help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furutani, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kandori, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furutani, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kandori, H.

Biophys J, December 2002, p. 3482-3489, Vol. 83, No. 6

FTIR Spectroscopy of the M Photointermediate in pharaonis Phoborhodopsin

Yuji Furutani,*dagger Masayuki Iwamoto,Dagger Kazumi Shimono,Dagger Naoki Kamo,Dagger and Hideki Kandori*

 *Department of Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan;  dagger Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; and  Dagger Laboratory of Biophysical Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. During the photocycle of ppR, the Schiff base of the retinal chromophore is deprotonated upon formation of the M intermediate (ppRM). The present FTIR spectroscopy of ppRM revealed that the Schiff base proton is transferred to Asp-75, which corresponds to Asp-85 in a light-driven proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR). In addition, the C==O stretching vibrations of Asn-105 were assigned for ppR and ppRM. The common hydrogen-bonding alterations in Asn-105 of ppR and Asp-115 of BR were found in the process from photoisomerization (K intermediate) to the primary proton transfer (M intermediate). These results implicate similar protein structural changes between ppR and BR. However, BRM decays to BRN accompanying a proton transfer from Asp-96 to the Schiff base and largely changed protein structure. In the D96N mutant protein of BR that lacks a proton donor to the Schiff base, the N-like protein structure was observed with the deprotonated Schiff base (called MN) at alkaline pH. In ppR, such an N-like (MN-like) structure was not observed at alkaline pH, suggesting that the protein structure of the M state activates its transducer protein.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR) from Natronobacterium pharaonis is a member of the archaeal rhodopsins (Kamo et al., 2001; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000). ppR activates a cognate transducer protein upon light absorption, leading to negative phototaxis. It possesses a retinal chromophore that is embedded within seven-transmembrane helices, like the well-studied proton-pump protein bacteriorhodopsin (BR) (Kamo et al., 2001; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000; Spudich and Lanyi, 1996). In ppR or BR, the retinal forms a Schiff base linkage with Lys-205 or Lys-216, respectively, and the protonated Schiff base is stabilized by a negatively charged counterion, Asp-75 or Asp-85, respectively. Light absorption of ppR triggers trans-cis photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore in its electronically excited state (Kandori et al., 2002b), followed by rapid formation of the ground-state species such as the K intermediate (Lutz et al., 2001). This process is also the case in BR. Relaxation of the primary intermediates eventually leads to functional processes during their photocycles (Kamo et al., 2001; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000; Spudich and Lanyi, 1996).

Comparative investigation of ppR and BR is a powerful method to understand their molecular mechanisms. We started such comparative studies by means of low-temperature FTIR spectroscopy. The results on the primary K intermediate revealed the structural similarity between ppR and BR on the polyene chain of the chromophore (Kandori et al., 2001b), and hydrogen bonds of internal water molecules (Kandori et al., 2001a). These observations were consistent with the similar crystallographic structures of ppR (Luecke et al., 2001; Royant et al., 2001) and BR (Belrhali et al., 1999; Luecke et al., 1999). In contrast, the structure of the K state after photoisomerization was more extended in ppR than in BR (Kandori et al., 2001b), which was probably correlated with the high thermal stability of ppRK (Hirayama et al., 1992). In fact, ppRK was stable even at 170 K, where the L intermediate was formed in BR (Kandori et al., 2001b).

Accompanying the relaxation of ppRK and BRL, the M intermediates appear by deprotonation of the Schiff base. The M intermediates of ppR and BR are functionally important in transducer activation and proton pumping, respectively (Kamo et al., 2001; Sasaki and Spudich, 2000; Spudich and Lanyi, 1996). ppRM is formed in tens of microseconds, like BRM, and decays in 1-2 s (Imamoto et al., 1992), which is two orders of magnitude longer than the lifetime of BRM. The long-lived M-state in ppR must be advantageous in interaction with the transducer. The longer lifetime of ppRM than BRM predominantly originates from the lack of the proton-donating groups (Asp-96-Thr-46 in BR) to the Schiff base, because the M intermediate of the F86D/L40T (Phe-86 and Leu-40 in ppR correspond to Asp-96 and Thr-46 in BR, respectively) mutant of ppR decays as fast as BRM (Iwamoto et al., 1999). By means of spin-labeling, Wegener et al. observed the opening of the F-helix at the cytoplasmic side during M formation (Wegener et al., 2000, 2001), as was the case for BR. These facts suggested similar structural changes at the M states in ppR and BR.

Despite functional importance, molecular understanding of ppRM has been much less than that of BRM. Engelhard et al. reported the difference infrared spectra between ppRM and ppR, whereas vibrational bands have not been assigned (Engelhard et al., 1996). A positive band appeared in the carboxylic C==O stretching region upon M formation (Engelhard et al., 1996), suggesting the proton transfer from the Schiff base to a carboxylate. Because the structure of ppR is similar to that of BR (Belrhali et al., 1999; Luecke et al., 1999, 2001; Royant et al., 2001), the proton acceptor is likely to be Asp-75, a corresponding amino acid of Asp-85 in BR. Indeed, the D75N mutant experiment strongly suggests that Asp-75 is the proton acceptor (Schmies et al., 1998). Nevertheless, it has not been assigned to date. Protein structural changes are much less known for ppRM, while extensive studies have been reported for BRM (Lanyi et al., 2000).

One of the notable aspects in ppR is that the N state has not been well identified in its photocycle. It is reasonable because the corresponding amino acid residue of Asp-96 in BR is Phe-86 in ppR (Iwamoto et al., 1999). In BR, the M intermediate decays accompanying a proton transfer from Asp-96 to the Schiff base, and the formed N intermediate possesses the protonated Schiff base and deprotonated Asp-96 with largely changed protein structure. The N-specific protein structure can be described by the highly dichroic strong amide-I vibrations at 1671 (-), 1663 (+), and 1649 (+) cm-1 in the BRN minus BR difference infrared spectrum (Kandori, 1998). The frequency of the C==O stretch of Asp-85 is shifted from 1762 in BRM to 1754 cm-1 in BRN (Braiman et al., 1991; Hessling et al., 1993; Kandori, 1998; Ormos et al., 1992; Pfefferlé et al., 1991). Great changes in amide-I vibrations presumably correspond to the opening of the F-helix at the cytoplasmic side in BRN, which was probed by diffraction (Dencher et al., 1989; Kamikubo et al., 1996; Subramaniam et al., 1999; Vonck, 1996) and spin-labeling (Rink et al., 2000; Thorgeirsson et al., 1997) experiments. When Asp-96 is replaced to Asn in BR, the N state is not observed and the M state is highly stabilized at alkaline pH. Previous FTIR spectroscopy of the D96N protein of BR revealed the appearance of the MN state after the M state, where the chromophore was M-like (deprotonated) but the protein structure was N-like (largely changed) (Sasaki et al., 1992). This fact suggested that protonation of the chromophore was not a prerequisite for formation of the N-like protein structure in BR. Observation of the MN state in D96N of BR then raised a question on ppR; does the MN-like state appear during the photocycle of ppR?

In this paper we report the structural changes occurring upon formation of ppRM by means of FTIR spectroscopy. By use of mutant proteins, we were able to assign the C==O stretch of Asp-75 and the C==O stretch of Asn-105 in the ppRM minus ppR spectrum. These data provided similar protein structural changes between ppR and BR at the M state. In contrast, the present study revealed that the photocycle of ppR lacked the N-like protein structure, which was in clear contrast to that of BR. Lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure in the photocycle of ppR may be substantial to its functional processes. Protein structural changes in the M intermediates are discussed on the basis of the present FTIR data.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation of the ppR sample

The wild-type and mutant proteins of ppR were prepared as described previously (Kandori et al., 2001a, b; Shimono et al., 1997). Briefly, the ppR proteins possessing histidine tag at the C-terminus were expressed in Escherichia coli, solubilized with 1.5% n-dodecyl-beta -D-maltoside (DM), and purified by Ni-column. The purified ppR sample was then reconstituted into L-alpha -phosphatidylcholine (PC) liposome by dialysis, where the molar ratio of the added PC was 50 times that of ppR.

FTIR spectroscopy

FTIR spectroscopy was applied as described previously (Kandori et al., 2001a, b). The ppR sample in the PC liposome was washed twice by buffers at pH 7 (2 mM phosphate) or 9 (2 mM borate). Five mM NaCl was added to test the chloride effect. A 90 µl sample of the ppR was dried on a BaF2 window with a diameter of 18 mm. After hydration by either H2O or D2O, the sample was placed in a cell, which was mounted in an Oxford DN-1704 cryostat (Oxon, England) equipped in the Bio-Rad FTS-40 spectrometer (Cambridge, MA).

Illumination with >480 nm light (VY-50, Toshiba, Shizuoka, Japan) provided by a 1 kW halogen-tungsten lamp at 250 K for 90 s converted ppR to ppRM. Because the ppRM completely reverted to ppR upon illumination with a UV light (UG-5, Melles Griot, Irvine, CA) for 90 s, as evidenced by the same but inverted spectral shape, the cycles of alternative illuminations with >480 nm light and UV light were repeated a number of times. The difference spectrum was calculated from the spectra constructed with 64 interferograms after minus before the illumination. Twenty-four spectra obtained in this way were averaged for the ppRM minus ppR spectrum.

Because photointermediates decay rapidly at 290 K, a slightly different experimental setup was applied to study the MN state in ppR, as described previously (Chon et al., 1999). In this case, the sample film was tilted 45o relative to the probe light, and the >480 nm light from a 150 W xenon lamp was focused on the sample at an angle of 90o with respect to the probe light. During illumination infrared spectra were obtained, and the difference spectrum was calculated from the spectra constructed with 128 interferograms during minus before the illumination. Ten spectra obtained in this way were averaged at 250, 270, and 290 K.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Infrared spectral changes of ppR upon formation of the M photointermediate

We tested various conditions such as pH, temperature, and illumination wavelength to accumulate ppRM. It was found that ppR and ppRM can be photoconverted with each other at 250 K, as shown by the mirror images of the difference IR spectra. Photoreversion of ppRM to ppR was previously reported by Balashov et al. (2000). The dotted line in Fig. 1 a shows the typical ppRM minus ppR spectrum measured at 250 K for the hydrated film at pH 9. There were no spectral differences between pH 9 (dotted line) and 7 (solid line), which was consistent with the previous report (Engelhard et al., 1996). In contrast, the O intermediate appeared at higher temperature and neutral pH, whereas only ppRM was observed at pH 9 even at higher temperatures (data not shown). Thus, alkaline pH is favorable to accumulate ppRM, as was reported by the flash photolysis (Miyazaki et al., 1992). Such pH dependence is also the case for BR. FTIR studies on ppRO will be reported elsewhere.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1   (a) ppRM minus ppR spectra measured at pH 7 (solid line) and 9 (dotted line) in the 1820-760 cm-1 region. The spectra are measured at 250 K for the hydrated film with H2O. ppR is converted to ppRM with >480 nm light, while being reverted with a UV-pass filter. (b) ppRM minus ppR spectra measured in the absence (dotted line) and the presence (solid line) of NaCl at 250 K and pH 9. The dotted line is reproduced from the dotted line in a. One division of the y axis corresponds to 0.01 absorbance unit.

Fig. 1 b exhibits a spectral comparison of ppRM between the absence (dotted line) and presence (solid line) of NaCl. Recent structural determination of ppR showed the presence of a chloride ion in the extracellular side of the chromophore (Royant et al., 2001). It is known that chloride does not affect the absorption of ppR (Shimono et al., 2000), while it is intriguing to determine whether the structure of ppRM is influenced by chloride ions. Fig. 1 b shows that both spectra are identical in the 1500-800 cm-1 region. Frequencies in the 1800-1500 cm-1 were also the same between the absence and presence of chloride ions, though amplitudes of some bands were different. Thus, we concluded that chloride ions do not affect the protein structural changes between ppR and ppRM.

The ppRM minus ppR spectrum (Fig. 1 a) exhibits a negative peak at 1545 cm-1 in the ethylenic C==C stretching region. The value is identical to that in the native ppR (Engelhard et al., 1996) and also in good agreement with the previous resonance Raman spectroscopy of the native ppR in DM solution (1548 cm-1) (Gellini et al., 2000). Negative bands at 1244, 1202, and 1164 cm-1 are attributable to the CC stretching vibrations of the retinal chromophore. The 1244 and 1202 cm-1 bands were also observed in the ppRK minus ppR spectrum, and tentatively assigned as a mixture of C12C13 stretch and NH in-plane bending, and C14C15 stretch in ppR, respectively, from the analogy to BR (Kandori et al., 2001b). The 1164-cm-1 band was not observed in the ppRK minus ppR spectrum (Kandori et al., 2001b), and newly appeared in the ppRM minus ppR spectrum. It is likely that the 1164-cm-1 band originates from C10C11 stretch, because the corresponding band of BR appears at 1170 cm-1 (Smith et al., 1985). This suggests that there are no structural changes at the C10C11 moiety between ppRK and ppR, and some changes in ppRM. It may also be possible that the chromophore structure is not altered at position C10C11 between ppR and ppRM, whereas deprotonation in ppRM weakens the absorbance of the IR band so that it appeared as a negative band. Another possibility is that the appearance of a different band at 1164 cm-1 cancels out the negative band at the same frequency in the ppRK minus ppR spectrum, possibly because of the extended structural changes upon K formation (Kandori et al., 2001b).

Because the band corresponds to the C10C11 stretching vibration of the retinal chromophore, these results can be interpreted in terms of no structural changes between ppRK and ppR, and some changes in ppRM. It may also be possible that the chromophore structure is not altered at position C10C11 between ppR and ppRM, whereas deprotonation in ppRM weakens the absorbance of the IR band so that it appeared as a negative band.

The appearance of the positive 1765-cm-1 band is characteristic of the M intermediate (Engelhard et al., 1996; Maeda, 1995; Rath et al., 1996). In addition, various peaks were observed in the >1600 cm-1 region; 1707 (+), 1701 (-), 1686 (-), 1663 (-), 1644 (+), 1634 (-), and 1622 (+) cm-1. These bands originate from protein vibrations. The C==N stretching vibration of the protonated Schiff base at 1650 cm-1 is present as the shoulder of the strong negative band at 1663 cm-1. The negative 1663-cm-1 band is located at the typical frequency region of amide-I vibration in the alpha II-helix.

Assignment of the C==O stretching vibrations of Asp-75 in ppRM

The appearance of a positive band at 1770-1760 cm-1 upon formation of the M intermediate is characteristic among BR, ppR, and phoborhodopsin of Halobacterium salinarum (pR), and interpreted in terms of protonation of a carboxylate by the proton transfer from the Schiff base. By means of FTIR spectroscopy, the proton acceptors were identified as Asp-85 (Maeda, 1995) and Asp-73 (Bergo et al., 2000) in BR and pR, respectively, whereas the acceptor has not been assigned for ppR. Fig. 2 a shows the positive bands at 1765 and 1753 cm-1 in H2O and D2O, respectively, in the carboxylic C==O stretching region.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2   (a) ppRM minus ppR spectra of the wild-type protein in H2O (solid line) and D2O (dotted line) in the 1820-900 cm-1 region. The spectra are measured at 250 K and pH 9. (b) Difference IR spectra of the wild-type (solid line) and the D75E mutant (dotted line) proteins in H2O. The latter spectrum is measured at 220 K and pH 9. One division of the y axis corresponds to 0.01 absorbance unit.

To assign the positive 1765-cm-1 band in the ppRM minus ppR spectrum, we replaced Asp-75 to Glu. HPLC analysis revealed that the D75E mutant protein possesses 40% all-trans and 60% 13-cis forms in the dark, like BR, whereas the wild-type ppR possesses only the all-trans form (Hirayama et al., 1995; Shimono et al., 2001). We found that, unlike BR, D75E does not show light-adaptation, possibly because of the slow photocycle of the all-trans form. Therefore, we searched the suitable illumination conditions to accumulate the M intermediate of the D75E protein. Absorption spectra in the UV and visible region showed that the M intermediate is formed by illumination with >480 nm light at 220 K, being a lower temperature than for the wild type (not shown). Thus, we measured the difference IR spectrum for the D75E protein. The obtained spectrum exhibited negative bands at 1244 and 1202 cm-1 and a positive band at 1179 cm-1 in the fingerprint region (Fig. 2 b). The negative bands imply that the photocycle of the all-trans form was predominantly involved in the spectrum, whereas the appearance of the positive band at 1179 cm-1 may originate from formation of another product possessing a protonated Schiff base.

In the carboxylic C==O stretching region, a positive band was observed at 1729 cm-1 (Fig. 2 b). In BR, the C==O stretching vibrations of Asp-85 and Glu-85 appeared at 1760 and 1724 cm-1, respectively (Braiman et al., 1988). These facts strongly suggest that the positive 1765-cm-1 band originates from the C==O stretching vibration of Asp-75, which down-shifts to 1729 cm-1 in the D75E mutant protein of ppR. The C==O stretching vibrations of the aspartic acids at 1760 and 1765 cm-1 indicate that Asp-85 in BR and Asp-75 in ppR, respectively, exist in the highly hydrophobic environment (Dioumaev and Braiman, 1995). In addition, it is likely that the environment of the position 75 in ppRM is more hydrophobic than that of the corresponding position 85 in BRM, because higher frequency represents a more hydrophobic environment for carboxylates.

Assignment of the C==O stretching vibrations of Asn-105 in ppRM

The ppRM minus ppR spectrum has a characteristic peak pair at 1707 (+)/1701 (-) cm-1 (Fig. 1 a). In the ppRK minus ppR spectrum, there is a peak pair at 1704 (-)/1700 (+) cm-1, which is not shifted in D2O (Fig. 3 a) (Kandori et al., 2001b). We recently assigned the bands as the C==O stretching vibration of Asn-105 in D-helix (Kandori et al., 2002a). In addition, from the analysis of the amplitude of the C==O stretches, we provided experimental evidence that photoisomerization yields more extended protein structural changes in ppR than in BR (Kandori et al., 2002a). Fig. 3 b shows the ppRM minus ppR spectra measured in H2O (solid line) and D2O (dotted line). The bands at 1707 (+) and 1701 (-) cm-1 are not shifted in D2O, while the positive 1695-cm-1 band disappeared in D2O.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3   (a) ppRK minus ppR spectra of the wild-type protein in H2O (solid line) and D2O (dotted line). The spectra measured at 77 K are reproduced from Kandori et al., 2001b. (b) ppRM minus ppR spectra of the wild-type protein in H2O (solid line) and D2O (dotted line) measured at 250 K and pH 9. The solid line is reproduced from the dotted line in Fig. 1 a. (c) ppRM minus ppR spectra of the N105D mutant protein in H2O (solid line) and D2O (dotted line). One division of the y axis corresponds to 0.003 absorbance unit.

The bands at 1707 (+) and 1701 (-) cm-1 completely disappeared in the N105D mutant protein, where the D2O-sensitive 1695-cm-1 band remained (Fig. 3 c). Instead, a negative peak newly appeared at 1739 cm-1, which shifts to 1728 cm-1 in D2O. This band is close in frequency to the negative 1744-cm-1 band in the ppRK minus ppR spectrum (Kandori et al., 2002a). Thus, we concluded that the bands at 1707 (+) and 1701 (-) cm-1 originate from the C==O stretch of Asn-105. In the difference spectrum of N105D, it seems that there is a positive peak at 1729 cm-1 in addition to the positive one at 1746 cm-1, which may suggest the structural heterogeneity in the M state of the mutant.

In ppR, the C==O stretching frequency of Asn-105 is down-shifted in ppRK and up-shifted in ppRM, indicating that the hydrogen bond is strengthened upon photoisomerization, and weakened upon primary proton transfer. In BR, it is known that the C==O stretching frequency of Asp-115 is down-shifted in BRK and BRL, and up-shifted in BRM (Maeda, 1995; Sasaki et al., 1994). Thus, the structural changes at position 105 in ppR are similar to those at the corresponding position 115 in BR through light absorption and M formation.

Lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure in ppR

In BR, the M intermediate decays accompanying a proton transfer from Asp-96 to the Schiff base, and the formed N intermediate possesses 1) a 13-cis chromophore; 2) a protonated Schiff base; 3) deprotonated Asp-96; and 4) largely changed protein structure. The N-specific protein structure can be described in the BRN minus BR difference infrared spectrum by the highly dichroic strong amide-I vibrations at 1671 (-), 1663 (+), and 1649 (+) cm-1 (Kandori, 1998), and the frequency shift of the C==O stretch of Asp-85 from 1762 (BRM) to 1754 (BRN) cm-1 (Braiman et al., 1991; Hessling et al., 1993; Kandori, 1998; Ormos et al., 1992; Pfefferlé et al., 1991). As described in the Introduction, protonation of the chromophore is not prerequisite for the formation of an N-like structure in BR. When Asp-96, an internal proton donor to the chromophore, is replaced to Asn, the M state is highly stabilized at alkaline pH. Previous FTIR spectroscopy of the D96N protein of BR revealed the appearance of the MN state after M, where the chromophore is M-like (deprotonated) but the protein structure is N-like (largely changed) (Sasaki et al., 1992).

Observation of the MN state in BR provides an implication for ppR. In ppR, the N state has not been well identified in its photocycle. It is reasonable because the corresponding amino acid residue of Asp-96 in BR is Phe-86 in ppR. Therefore, it is an intriguing question whether the MN-like state is present during the photocycle of ppR. To answer this question, we measured infrared spectral changes of the alkaline film of ppR at various temperatures. BRN is normally trapped at 273 K (Kandori, 1998). In the present study, we also examined higher temperatures (290 K). Consequently, we had to modify the experimental setup as described in Materials and Methods because photointermediates decayed rapidly at room temperature. Fig. 4 a shows the ppRM minus ppR spectrum measured at 250 K. It is noted that the amplitudes of some bands were different in Fig. 4 a from those in Fig. 1 a, though frequencies were identical. Such difference presumably originates from the fact that the ppR molecules were partially oriented in the film. In Fig. 4 the film sample was tilted by 45o, so that vibrations whose dipole moments were parallel to the membrane normal were enhanced in amplitude. In fact, the C==O stretch of Asp-75 and various amide-I vibrations whose dipole moments tend to be parallel to the membrane normal were likely to be enhanced in Fig. 4, while C==C and CC stretches of the chromophore whose dipole moments are parallel to the membrane were reduced in intensity from Fig. 1.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4   ppRM minus ppR spectra measured in the 1820-1090 cm-1 region at 250 (a), 270 (b), and 290 (c) K. Dotted lines in b and c reproduce the spectrum of a for comparison. The spectra are measured for the hydrated film at pH 9. One division of the y axis corresponds to 0.008 absorbance unit.

Fig. 4 shows that spectral shape and amplitude do not change among 250, 270, and 290 K. This is clear contrast to the D96N mutant of BR, where the M state was observed at lower temperature, and the MN state was observable at higher temperature (Sasaki et al., 1992). Formation of the MN state accompanied 1) appearance of the prominent amide-I bands at 1669 (-) and 1649 (+) cm-1; and 2) frequency shift of the C==O stretch of Asp-85 from 1762 to 1755 cm-1 (Sasaki et al., 1992). In ppR, the positive 1765-cm-1 band of Asp-75 did not change its frequency at 250-290 K. In addition, there are no significant amplitude changes in the amide-I vibrations (1686 (-), 1664 (-), and 1644 (+) bands), which can be observed in N and MN (Sasaki et al., 1992; Kandori, 1998). Thus, we concluded that the N-like (MN-like) structure was not involved in the photocycle of ppR at alkaline pH.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this paper we studied the structure of ppRM by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Balashov et al. reported that ppRM was formed at ~220 K in their low-temperature visible spectroscopy (Balashov et al., 2000). However, we observed spectral contamination of ppRK at 220-240 K in the present FTIR measurement (data not shown). The difference between the two experiments probably originates from the sample condition; the ppR molecule was solubilized by DM in the previous visible spectroscopy (Balashov et al., 2000), while the protein was reconstituted into the PC liposome in this work. Thus, it is likely that ppRK is more stabilized in membrane than in the DM solution. A similar observation was reported for visual rhodopsin, where metarhodopsin II, having the deprotonated Schiff base like ppRM, was highly stable in the DM solution (Hofmann et al., 1995).

The present study assigned the positive 1765-cm-1 band as the C==O stretch of the protonated Asp-75 in ppRM (Fig. 2). Upon formation of ppRM, Asp-75 receives a proton from the Schiff base, while BRM formation accompanies a proton transfer from the Schiff base to Asp-85. Thus, such mechanism is common between ppR and BR. In addition, this study assigned the bands at 1707 (+)/1701 (-) cm-1 as the C==O stretches of Asn-105 (Fig. 3). Together with the previous report on Asn-105 in ppRK (Kandori et al., 2002a), it was revealed that hydrogen-bonding alterations at position 105 in ppR (115 in BR) are common between ppR and BR, first strengthened upon photoisomerization, followed by weakened upon primary proton transfer from the Schiff base to Asp-75 in ppR (Asp-85 in BR). These observations provided the experimental evidence for the similar structural changes. However, there is a certain difference between ppR and BR. In the absence of transducer, ppR can pump protons, whereas the pumping efficiency is much lower in ppR than in BR (Schmies et al., 2001; Sudo et al., 2001a). This has to be explained in terms of structural factors.

The present study revealed that the photocycle of ppR lacked the N-like structure at alkaline pH. This observation was in clear contrast to that of BR. In the D96N mutant protein of BR, the N-like protein structure is formed with the deprotonated Schiff base (called MN), even though the protein does not have an internal proton donor to the Schiff base (Sasaki et al., 1992). Thus, lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure implies different structural changes between ppR and BR. They may be substantial to the low efficiency in the proton pumping of ppR (Schmies et al., 2001). It is, however, noted that the recent spin-labeling experiment of ppR reported the opening of F-helix in ppR and in BR (Wegener et al., 2000, 2001). This fact may suggest that the N-specific amide vibrations in BRN are not directly correlated with the outward motion of F-helix. An alternative explanation is that the mechanism of the F-helix opening is different between ppR and BR.

The lack of the N-like (MN-like) structure in ppR also suggests the mechanism of the interaction with its transducer protein. The protein structure characteristic of ppRM is likely to activate its transducer protein. It is, however, noted that the association between ppR and its transducer is weakened upon formation of ppRM (Sudo et al., 2001b, 2002). This may suggest that the structure of ppRM is not important in the complex formation with the transducer. Rather, a ppR-transducer complex forces the transducer in the non-active state, and light-induced dissociation of the complex may be an essence of the transducer activation. Further experiments will lead to better understanding of the structural changes in the transducer activation.

The present study also provided implications for the chloride binding site. Royant et al. showed the presence of the chloride binding site inside ppR according to their x-ray structure (Royant et al., 2001), which was not visible in the x-ray structure of Luecke et al. (2001). The present results clearly showed little chloride effect on the ppRM minus ppR spectrum (Fig. 1 b), suggesting that there are no structural alterations at the chloride binding site present in the extracellular side. In contrast, chloride ions influence the structure of ppRO according to our FTIR spectroscopy (Furutani et al., manuscript in preparation). Thus, chloride ions are likely to influence the last step in the photocycle of ppR, which is our next focus.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Y. Sudo and Taro Tanimoto for useful discussion.

    FOOTNOTES

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hideki Kandori, Department of Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan. Tel. and Fax: 81-52-735-5207; E-mail: kandori{at}ach.nitech.ac.jp.

Submitted April 22, 2002, and accepted for publication July 29, 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Biophys J, December 2002, p. 3482-3489, Vol. 83, No. 6
© 2002 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/02/12/3482/08  $2.00



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Y. Sudo, T. Nishihori, M. Iwamoto, K. Shimono, C. Kojima, and N. Kamo
A Long-Lived M-Like State of Phoborhodopsin that Mimics the Active State
Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 753 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
K. Inoue, J. Sasaki, J. L. Spudich, and M. Terazima
Laser-Induced Transient Grating Analysis of Dynamics of Interaction between Sensory Rhodopsin II D75N and the HtrII Transducer
Biophys. J., March 15, 2007; 92(6): 2028 - 2040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Sudo, Y. Furutani, H. Kandori, and J. L. Spudich
Functional Importance of the Interhelical Hydrogen Bond between Thr204 and Tyr174 of Sensory Rhodopsin II and Its Alteration during the Signaling Process
J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 34239 - 34245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. B. Bergo, E. N. Spudich, K. J. Rothschild, and J. L. Spudich
Photoactivation Perturbs the Membrane-embedded Contacts between Sensory Rhodopsin II and Its Transducer
J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28365 - 28369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. Iwamoto, Y. Sudo, K. Shimono, T. Araiso, and N. Kamo
Correlation of the O-Intermediate Rate with the pKa of Asp-75 in the Dark, the Counterion of the Schiff Base of Pharaonis Phoborhodopsin (Sensory Rhodopsin II)
Biophys. J., February 1, 2005; 88(2): 1215 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
Y. Sato, M. Hata, S. Neya, and T. Hoshino
Computational analysis of the transient movement of helices in sensory rhodopsin II
Protein Sci., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 183 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Bergo, E. N. Spudich, J. L. Spudich, and K. J. Rothschild
Conformational Changes Detected in a Sensory Rhodopsin II-Transducer Complex
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36556 - 36562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furutani, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kandori, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furutani, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kandori, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Biophysical Society.