| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, December 2002, p. 3482-3489, Vol. 83, No. 6



and
*Department of Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology,
Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan;
Department of
Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku,
Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; and
Laboratory of Biophysical
Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido
University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. During the photocycle of ppR, the Schiff base of the retinal chromophore is deprotonated upon formation of the M intermediate (ppRM). The present FTIR spectroscopy of ppRM revealed that the Schiff base proton is transferred to Asp-75, which corresponds to Asp-85 in a light-driven proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR). In addition, the C==O stretching vibrations of Asn-105 were assigned for ppR and ppRM. The common hydrogen-bonding alterations in Asn-105 of ppR and Asp-115 of BR were found in the process from photoisomerization (K intermediate) to the primary proton transfer (M intermediate). These results implicate similar protein structural changes between ppR and BR. However, BRM decays to BRN accompanying a proton transfer from Asp-96 to the Schiff base and largely changed protein structure. In the D96N mutant protein of BR that lacks a proton donor to the Schiff base, the N-like protein structure was observed with the deprotonated Schiff base (called MN) at alkaline pH. In ppR, such an N-like (MN-like) structure was not observed at alkaline pH, suggesting that the protein structure of the M state activates its transducer protein.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pharaonis phoborhodopsin
(ppR) from Natronobacterium pharaonis is a member
of the archaeal rhodopsins (Kamo et al., 2001
; Sasaki and Spudich,
2000
). ppR activates a cognate transducer protein upon light
absorption, leading to negative phototaxis. It possesses a retinal
chromophore that is embedded within seven-transmembrane helices, like
the well-studied proton-pump protein bacteriorhodopsin (BR) (Kamo et
al., 2001
; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000
; Spudich and Lanyi, 1996
). In
ppR or BR, the retinal forms a Schiff base linkage with
Lys-205 or Lys-216, respectively, and the protonated Schiff base is
stabilized by a negatively charged counterion, Asp-75 or Asp-85,
respectively. Light absorption of ppR triggers
trans-cis photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore in
its electronically excited state (Kandori et al., 2002b
), followed by
rapid formation of the ground-state species such as the K intermediate
(Lutz et al., 2001
). This process is also the case in BR. Relaxation of the primary intermediates eventually leads to functional processes during their photocycles (Kamo et al., 2001
; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000
;
Spudich and Lanyi, 1996
).
Comparative investigation of ppR and BR is a powerful method
to understand their molecular mechanisms. We started such comparative studies by means of low-temperature FTIR spectroscopy. The results on
the primary K intermediate revealed the structural similarity between
ppR and BR on the polyene chain of the chromophore (Kandori et al., 2001b
), and hydrogen bonds of internal water molecules (Kandori
et al., 2001a
). These observations were consistent with the similar
crystallographic structures of ppR (Luecke et al., 2001
;
Royant et al., 2001
) and BR (Belrhali et al., 1999
; Luecke et al.,
1999
). In contrast, the structure of the K state after photoisomerization was more extended in ppR than in BR
(Kandori et al., 2001b
), which was probably correlated with the high
thermal stability of ppRK (Hirayama et
al., 1992
). In fact, ppRK was stable even at 170 K, where the L intermediate was formed in BR (Kandori et
al., 2001b
).
Accompanying the relaxation of ppRK
and BRL, the M intermediates appear by
deprotonation of the Schiff base. The M intermediates of ppR
and BR are functionally important in transducer activation and proton
pumping, respectively (Kamo et al., 2001
; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000
;
Spudich and Lanyi, 1996
). ppRM is
formed in tens of microseconds, like BRM, and
decays in 1-2 s (Imamoto et al., 1992
), which is two orders of
magnitude longer than the lifetime of BRM. The
long-lived M-state in ppR must be advantageous in interaction with the transducer. The longer lifetime of
ppRM than BRM
predominantly originates from the lack of the proton-donating groups
(Asp-96-Thr-46 in BR) to the Schiff base, because the M intermediate
of the F86D/L40T (Phe-86 and Leu-40 in ppR correspond to
Asp-96 and Thr-46 in BR, respectively) mutant of ppR decays as fast as BRM (Iwamoto et al., 1999
). By means
of spin-labeling, Wegener et al. observed the opening of the F-helix at
the cytoplasmic side during M formation (Wegener et al., 2000
, 2001
),
as was the case for BR. These facts suggested similar structural
changes at the M states in ppR and BR.
Despite functional importance, molecular understanding of
ppRM has been much less than that of
BRM. Engelhard et al. reported the difference
infrared spectra between ppRM and
ppR, whereas vibrational bands have not been assigned
(Engelhard et al., 1996
). A positive band appeared in the carboxylic
C==O stretching region upon M formation (Engelhard et al., 1996
),
suggesting the proton transfer from the Schiff base to a carboxylate.
Because the structure of ppR is similar to that of BR
(Belrhali et al., 1999
; Luecke et al., 1999
, 2001
; Royant et al.,
2001
), the proton acceptor is likely to be Asp-75, a corresponding
amino acid of Asp-85 in BR. Indeed, the D75N mutant experiment strongly
suggests that Asp-75 is the proton acceptor (Schmies et al., 1998
).
Nevertheless, it has not been assigned to date. Protein structural
changes are much less known for ppRM,
while extensive studies have been reported for
BRM (Lanyi et al., 2000
).
One of the notable aspects in ppR is that the N state has
not been well identified in its photocycle. It is reasonable because the corresponding amino acid residue of Asp-96 in BR is Phe-86 in
ppR (Iwamoto et al., 1999
). In BR, the M intermediate decays accompanying a proton transfer from Asp-96 to the Schiff base, and the
formed N intermediate possesses the protonated Schiff base and
deprotonated Asp-96 with largely changed protein structure. The
N-specific protein structure can be described by the highly dichroic
strong amide-I vibrations at 1671 (
), 1663 (+), and 1649 (+)
cm
1 in the BRN minus BR
difference infrared spectrum (Kandori, 1998
). The frequency of the
C==O stretch of Asp-85 is shifted from 1762 in
BRM to 1754 cm
1 in
BRN (Braiman et al., 1991
; Hessling et al., 1993
;
Kandori, 1998
; Ormos et al., 1992
; Pfefferlé et al., 1991
). Great
changes in amide-I vibrations presumably correspond to the opening of the F-helix at the cytoplasmic side in BRN, which
was probed by diffraction (Dencher et al., 1989
; Kamikubo et al., 1996
;
Subramaniam et al., 1999
; Vonck, 1996
) and spin-labeling (Rink et al.,
2000
; Thorgeirsson et al., 1997
) experiments. When Asp-96 is replaced to Asn in BR, the N state is not observed and the M state is highly stabilized at alkaline pH. Previous FTIR spectroscopy of the D96N protein of BR revealed the appearance of the MN
state after the M state, where the chromophore was M-like
(deprotonated) but the protein structure was N-like (largely changed)
(Sasaki et al., 1992
). This fact suggested that protonation of the
chromophore was not a prerequisite for formation of the N-like protein
structure in BR. Observation of the MN state in
D96N of BR then raised a question on ppR; does the
MN-like state appear during the photocycle of
ppR?
In this paper we report the structural changes occurring upon formation of ppRM by means of FTIR spectroscopy. By use of mutant proteins, we were able to assign the C==O stretch of Asp-75 and the C==O stretch of Asn-105 in the ppRM minus ppR spectrum. These data provided similar protein structural changes between ppR and BR at the M state. In contrast, the present study revealed that the photocycle of ppR lacked the N-like protein structure, which was in clear contrast to that of BR. Lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure in the photocycle of ppR may be substantial to its functional processes. Protein structural changes in the M intermediates are discussed on the basis of the present FTIR data.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of the ppR sample
The wild-type and mutant proteins of ppR were
prepared as described previously (Kandori et al., 2001a
, b
; Shimono et
al., 1997
). Briefly, the ppR proteins possessing histidine
tag at the C-terminus were expressed in Escherichia coli,
solubilized with 1.5%
n-dodecyl-
-D-maltoside (DM), and
purified by Ni-column. The purified ppR sample was then
reconstituted into L-
-phosphatidylcholine (PC)
liposome by dialysis, where the molar ratio of the added PC was 50 times that of ppR.
FTIR spectroscopy
FTIR spectroscopy was applied as described previously (Kandori
et al., 2001a
, b
). The ppR sample in the PC liposome was
washed twice by buffers at pH 7 (2 mM phosphate) or 9 (2 mM borate). Five mM NaCl was added to test the chloride effect. A 90 µl sample of
the ppR was dried on a BaF2 window
with a diameter of 18 mm. After hydration by either
H2O or D2O, the sample was
placed in a cell, which was mounted in an Oxford DN-1704 cryostat
(Oxon, England) equipped in the Bio-Rad FTS-40 spectrometer (Cambridge, MA).
Illumination with >480 nm light (VY-50, Toshiba, Shizuoka, Japan) provided by a 1 kW halogen-tungsten lamp at 250 K for 90 s converted ppR to ppRM. Because the ppRM completely reverted to ppR upon illumination with a UV light (UG-5, Melles Griot, Irvine, CA) for 90 s, as evidenced by the same but inverted spectral shape, the cycles of alternative illuminations with >480 nm light and UV light were repeated a number of times. The difference spectrum was calculated from the spectra constructed with 64 interferograms after minus before the illumination. Twenty-four spectra obtained in this way were averaged for the ppRM minus ppR spectrum.
Because photointermediates decay rapidly at 290 K, a slightly different
experimental setup was applied to study the MN
state in ppR, as described previously (Chon et al., 1999
).
In this case, the sample film was tilted 45o
relative to the probe light, and the >480 nm light from a 150 W xenon
lamp was focused on the sample at an angle of 90o
with respect to the probe light. During illumination infrared spectra
were obtained, and the difference spectrum was calculated from the
spectra constructed with 128 interferograms during minus before the
illumination. Ten spectra obtained in this way were averaged at 250, 270, and 290 K.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Infrared spectral changes of ppR upon formation of the M photointermediate
We tested various conditions such as pH, temperature, and
illumination wavelength to accumulate
ppRM. It was found that ppR and ppRM can be photoconverted with
each other at 250 K, as shown by the mirror images of the difference IR
spectra. Photoreversion of ppRM to
ppR was previously reported by Balashov et al. (2000)
. The
dotted line in Fig. 1 a shows
the typical ppRM minus ppR
spectrum measured at 250 K for the hydrated film at pH 9. There were no spectral differences between pH 9 (dotted line) and 7 (solid line), which was consistent with the previous report
(Engelhard et al., 1996
). In contrast, the O intermediate appeared at
higher temperature and neutral pH, whereas only
ppRM was observed at pH 9 even at higher temperatures (data not shown). Thus, alkaline pH is favorable to
accumulate ppRM, as was reported by
the flash photolysis (Miyazaki et al., 1992
). Such pH dependence is
also the case for BR. FTIR studies on
ppRO will be reported elsewhere.
|
Fig. 1 b exhibits a spectral comparison of
ppRM between the absence (dotted
line) and presence (solid line) of NaCl. Recent structural determination of ppR showed the presence of a
chloride ion in the extracellular side of the chromophore (Royant et
al., 2001
). It is known that chloride does not affect the absorption of
ppR (Shimono et al., 2000
), while it is intriguing to
determine whether the structure of
ppRM is influenced by chloride ions. Fig. 1 b shows that both spectra are identical in the
1500-800 cm
1 region. Frequencies in the
1800-1500 cm
1 were also the same between the
absence and presence of chloride ions, though amplitudes of some bands
were different. Thus, we concluded that chloride ions do not affect the
protein structural changes between ppR and
ppRM.
The ppRM minus ppR spectrum
(Fig. 1 a) exhibits a negative peak at 1545 cm
1 in the ethylenic C==C stretching region.
The value is identical to that in the native ppR (Engelhard
et al., 1996
) and also in good agreement with the previous resonance
Raman spectroscopy of the native ppR in DM solution (1548 cm
1) (Gellini et al., 2000
). Negative bands at
1244, 1202, and 1164 cm
1 are attributable to
the C
C stretching vibrations of the retinal chromophore. The 1244 and 1202 cm
1 bands were also observed in the
ppRK minus ppR spectrum,
and tentatively assigned as a mixture of C12
C13 stretch and N
H
in-plane bending, and C14
C15 stretch in ppR,
respectively, from the analogy to BR (Kandori et al., 2001b
). The
1164-cm
1 band was not observed in the
ppRK minus ppR spectrum
(Kandori et al., 2001b
), and newly appeared in the
ppRM minus ppR spectrum. It
is likely that the 1164-cm
1 band originates
from C10
C11 stretch, because the corresponding band of BR appears at
1170 cm
1 (Smith et al., 1985
). This suggests
that there are no structural changes at the C10
C11 moiety between
ppRK and ppR, and some
changes in ppRM. It may also be
possible that the chromophore structure is not altered at position
C10
C11 between ppR and
ppRM, whereas deprotonation in
ppRM weakens the absorbance of the IR
band so that it appeared as a negative band. Another possibility is
that the appearance of a different band at 1164 cm
1 cancels out the negative band at the same
frequency in the ppRK minus
ppR spectrum, possibly because of the extended structural changes upon K formation (Kandori et al., 2001b
).
Because the band corresponds to the C10
C11 stretching vibration of
the retinal chromophore, these results can be interpreted in terms of
no structural changes between ppRK and
ppR, and some changes in
ppRM. It may also be possible that the
chromophore structure is not altered at position C10
C11 between
ppR and ppRM, whereas
deprotonation in ppRM weakens the
absorbance of the IR band so that it appeared as a negative band.
The appearance of the positive 1765-cm
1 band is
characteristic of the M intermediate (Engelhard et al., 1996
; Maeda,
1995
; Rath et al., 1996
). In addition, various peaks were observed in the >1600 cm
1 region; 1707 (+), 1701 (
),
1686 (
), 1663 (
), 1644 (+), 1634 (
), and 1622 (+)
cm
1. These bands originate from protein
vibrations. The C==N stretching vibration of the protonated Schiff
base at 1650 cm
1 is present as the shoulder of
the strong negative band at 1663 cm
1. The
negative 1663-cm
1 band is located at the
typical frequency region of amide-I vibration in the
II-helix.
Assignment of the C==O stretching vibrations of Asp-75 in ppRM
The appearance of a positive band at 1770-1760
cm
1 upon formation of the M intermediate is
characteristic among BR, ppR, and phoborhodopsin of
Halobacterium salinarum (pR), and interpreted in terms of
protonation of a carboxylate by the proton transfer from the Schiff
base. By means of FTIR spectroscopy, the proton acceptors were
identified as Asp-85 (Maeda, 1995
) and Asp-73 (Bergo et al., 2000
) in
BR and pR, respectively, whereas the acceptor has not been assigned for
ppR. Fig. 2 a shows
the positive bands at 1765 and 1753 cm
1 in
H2O and D2O, respectively,
in the carboxylic C==O stretching region.
|
To assign the positive 1765-cm
1 band in the
ppRM minus ppR spectrum, we
replaced Asp-75 to Glu. HPLC analysis revealed that the D75E mutant
protein possesses 40% all-trans and 60% 13-cis forms in the dark, like BR, whereas the wild-type ppR
possesses only the all-trans form (Hirayama et al., 1995
;
Shimono et al., 2001
). We found that, unlike BR, D75E does not show
light-adaptation, possibly because of the slow photocycle of the
all-trans form. Therefore, we searched the suitable
illumination conditions to accumulate the M intermediate of the D75E
protein. Absorption spectra in the UV and visible region showed that
the M intermediate is formed by illumination with >480 nm light at 220 K, being a lower temperature than for the wild type (not shown). Thus,
we measured the difference IR spectrum for the D75E protein. The obtained spectrum exhibited negative bands at 1244 and 1202 cm
1 and a positive band at 1179 cm
1 in the fingerprint region (Fig. 2
b). The negative bands imply that the photocycle of the
all-trans form was predominantly involved in the spectrum,
whereas the appearance of the positive band at 1179 cm
1 may originate from formation of another
product possessing a protonated Schiff base.
In the carboxylic C==O stretching region, a positive band was observed
at 1729 cm
1 (Fig. 2 b). In BR, the
C==O stretching vibrations of Asp-85 and Glu-85 appeared at 1760 and
1724 cm
1, respectively (Braiman et al., 1988
).
These facts strongly suggest that the positive
1765-cm
1 band originates from the C==O
stretching vibration of Asp-75, which down-shifts to 1729 cm
1 in the D75E mutant protein of
ppR. The C==O stretching vibrations of the aspartic acids
at 1760 and 1765 cm
1 indicate that Asp-85 in BR
and Asp-75 in ppR, respectively, exist in the highly
hydrophobic environment (Dioumaev and Braiman, 1995
). In addition, it
is likely that the environment of the position 75 in
ppRM is more hydrophobic than that of
the corresponding position 85 in BRM, because
higher frequency represents a more hydrophobic environment for carboxylates.
Assignment of the C==O stretching vibrations of Asn-105 in ppRM
The ppRM minus ppR
spectrum has a characteristic peak pair at 1707 (+)/1701 (
)
cm
1 (Fig. 1 a). In the
ppRK minus ppR spectrum,
there is a peak pair at 1704 (
)/1700 (+) cm
1,
which is not shifted in D2O (Fig.
3 a) (Kandori et al., 2001b
). We recently assigned the bands as the C==O stretching vibration of
Asn-105 in D-helix (Kandori et al., 2002a
). In addition, from the
analysis of the amplitude of the C==O stretches, we provided experimental evidence that photoisomerization yields more extended protein structural changes in ppR than in BR (Kandori et
al., 2002a
). Fig. 3 b shows the
ppRM minus ppR spectra
measured in H2O (solid line) and
D2O (dotted line). The bands at 1707 (+) and 1701 (
) cm
1 are not shifted in
D2O, while the positive
1695-cm
1 band disappeared in
D2O.
|
The bands at 1707 (+) and 1701 (
) cm
1
completely disappeared in the N105D mutant protein, where the
D2O-sensitive 1695-cm
1
band remained (Fig. 3 c). Instead, a negative peak newly
appeared at 1739 cm
1, which shifts to 1728 cm
1 in D2O. This band is
close in frequency to the negative 1744-cm
1
band in the ppRK minus ppR
spectrum (Kandori et al., 2002a
). Thus, we concluded that the bands at
1707 (+) and 1701 (
) cm
1 originate from the
C==O stretch of Asn-105. In the difference spectrum of N105D, it seems
that there is a positive peak at 1729 cm
1 in
addition to the positive one at 1746 cm
1, which
may suggest the structural heterogeneity in the M state of the mutant.
In ppR, the C==O stretching frequency of Asn-105 is
down-shifted in ppRK and up-shifted in
ppRM, indicating that the hydrogen bond is strengthened upon photoisomerization, and weakened upon primary
proton transfer. In BR, it is known that the C==O stretching frequency
of Asp-115 is down-shifted in BRK and
BRL, and up-shifted in BRM
(Maeda, 1995
; Sasaki et al., 1994
). Thus, the structural changes at
position 105 in ppR are similar to those at the
corresponding position 115 in BR through light absorption and M formation.
Lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure in ppR
In BR, the M intermediate decays accompanying a proton transfer
from Asp-96 to the Schiff base, and the formed N intermediate possesses
1) a 13-cis chromophore; 2) a protonated Schiff base; 3)
deprotonated Asp-96; and 4) largely changed protein structure. The
N-specific protein structure can be described in the
BRN minus BR difference infrared spectrum by the
highly dichroic strong amide-I vibrations at 1671 (
), 1663 (+), and
1649 (+) cm
1 (Kandori, 1998
), and the frequency
shift of the C==O stretch of Asp-85 from 1762 (BRM) to 1754 (BRN)
cm
1 (Braiman et al., 1991
; Hessling et al.,
1993
; Kandori, 1998
; Ormos et al., 1992
; Pfefferlé et al., 1991
).
As described in the Introduction, protonation of the chromophore is not
prerequisite for the formation of an N-like structure in BR. When
Asp-96, an internal proton donor to the chromophore, is replaced to
Asn, the M state is highly stabilized at alkaline pH. Previous FTIR spectroscopy of the D96N protein of BR revealed the appearance of the
MN state after M, where the chromophore is M-like
(deprotonated) but the protein structure is N-like (largely changed)
(Sasaki et al., 1992
).
Observation of the MN state in BR provides an
implication for ppR. In ppR, the N state has not
been well identified in its photocycle. It is reasonable because the
corresponding amino acid residue of Asp-96 in BR is Phe-86 in
ppR. Therefore, it is an intriguing question whether the
MN-like state is present during the photocycle of
ppR. To answer this question, we measured infrared spectral
changes of the alkaline film of ppR at various temperatures. BRN is normally trapped at 273 K (Kandori, 1998
).
In the present study, we also examined higher temperatures (290 K).
Consequently, we had to modify the experimental setup as described in
Materials and Methods because photointermediates decayed rapidly at
room temperature. Fig. 4 a
shows the ppRM minus ppR
spectrum measured at 250 K. It is noted that the amplitudes of some
bands were different in Fig. 4 a from those in Fig. 1
a, though frequencies were identical. Such difference
presumably originates from the fact that the ppR molecules
were partially oriented in the film. In Fig. 4 the film sample was
tilted by 45o, so that vibrations whose dipole
moments were parallel to the membrane normal were enhanced in
amplitude. In fact, the C==O stretch of Asp-75 and various amide-I
vibrations whose dipole moments tend to be parallel to the membrane
normal were likely to be enhanced in Fig. 4, while C==C and C
C
stretches of the chromophore whose dipole moments are parallel to the
membrane were reduced in intensity from Fig. 1.
|
Fig. 4 shows that spectral shape and amplitude do not change among 250, 270, and 290 K. This is clear contrast to the D96N mutant of BR, where
the M state was observed at lower temperature, and the
MN state was observable at higher temperature
(Sasaki et al., 1992
). Formation of the MN state
accompanied 1) appearance of the prominent amide-I bands at 1669 (
)
and 1649 (+) cm
1; and 2) frequency shift of the
C==O stretch of Asp-85 from 1762 to 1755 cm
1
(Sasaki et al., 1992
). In ppR, the positive
1765-cm
1 band of Asp-75 did not change its
frequency at 250-290 K. In addition, there are no significant
amplitude changes in the amide-I vibrations (1686 (
), 1664 (
), and
1644 (+) bands), which can be observed in N and
MN (Sasaki et al., 1992
; Kandori, 1998
). Thus, we
concluded that the N-like (MN-like) structure was
not involved in the photocycle of ppR at alkaline pH.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this paper we studied the structure of
ppRM by means of FTIR spectroscopy.
Balashov et al. reported that ppRM was
formed at ~220 K in their low-temperature visible spectroscopy
(Balashov et al., 2000
). However, we observed spectral contamination of ppRK at 220-240 K in the present FTIR
measurement (data not shown). The difference between the two
experiments probably originates from the sample condition; the
ppR molecule was solubilized by DM in the previous visible
spectroscopy (Balashov et al., 2000
), while the protein was
reconstituted into the PC liposome in this work. Thus, it is likely
that ppRK is more stabilized in
membrane than in the DM solution. A similar observation was reported
for visual rhodopsin, where metarhodopsin II, having the deprotonated Schiff base like ppRM, was highly
stable in the DM solution (Hofmann et al., 1995
).
The present study assigned the positive
1765-cm
1 band as the C==O stretch of the
protonated Asp-75 in ppRM (Fig. 2).
Upon formation of ppRM, Asp-75
receives a proton from the Schiff base, while BRM
formation accompanies a proton transfer from the Schiff base to Asp-85.
Thus, such mechanism is common between ppR and BR. In
addition, this study assigned the bands at 1707 (+)/1701 (
) cm
1 as the C==O stretches of Asn-105 (Fig. 3).
Together with the previous report on Asn-105 in
ppRK (Kandori et al., 2002a
), it was
revealed that hydrogen-bonding alterations at position 105 in
ppR (115 in BR) are common between ppR and BR,
first strengthened upon photoisomerization, followed by weakened upon
primary proton transfer from the Schiff base to Asp-75 in
ppR (Asp-85 in BR). These observations provided the
experimental evidence for the similar structural changes. However,
there is a certain difference between ppR and BR. In the
absence of transducer, ppR can pump protons, whereas the
pumping efficiency is much lower in ppR than in BR (Schmies et al., 2001
; Sudo et al., 2001a
). This has to be explained in terms of
structural factors.
The present study revealed that the photocycle of ppR lacked
the N-like structure at alkaline pH. This observation was in clear
contrast to that of BR. In the D96N mutant protein of BR, the N-like
protein structure is formed with the deprotonated Schiff base (called
MN), even though the protein does not have an
internal proton donor to the Schiff base (Sasaki et al., 1992
). Thus,
lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure implies
different structural changes between ppR and BR. They may be
substantial to the low efficiency in the proton pumping of
ppR (Schmies et al., 2001
). It is, however, noted that the
recent spin-labeling experiment of ppR reported the opening
of F-helix in ppR and in BR (Wegener et al., 2000
, 2001
).
This fact may suggest that the N-specific amide vibrations in
BRN are not directly correlated with the outward motion of F-helix. An alternative explanation is that the mechanism of
the F-helix opening is different between ppR and BR.
The lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure in
ppR also suggests the mechanism of the interaction with its
transducer protein. The protein structure characteristic of
ppRM is likely to activate its
transducer protein. It is, however, noted that the association between
ppR and its transducer is weakened upon formation of
ppRM (Sudo et al., 2001b
, 2002
). This
may suggest that the structure of ppRM
is not important in the complex formation with the transducer. Rather,
a ppR-transducer complex forces the transducer in the non-active state, and light-induced dissociation of the complex may be
an essence of the transducer activation. Further experiments will lead
to better understanding of the structural changes in the transducer activation.
The present study also provided implications for the chloride binding
site. Royant et al. showed the presence of the chloride binding site
inside ppR according to their x-ray structure (Royant et
al., 2001
), which was not visible in the x-ray structure of Luecke et
al. (2001)
. The present results clearly showed little chloride effect
on the ppRM minus ppR
spectrum (Fig. 1 b), suggesting that there are no structural
alterations at the chloride binding site present in the extracellular
side. In contrast, chloride ions influence the structure of
ppRO according to our FTIR
spectroscopy (Furutani et al., manuscript in preparation). Thus,
chloride ions are likely to influence the last step in the photocycle
of ppR, which is our next focus.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Y. Sudo and Taro Tanimoto for useful discussion.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address reprint requests to Dr. Hideki Kandori, Department of Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan. Tel. and Fax: 81-52-735-5207; E-mail: kandori{at}ach.nitech.ac.jp.
Submitted April 22, 2002, and accepted for publication July 29, 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Asn bacteriorhodopsin. The MN intermediate with unprotonated Schiff base but N-like protein structure.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:20782-20786
Biophys J, December 2002, p. 3482-3489, Vol. 83, No. 6
© 2002 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/02/12/3482/08 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Sudo, T. Nishihori, M. Iwamoto, K. Shimono, C. Kojima, and N. Kamo A Long-Lived M-Like State of Phoborhodopsin that Mimics the Active State Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 753 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Inoue, J. Sasaki, J. L. Spudich, and M. Terazima Laser-Induced Transient Grating Analysis of Dynamics of Interaction between Sensory Rhodopsin II D75N and the HtrII Transducer Biophys. J., March 15, 2007; 92(6): 2028 - 2040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sudo, Y. Furutani, H. Kandori, and J. L. Spudich Functional Importance of the Interhelical Hydrogen Bond between Thr204 and Tyr174 of Sensory Rhodopsin II and Its Alteration during the Signaling Process J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 34239 - 34245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. B. Bergo, E. N. Spudich, K. J. Rothschild, and J. L. Spudich Photoactivation Perturbs the Membrane-embedded Contacts between Sensory Rhodopsin II and Its Transducer J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28365 - 28369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iwamoto, Y. Sudo, K. Shimono, T. Araiso, and N. Kamo Correlation of the O-Intermediate Rate with the pKa of Asp-75 in the Dark, the Counterion of the Schiff Base of Pharaonis Phoborhodopsin (Sensory Rhodopsin II) Biophys. J., February 1, 2005; 88(2): 1215 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, M. Hata, S. Neya, and T. Hoshino Computational analysis of the transient movement of helices in sensory rhodopsin II Protein Sci., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 183 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bergo, E. N. Spudich, J. L. Spudich, and K. J. Rothschild Conformational Changes Detected in a Sensory Rhodopsin II-Transducer Complex J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36556 - 36562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |