help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michailova, A.
Right arrow Articles by Niggli, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michailova, A.
Right arrow Articles by Niggli, E.

Biophys J, December 2002, p. 3134-3151, Vol. 83, No. 6

Spatiotemporal Features of Ca2+ Buffering and Diffusion in Atrial Cardiac Myocytes with Inhibited Sarcoplasmic Reticulum

Anushka Michailova,*dagger Franco DelPrincipe,* Marcel Egger,* and Ernst Niggli*

 *Department of Physiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and  dagger Department of Biophysics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Ca2+ signaling in cells is largely governed by Ca2+ diffusion and Ca2+ binding to mobile and stationary Ca2+ buffers, including organelles. To examine Ca2+ signaling in cardiac atrial myocytes, a mathematical model of Ca2+ diffusion was developed which represents several subcellular compartments, including a subsarcolemmal space with restricted diffusion, a myofilament space, and the cytosol. The model was used to quantitatively simulate experimental Ca2+ signals in terms of amplitude, time course, and spatial features. For experimental reference data, L-type Ca2+ currents were recorded from atrial cells with the whole-cell voltage-clamp technique. Ca2+ signals were simultaneously imaged with the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fluo-3 and a laser-scanning confocal microscope. The simulations indicate that in atrial myocytes lacking T-tubules, Ca2+ movement from the cell membrane to the center of the cells relies strongly on the presence of mobile Ca2+ buffers, particularly when the sarcoplasmic reticulum is inhibited pharmacologically. Furthermore, during the influx of Ca2+ large and steep concentration gradients are predicted between the cytosol and the submicroscopically narrow subsarcolemmal space. In addition, the computations revealed that, despite its low Ca2+ affinity, ATP acts as a significant buffer and carrier for Ca2+, even at the modest elevations of [Ca2+]i reached during influx of Ca2+.


    GLOSSARY
TOP
ABSTRACT
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Abbreviations


RSP Restricted subsarcolemmal space;
MYOF Myofibrillar space;
SR Sarcoplasmic reticulum;
RyR Ryanodine receptor;
DHPR Dihydropyridine receptor (L-type Ca2+ channel);
ATP Adenosine triphosphate.

Geometric parameters and constants


R Cell radius;
L Cell length;
Cm Cell capacitance;
Vcell Cell volume;
dRSP Restricted space thickness;
Vrd Thin boundary volume between extracellular space and RSP;
rd Boundary thickness;
Vacc Accessible volume for Ca2+ in the cell;
S Model cell surface through which Ca2+ enters.

Concentrations and reaction parameters


[Ca2+]i Free intracellular Ca2+ concentration;
[Ca2+]o Extracellular Ca2+ concentration;
[Ca2+]rest Resting Ca2+ concentration;
[TN] Total troponin concentration (low-affinity sites);
[CAL] Total calmodulin concentration;
[PL] Total phospholipid concentration (low-affinity sites);
[PH] Total phospholipid concentration (high-affinity sites);
[FLUO] Total Fluo-3 concentration;
[ATP] Free ATP concentration;
[CaTN] Ca2+-troponin concentration (low-affinity sites);
[CaCAL] Ca2+-calmodulin concentration;
[CaPL] Ca2+-phospholipid concentration (low-affinity sites);
[CaPH] Ca2+-phospholipid concentration (high-affinity sites);
[CaFLUO] Ca2+-Fluo-3 concentration;
[CaATP] Ca2+-ATP concentration;
D<UP><SUB>RSP</SUB><SUP>Ca</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for Ca2+ in RSP;
D<UP><SUB>MYOF</SUB><SUP>Ca</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for Ca2+ in MYOF;
D<UP><SUB>RSP</SUB><SUP>CaCAL</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for CaCAL in RSP;
D<UP><SUB>MYOF</SUB><SUP>CaCAL</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for CaCAL in MYOF;
D<UP><SUB>RSP</SUB><SUP>CaFLUO</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for CaFLUO in RSP;
D<UP><SUB>MYOF</SUB><SUP>CaFLUO</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for CaFLUO in MYOF;
D<UP><SUB>MYOF</SUB><SUP>CaATP</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for CaATP in MYOF;
D<UP><SUB>RSP</SUB><SUP>CaATP</SUP></UP> Diffusion coefficient for CaATP in RSP;
k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>TN</SUP></UP> Ca2+ on-rate constant for troponin (low-affinity sites);
k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>TN</SUP></UP> Ca2+ off-rate constant for troponin (low-affinity sites);
k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>CAL</SUP></UP> Ca2+ on-rate constant for calmodulin;
k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>CAL</SUP></UP> Ca2+ on-rate constant for calmodulin;
k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>PL</SUP></UP> Ca2+ off-rate constant for phospholipid (low-affinity sites);
k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>PL</SUP></UP> Ca2+ off-rate constant for phospholipid (low-affinity sites);
k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>PH</SUP></UP> Ca2+ on-rate constant for phospholipid (high-affinity sites);
k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>PH</SUP></UP> Ca2+ off-rate constant for phospholipid (high-affinity sites);
k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>FLUO</SUP></UP> Ca2+ on-rate constant for Fluo-3;
k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>FLUO</SUP></UP> Ca2+ off-rate constant for Fluo-3;
k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>ATP</SUP></UP> Ca2+ on-rate constant for ATP;
k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>ATP</SUP></UP> Ca2+ off-rate constant for ATP;
JICa Ca2+ flux via L-type Ca2+ channels;
F Faraday's constant;
ICa L-type Ca2+ current;
I0 Constant;
ai, bj Constants;
Jexch Ca2+ flux through Na+/Ca2+ exchanger;
Vmax,x Maximal velocity of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger;
Km Ca2+ concentration at half Vmax,x;
n Hill's coefficient;
Jexl Inward Ca2+ leak flux via plasma membrane;
Lm Ca2+ leak constant.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

In cardiac and skeletal muscle cells mechanical activity is controlled by a transient elevation of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) (Taylor et al., 1975; Cannell et al., 1987; Niggli, 1999). Compared to other cell types, striated muscle cells are quite large. Depending on the diameter of a given muscle cell, diffusion of Ca2+ from the cell membrane to the proteins regulating muscle force (i.e., troponin C) would introduce unacceptable delays in the activation of contraction. Reasons for this delay are the sheer distance and the presence of stationary Ca2+ buffers in the cell, which tend to slow the movement of Ca2+ (Crank, 1975; Neher and Augustine, 1992; Jafri and Keizer, 1995; Haddock et al., 1999). Therefore, several structural and functional systems have evolved to accelerate the spread of Ca2+ signals in muscle cells considerably. Skeletal and most cardiac muscle cells have developed deep invaginations of the extracellular space via infoldings of the cell membrane. These so-called T-tubules form a network of extracellular space, extending deep into the cell interior and allowing the fast electrical signal (i.e., the action potential) to be carried close to the subcellular location where Ca2+ is needed (Bers, 2001). In addition, intracellular Ca2+ stores are present in most species (i.e., the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)). In cardiac muscle Ca2+ release from these stores drastically reduces the amount of Ca2+ that has to enter from the extracellular space, while in skeletal muscle it represents the almost exclusive source of Ca2+. Besides acting as an amplifier of the trigger signals, Ca2+ release from the SR also acts as an accelerator for the spatial spread of Ca2+ signals (Dawson et al., 1999). In skeletal muscle, Ca2+ release from the SR initially occurs via Ca2+ release channels (ryanodine receptors; RyRs) that are under the control of voltage sensors located in the sarcolemma (Schneider and Chandler, 1973; Rios et al., 1991). In cardiac muscle, the RyRs are controlled by the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release mechanism (CICR; Fabiato, 1983). The trigger Ca2+ is provided by influx via L-type Ca2+ channels (DHP receptors), which represent the structural and functional equivalent of the voltage sensors present in skeletal muscle. By working together, the T-tubules and the Ca2+ release from the SR ensure spatially homogeneous and synchronized Ca2+ release throughout each cell.

In many species atrial cardiac muscle cells have no T-tubules and are thus an interesting exception to the rule (Bers, 2001). Although generally exhibiting smaller diameters than ventricular myocytes, these cells might encounter Ca2+ diffusion delays if SR Ca2+ release from the SR fails (Lipp et al., 1990; Hüser et al., 1996; Kockskämper et al., 2001). They may have developed a dense network of Ca2+ stores close to the sarcolemma, but also deep inside the cell, to compensate partly for the lack of T-tubules. In the absence of functional T-tubules, Ca2+ signals are known to spread rapidly from one SR Ca2+ release site to the next, giving rise to saltatoric reaction-diffusion waves (Hüser et al., 1996; Cheng et al., 1996; Keizer and Smith, 1998; Kockskämper et al., 2001).

In the present study we examined Ca2+ diffusion in atrial cells that had been treated with ryanodine and thapsigargin to eliminate release and uptake of Ca2+ by the SR. Using a combination of experimental techniques and a mathematical model, we could analyze several important spatial and temporal features of Ca2+ diffusion and signaling in these cells. In this context, the goal was at least threefold. The first aim was to develop a mathematical model that would quantitatively predict our experimental results on Ca2+ influx, Ca2+ buffering, and Ca2+ diffusion in atrial cells, when the SR was inhibited. Second, we used the model to explore the parameter space beyond the experimentally accessible limits. The third task was to use the model to examine the importance of mobile and stationary Ca2+ buffers and the effect of altered restricted space geometry for the Ca2+ signals. The restricted space is also known as the "fuzzy space" (Lederer et al., 1990) and is below the optical resolution of confocal (optical) microscopes. Inclusion of the fuzzy space was not required to model the experimental results, but allowed explorations and predictions of Ca2+ signals in this space. Furthermore, our model calculations suggest an important role for mobile and stationary Ca2+ buffers, including the Ca2+ indicator dye used in our experiments. The model also predicts a significant acceleration of Ca2+ diffusion by physiological concentrations of the low-affinity Ca2+ buffer ATP. Preliminary results of this work have been presented to the Biophysical Society in abstract form (Michailova et al., 1999).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Cell isolation and solutions

Experiments were performed on single atrial myocytes isolated enzymatically from guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). The isolation procedure used was a modification of the method reported by Kockskämper and Glitsch (1997). Adult animals were killed by cervical dislocation, the hearts rapidly removed, and retrogradely perfused for 3 min on a Langendorff perfusion system at 37°C. The perfusing solution consisted of basic Ca2+-free solution (in mM: sucrose 204, NaCl 35, KCl 5.4, MgCl2 1, HEPES 10, pH 7.4 adjusted with NaOH) with 2 mM ethylene glycol-bis-(beta -aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA). Enzymatic digestion was started by switching to Ca2+-free solution containing collagenase B (0.2 mg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim, Rotkreuz, Switzerland), protease type XIV (0.05 mg/ml; Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland) and elastase (5 µl/ml; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany). To promote the digestion of the atria the large blood vessels were ligated and the heart was immersed in an organ bath.

After 15 min the atria were minced, placed in Ca2+-free solution containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) to stop the digestion, and left on a rocking table at room temperature (22°C) to allow for dispersion of the tissue. During this procedure (~1-h) the cells were adapted to calcium by dropwise addition of an equal volume of cell culture medium containing 1.26 mM Ca2+ (M199, Gibco, Basel, Switzerland) and supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum (all from Gibco). Finally, cells were taken from the supernatant and plated onto glass coverslips placed in culture dishes. The cells were incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2 and used the following day.

Current measurements

All experiments were carried out at room temperature (22°C). A coverslip with adherent cells was assembled into a recording chamber and mounted onto the stage of an inverted microscope (Diaphot TMD, Nikon, Küsnacht, Switzerland). The cells were constantly superfused (1-2 ml/min) with extracellular solution containing (in mM) NaCl 140, KCl 5, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1, glucose 10, HEPES 10, pH 7.4 adjusted with NaOH. Patch-clamp recording electrodes were pulled from filamented borosilicate glass capillaries (GC150F, Clark Electromedical Instruments, Pangbourne, UK) on a horizontal puller (DMZ, Zeitz Instruments, Augsburg, Germany) and filled with intracellular solution containing (in mM): CsAsp 120, NaCl 10, TEA-Cl 20, HEPES 20, MgATP 5, MgCl2 1, Fluo-3 0.1, pH 7.2 adjusted with CsOH. The free [Ca2+] calculated for this solution was 99 nM (when assuming a typical Ca2+ contamination of 15 µM). Pipette resistances ranged from 2 to 4 MOhm. Cells were voltage-clamped in the whole-cell configuration and held at -70 mV without correction for the liquid junction potential (Axopatch 200, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). The voltage was stepped to -40 mV for 50 ms to inactivate the Na+ current and subsequently to 0 mV for 200 ms to elicit a Ca2+ current. The step to -40 mV was introduced to avoid any residual Na+ current that would contaminate the recording of the Ca2+ current despite the presence of 10 µM tetrodotoxin (TTX). In addition, the Ca2+ current was enhanced by application of 1 µM isoproterenol.

Series resistance and membrane capacitance were compensated with the built-in compensation circuit of the amplifier. The reading on the capacitance compensation dial of the amplifier was taken as the membrane capacitance of the cell. No leak subtraction was performed. The pure Ca2+ current was determined off-line by subtracting the current recorded in the presence of 5 mM Cd2+. Currents were low-pass filtered at 5 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz using the LabView data acquisition software (National Instruments, Ennetbaden, Switzerland). Data were stored on hard disk for later analysis with the IgorPro software (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR).

Thapsigargin and TTX were purchased from Alomone Labs (Jerusalem, Israel), ryanodine from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), isoproterenol from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland), and Fluo-3 (penta-potassium) from TefLabs (Austin, TX). Cells were incubated with thapsigargin and ryanodine for 30 min before each experiment to block the SR Ca2+ pump and the ryanodine receptor. Thapsigargin was dissolved as 1 mM stock in ethanol and used at 0.1 µM. Ryanodine was dissolved at 10 mM in distilled water and used at 10 µM concentration. Isoproterenol stock solution (10 mM) was freshly prepared before each experiment in distilled water containing 1 mM L-ascorbic acid and added at 1 µM to the extracellular solution. TTX was dissolved in distilled water, kept in aliquots at -20°C as a stock solution (10 mM) and used at 10 µM. Fluo-3 was reconstituted in distilled water to 5 mM and diluted to 0.1 mM into the pipette filling solution. Drugs were delivered to the cells through a gravity-driven rapid superfusion system.

Confocal Ca2+ measurements

Cells were viewed with a 40× oil-immersion objective (Fluor, N.A. = 1.3, Nikon) and loaded with Fluo-3 through the recording pipette. Fluo-3 was excited with the 488 nm line of an argon laser (model 5000, Ion Laser Technology, Salt Lake City, UT) at 50 µW intensity on the cell. The fluorescence was detected at 540 ± 15 nm with a photomultiplier tube (PMT) of a laser-scanning confocal system (MRC 1000, Bio-Rad, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) operated in the line-scan mode. The recording chamber was rotated to position the cell's width in parallel to the scan direction. The scan speed was set to 2 ms per line. Synchronization of the Ca2+ signal with the voltage protocol was assured by simultaneously recording a red light-emitting diode, triggered by the acquisition software, with the second PMT of the confocal system (>600 nm).

To record the Ca2+ influx generated by the activation of L-type Ca2+ channels without contamination by CICR from the SR, the cells were treated with 10 µM ryanodine and 0.1 µM thapsigargin. Amplitude and time course of Ca2+ signals due to Ca2+ influx were computed off-line using a customized version of the NIH Image software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Different regions of interest (width = 1-2 µm) were chosen to average the temporal Ca2+ concentration changes near the plasmalemma or in the center of the cell. Similarly, Ca2+ concentration profiles across the entire width of the cell were extracted for each time point (2 ms). The spatial profiles of [Ca2+]i are limited by optical diffraction, while the mathematical simulation can exhibit a much better spatial resolution. The point-spread-function of our confocal microscope was examined with fluorescent beads (diameter 100 nm) and was determined to have a full-width at half-maximal amplitude (FWHM) of 350 nm · 350 nm · 900 nm (for the x, y, and z dimension, respectively). Ca2+ concentration was calculated from fluorescence images using an established self-ratio calibration procedure (Cheng et al., 1993). For the calibration we assumed a Kd value for Fluo-3 of 739 nM and a resting Ca2+ concentration of 100 nM at the beginning of each experiment. Surface plots were generated from line-scan images using the IDL software (Research Systems, Boulder, CO). Confocal x-y images were used to calculate the surface and the volume of the cells using the NIH Image software. The accuracy of the procedure was verified by comparing the results with the values obtained using the measured membrane capacitance (assuming 1 µF capacitance per cm2 of membrane).

Mathematical model

We developed a mathematical model of Ca2+-signaling, Ca2+-diffusion, and Ca2+-buffering inside an atrial cardiac muscle cell. The goal was to simulate and analyze Ca2+ events, which were recorded on the confocal microscope and, in addition, to simulate Ca2+ signals that are not accessible experimentally. In view of the fact that the isolated atrial myocyte has an approximately cylindrical shape (see Fig. 1 A) and lacks T-tubules (Bers, 2001; Hüser et al., 1996; Kockskämper et al., 2001) a cylindrical geometry is assumed (see Fig. 2 A).

Model cell geometry

The model cell geometry was derived from the experimental data. The guinea pig atrial myocyte used for this study had a spindle shape (see Fig. 1 A) with a maximal diameter of 15.6 µm, a cell length of 125 µm, and a membrane capacitance of 41 pF. For the model, the shape was simplified into a cylinder that had the same diameter (see Fig. 2 A). The actual cylinder length was decreased from 125 µm to 83.7 µm to adjust the volume accessible for Ca2+ (~50%, see below) to be consistent with that of the real atrial myocyte. It is necessary to note that scaling of the cell length is allowed because the model simulates the radial diffusion only. Therefore, other accessible volume fractions were simulated by changing the length of the cylinder and by scaling the densities of the membrane currents accordingly.

The accessible volume for Ca2+ was estimated on the basis of the data by Forbes and Van Niel (1988) in guinea pig atrium (see also Bers, 2001 and Table 1). In accordance with these data the myofilaments occupy 43.2% of the cell volume, mitochondria 17.9%, the nucleus 3.8%, T-tubule 0.08%, and SR 9.93%. For simplification we assumed that the volume occupied by T-tubules is zero, as several reports indicate that guinea pig atrial muscle cells have no T-tubules (Bers, 2001; Hüser et al., 1996). The experimental data also suggest that ~50% of the myofilament space is accessible for Ca2+ ions (i.e., contains water) and that mitochondria and nuclei are not rapidly accessible for Ca2+ (Bers, 2001). We also assume that the SR lumen is not accessible for Ca2+ in the presence of ryanodine and thapsigargin. Thus, in accordance with Forbes and Van Niel (1988) and above assumptions, the accessible volume for Ca2+ in guinea pig atrial cells was estimated to be ~50% of the total cytosolic volume (Vacc = 46.8% = 100% - 21.6% - 17.9% - 3.8% - 9.93%).

The model cell has two separate spaces, the restricted subsarcolemmal space (RSP) and the myofibrillar space (MYOF) (see Fig. 2 A). Ca2+ and mobile buffers, Fluo-3 and calmodulin, diffuse throughout the myocyte purely in the radial (r) direction and reflect from the cell walls.

Restricted subsarcolemmal space

In the literature, the restricted space (RSP) thickness (i.e., the distance between the SR and sarcolemmal membrane) is reported to be between 12 and 20 nm (Fawcett and McNutt, 1969; Forbes and Sperelakis, 1982; Langer and Peskoff, 1996; Soeller and Cannell, 1997). In our study, the width of this space was assumed to be 20 nm. Within the RSP Ca2+ ions are free to diffuse and react with the stationary Ca2+ buffers (phospholipids) and with the mobile Ca2+ buffers (calmodulin and Fluo-3). In the fuzzy space, the diffusion coefficients for Ca2+ and mobile buffers in the r-direction are assumed to be those in water (see Table 1). The one-dimensional diffusion equations for Ca2+, calmodulin, Fluo-3, and phospholipids in the restricted subsarcolemmal space can be written in cylindrical coordinates as (for definitions, symbols, and abbreviations, please see "Glossary").
<FR><NU>∂[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUP><UP>Ca</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>RSP</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR> <FENCE>r <FR><NU>∂[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR></FENCE>+J<SUB><UP>I<SUB>Ca</SUB></UP></SUB>−J<SUB><UP>exch</UP></SUB>+J<SUB><UP>exl</UP></SUB> (1)

−k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>FLUO</UP>]−[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

+k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]

−k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>CAL</UP>]−[<UP>CaCAL</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>+k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]

−k<SUP><UP>PL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>PL</UP>]−[<UP>CaPL</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

+k<SUP><UP>PL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaPL</UP>]

−k<SUP><UP>PH</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>PH</UP>]−[<UP>CaPH</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

+k<SUP><UP>PH</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaPH</UP>]

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUP><UP>CaCAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>RSP</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR> <FENCE>r <FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR></FENCE>

+k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>CAL</UP>]−[<UP>CaCAL</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB> (2)

−k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUP><UP>CaFLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>RSP</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR> <FENCE>r <FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR></FENCE>

+k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>FLUO</UP>]−[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

−k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>] (3)

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaPL</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=k<SUP><UP>PL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>PL</UP>]−[<UP>CaPL</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>−k<SUP><UP>PL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaPL</UP>] (4)

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaPH</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=k<SUP><UP>PH</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>PH</UP>]−[<UP>CaPH</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>−k<SUP><UP>PH</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaPH</UP>] (5)
The Ca2+ flux via L-type Ca2+ channels (JICa) is proportional to the L-type Ca2+ current (ICa) recorded with the whole-cell voltage-clamp technique, Eq. 6.
J<SUB><UP>I<SUB>Ca</SUB></UP></SUB>=<FENCE><FR><NU>S</NU><DE>2FV<SUB><UP>rd</UP></SUB></DE></FR></FENCE>I<SUB><UP>Ca</UP></SUB> (6)
The time course of ICa(t) in Eq. 6 is approximated by the following equations:
I<SUB><UP>Ca</UP></SUB>(t)=I<SUB>0</SUB>f(t) (7)
where
f(t)=a<SUB>1</SUB>+a<SUB>2</SUB> <UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>a<SUB>3</SUB>t) t≤0.02s

f(t)=b<SUB>0</SUB>+b<SUB>1</SUB> <UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>b<SUB>2</SUB>t)+b<SUB>3</SUB> <UP>exp</UP>(<UP>−</UP>b<SUB>4</SUB>t) t>0.02s (8)
In the model the Hill equation is used to describe Ca2+ movement by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (Jexch) (Cannell and Allen, 1984; Kargacin and Fay, 1991):
J<SUB><UP>exch</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>max,x</UP></SUB>[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUP><UP>n</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></NU><DE>(K<SUP><UP>n</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>+[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUP><UP>n</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>)</DE></FR> (9)
The inward Ca2+ leak flux through the plasma membrane (Jexl) is described by:
J<SUB><UP>exl</UP></SUB>=L<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>([<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>o</UP></SUB>−[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>) (10)

Myofibrillar space

In the MYOF Ca2+ ions diffuse and react with stationary (troponin C) and mobile Ca2+ buffers (calmodulin and Fluo-3). In the myofibrillar space we assume that the diffusion coefficients for the free Ca2+ and mobile buffers are reduced in the r-direction because of the impediment imposed by myofilaments, mitochondria, SR, and other structures (i.e., structural tortuosity, see Table 1). Accordingly, the diffusion coefficients in the r-direction for the free Ca2+, Fluo-3, and calmodulin in the MYOF and the RSP have different values because the MYOF and the RSP are morphologically different. The one-dimensional diffusion equations for Ca2+, calmodulin, Fluo-3, and troponin C in the myofibrillar space can be written in cylindrical coordinates as:
<FR><NU>∂[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUP><UP>Ca</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>MYOF</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR> <FENCE>r <FR><NU>∂[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB></NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR></FENCE> (11)

−k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>FLUO</UP>]−[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

+k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]

−k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>CAL</UP>]−[<UP>CaCAL</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

+k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]

−k<SUP><UP>TN</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>TN</UP>]−[<UP>CaTN</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

+k<SUP><UP>TN</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaTN</UP>]

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUP><UP>CaCAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>MYOF</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR> <FENCE>r <FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaCAL</UP>]</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR></FENCE>

+k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>CAL</UP>]−[<UP>CaCAL</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

−k<SUP><UP>CAL</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaCAL</UP>] (12)

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=D<SUP><UP>CaFLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>MYOF</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r</DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR> <FENCE>r <FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]</NU><DE>∂r</DE></FR></FENCE> (13)

+k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>FLUO</UP>]−[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>])·[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>

−k<SUP><UP>FLUO</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaFLUO</UP>]

<FR><NU>∂[<UP>CaTN</UP>]</NU><DE>∂t</DE></FR>=k<SUP><UP>TN</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>+</UP></SUB>([<UP>TN</UP>]−[<UP>CaTN</UP>])[<UP>Ca<SUP>2+</SUP></UP>]<SUB><UP>i</UP></SUB>−k<SUP><UP>TN</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>−</UP></SUB>[<UP>CaTN</UP>] (14)
In the model we also assume 1) Ca2+ binds to Fluo-3, calmodulin, troponin C, and phospholipids without cooperativity; 2) the initial total concentrations of the mobile buffers (Fluo-3 or calmodulin) are spatially uniform; and 3) the diffusion coefficients of Fluo-3 or calmodulin with bound Ca2+ are equal to the diffusion coefficients of free Fluo-3 or calmodulin.

Ca2+ current, Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, and Ca2+ leak

To assess the influx of Ca2+ during cell excitation, the Ca2+ current was recorded with the whole-cell voltage-clamp technique. For the quantitative model, the simulated Ca2+ current was adjusted to match the experimentally acquired Ca2+ current record (Eqs. 7 and 8, Table 1).

The Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and Ca2+ leak parameters were estimated or taken from the literature. Based on measurements of Na+/Ca2+ exchange currents in atrial myocytes, we estimated the maximum exchanger velocity (Vmax,x) at -70 mV to be ~853 µM s-1 and ~85.3 µM s-1 at 0 mV. In ventricular cells Backx et al. (1989) reported a Vmax,x of 1000 µM s-1. The Ca2+ concentration at half Vmax,x (Km) and the Hill coefficient (n) used during the simulations were those reported by Backx et al. (1989). The Ca2+ leak constant (Lm) was adjusted so that at rest the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger efflux balanced the inward Ca2+ leak flux through the plasma membrane (Egger and Niggli, 1999).

Initial Ca2+ and buffer concentrations and buffer rate and dissociation constants

In the cytosolic space, basal Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]rest) is estimated to be 100 nM (Fabiato, 1983; Carafoli, 1985; Bers, 2001). It was found that the cells are able to maintain this Ca2+ level despite addition of exogenous dyes and buffers (Neher and Augustine, 1992). In this study, each simulation started with a resting Ca2+ concentration of 100 nM and buffers in equilibrium. The extracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]o) was 1 mM and remained constant.

A number of powerful buffering systems for intracellular Ca2+ (SR, mitochondria, different stationary and mobile Ca2+ buffers) are known in cardiac muscle cells (Fabiato, 1983; Bers, 2001). As already mentioned, our model did not incorporate Ca2+ storing organelles, such as the SR and mitochondria; but because other stationary Ca2+ buffers (troponin C and phospholipids) and mobile Ca2+ buffers (calmodulin, Fluo-3, and ATP) strongly affect the Ca2+ dynamics in cardiac myocytes, these buffers were included in our model (Robertson et al., 1981; Fabiato, 1983; Bers, 2001; Harkins et al., 1993; Langer and Peskoff, 1996; Soeller and Cannell, 1997; Baylor and Hollingworth, 1998). Stationary Ca2+ buffers like troponin C and phospholipids are localized to different cell regions, while the mobile buffers diffuse throughout the entire cell.

Two classes of Ca2+ binding sites have been identified on cardiac troponin: low-affinity (Ca2+-specific) and high-affinity (Ca2+-Mg2+) binding sites (Robertson et al., 1981). The high-affinity sites (Kd = 3.3 nM) are already saturated at resting [Ca2+]i. Therefore, only the Ca2+-specific sites were included because large and rapid changes in the Ca2+ occupancy of these sites can occur during a Ca2+ transient (Robertson et al., 1981; Fabiato, 1983; Bers, 2001; Soeller and Cannell, 1997). We assumed that these binding sites are immobile because of their attachment to the actin filaments. The concentration of the Ca2+-specific troponin sites is estimated to be 70 µM (published concentrations 50-150 µM for 50% accessible volume; Robertson et al., 1981; Fabiato, 1983). The dissociation constant (K<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>TN</SUP></UP> = 0.5 µM) and Ca2+ on- and off-rate constants were taken from Robertson et al. (1981).

Stationary low- and high-affinity Ca2+ binding sites on phospholipids were also included in our analysis because a major effect of these anionic sites on the time course of Ca2+ movements in the fuzzy space has been suggested (Langer and Peskoff, 1996; Soeller and Cannell, 1997; Peskoff and Langer, 1998). In agreement with the experimental observations, the phospholipid stationary sites were located on the inner sarcolemmal leaflet of our model cell (Post and Langer, 1992). The initial concentrations of the phospholipid sites and their affinities were taken from Peskoff and Langer (1998) (Table 1). Because we did not find any published data for the phospholipid rate constants for Ca2+ binding, the typical near-diffusion-limited value of 125 µM-1 s-1 was assumed for the low- and high-affinity phospholipid on-rate constants. The corresponding off-rate constants were calculated from the known values of the equilibrium dissociation constants (K<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>PH</SUP></UP>, K<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>PL</SUP></UP>) and on-rate constants.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1   Cell geometry parameters

Ca2+ buffering by the endogenous mobile buffer calmodulin (24 µM) was also included in the model because calmodulin can bind significant amounts of Ca2+ (Robertson et al., 1981; Fabiato, 1983). Calmodulin has four Ca2+ binding sites that also bind Mg2+, K+, and Na+. Fabiato (1983) reported two classes of Ca2+ binding sites on calmodulin (low- and high-affinity), and Robertson et al. (1981) suggested that the properties of all calmodulin metal-binding sites are similar to the Ca2+-specific sites on troponin. In our paper, we assumed that all four calmodulin binding sites were similar. The calmodulin equilibrium dissociation constant (K<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>CAL</SUP></UP> = 2.38 µM) was taken from Robertson et al. (1981). The value of the off-rate calmodulin constant was calculated assuming that the on-rate constant has a value of 125 µM-1 s-1.

During the experiment the atrial myocyte was loaded with 100 µM fluorescent Ca2+-indicator (Fluo-3). In skeletal muscle, Fluo-3 was found to strongly bind to cellular constituents, giving rise to a total Fluo-3 concentration that is higher than in the pipette filling solution (Harkins et al., 1993). Indeed, confocal images of skeletal muscle cells loaded with Fluo-3 show a clear striation pattern, indicative of dye binding. However, in both ventricular and atrial cardiac muscle cells, a striation pattern is not observed, suggesting that Fluo-3 binding is less pronounced in these cells. Further support for this notion was obtained when cardiac myocytes were permeabilized and only 4% of the dye was found to be irreversibly bound (Lipp et al., 1996), at least when the Ca2+-indicator was loaded in the salt form via a patch-clamp pipette. Thus, as an approximation we used a concentration of 100 µM Fluo-3 in our analysis. The Ca2+ dissociation constant for Fluo-3 was (K<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>FLUO</SUP></UP> = 0.739 µM) and the Ca2+ on- and off-rate constants were (k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>FLUO</SUP></UP> = 230 µM-1 s-1, k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>FLUO</SUP></UP> = 170 s-1) (Eberhard and Erne, 1989; Ellis-Davies et al., 1996). In this study we also examined how Ca2+ binding by the endogenous low-affinity mobile Ca2+ buffer ATP might influence the intracellular Ca2+ signals in atrial myocytes. The ATP concentration in the pipette was 5 mM. With 1 mM Mg2+ added, free ATP is calculated to be 260 µM. During our simulations, the amount of ATP able to bind Ca2+ was therefore assumed to be 260 µM (i.e., ~5% of 5 mM total ATP), because [MgATP] is known to remain almost constant despite some changes in [Ca2+]i. The ATP dissociation constant (K<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>ATP</SUP></UP> = 200 µM) and Ca2+ on- and off-rate constants (225 µM s-1 and 45,000 s-1) were taken from Baylor and Hollingworth (1998) and recalculated to account for 22°C (i.e., k<UP><SUB>+</SUB><SUP>ATP</SUP></UP> = 1.5 × 150 µM s-1 and k<UP><SUB>−</SUB><SUP>ATP</SUP></UP> = 1.5 × 30,000 s-1). We also assumed that ATP binds only Ca2+ and Mg2+ and that the binding of ATP to different immobile structures (proteins, organelles) within the cell is not able to noticeably change the total ATP amount (Kushmerick and Podolsky, 1969).

Ca2+ and buffer diffusion coefficients

The diffusion coefficient for Ca2+ in the restricted subsarcolemmal space has been reported to be 350 µm2 s-1 in the r-direction (i.e., ~0.5-fold that in water because of the viscosity of the cytoplasm) and ~140 µm2 s-1 in the longitudinal z-direction (i.e., further reduced by the presence of the "foot" structures; Soeller and Cannell, 1997). Because our model only simulates radial diffusion and assuming that there is water in the restricted space, the diffusion coefficient for Ca2+ used there was 780 µm2 s-1.

Gabso et al. (1997) assessed the values for the average diffusion coefficient of the endogenous buffers (calmodulin, calbindin) in the cytoplasm to be between 14 and 20 µm2 s-1. In our model the diffusion coefficient for calmodulin (as CaCAL) in the MYOF was assumed to be 25 µm2 s-1. The diffusion coefficient for Fluo-3 (as CaFLUO), which resulted in the best agreement with the experimental data, turned out to be 100 µm2 s-1. This estimated diffusion coefficient is fivefold larger than what has been measured in skeletal muscle (Harkins et al., 1993), in agreement with the assumption that Fluo-3 does not strongly bind to cellular constituents in atrial cardiac myocytes. It corresponds to the diffusion coefficient in water, with a correction for intracellular viscosity (Klingauf and Neher, 1997). The diffusion coefficient for ATP (as CaATP) in the MYOF (168 µm2 s-1) was taken from Baylor and Hollingworth (1998) and adjusted for 22°C (i.e., =1.2 × 140 µm2 s-1).

To solve the system of diffusion equations numerically, the explicit finite-difference method described by Crank (1975) was used. The boundaries between the extracellular space and the RSP and the MYOF and the RSP, where the diffusion coefficients for Ca2+, Fluo-3, and calmodulin change, were treated as described for the diffusion through composite media. Taking the cylindrical symmetry of the problem into account, the system of equations was solved on a one-dimensional nonlinear grid. The radial step size for integration was 77 nm in MYOF and 6 nm in RSP. The interval for the integration was 10-8 s. Because of the complex nature of the calculations, they had to be carried out on a VAX mainframe computer (University Computing Center, Bern, Switzerland). Unless specified otherwise in the figure legends or in the text, the standard set of parameters was used in the simulations, as listed in Table 1.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Experimental recordings of Ca2+ influx and changes of [Ca2+]i

The voltage-clamp protocol elicited inward currents with the typical signatures of the L-type Ca2+ current (Fig. 1 D). At the onset of the first voltage step from -70 to -40 mV a small current was observable, most likely attributable to incomplete blockade of Na+ channels by 10 µM TTX. In all cases a Ca2+ signal due to Ca2+ influx accompanied the inward current that coincided with the second voltage step from -40 to 0 mV, and thus corresponded to the activation of the L-type Ca2+ current. The Ca2+ current and the Ca2+ signal resulting from the Ca2+ influx were both blocked by 5 mM Cd2+ (data not shown). Please note that there was no Ca2+ release from the SR in our experiments, because the cells had been pretreated with ryanodine and thapsigargin.

Fig. 1 also shows additional data used to develop and validate the mathematical model. Panel A represents a false color x-y image of cytosolic Fluo-3 fluorescence under resting conditions, which was used to determine the geometrical parameters of the cell. The bright spot marks the tip of the patch-clamp pipette. This cell had a length of 125 µm, a diameter of 15.6 µm, and a membrane capacitance of 41 pF.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   Ca2+ current and Ca2+ concentration recorded from an isolated guinea pig atrial myocyte (A), loaded with 100 µM Fluo-3 by dialysis from a patch-clamp pipette. A single line (yellow line in A) was then scanned to obtain a line-scan image of fluorescence versus space and time (E). (B) The time course of [Ca2+]i was obtained for the periphery (red) and center (blue) of the cell. Panel (C) shows the Ca2+ transient averaged along the complete line-scan image. The voltage-clamp protocol and the resulting L-type Ca2+ current are illustrated in (D). The spatial profile of [Ca2+]i is shown in (F), while (G) shows a surface plot computed from the line-scan image in (E). The red, green and blue bars in (E) indicate the region from which traces were averaged. Note that the gray portions of the traces in panels B-D belong to the pre-pulse protocol and where not simulated in the model.

A typical line-scan image acquired during a voltage-clamp protocol along the entire width of the cell is shown in Fig. 1 E. The colors correspond to fluorescence ratio values (F/F0) reflecting the changes of Ca2+ concentration in time (vertical dimension of the image). A clear U-shaped profile extending across the cell is visible at the beginning of the Ca2+ signal resulting from Ca2+ influx (see also Fig. 1 F). A convenient way to visualize the relationship among space, time, and Ca2+ concentration is provided by the surface plot (panel 1 G). In this representation it is readily appreciable that the Ca2+ concentration increased faster and to a higher amplitude at the edges of the cell for a given time point, whereas in the center of the cell the signal reached a similar amplitude only after a considerable delay.

In Fig. 1 B the Ca2+ concentration changes extracted from the periphery (red) and the center of the line-scan image (blue) are superimposed to emphasize the delay between the two signals. The time course of the average Ca2+ concentration (calculated by averaging all points along the line-scan) is plotted in Fig. 1 C. The duration of the rising phase (200 ms) of the Ca2+ signal from the edge of the cell (red trace in Fig. 1 B) matched the duration of the L-type Ca2+ current. In contrast, the Ca2+ signal recorded from the center (blue) developed more slowly and continued to rise even when the current was already terminated.

Numerical simulation of the experimental data

The first set of modeling results (Fig. 2) describes our attempt to create a simulation that quantitatively approximates the experimental data. Fig. 2, A-G are arranged in analogy to the experimental Fig. 1; Fig. 2 H was obtained by convolving the model data with a simplified confocal point-spread function. Thus Fig. 2, E, G, and H illustrate the calculated temporal and spatial Ca2+ concentration changes as line-scan images and as a surface plot. The simulated local Ca2+ signals in the center (blue) and periphery (red) are shown in Fig. 2 B. The Ca2+ signal in the cell periphery was calculated by averaging the Ca2+ concentration across the first micrometer under the membrane. This average corresponds to the experimental measurement of peripheral [Ca2+], which is also a spatial average due to the limited optical resolution. As expected, the convolution of the simulated data with the point-spread function eliminated the signal in the fuzzy space and also introduced some edge effects at the boundary of the line-scan. These model results illustrate that the Ca2+ signal in the cell periphery increases faster and has a larger amplitude than the Ca2+ signal in the center, which peaks with a delay of ~100 ms. The simulations also suggest that the slower and smaller Ca2+ transient in the center can be explained by diffusion of Ca2+. The Ca2+ influx carried by the simulated Ca2+ current allowed us to predict the Ca2+ concentration levels developed in the narrow fuzzy space (RSP) that is not accessible experimentally (Fig. 2 B, green line). Thus, the model predicts steep Ca2+ concentration gradients within the signals recorded experimentally from the cell periphery. The simulated U-profile of Ca2+ at 100 ms extracted from the line-scan image (Fig. 2 E) is shown in Fig. 2 F. Note that, in contrast to the experimentally measured signal (Fig. 1 F), the calculated Ca2+ concentration near the plasmalemma peaks at 244 nM above resting concentration because the model is able to predict Ca2+ concentrations in the narrow RSP, which cannot be resolved optically. Fig. 2 C shows a Ca2+ transient averaged across the entire cell corresponding to the experimentally measured signal (Fig. 1 C).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   Simulating the experimental data with the computer model. Panel (A) depicts the cylindrical model cell containing a myofilament space (MYOF) surrounded by a space with restricted diffusion (RSP). The radius of the cell was 7.8 µm, the thickness of RSP was 20 nm (unless noted otherwise). The length of the cylinder was adjusted to accommodate the accessible volume of the cytosol (~50% of total cytosolic volume in this case). The time courses of the Ca2+ concentration in the center (blue line) and in the RSP (green line) are superimposed in (B). In addition, the Ca2+ profile averaged over the first micrometer under the membrane is shown in red. This approximately corresponds to confocal recordings of Ca2+ in the cell periphery. Panel (C) shows the time course of the Ca2+ concentration averaged over the entire cell. The simulated Ca2+ influx, corresponding to the L-type Ca2+ current in Fig. 1, is illustrated in (D). The Ca2+ concentration changes were also visualized as line-scans (E) and as surface plots (G). From the line-scan image the time course traces and the Ca2+ concentration profile at 100 ms (F) were extracted and colored according to the respective symbols. Panel (H) was computed by convolving a simplified confocal point-spread function with the image shown in (E). This mimicks the limited optical resolution present in experimental data (compare with Fig. 1 E).

The good agreement between the theoretical and the experimental data suggested that the model, as implemented, correctly described the subcellular Ca2+ signaling in atrial myocytes. Furthermore, these quantitatively correct results provided an opportunity to examine and better understand how different model parameters beyond the experimentally accessible limits might influence the spatial and temporal characteristics of the Ca2+ transients.

Exploring the parameter space

Accessible volume fraction

The subcellular aqueous volume accessible to Ca2+ represents an important but not precisely known scaling factor for the amplitude of the Ca2+ signals. In the next set of simulations we sought to determine the role of the accessible volume fraction. The spatial and temporal Ca2+ concentration changes calculated in response to the L-type Ca2+ current (Fig. 2 D) for an accessible volume fraction of ~70% are shown in Fig. 3 A (compare with Fig. 2 G where Vacc ~ 50%). A subcellular aqueous volume of 70% assumes that 1) the nuclei are accessible for Ca2+; 2) the mitochondria are not accessible for Ca2+; 3) the SR is accessible for Ca2+, i.e., SR Ca2+ release channels are open and Ca2+ would even be able to go backward into the SR during the cytosolic Ca2+ transient; and 4) the myofilament space contains 75% water. The local Ca2+ transients obtained for Vacc ~70% (solid lines) and those for a volume of 50% (dashed lines) are superimposed in Fig. 3 B. The Ca2+ U-profiles at 100 ms can be compared in Fig. 3 C. These model results reveal that the increased accessible volume fraction reduces cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations in all simulated cytosolic layers, as expected. Variable scaling of the cell length allowed us to keep the cylindrical cell shape, the diameter, and the total buffer capacity of the model cell constant, while simulating different accessible volumes. For numerical simulations of different concentrations for calmodulin, troponin C, and Fluo-3, see below.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   Effects of changes in the accessible volume fraction and buffer mobility. Different estimates of the accessible volume fraction are compared in (A-C). (A) The surface plot obtained for an accessible volume of 70% of the total cell volume (compare also with Fig. 2 G, where accessible volume was 50%). In (B) Ca2+ profiles are shown for the cell center (blue), restricted space (green), and periphery (red). (C) The Ca2+ profile at 100 ms. These signals are compared with those from a volume of 50% (dashed lines in (B) and (C)). In panels (D-F) we illustrate the effect of buffer mobility. Panel (D) represents a surface plot when all buffers remain stationary (compare with Fig. 2 G, where Fluo-3 and calmodulin were mobile). (E) and (F) allow a quantitative comparison of the effects of buffer mobility. The color-coding is identical to (B) and (C). The Ca2+ signal in the center is dramatically slowed down while the Ca2+ concentration in the restricted space reaches much larger values when the buffers are immobilized.

Buffer mobility

A number of theoretical and experimental studies (Zhou and Neher, 1993; Wagner and Keizer, 1994; Jafri and Keizer, 1995; Gabso et al., 1997; Baylor and Hollingworth, 1998; Jiang et al., 1999; Tang et al., 2000) suggest that mobile buffers tend to increase the diffusion of Ca2+ while the stationary buffers retard Ca2+ transport in the cell. The conjecture made in the present model, that the endogenous calmodulin and the exogenous Fluo-3 are mobile Ca2+ buffers, allowed us to examine how the mobility of these buffers would affect the Ca2+ dynamics in atrial myocytes. Fig. 3 D shows a simulation in which all Ca2+ buffers were made stationary. It is striking that under these conditions Ca2+ only diffused slowly to the center of the cell and essentially remained near the cell membrane during the analyzed interval, resulting in a high local Ca2+ concentration in the RSP (compare with Fig. 2 G, where Fluo-3 and calmodulin were mobile with D<UP><SUB>MYOF</SUB><SUP>CaFLUO</SUP></UP> = 100 µm2 s-1 and D<UP><SUB>MYOF</SUB><SUP>CaCAL</SUP></UP> = 25 µm2 s-1).

Fluo-3 concentration

The inclusion of the Ca2+ indicator Fluo-3 in the model provided a possibility to examine and analyze how different Fluo-3 concentrations would affect the Ca2+ signals in atrial myocytes. For this purpose Ca2+ signals arising from influx via L-type Ca2+ current were simulated for Fluo-3 concentrations ranging from 0 µM to 1600 µM. The surface plots in Fig. 4, A-C reveal that the Ca2+ indicator has a pronounced effect on the Ca2+ mobility. In addition, our model results (Fig. 4 D) illustrate that 1) at low concentrations, Fluo-3 accelerates the spread of the Ca2+ signal toward the center because the CaFLUO complex carries a sizeable amount of Ca2+; 2) at concentrations above ~50 µM, Fluo-3 suppresses the Ca2+ signal in the center because the buffering capacity of the Ca2+ indicator dye becomes dominant. The calculated Ca2+ concentrations at 100 ms versus different Fluo-3 concentrations in the RSP (red), periphery (green), and the cell center (blue), and for the averaged concentration (black) are shown in Fig. 4 E.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   Effect of Fluo-3 concentration, ATP concentration, and presence of phospholipids on the sarcolemma. Surface plots were constructed from simulations with different concentrations of the mobile Ca2+ buffer Fluo-3 (A, 0 µM; B, 30 µM; C, 400 µM). The time course of the Ca2+ concentration in the center of the cell is illustrated in (D) for Fluo-3 concentrations from 0 µM to 1600 µM. Two effects of Fluo-3 become apparent: 1) at low concentrations, Fluo-3 accelerated the Ca2+ signal in the cell center because it carries bound Ca2+ while it diffuses; 2) at high concentration, the Ca2+ signals are suppressed because the buffering capacity of Fluo-3 dominates. This is also evident in (E) where the Ca2+ concentration at 100 ms is shownat various Fluo-3 concentrations for the restricted space (red), the periphery (green), the average (black), and the cell center (blue). In the center, the dual effect of Fluo-3 leads to low Ca2+ at both low and high Fluo-3 concentrations. Panels (F-G) show the effect of the mobile Ca2+ buffer ATP in the absence of Fluo-3. Panel (F) allows a quantitative comparison of the effect of ATP. Panel (