| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |



* Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7 Canada;
Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA; and
Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 USA
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Ronald N. McElhaney, Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Medical Sciences Bldg., Rm. 3-39, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7 Canada. Tel.: 780-492-2413; Fax: 780-492-0095; E-mail: rmcelhan{at}gpu.srv.ualberta.ca.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 mol % (Ipsen, et al., 1987
Because the phospholipids and sterols found in cellular membranes contain one or more chiral carbon atoms and occur in an enantimerically pure form, enantiospecific interactions can in principle occur in the lipid bilayers of such membranes. However, previous studies of phospholipid-phospholipid (van Deenen et al., 1962
; Rainier et al., 1979
; Arnett et al., 1988
; Rose et al., 1993
) and sterol-phospholipid (Ghosh et al., 1971
; Arnett and Gold, 1982
; Hermetter and Paltauf, 1982
; Guyer and Block, 1983
; Agarwal et al., 1986a
,b
) interactions utilizing dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) or close structural analogs have not provided evidence for significant enantioselectivity for either type of interaction. Recently, however, a report has appeared in which enantioselective interactions between natural cholesterol or enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM in monolayer films have apparently been detected (Lalitha et al., 2001
). In particular, it has been reported that at 24°C and at a lateral pressure of 30 mN/m (a value near the bilayer-equivalent lateral pressure for DPPC (Marsh, 1996
)), enantiomeric cholesterol is approximately twice as effective as natural cholesterol in condensing egg SpM monolayers at sterol concentrations of 30 mol %. If shown also in lipid-bilayer systems, such strongly enantiospecific interactions between cholesterol and naturally occurring SpMs could be potentially important, because it is well established that cholesterol preferentially interacts with SpM in both model and biological membrane systems (Demel and de Kruijff, 1976
; Yeagle, 1988
; McMullen and McElhaney, 1996
), perhaps forming the molecular basis for the existence of detergent-insoluble, cholesterol- and SpM-enriched rafts in mammalian plasma membranes (Brown, 1998
; Kinnunen, 1991
).
Although the function of cholesterol as a modulator of the physical properties of the lipid bilayer of plasma membranes is the best known and most extensively studied, cholesterol has been shown to perform other essential roles in living organisms. For example, even in the sterol-requiring cell-wall-less bacteria Mycoplasma capricolum, cholesterol has been shown to stimulate the biosynthesis of phospholipids that contain unsaturated fatty acids, which in turn act as fatty acyl group donors for the biosynthesis of fatty acylated membrane proteins. Furthermore, cholesterol is required for macromolecular synthesis and cell growth as well as for membrane biogenesis in this microorganism in addition to its role of regulating membrane lipid-phase state and fluidity (Dahl and Dahl, 1988
). Similarly, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ergosterol has been shown to play specific roles in cell budding, phospholipid biosynthesis, phosphoinositide signaling, and protein kinase activity modulation (Parks et al., 1995
, 1999
), and cholesterol has been shown to be involved in an even wider range of functions in mammalian cells (Dahl and Dahl, 1988
). It is noteworthy that these alternate functions of sterols are generally characterized by the requirement for much lower levels of sterol but by a much higher stereospecificity than for the so-called bulk or lipid-bilayer-modulation sterol function (Dahl and Dahl, 1988
; Parks et al., 1995
, 1999
).
In this article, we present the results of the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), x-ray diffraction, and neutral buoyant-density experiments, which address the question of the existence of enantioselective interactions between cholesterol and egg SpM in lipid-bilayer model membranes. The results of this study are of special interest, because enantioselectivity has hitherto been assumed to be characteristic only of the interactions of sterols with membrane proteins and not of sterols with membrane lipids.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We utilized the DSC protocol described previously, which involved increasing total sample size with increasing sterol concentrations to insure that the broad, low-enthalpy phase transitions occurring under these circumstances could be accurately monitored (McMullen et al., 1993
). However, in this study, DSC was performed using a Calorimetry Sciences Corporation 6100 NanoDSC II (American Fork, UT) with deionized water as a reference. The appropriate amounts of SpM and either cholesterol or its enantiomer were dissolved in chloroform containing a minimum amount of methanol and were mixed from stock solutions to give the appropriate sterol and SpM concentrations. These mixtures were then dried at 5060°C under a stream of N2, and traces of solvent were removed by placing the samples in vacuo overnight. The dried mixtures were then resuspended in deionized water at 5060°C and vortexed to give multilamellar suspensions. Samples were heated and cooled at a rate of 10°C/h starting at a minimum of 510°C and finishing at 7095°C depending on the sample composition. Thermograms were obtained with the cells pressurized to 3 atm to suppress bubble formation as recommended by the manufacturer. Each sample was subjected to at least three heating-and-cooling cycles. Data were collected using the N-DSC II control program and imported into Origin 7.0 (Originlab Corp., Northampton, MA). A typical analysis consisted of subtraction of a fast Fourier transform-smoothed reference water baseline from the sample thermogram. Correction for baseline curvature was achieved by subtraction of a computer-generated baseline of 100200 points over the temperature range of the scan. The lower and upper intersections of the baseline with the DSC trace were estimated by eye and were reproducible in both heating and cooling runs. At lower sterol concentrations, where there are both sharp and broad phase transitions present, peak fitting was performed using the Origin peak-fitting module to resolve the individual components.
Two types of systems were studied by x-ray diffraction: unoriented dispersions and oriented multilayers, both of which are composed of binary mixtures of either natural or enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM at a molar ratio of 3:7. This sterol/egg SpM ratio was chosen because it exhibited the greatest degree of enantioselectivity in the previous monolayer experiments (Lalitha et al., 2001
). To prepare both types of model membrane systems, multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) were first prepared by codissolving the lipids in chloroform, removing the solvent by rotary evaporation, and hydrating the lipids in excess water. To ensure proper hydration, the lipid-water suspensions were heated to 60°C and extensively vortexed. To study the diffraction of unoriented specimens, the MLVs were centrifuged with a bench centrifuge, sealed in a thin-walled glass capillary tube, and mounted in a point-collimation x-ray camera. Oriented lipid multilayers were prepared by placing a drop of the MLV suspension onto a curved glass substrate and drying it under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The lipid multilayers oriented on the glass substrate were mounted in a temperature-controlled constant-humidity sample chamber on a line-focus (single-mirror) x-ray camera (McIntosh et al., 1987
, 1989
, 1992a
,b
). Relative humidities were set by incubation with saturated salt solutions (McIntosh et al., 1987
, 1989
). All x-ray patterns were recorded on Kodak DEF-5 x-ray film at 20°C to facilitate a comparison with the previously published monolayer data, which was collected at a similar temperature (Lalitha et al., 2001
). To obtain electron-density profiles across the bilayer, a Fourier analysis of the x-ray diffraction patterns was performed. Integrated intensities were obtained for each diffraction order by measuring the area under each diffraction peak, and structure amplitudes were obtained by applying standard correction factors for either oriented or unoriented specimens (McIntosh et al., 1987
; McIntosh and Simon, 1986
). As described in detail previously (McIntosh and Simon, 1986
; McIntosh et al., 1989
, 1992a
,b
; Gandhavadi et al., 2002
), phase angles were determined by using osmotic stress experiments to trace out the continuous transform of the bilayer. For each bilayer system, continuous transforms were calculated by use of the sampling theorem (Shannon, 1949
) for one data set for each possible phase combination. The phase combination that gave the best match to the other structure factors was selected (McIntosh et al., 1984
, 1987
; McIntosh and Holloway, 1987
). Electron-density profiles across the bilayer were calculated from Fourier reconstructions using the x-ray structure factors
![]() | (1) |
(h) is the phase angle of order h (either 0 or 180° for these centrosymmetric systems), and the sum is over h.
Measurements of the density of bilayers composed of either natural or enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM at a molar ratio of 7:3 were made using the neutral density procedure of Wiener et al. (1988)
. MLVs were prepared in precisely measured volumes of H2O, and successive volumes of D2O were added, vortexed, and equilibrated for 30 min to ensure complete transfer of water across the multilayers (Wiener et al., 1988
). After each addition of D2O, the MLV suspensions were centrifuged using an Eppendorf bench centrifuge to determine whether the MLVs pelleted or floated. Again, these buoyant-density measurements were carried out at 20°C to facilitate comparison with the previously published monolayer experiments (Lalitha et al., 2001
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The effects of increasing concentrations of natural and enantiomeric cholesterol on the apparent peak temperature of the DSC heating endotherm of egg SpM bilayers is presented in Fig. 3. At low sterol concentrations, the peak temperature decreases slightly and then increases modestly at higher sterol concentrations in both cases. As discussed above, this apparent reversal of peak temperature is actually an artifact of sorts due to the superposition of the sharper component arising from the gel/liquid-crystalline phase-transition temperature of domains of SpM alone, which slightly but progressively decreases in temperature before disappearing entirely, and the broad component arising from the chain-melting phase transition of egg SpM domains enriched in cholesterol, which progressively increases in temperature with increasing sterol concentration. The key result, however, is that both natural and enantiomeric cholesterol have identical effects on the apparent peak temperature of egg SpM MLVs within experimental error.
|
|
T1/2 of the overall thermogram are due to a superposition of the differential qualitative and quantitative effects of both of these sterols on the sharp and broad components of the DSC endotherms present at lower sterol levels. Nevertheless, the effects of natural and enantiomeric cholesterol on the apparent cooperativity of the chain-melting phase transition of egg SpM large MLVs are again identical within experimental error.
|
|
|
7 Å) for natural or enantiomeric cholesterol/SpM bilayers (molar ratio, 3:7), with Fig. 7 A showing profiles for unoriented MLVs in excess water and Fig. 7 B showing profiles from oriented multilayers at 66% relative humidity. For each profile, the center of the bilayer is located at the origin, the low-electron-density trough in the center of the profile corresponds to the terminal methyl groups at the ends of the hydrocarbon chains, the medium-density regions on either side of this trough correspond to the methylene-chain regions of the bilayer, and the high-electron-density peaks near the edge of the profile correspond to the lipid headgroups. It can be seen that in both excess water and at 66% relative humidity, the electron-density profiles are identical within experimental error for SpM bilayers containing either natural or enantiomeric cholesterol. In particular, the headgroup peak separation across the bilayer (dpp) is similar for the two systems (Table 1), so that dpp = 45.4 Å ± 1.1 Å (mean ± standard deviation, n = 4 experiments) and dpp = 45.9 Å ± 1.0 Å (n = 3) for SpM bilayers containing 30 mol % natural or enantiomeric cholesterol, respectively. These results can be compared to the value of dpp = 47.8 Å ± 1.0 Å (n = 8) that was recently obtained for bilayers of natural cholesterol and bovine brain SpM (molar ratio, 1:2) (Gandhavadi et al., 2002
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of our DSC studies of binary mixtures of natural or enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM are also in excellent agreement with previous DSC studies of the thermotropic phase behavior of binary mixtures of natural cholesterol with various naturally occurring SpMs (Oldfield and Chapman, 1971
; Calhoun and Shipley, 1979
; Estep et al., 1979
; McKeone et al., 1986
; Chien et al., 1991
; Chi et al., 1992
; McIntosh et al., 1992b
). In all of these studies, the incorporation of increasing quantities of cholesterol into SpM bilayers results in small shifts in the temperature and large decreases in the enthalpy and cooperativity of the gel/liquid-crystalline phase transition, with this phase transition being completely abolished at 50 mol % cholesterol. However, neither our present results nor the previous results of other investigators agree with those recently reported by Shaikh et al. (2001)
. These workers report that the incorporation of up to 10 mol % of natural cholesterol into egg SpM bilayers results in a small downward shift in the temperature, only a slight decrease in the cooperativity, but a major decrease in the enthalpy of the gel/liquid-crystalline phase transition. These discrepant findings are almost certainly due to the fact that these workers failed to detect and accurately monitor the broad component of the egg SpM phase transition, which was lost in the baseline, and in fact actually monitored only the sharp component of their DSC thermograms. As we have discussed previously (McMullen et al., 1993
), the same error has also produced artifactual DSC results in previous studies of MLVs composed of natural cholesterol and PC (Singer and Finegold, 1990a
,b
) or PE (Singer and Finegold, 1990b
).
It is interesting to compare the effects of the incorporation of natural (or enantiomeric) cholesterol on the thermotropic phase behavior of egg SpM bilayers, which consists primarily of N-16:0-SpM, reported in the present work, with the effects of the incorporation of natural cholesterol on the thermotropic phase behavior of bilayers composed of dipalmitoyl molecular species of PC (Vist and Davis, 1990
; McMullen et al., 1993
), PE (McMullen et al., 1999
), or PS (McMullen et al., 2000
) reported previously. In all four binary systems, the incorporation of increasing quantities of cholesterol decreases the temperature of the sharp component of the gel/liquid-crystalline phase transition slightly and decreases its enthalpy markedly, such that this component is abolished at sterol levels >20 mol %. Similarly, the incorporation of progressively increasing quantities of cholesterol initially increases and then decreases the enthalpy of the broad component of the chain-melting phase transition and progressively decreases its cooperativity, such that the broad component is abolished at 50 mol % sterol. These results indicate that the stoichiometry of the interactions of cholesterol in egg SpM and phospholipid bilayers are similar, and that cholesterol is freely miscible in all of these lipids up to a level of at least 50 mol %. However, the incorporation of increasing quantities of cholesterol does have a different effect on the temperature shift of the broad component, increasing it moderately in DPPC bilayers (Simons and Ikonen, 2000
; McMullen et al., 1993
), decreasing it slightly in dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine bilayers (McMullen et al., 2000
) and decreasing it markedly in dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine bilayers (McMullen et al., 1999
). Interestingly, the incorporation of increasing quantities of natural or enantiomeric cholesterol into egg SpM bilayers also shifts the temperature of the broad component of the gel/liquid-crystalline phase transition moderately upward, as observed previously for DPPC bilayers (McMullen and McElhaney, 1995
; McMullen et al., 1993
). In fact, the magnitude of the upward temperature shift observed in the cholesterol/egg SpM system is slightly greater than that observed in the cholesterol/DPPC system (+56° versus +3°C at 40 mol % sterol, respectively). This occurs despite the fact that the average length of the two hydrocarbon chains is slightly greater in egg SpM than in DPPC, which should reduce the magnitude of this upward temperature shift due to a reduction in hydrophobic mismatch between the host SpM bilayer and the cholesterol molecule (see McMullen et al., 1993
). This finding is thus compatible with previous suggestions that cholesterol may interact more strongly with SpM than with PC molecules of comparable hydrocarbon-chain length and structure and therefore preferentially stabilize the gel relative to the liquid-crystalline state (Kinnunen, 1991
; Brown, 1998
).
The x-ray and density measurements indicate that the structures of bilayers composed of either natural or enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM at a molar ratio of 3:7 are very similar. Electron density profiles at 7 Å resolution (Fig. 7) are nearly identical, showing that the thicknesses of these bilayers are, within experimental error, the same both in excess-water (Fig. 7 A) and partially hydrated (Fig. 7 B) systems. The mass densities of the fully hydrated SpM bilayers that contain 30 mol % of either natural or enantiomeric cholesterol are also the same within 0.1%, which indicates that the partial molar volumes of the two bilayers are essentially identical. Because the thickness and volume of these bilayers are similar, the area per lipid molecule must also be very similar. These results strongly suggest that natural and enantiomeric cholesterol interact with egg SpM in an essentially identical fashion in lipid-bilayer systems.
The results of the present DSC and x-ray diffraction study generally agree well with previous studies of the interaction of natural cholesterol with enantiomeric PCs and their structural analogs in bilayer systems (Ghosh et al., 1971
; Arnett and Gold, 1982
; Hermetter and Paltauf, 1982
; Guyer and Block, 1983
; Agarwal et al., 1986a
,b
) in that significant enantioselective sterol-lipid interactions were not detected. However, there is an apparent discrepancy between our bilayer results and the previous monolayer study, which appeared to show enantioselective cholesterol/egg SpM interactions (Lalitha et al., 2001
). We consider two possible explanations for this discrepancy: 1), differences in properties of monolayers and bilayers; and 2), potential problems with the monolayer studies. In terms of the first possibility, a lipid monolayer spread at an air-water interface may not have the same properties as one-half of a lipid bilayer because of the different boundary conditions of hydrocarbon-air and hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interfaces. In terms of the second possibility, we note that the mean molecular areas reported for monolayers composed of mixtures of enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM at biologically relevant lateral pressures are actually significantly lower than the minimum molecular areas measured for each component separately in the liquid-condensed state. Specifically, at 24°C and a lateral surface pressure of 30 mN/m, the cross-sectional areas of enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM alone were reported as 37.3 Å2 and
45 Å2, respectively, whereas the mean molecular area of a binary mixture of 30 mol % enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM was reported as 3637 Å2. This result is not physically plausible, because cholesterol and other sterols are known to induce a liquid-ordered state in lipid monolayers and bilayers with a degree of organization and tightness of packing that is intermediate between that of the liquid-condensed (gel) and liquid-expanded (liquid-crystalline) states (Vist and Davis, 1990
; Kinnunen, 1991
; McMullen et al., 1993
; Brown, 1998
). To address these and other concerns, a reinvestigation of the force/area curves of monolayers composed of natural and enantiomeric cholesterol and egg SpM would seem to be in order.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted on August 14, 2002; accepted for publication November 1, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Agarwal, K., A. Bali, and C. M. Gupta. 1986b. Effect of phospholipid structure on stability and survival times of liposomes in circulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 883:468475.[Medline]
Ahmed, S. N., D. A. Brown, and E. London. 1997. On the origin of sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich detergent-insoluble cell membranes: physiological concentrations of cholesterol and sphingolipid induce formation of a detergent-insoluble, liquid-ordered lipid phase in model membranes. Biochemistry 36:1094410953.[Medline]
Arnett, E. M., and J. M. Gold. 1982. Chiral aggregation phenomena. 4. A search for stereospecific interactions between highly purified enantiomeric and racemic dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholines and other chiral surfactants in monolayers, vesicles, and gels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:636639.
Arnett, E. M., J. M. Gold, N. Harvey, E. A. Johnson, and L. G. Whitesell. 1988. Stereoselective recognition in phospholipid monolayers. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 238:2136.[Medline]
Brown, D. A., and E. London. 2000. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 275:1722117224.
Brown, R. E. 1998. Sphingolipid organization in biomembranes: what physical studies of model membranes reveal. J. Cell Sci. 111:19.[Abstract]
Calhoun, W. I., and G. G. Shipley. 1979. Fatty acid composition and thermal behavior of natural sphingomyelins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 555:436441.[Medline]
Chi, L., C. Hsieh, and W.-G. Wu. 1992. Probing the double-bond and phase properties of natural lipid dispersions by cross polarization/magic angle spinning C-13 NMR. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 39:3542.
Chien, K.-Y., W.-N. Huang, J.-H. Jean, and W.-G. Wu. 1991. Fusion of sphingomyelin vesicles induced by proteins from Taiwan cobra (Naja naja atra) venom. Interactions of zwitterionic phospholipids with cardiotoxin analogues. J. Biol. Chem. 266:32523259.
Dahl, C. E., and J. S. Dahl. 1988. The Biology of Cholesterol. P. L. Yeagle, editor. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 148153.
Demel, R. A., and B. de Kruijff. 1976. The function of sterols in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 457:109132.[Medline]
Dietrich, C., L. A. Bagatolli, Z. N. Volovyk, N. L. Thompson, M. Levi, K. Jacobson, and E. Graton. 2001. Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys. J. 80:14171428.
Estep, T. N., D. B. Mountcastle, Y. Barenholz, R. L. Biltonen, and T. E. Thompson. 1979. Thermal behavior of synthetic sphingomyelin-cholesterol dispersions. Biochemistry 18:21122117.[Medline]
Estep, T. N., D. B. Mountcastle, R. L. Biltonen, and T. E. Thompson. 1978. Studies on the anomalous thermotropic behavior of aqueous dispersions of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine-cholesterol mixtures. Biochemistry 17:19841989.[Medline]
Gandhavadi, M., D. Allende, A. Vidal, S. A. Simon, and T. J. McIntosh. 2002. Biophys. J. 82:14691482.
Genz, A., J. F. Holzwarth, and T. Y. Tsong. 1986. The influence of cholesterol on the main phase transition of unilamellar dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles. A differential scanning calorimetry and iodine laser T-jump study. Biophys. J. 50:10431051.
Ghosh, D., R. L. Lyman, and J. Tinoco. 1971. Behavior of specific natural lecithins and cholesterol at the air water-interface. Chem. Phys. Lipids 7:173184.[Medline]
Guyer, W., and K. Block. 1983. Phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol interactions in model membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 33:313322.[Medline]
Hermetter, A., and F. Paltauf. 1982. Interaction of enantiomeric alkylacyl and diacylglycero-phosphocholines with cholesterol in bilayer membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 31:283289.[Medline]
Ikonen, E. 2001. Roles of lipid rafts in membrane transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:470477.[Medline]
Ipsen, J. H., G. Karlstrom, O. G. Mouritsen, H. W. Wennerstrom, and M. Zuckermann. 1987. Phase equilibria in the phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 905:162172.[Medline]
Jiang, X., and D. F. Covey. 2002. Total synthesis of ent-cholesterol via a steroid C,D-ring side-chain synthon. J. Org. Chem. 67:48934900.[Medline]
Kinnunen, P. K. J. 1991. On the principles of functional ordering in biological membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 57:375399.[Medline]
Lalitha, S., A. S. Kumar, K. J. Stine, and D. F. Covey. 2001. Chirality in membranes: first evidence that enantioselective interactions between cholesterol and cell membrane lipids can be a determinant of membrane physical properties. Supramol. Chem. 1:5361.
Lis, L. J., M. McAlister, N. Fuller, R. P. Rand, and V. A. Parsegian. 1982. Interactions between neutral phospholipid bilayer membranes. Biophys. J. 37:657666.
Liscum, L., and N. J. Munn. 1999. Intracellular cholesterol transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1438:1937.[Medline]
Mabrey, S., P. L. Mateo, and J. M. Sturtevant. 1978. High-sensitivity scanning calorimetric study of mixtures of cholesterol with dimyristoyl- and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholines. Biochemistry 17:24642468.[Medline]
Marsh, D. 1996. Lateral pressure in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1286:183223.[Medline]
Marsh, D. 1999. Handbook of Lipid Bilayers. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 131, 156, 194, 224.
McIntosh, T. J., and P. W. Holloway. 1987. Determination of the depth of bromine atoms in bilayers formed from bromolipid probes. Biochemistry 26:17831788.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J., A. D. Magid, and S. A. Simon. 1987. Steric repulsion between phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochemistry 26:73257332.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J., A. D. Magid, and S. A. Simon. 1989. Cholesterol modifies the short-range repulsive interactions between phosphatidylcholine membranes. Biochemistry 28:1725.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J., and S. A. Simon. 1986. The hydration force and bilayer deformation: a reevaluation. Biochemistry 25:40584066.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J., S. A. Simon, J. C. Ellington, and N. A. Porter. 1984. A new structural model for mixed-chain phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochemistry 23:40384044.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J., S. A. Simon, D. Needham, and C.-H. Huang. 1992a. Interbilayer interactions between sphingomyelin and sphingomyelin: cholesterol bilayers. Biochemistry 31:20202024.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J., S. A. Simon, D. Needham, and C.-H. Huang. 1992b. Structure and cohesive properties of sphingomyelin: cholesterol bilayers. Biochemistry 31:20122020.[Medline]
McKeone, B. J., H. J. Pownall, and J. B. Massey. 1986. Ether phosphatidylcholines: comparison of miscibility with ester phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelin, vesicle fusion, and association with apolipoprotein A-I. Biochemistry 25:77117716.[Medline]
McMullen, T. P. W., R. N. A. H. Lewis, and R. N. McElhaney. 1993. Differential scanning calorimetric study of the effect of cholesterol on the thermotropic phase behavior of a homologous series of linear saturated phosphatidylcholines. Biochemistry 32:516522.[Medline]
McMullen, T. P. W., R. N. A. H. Lewis, and R. N. McElhaney. 1999. Calorimetric and spectroscopic studies of the effects of cholesterol on the thermotropic phase behavior and organization of a homologous series of linear saturated phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1416:119134.[Medline]
McMullen, T. P. W., R. N. A. H. Lewis, and R. N. McElhaney. 2000. Differential scanning calorimetric and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic studies of the effects of cholesterol on the thermotropic phase behavior and organization of a homologous series of linear saturated phosphatidylserine bilayer membranes. Biophys. J. 79:20562065.
McMullen, T. P. W., and R. N. McElhaney. 1995. New aspects of the interactions of cholesterol with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers as revealed by high-sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1234:9098.[Medline]
McMullen, T. P. W., and R. N. McElhaney. 1996. Physical studies of cholesterol-phospholipid interactions. Curr. Opin.n Colloid Interface Sci. 1:8390.
Needham, D., and R. S. Nunn. 1990. Elastic deformation and failure of lipid bilayer membranes containing cholesterol. Biophys. J. 58:9971009.
Nes, W. R., and M. L. McKean. 1977. Biochemistry of Steroids and Other Isopentenoids. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD.
Oldfield, E., and D. Chapman. 1971. Effects of cholesterol and cholesterol derivatives on hydrocarbon chain mobility in lipids. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 43:610617.[Medline]
Parks, L. W., J. H. Crowley, F. W. Leak, S. J. Smith, and M. E. Tomeo. 1999. Use of sterol mutants as probes for sterol functions in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34:399404.[Medline]
Parks, L. W., S. J. Smith, and J. H. Crowley. 1995. Biochemical and physiological effects of sterol alterations in yeasta review. Lipids 30:227230.[Medline]
Rainier, S., M. K. Jam, F. Ramirez, V. Ioannou, J. F. Marececk, and R. Wagner. 1979. Phase transition characteristics of diphosphatidyl-glycerol (cardiolipid) and stereoisomeric phosphatidyldiacylglycerol bilayers. Mono- and divalent metal ion effects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 558:187198.[Medline]
Rose, P. L., N. G. Harvey, and E. M. Arnett. 1993. T1 chirality and molecular recognition in monolayers at the air-water-interface. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 28:45138.
Shaikh, S. R., A. C. Dumaual, L. J. Jenski, and W. Stillwell. 2001. Lipid phase separation in phospholipid bilayers and monolayers modeling the plasma membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1512:317328.[Medline]
Shannon, C. E. 1949. Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs, NewYork. 37:1021.
Simons, K. and E. Ikonen. 2000. How cells handle cholesterol. Science 290:17211726.
Singer, M. A., and L. Finegold. 1990a. Cholesterol interacts with all of the lipid in bilayer membranes. Implications for models. Biophys. J. 57:153156.
Singer, M. A., and L. Finegold. 1990b. Interaction of cholesterol with saturated phospholipids: role of the C(17) side chain. Chem. Phys. Lipids 56:217222.[Medline]
Tardieu, A., V. Luzzati, and F. C. Reman. 1973. Structure and polymorphism of the hydrocarbon chains of lipids: a study of lecithin-water phases. J. Mol. Biol. 75:711733.[Medline]
Thewalt, J. L., and M. Bloom. 1992. Phosphatidylcholine:cholesterol phase diagrams. Biophys. J. 63:11761181.
Van Deenen, L. L. M., U. M. T. Houtsmuller, G. H. de Hass, and E. J. Mulder. 1962. Monomolecular layers of synthetic phosphatides. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 14:429444.[Medline]
Vist, M. R., and J. H. Davis. 1990. Phase equilibria of cholesterol/DPPC mixtures: 2H-nuclear magnetic resonance and differential scanning calorimetry. Biochemistry 29:451464.[Medline]
Wiener, M. C., S. Tristram-Nagle, D. A. Wilkinson, L. E. Campbell, and J. F. Nagle. 1988. Specific volumes of lipids in fully hydrated bilayer dispersions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 938:135142.[Medline]
Yeagle, P. L. 1988. Cholesterol and the cell membrane. In The Biology of Cholesterol. P. L. Yeagle, editor. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Sasaki and S. H. White Aggregation Behavior of an Ultra-Pure Lipopolysaccharide that Stimulates TLR-4 Receptors Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 986 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Mannock, R. N. A. H. Lewis, and R. N. McElhaney Comparative Calorimetric and Spectroscopic Studies of the Effects of Lanosterol and Cholesterol on the Thermotropic Phase Behavior and Organization of Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine Bilayer Membranes Biophys. J., November 1, 2006; 91(9): 3327 - 3340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lange, J. Ye, and T. L. Steck Activation of Membrane Cholesterol by Displacement from Phospholipids J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36126 - 36131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chachaty, D. Rainteau, C. Tessier, P. J. Quinn, and C. Wolf Building Up of the Liquid-Ordered Phase Formed by Sphingomyelin and Cholesterol Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 4032 - 4044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Gonzales, C. L. Bell-Horner, M. A. M. de la Cruz, J. A. Ferrendelli, D. F. Covey, and G. H. Dillon Enantioselectivity of {alpha}-Benzyl-{alpha}-methyl-{gamma}-butyrolactone-Mediated Modulation of Anticonvulsant Activity and GABAA Receptor Function J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2004; 309(2): 677 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Holopainen, A. J. Metso, J.-P. Mattila, A. Jutila, and P. K. J. Kinnunen Evidence for the Lack of a Specific Interaction between Cholesterol and Sphingomyelin Biophys. J., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 1510 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Westover, D. F. Covey, H. L. Brockman, R. E. Brown, and L. J. Pike Cholesterol Depletion Results in Site-specific Increases in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Phosphorylation due to Membrane Level Effects: STUDIES WITH CHOLESTEROL ENANTIOMERS J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51125 - 51133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Veatch and S. L. Keller Separation of Liquid Phases in Giant Vesicles of Ternary Mixtures of Phospholipids and Cholesterol Biophys. J., November 1, 2003; 85(5): 3074 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Epand Cholesterol in Bilayers of Sphingomyelin or Dihydrosphingomyelin at Concentrations Found in Ocular Lens Membranes Biophys. J., May 1, 2003; 84(5): 3102 - 3110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. M. Nyholm, M. Nylund, and J. P. Slotte A Calorimetric Study of Binary Mixtures of Dihydrosphingomyelin and Sterols, Sphingomyelin, or Phosphatidylcholine |