence of the rotation axis of the dimer with that of the alpha G helix is observed. The gray arrow indicates the direction of the movement from T to R.

To describe the movement of the helices of the protein over time, we calculated the angle between each helix axis at time t relative to its corresponding axis in the T structure (here, the 7-ps structure at the beginning of free equilibration) after superimposition of the relevant chain (results not shown). In the alpha  chains, the C helix underwent the largest movement, which started in the beginning of the transition. The F helix moved to a lesser extent, and the other helices did not move significantly. In the beta  chains, the amplitude of the movement of the D and F helices was greater than that of the C helix, and the movement of the other helices was not significant. Interestingly, in the beta  chains, the system behaved as if the amplitude of the C helix movement was diminished by the presence of the D helix, which has no equivalent in the alpha  chains.

Comparison with rigid-body rotation

We investigated possible factors impeding or favoring simple rigid-body rotation of the dimers. Independently of the calculated PEDC-MD trajectories, we carried out a rigid-body rotation (RBR) of one dimer with respect to the other and calculated, for each degree of rotation, the distances between the Calpha atoms of the contact residues at the alpha 1beta 2 and alpha 2beta 1 interfaces. More precisely, the rigid-body movement consisted of rotation of one dimer with respect to the other, accompanied by a small translation of that dimer to bring the quaternary T structure close to the R form. For the sake of simplicity, however, this rigid-body movement will be referred to as rotation.

Various pairwise residue distances at the interdimer interface were calculated as a function of the RBR angle theta '. To compare the RBR distances with those obtained along the calculated PEDC-MD trajectories, they are expressed as a function of time using the correspondence between angles theta ' and theta  to obtain the equivalent time from Fig. 3 A. Some typical curves are shown in Fig. 5.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5   Distances across the dimer interface calculated along the PEDC-MD trajectories, between the Calpha atoms of (A) alpha 1Pro-44(CE2) and beta 2His-97(FG4), (B) alpha 1Asp-94(G1) and beta 2Trp-37(C3), in which the black curve corresponds to interface alpha 1beta 2 and the gray curve to alpha 2beta 1, and (C) alpha 1Val-96(G3) and alpha 2Val-96(G3). In frames A, B, and C, the dashed curves correspond to the distances between these residues if the alpha 2beta 2 dimer is rotated as a rigid body with respect to alpha 1beta 1 (see the RBR procedure in text). For these curves, the angle of rotation was replaced by the corresponding time obtained via Fig. 3 A. (D) Representation of the alpha 2 and beta 1 subunits, with the residues listed above shown as hard spheres along with the proximal histidines (His-87 in alpha  and His-92 in beta ) and the hemes. (E) The G helices (ribbons) and Val-96 (hard spheres) of alpha 1 (gray) and alpha 2 (black) are shown at three different points in the transition pathway, T (t = 7 ps), R (t = 200 ps), and t = 57 ps (end of J = 3). Note that, at t = 57 ps, helix alpha 2G shows a slight deformation due to rotation of the first part of the helix as described in the Discussion.

As can be seen in Fig. 5 for the residue pair alpha 1(alpha 2)Pro-44(CE2) and beta 2(beta 1)His-97(FG4), several distance curves taken from the PEDC-MD trajectories corresponded well, or with a short time-lag, to RBR, suggesting that modification of the distance between these regions is similar to that of a simple dimer rotation. Interestingly, some of the other curves were very different, such as those referring to the "flexible joint" region consisting of the alpha FG corner and the beta C helix (Fig. 6). More precisely, the curves in Fig. 5, corresponding to the Calpha distance between alpha 1(alpha 2)Asp-94(G1) and beta 2(beta 1)Trp-37(C3), showed that the RBR distance decreased to 3.5 Å, whereas the distance seen in PEDC dynamics decreased only to 6 Å. Similar behavior was observed to a lesser extent for other amino-acid pairs in the flexible joint region, such as those involving residues 92, 93, and 95 in the alpha  chains, and residues 40 and 43 in the beta  chains. This implies that the residues in this region, especially alpha Asp-94 and beta Trp-37, are likely to impede simple rotation of the dimers and that this could be overcome by tertiary modifications of the subunits.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6   Representation of the alpha 2 and beta 1 subunits, with the proximal histidines and hemes shown as hard spheres. The joint region consists of the alpha 2FG segment and the beta 1C helix and the switch region consists of the alpha 2C helix and the beta 1FG segment.

Another interesting case in which RBR yielded a distance curve significantly different from the corresponding PEDC result concerned the residues alpha 1Val-96(G3) and alpha 2Val-96(G3). Indeed, whereas RBR would increase the distance between the Calpha atoms of these residues, in the calculated trajectories, this distance decreased to a minimum (at ~57 ps, J = 3) during dimer rotation and then increased to the distance given by the RBR. At the minimum distance in the PEDC-MD results, contact between valine side chains occurred.

Interfaces alpha 2beta 1 and alpha 1beta 2

The major structural modifications in the T-to-R transition described in the literature concern the C-termini of the alpha  and beta  chains and the switch region, which consists of the C-helix of alpha 2(alpha 1) and the FG segment of beta 1(beta 2) (Figs. 5 D and 6). In the switch region, during the T-R transition, the relative position of beta 1His-97 (FG4) changes from between alpha 2Pro-44(CE2) and alpha 2Thr-41(C6) to the adjacent placement between residues alpha 2Thr-41(C6) and alpha 2Thr-38(C3). This movement is referred to here as the "switch transition"; it is shown in Fig. 7, in which the alpha -chain C helices of several structures (at the ends of intervals J = 0 to J = 16) are superimposed. However, this representation can give the misleading impression that the alpha 2C helix is static and that only the beta 1His-97 moves. This is not the case because, as was mentioned above, the alpha C helices were shown to be very mobile during the transition. Thus, Fig. 8 shows another representation in which the alpha 2C helix and its facing beta 1His-97 in the first half of the transition (snapshots taken at the ends of intervals J = 0 through J = 7) are represented on a grid in the absolute frame (i.e., with no superimposition). This shows that, in the first part of the transition, the alpha 2C helix is mobile and deformable, possibly inducing the shift of beta 1His-97(FG4). Indeed, in this representation, it is only in interval J = 6 (between 78 and 88 ps) that beta 1His-97 started to change its absolute position.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7   Snapshots of the switch region taken at the ends of the 16 intervals of displacement, in which each of the alpha 2C helix (dark gray) was superimposed on that of the T state (only the T-state helix is shown). beta 1His-97(FG4) from these timepoints and from T are drawn (light gray). The histidine resides most of the time either in the T conformation (i.e., between alpha Thr-41 and alpha Pro-44) or in the R conformation (between alpha Thr-41 and alpha Thr-38), with the transition taking place very rapidly, i.e., in only one interval (J = 6, between 78 and 88 ps, black).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8   Snapshots of the switch region for the first half of the transition path, at the ends of displacement intervals J = 0 (T state) through J = 7 (98 ps), with no superimposition. The fixed grid is shown as a reference. In the first part of the transition path the alpha C helix fluctuates, while the backbone of beta His-97(FG4) maintains its absolute position until interval J = 6 (between 78 and 88 ps), where it starts its transition. Note that the residue's position is maintained throughout nearly the entire period in which dimer rotation occurs (see Fig. 3 A).

The distance between the centers of mass (CM) of side chains beta 1(beta 2)His-97(FG4) and alpha 2(alpha 1)Pro-44(CE2) (Fig. 9 A), started to increase at 67 ps (start of interval J = 5) due essentially to movement of the alpha C helix itself. Note that, at this point, before the relative position of beta 1(beta 2)His-97(FG4) started to change, the dimer had rotated by ~11° (theta  approx  4°, see Fig. 3 A). At the end of the switch transition (J = 9, 120 ps), when dimer rotation was essentially complete (theta  < 2°), the intrasubunit distance between the side chains CM of the beta C-terminal residue His-146(HC3) and beta Asp-94(FG1) began to increase significantly (Fig. 9 B). Finally, near the end of the trajectories (130 ps, end of J = 10), the interdimer residues beta 1(beta 2)Trp-37(C3) and the alpha C-termini alpha 2(alpha 1)Arg-141(HC3) started to separate (Fig. 9 C). This shows that there is a sequence of events that is well respected in both dimers and in both trajectories. We will see later that, in these trajectories, there appears to be a cause-and-effect relationship between these events.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9   Distance between the side chain center of mass of the residues shown in the right-hand panels. (A) alpha 2Pro-44(CE2)-beta 1His-97(FG4), (B) beta 1Asp-94(FG1)-beta 1His-146(HC3), and (C) alpha 2Arg-141(HC3)-beta 1Trp-37(C3). The distances between alpha 1 and beta 2 or between beta 1 and beta 1 are in black and the distances between alpha 2 and beta 1 or between beta 2 and beta 2 are in gray. In the right-hand panels, the part of the subunit shown as a ribbon was superimposed on that of the T structure (only the latter is represented), and for the residue of interest, such as beta His-97, beta His-146, and alpha Arg-141, the T structure and snapshots from the following 16 intervals of displacement are shown. The arrows indicate the direction of movement from T to R.

Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges

In the switch region, the energy of the hydrogen bond between alpha 2(alpha 1)Thr-41(C6) and beta 1(beta 2)His-97(FG4) was calculated along the trajectories (Fig. 10). We found that, in the alpha 1beta 2 interface, a strong hydrogen bond formed between these residues during the switch transition of beta 2His-97(FG4), whereas at the corresponding alpha 2beta 1 interface, this hydrogen bond formed only after the relative transition of beta 1His-97 was completed. More generally, during the transition of beta His-97 (i.e., between 67 and 120 ps), the interaction energy (and not only the hydrogen bond energy) between this residue and alpha Thr-41(C6) was always attractive at the alpha 1beta 2 interface, whereas it was, at times, repulsive at the alpha 2beta 1 interface (results not shown), suggesting that there are different ways for the system to undergo this transition.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 10   Hydrogen bond energy between residues at the alpha 1beta 2 (black) and alpha 2beta 1 (gray) interfaces. The alpha 2beta 1 interface in the T structure is represented in the right-hand panels, where the alpha  and beta  C helices and FG segments are shown as ribbons, and the two residues for which hydrogen bond energy is presented are shown as hard spheres.

In contrast, the hydrogen bond between alpha 2(alpha 1)Tyr-42(C7) and beta 1(beta 2)Asp-99(G1), which is characteristic of the T-state, largely resisted dimer rotation, although it did display fluctuation. It broke definitively after the dimer rotation angle theta  decreased to less than 4°. Another T-state hydrogen bond, between alpha 2(alpha 1)Asp-94(G1) and beta 1(beta 2)Trp-37(C3) (in the joint region), was much weaker but still resisted dimer rotation, at least at the alpha 2beta 1 interface. The hydrogen bond between alpha 2(alpha 1)Asp-94(G1) and beta 1(beta 2)Asn-102(G4) is usually described as characteristic of the R-state; Fig. 10 shows that it may exist at various stages of the allosteric transition, even in the T-state, though it is more frequent in the R-state. The strongest hydrogen bond (mean value -1.5kcal/mol) at this interface, which also resists dimer rotation, is between alpha 2(alpha 1)Arg-141(HC3) and the backbone of beta 1(beta 2)Val-34(B16).

Two salt bridges have also been described at this interface. In TrajI, both salt bridges alpha 2(alpha 1)Lys-90(FG2)-beta 1(beta 2)Glu-43(CD2) were disrupted more or less as a function of dimer rotation (Fig. 11 a, left). In TrajII, this salt bridge in the alpha 1beta 2 interface broke very quickly because, during the first half of this trajectory, beta 2Glu-43 interacted more strongly with the neighboring alpha 1Arg-92(FG4). In both trajectories and both dimers, when the system was close to the R state, alpha Lys-90(FG2) rotated and established a hydrogen bond with one heme propionate of the same chain (not shown).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 11   (a) Interaction energy between residues involved in salt bridges at the alpha 1beta 2 (black) and alpha 2beta 1 (red) interfaces. Left, alpha 2Lys-90(FG2) and beta 1Glu-43(CD2); right, alpha 2Lys-40(C5) and beta 1His-146(HC3). The T structure and snapshots from the following 16 intervals of displacement are shown. The residues are drawn in red with the amino group in green for alpha , and in blue with the carboxyl group in orange for beta . The arrows indicate the direction of movement from T to R. (b) Three snapshots corresponding to the T, the R, and the t = 88 ps (end of J = 6) instantaneous structures are shown. The alpha 2C helix is in green with its Lys-40(C5) in red, whereas the beta 1His-146(HC3) is in orange with beta 1His-97(FG4) and the segment connecting these two residues (i.e., helices G and H) in blue. This shows that, during the switch transition, beta His-97 pushes away the beta C-terminus, breaking the salt bridge between the terminal residue (beta His-146) and alpha Lys-40.

The second salt bridge is between alpha 2(alpha 1)Lys-40(C5), which is in the switch region, and the C-terminal carboxyl group of beta 1(beta 2)His-146 (Fig. 11 A, right). It broke entirely after ~120 ps (J = 9) because the beta C-terminal histidine moved away from the alpha -lysine (Fig. 11 b) as a result of the transition of beta 1(beta 2)His-97(FG4) from the alpha 2(alpha 1)Pro-Thr environment to the alpha 2(alpha 1)Thr-Thr environment (Fig. 7). This transition also induced the movement of beta 1(beta 2)Asp-94(FG1), releasing the terminal histidine (Fig. 9 B), which could then rotate easily to adopt its position in the R structure. This is why the C-terminal histidine (Fig. 9 B) moved after the transition of beta His-97(FG4) in the switch region (Fig. 9 A).

Interfaces alpha 1alpha 2 and beta 1beta 2

The alpha 1alpha 2 interface was not significantly modified during the transition (Fig. 12), except that as the R structure was neared, the alpha Arg-141 C-termini rotated and filled the space between the two chains. In contrast, the beta 1beta 2 interface showed extensive modification during the transition. Indeed, in the T structure, there is a wide cavity between the beta  chains within which 2,3-diphosphoglycerate binds. This cavity closes upon dimer rotation, as shown in the structure at the end of J = 6 (88 ps) in which this rotation has already ended (theta  < 2°), but the beta His-146 C-termini are still outside the cavity. Only after the hydrogen bonds between the beta  chain C-termini and the alpha Lys-40(C5) in the opposite dimer were broken at J = 9 (120 ps) did the histidine residues rotate to fill the remaining space in the cavity, as a consequence of the attraction by the N-terminal amino group of the facing beta  chain.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 12   Three snapshots corresponding to those represented in Fig. 11 b (i.e., T, R, and t = 88 ps) but here with the alpha 1alpha 2 and beta 1beta 2 interfaces shown as hard spheres. The alpha Arg-141 and the beta His-146 C-termini are in black. The alpha 1alpha 2 interface can be seen to be relatively unmodified during the T-R transition, except for the alpha C-termini that fit into this interface at the end of the transition. In the beta 1beta 2 interface, the closing of the cavity was seen to occur by 88 ps (i.e., during dimer rotation) with the C-termini still outside the cavity, after which the C-termini rotated and fit into the interface.

Interfaces alpha 1beta 1 and alpha 2beta 2

The alpha 1beta 1(alpha 2beta 2) interface consists of helices B, G, and H in the alpha  subunit facing helices H, G, and B in the beta  subunit, respectively. The angles between the axes of the different helix pairs were calculated along the trajectories. Of these, the alpha G-beta G, alpha G-beta H, and alpha H-beta H helix angles showed significant transient deviations during the T-R transition. These movements are shown in Fig. 13. Although, in the other contacting helix pairs (alpha B-beta H and alpha H-beta B), such movements were less pronounced, they were still sufficiently large to induce transient contacts between certain residues at this interface, especially between alpha 1(alpha 2)Phe-36(C1) and beta 1(beta 2)Gln-131(H9).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 13   The angle between helix axes at the alpha 1beta 1 (black) and alpha 2beta 2 (gray) interfaces. (A) Angle between helices alpha 1G and beta 1G; (B) alpha 1G and beta 1H; and (C) alpha 1H and beta 1H. The other pairwise combinations involving contact helices B, G, and H showed no significant transient movement.

Environment of the hemes

Distal environment of the hemes

In the beta  chains, the iron atom is hidden by the distal histidine (E7) and valine (E11) in the T state, which makes binding of the oxygen molecule more difficult than in the alpha  chains (Fig. 14). In the R state (in which O2 is bound but not shown in the Figure), these residues are pushed away. To characterize this movement, which is parallel to the heme plane, we calculated for both trajectories and for all chains the distances between the Calpha atoms of the distal side residues and the normal to the best plane made by the four nitrogens of heme, this line passing through the Fe atom. In the alpha  chains, these distances are approximately the same throughout the T-to-R transition (Fig. 15). In the beta  chains, these distances are modified, reflecting the change in iron accessibility. For beta His-E7 and beta Val-E11, the distance to the heme normal is ~3.5 Å in the T state and increases during the transition to reach 5-5.5 Å in the R state. More precisely, this value is seen to increase at the end of dimer rotation (near 90-110 ps, or J = 6-8).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 14   The distal side (black) of the alpha  and beta  subunits in the T and R conformations. The heme is in gray and the iron atom in white. The five residues (B13, CD1, E7, E11, and G8) that are in close contact with the heme on the distal side are shown as hard spheres. It can be seen that, in the T state, the Fe atom is more accessible to ligand in the alpha  chains than in the beta  chains.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 15   Distances from the normal of the heme plane (passing through the Fe atom) to the Calpha atom for the five residues of the distal side shown in Fig. 14. For each chain, only the curves corresponding to residues CD1 (light gray, top curve) and E11 (dark gray, middle curve) are represented for clarity. The curves for residues B13 and G8 were almost coincident with that for CD1, and the curve for E7 was almost coincident with that for E11. The bottom curve (black) for each chain corresponds to the distance between the Fe atom in each instantaneous structure along the trajectory and the Fe atom of the same chain of the T structure, after superimposition of the Calpha and Fe atoms of the corresponding chain.

In the alpha  subunits, there is apparently very little relative movement of the distal side residues with respect to the heme normal. In the beta  subunits, the distances calculated for these residues showed an apparent correlation during the transition, although in some cases with opposite profiles. This indicates that either the distal side residues move together parallel to the heme plane in the subunit frame or the heme moves relative to them. In both cases, given the position of these residues encircling the normal to the heme plane (see Fig. 14, where this normal points from the Fe atom toward the reader), such a relative movement would bring the normal closer to some residues and away from the others. This explains why, in Fig. 15, the curve corresponding to Val-E11 (and to His-E7) in the beta  chains have a profile opposite from that of their neighboring residues.

In fact, these curves reflect movement of the heme within the beta  subunit, rather than movement of the whole set of distal side residues in concert. This is seen by examining the movement of the Fe atom itself relative to its position in the T state. In this analysis, for each alpha  or beta  subunit, the structures along the trajectories were superimposed on the corresponding subunit of the T structure, and the distance between the Fe atom at each timepoint and its position in T calculated (curves in black in Fig. 15). The data show that, in the beta  subunits, the displacements of the Fe atom (black curves) are very well correlated with the distances of the distal residues from the normal of the heme plane (gray curves). This is not the case for the alpha  subunits, where these distances are seen not to vary during the T-R transition. The same analysis but carried out for the Calpha atoms of the different distal residues instead of the Fe atom showed no such correlation for either the alpha  or beta  chains (data not shown).

Therefore, from the results presented in this section, we can conclude that, whereas in the alpha  chain the Fe atom is accessible to ligand even in the T state, in the beta  chain the Fe atom becomes accessible during the transition not because of concerted movement of the distal side residues, but because of movement of the heme itself within the subunit.

Analysis in the frame of the heme

To study in detail the motion of other residues around the heme in each subunit, each chain was considered independently, and the reference frame was modified to coincide with its heme. This treatment involved frame modification in the T structure, with each subunit rotated and translated to position the origin of the frame on the Fe atom (Fig. 16 a), the heme plane in the (X, Y) plane, the X axis approximately parallel to the F helix in the C- to N-terminal direction of the helix, and the Z axis pointing toward the distal side of the heme. In this representation, the Y axis points toward the interior of the subunit. As before, the instantaneous structures of each chain along a given trajectory were superimposed, using the Calpha and Fe atoms, on the corresponding chain in the T structure in the new frame, and the coordinate differences calculated along the X, Y, and Z axes. The results are discussed below.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 16   (a) Representation of the T-state alpha 2 (green) and beta 1 (blue) subunits, in the reference frame used to interpret movements in the heme region. As shown here for alpha 2, each subunit of the T-state protein is reoriented independently such that the origin is at the Fe atom (the heme is yellow), the X-axis is approximately parallel to the axis of the F helix (red), running from the C- to the N-termini of the helix, the Y axis points toward the interior of the subunit, and the Z axis points toward the distal side of the heme (i.e., toward the reader). In the flexible joint region, alpha 2Asp-94 is shown as red wireframe and beta 1Trp-37 as hard white spheres. (b) Atom displacements relative to T in the instantaneous structures, obtained by superimposition of each subunit on the corresponding one in the T structure in the frame described above. The displacement along the X axis of the atom of interest at each timepoint from its position in the T structure was calculated. These displacements were calculated for the Fe atom (dark blue) and for the Calpha atoms of the proximal histidine, F8 (red), and for residue FG4 (cyan, Arg-92 in alpha  and His-97 in beta ). The right-hand panels, showing each subunit in the reference frame described in (a) but viewed from the proximal side, represent the F helix and the heme for the T (yellow) and R (blue) structures. It can be seen that, in beta , the F helix and the heme move in the negative direction along the X axis, whereas in alpha  no significant movement is observed along this axis. In the T structure of both alpha  a