| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Bioengineering and Physical Science, Office of Research Service, Office of Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to James Dvorak, Email: jdvorak{at}niaid.nih.gov.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
1.4 nm higher than the surrounding DLPC-rich membrane areas as a consequence of intrinsic phase differences. DPPC-rich microscopic domains became larger as DPPC concentration increased. In cholesterol-free mixtures, nanoscopic DPPC-rich domain sizes ranged from 26 to 46 nm depending on phospholipid concentration. Domain size varied between 33 and 48 nm in the presence of cholesterol (0 
[chol] 40). The nanoscopic domains were markedly fragmented near [chol] = 0.135 and appeared to fuse more readily into microscopic domains at higher and lower [chol]. By phase balance analyses we demonstrated phase behavior differences between a free-vesicle GUV system studied by confocal light microscopy and a supported membrane system studied by AFM. We propose a new three-dimensional phase diagram elucidating the effects of a solid substrate support on lipid phase behavior relevant to complex membrane phase phenomena in biological systems. |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; Simons and Ikonen, 1997), are characterized by their resistance to cold, nonionic detergents such as Triton X-100. These rafts are involved in biological processes such as membrane fusion, signal transduction, and virus release at the cell membrane level (Lang et al., 2001; Ono and Freed, 2001; Sheets et al., 1999; Stefanova et al., 1991). Biochemical studies demonstrate that membrane rafts are rich in sphingolipids, phospholipids, and cholesterol, as well as glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored and other proteins. At physiological temperatures it has been proposed that rafts are liquid-ordered phase domains (cf. Brown and London, 2000). Although data from detergent solubility studies confirm the existence of rafts and their modifications by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, the mechanisms involved in raft formation, behavior, and structure remain to be elucidated.
Mixed lipid bilayers are excellent model systems for lipid distributions involved in membrane rafts. Well-defined mixtures can provide physical chemical insights relevant to native biological membrane systems. Supported lipid bilayers and giant lipid vesicles assayed by techniques such as fluorescence microscopy (Dietrich et al., 2001; Hwang et al., 1995) and x-ray and neutron diffraction (Bedzyk et al., 1988; Koenig et al., 1996) have been used to both visualize and elucidate lipid phase behavior and phase separations. Although lateral phase separations are detectable by these techniques, many structural characteristics of phase domains remain to be elucidated. Recently, atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to study lipid mixtures, in the form of vesicles and membranes, and biological structures at very high spatial resolution with minimal sample manipulation or preparation. AFM has been used to directly visualize living cell membranes and submembraneous structures (Braet et al., 1998; Nagao and Dvorak, 1998; Henderson et al., 1992; Swihart et al., 2001; Ushiki et al., 1999), membrane protein structures (Kaasgaard et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2000; Takeyasu et al., 1996) as well as the domain structures of cell membranes (Giocondi et al., 2000) and mixed lipid membranes (cf. Dufrene et al., 1998 and Tokumasu et al., 2002).
We report here an AFM study of the phase properties of domains using three component mixed lipid bilayers composed of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC), and cholesterol (chol), whose overall phase behavior as giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) was previously studied by confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) (Feigenson and Buboltz, 2001). The GUV study demonstrated a relationship between phase behavior and domain separation at a resolution of 400 nm. In addition, using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) (Feigenson and Buboltz, 2001) proposed that nanoscopic domains may exist where domain separation could not be resolved by conventional CFM. Here we report the coexistence of microscopic and nanoscopic domains and quantitative analyses of nanoscopic domains, as small as 25 nm. We also describe the dependence of microscopic domain size on cholesterol concentration and a theoretical treatment of phase balance of supported lipid bilayers that amplifies the previous report on GUVs. Our results provide new insights into membrane physical chemistry relevant to cell membranes in a native environment.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
).
Vesicle and supported lipid membrane preparation
Multilamellar lipid dispersions were prepared by rapid solvent exchange, essentially as described by Buboltz and Feigenson (1999), but with a somewhat simplified procedure. Phospholipids and cholesterol were dissolved in 50–100 µl chloroform at concentrations of 50–100 nmol and placed in 13 x 100 mm screw-cap culture tubes. PIPES buffer (5 mM PIPES, 200 mM KCl, and 1 mM EDTA, pH = 7.0), 0.5–1 ml was added, and a vacuum of 23 torr was applied to the tubes for 10 min while vortexing to remove the organic solvent. The tubes were sealed under argon, heated to 50°C for 2 h, and slowly cooled to 23°C over a 12 to 20 h period.
Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) were prepared from the multilamellar vesicles with a mini-extruder (Avanti) containing two layers of 100 nm-pore size Nucleopore polycarbonate membranes (Corning, Corning, NY). Extrusions were performed for 50 cycles in the same PIPES buffer at 49°C, a temperature at which both phospholipids are in the fluid phase. The size homogeneity of vesicles prepared by this method has been described (Jin et al., 1999; Pencer et al., 2001). After extrusion, the vesicle suspensions were placed in an 8400 cm3-styrofoam box (wall thickness 5 cm) containing 3.5 L of 50°C water and allowed to equilibrate overnight to room temperature.
Supported membrane bilayers were prepared from LUV suspensions as described previously (Tokumasu et al., 2002). In brief, a 5 µl portion of a freshly prepared LUV suspension was applied onto freshly cleaved mica, incubated for 30 s and washed with the PIPES buffer. Excess fluid was removed and the sample was placed in a liquid cell attached to a Multimode AFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA). The sample was equilibrated in the same extrusion buffer for 20–30 min before imaging. We used the liposome adsorption method instead of the alternative Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) surface film deposition method (see e.g., Diociaiuti et al., 2002), to prepare supported membranes of various three-component mixtures. The liposome adsorption technique is more reliable for easier establishment, maintenance, and control of a known lipid mixture ratios and symmetry between the two leaflets in the resulting surface bilayers. In contrast, the LB method is better for the preparation of supported monolayers and for making bilayers that are asymmetric between two leaflets.
Atomic force microscopy
Imaging was performed using tapping mode at room temperature at a scanning rate of 1.5 Hz with a Multimode AFM and a Nanoscope IIIa controller (Digital Instruments), a Type D scanner (max scanning range: 10 µm x 10 µm) and silicon nitride DNP probes (Digital Instruments), having a nominal spring constant of 0.58 N/m. A controlled environment chamber was used to minimize perturbations from the temperature increase of the piezo scanner that normally occurs during imaging (Tokumasu et al., 2002). The tapping frequency was 8.7 kHz. Soft tapping was maintained by keeping the ratio of cantilever oscillation amplitudes before and after probe engagement of the sample surface (Asp/A0) at 8.8 (Magonov et al., 1997). Images were acquired and stored in either 512 x 512 or 512 x 256 pixel-element formats and converted to uncompressed linear 8-bit gray scale TIF format for further analyses. Domain size measurements were made using Image Pro Plus version 4.5 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) and numeric data were exported to Microsoft Excel for modeling and statistical analyses. Statistical analyses of domain size distributions and phase balance analyses were carried out using Origin version 5.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA) and Mathcad version 8.0 (Mathsoft, Cambridge, MA), respectively. Probe-tip size estimates were performed as described (Bustamante and Keller, 1995) using tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). The membrane domain size was calculated with a correction for tip-induced broadening using a step-height sample model (Takeyasu et al., 1996).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
). Although CFM data showed micrometer-size phase separations, nanoscopic domains were not detected as they are below the lateral resolution limit of the CFM. However, FRET analyses implied that three-component lipid mixtures can form nanoscopic domains at certain mixture ratios (Feigenson and Buboltz, 2001). Therefore, we studied by AFM these specific mixture ratios to determine if nanoscopic domain structures could be identified.
We use two parameters to describe sample composition, 
DPPC (the mole fraction of DPPC of all phosphatidylcholines: PC) and chol (the mole fraction of cholesterol in the total mixture). Fig. 1 shows AFM images of a DLPC/DPPC/chol (DPPC = 0.7 and chol = 0.189) mixed lipid bilayer with structural domains. This lipid concentration is near the center of region D described by Feigenson and Buboltz (2001) where free GUV membrane is thought to contain only nanoscopic, but not microscopic, domains. Here we observed both nanoscopic domains and some intermediate size domains (100 nm < diameter < 1 µm). The domains were distributed over the entire membrane surface and showed a heterogeneous size distribution with the intermediate size domains predominating at the edges of the membrane patches. In contrast, nanoscopic domains, with an apparent size of 50 nm, showed a more random distribution than larger domains. The contours of the larger domains are rough and have a more irregular shape. Similar domain border structures have been reported (Milhiet et al., 2001; Sikes and Schwartz, 1997; Yuan and Johnston, 2001). Analyses of membrane height profiles revealed two Gaussian distributions with peaks at 4.3 nm and 5.5 nm, representing DLPC-rich and DPPC-rich domain regions, respectively (Fig. 1 b). The interdomain difference in membrane thickness was 1.2 nm, consistent for both nanoscopic domains and submicrometer size domains. These thickness measurements are in good agreement with both x-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction data on pure DPPC (6.0 nm) and DLPC (4.2 nm) membranes (Balgavy et al., 2001; Nagle and Tristram-Nagle, 2000; Cevc and Marsh, 1987). In high coverage areas, membranes clearly showed both nanoscopic as well as submicrometer size domains (Fig. 1 c). Nanoscopic domain size appears to be similar in large patches or in nearly intact single bilayers; larger domain size is not restricted by the size of the membrane patch that typically reached our AFM scan size limit of 5 x 10 µm. Our AFM data demonstrate that in addition to the microscopic domains visible in CFM, nanoscopic domains do indeed exist below the resolution limit of CFM and can be observed directly by AFM.
|
) demonstrated that phase separation patterns varied depending on the DPPC/DLPC/chol mixture ratios. They also showed that no CFM-observable phase separation occurred at certain lipid mixture ratios (cf. Fig. 2 d) as expected. We imaged multiple samples with different lipid compositions both with and without cholesterol to determine how domain formation is controlled by lipid mixture ratio. AFM images (Fig. 2) in cholesterol-free conditions (DPPC = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8), show a mixed architecture of nanoscopic and microscopic domains, similar to CFM images at equivalent DPPC concentrations. At low DPPC, large DPPC-rich domains were observed only at the edges of the membrane whereas small nanoscale domains were present throughout the surrounding membrane areas (Fig. 2 a). In contrast, CFM images showed a homogeneous distribution of DLPC and the distributions of the two phospholipids were uniformly intermixed (Fig. 2 d). When DPPC was increased to 0.5 (Fig. 2 b), a larger number of predominately DLPC-rich areas were still observed. In contrast to CFM images where a DLPC-rich phase occupied larger areas (Fig. 2 e), AFM demonstrated that domains existed not only at membrane edges but also within membrane regions. More nanoscopic domains appeared although significant growth of larger DPPC-rich domains was not observed. In addition, weaker attachment of the membrane to the mica substrate was noticed during sample preparation. These data imply that the phase behavior changed. At DPPC = 0.8, significantly more microscopic membrane domains were seen by AFM (Fig. 2 c), and nanoscopic domains with diameters of 46 nm were still dispersed throughout all membrane areas. We were unable to identify domain-like structures in either DLPC or DPPC single-lipid samples at room temperature (data not shown). Therefore, as in free GUV membranes, phase coexistence occurs for a range of DPPC. However, CFM images show that a DPPC-rich phase region occupies a larger fraction of the membrane area than was seen by AFM at all corresponding DLPC/DPCP mixtures. These data fortify the concept that supported membranes contain both nanoscopic and microscopic domains, but exhibit phase behaviors quantitatively different than unsupported GUVs. In all cases, higher membrane domains present a flat surface and none of our AFM samples showed nanoscopic DLPC-rich domains contained within larger DPPC-rich structures.
|
chol = 0 and DPPC = 0.6, large domains with micrometer size diameters occupied 50% of the membrane area (Fig. 3 c). However, at chol = 0.135 and DPPC = 0.6, the large domains dissociated into small domains with diameters of 46 nm and into medium size clusters with diameters of several hundreds of nm; no domains with diameter larger than 1 µm were found (Fig. 3 b). This fragmentation of nanoscopic domains is especially clear in the second membrane layer over the mica surface (Fig. 3 b). When chol was increased to 0.185, small domains with diameters of 43 nm still existed and a few microscopic domains could be seen (Fig. 3 a). These data imply that micrometer-size domain structures at chol = 0 were disrupted by the addition of cholesterol and that the membrane was in a transitional state near chol = 0.135. Consequently, we predict that there may be a diffuse intermediate region near chol = 0.135 along a line of DPPC = 0.6, corresponding to the region D reported by Feigenson and Buboltz (2001) . The domain structures at chol = 0.135 observed by AFM would appear homogeneous at the resolution limits of CFM. A similar domain pattern over chol was also observed along the line of DPPC = 0.7 (cf. Fig. 1).
|
100 nm) revealed by AFM. This approach allowed us to clarify the structural characteristics of the fundamental domain units which give rise to macroscopic domains.
We used a multi-peak Gaussian model to obtain the peak domain sizes for each distribution (Table 1). All domain size data were corrected for broadening in lateral dimensions due to AFM tip geometry (See Materials and Methods). The average domain size was 42.4 ± 3.5 nm with the exception of DPPC = 0.5, where peak domain size was 25.8 ± 0.6 nm (Fig. 4). The distribution at DPPC = 0.5 was relatively large (28.3 ± 1.0 nm), but only 11% of the total fell within the 42.4 ± 3.5 nm range.
|
|
chol (0.135 and 0.189) also showed similar domain sizes (44.6 ± 3.3 nm, Table 1). The change in domain size was small for DPPC = 0.6 whereas 4 nm changes occurred between chol = 0, 0.135, and 0.189. In contrast, at DPPC = 0.7, the peak domain size increased from the cholesterol-free state by as much as 10 nm when chol = 0.135 and decreased by as much as 7 nm when chol = 0.189. At chol = 0.4 and DPPC = 0.7, peak domain sizes decreased to 33 nm (data not shown). These relatively large changes in nanoscopic domain size and the AFM images showing a breakdown in micrometer-size domains near chol = 0.135 indicate that at least three different states exist along the DPPC = 0.6 and DPPC = 0.7 isoclines with respect to cholesterol concentration. Considering the full distribution (Fig. 4), nanoscopic domains for various concentration mixtures show significant overlap in diameters size that are centered between 25 nm and 50 nm.
Phase balance in DPPC/DLPC mixtures
AFM data were used to determine the classical phase coexistence boundaries by quantifying the phase partition between the detected high and low phase areas. For a classical first-order transition with two-phase consistence, a phase balance exists that allows a consistency check of the equilibrium and a determination of the composition of the two phases. For two-phase coexistence between A (DPPC composition x) and B (DPPC composition y), we express the fraction of phase A, FA, (e.g., DPPC-rich gel phase) as a function of the DPPC mole fraction of the sample, 
,
 | (1) |
and 
, and can calculate:
 | (2) |
}, a vector plot of {FA} versus {} should result in a straight line. The goodness of fit of a regression of this line shows the degree of consistency to classical two-phase equilibria. Furthermore, the intercept of the regression provides the error weighted estimate of the phase compositions, (x, y).
For DLPC and DPPC mixtures, GUV studies showed a classical coexistence region between a more disordered DLPC-rich phase and a more ordered DPPC-rich phase between DPPC molar fractions of 0.3 and 0.8 (Feigenson and Buboltz, 2001). When we analyzed the GUV images, we corrected the spherical geometry pixel by pixel to convert the data into two-dimensional projections of the actual surface areas. We excluded a small edge region from the estimate to minimize associated conversion errors. For both AFM and GUV images, appropriate cutoff values were selected to differentiate between competing phases. We assumed that the relative area for each phase approximates the molar fraction of the phases (see Discussion for quantitative estimate). The deduced DLPC-rich fraction follows a straight line as required by the phase balance rule (Fig. 5). The intercepts of the regression lines yield (
, 
) = (0.28, 0.87) (Fig. 5), where 
represents the mole fraction of DPPC in the DLPC-rich phase, and are consistent with the Feigenson and Buboltz (2001) interpretation. Near the center of the GUV phase coexistence region, our AFM phase balance measurements also follow a straight line (Fig. 5). This suggests that a phase structure similar to that described for GUVs also exists for mica-supported membranes. The corresponding intercepts yield (, ) = (0.46, 0.89). The combined AFM data demonstrate that the phase boundaries shifted markedly along the zero cholesterol line.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Proposed phase diagram
By collating AFM and CFM data sets, we constructed a new, three-dimensional phase diagram for supported lipid membranes (Fig. 6).
|
DPPC = 0.5 along the chol = 0 isocline and morphologically different microscopic domains suggests that another phase boundary exists between DPPC = 0.2 and DPPC = 0.5. The nanoscopic domain sizes then gradually increase with increasing DPPC up to DPPC = 0.8. We did not detect additional phase boundaries in this region (Fig. 4, light green region). However, according to the results of the phase boundary analysis shown in Fig. 5, phase boundaries must occur at approximately DPPC = 0.46, and 0.89. Compared with CFM data (Fig. 5) for GUVs, the phase boundary shift is larger in the DLPC-rich phase (0.28 
0.46) than in the DPPC-rich phase (0.87 0.89) region. Fundamentally, our new data supplement and extend the previously reported GUV-based phase diagram; we also confirmed the miscibility of DPPC in a DLPC-rich phase, a miscibility gap at 0.46 DPPC 0.89, and, finally, miscibility of DLPC in a DPPC-rich phase at 0.89 DPPC.
The phase boundary determination in Fig. 5 (using Eqs. 1 and 2) involves the following two approximations. First, the property that should be considered in this analysis with Eqs. 1 and 2 is the molar ratio of the two phases at first-order coexistence. In both the AFM and CFM data, we determined the ratio of the membrane areas occupied by the two phases, FA, and used them in place of the molar ratio as an approximation. However, the molecular areas of saturated DLPC and DPPC are typically 0.53 nm2 in their gel phase and 0.65 nm2 in their fluid, liquid-crystalline phase (Marsh, 1990). The coexisting phases we observed at room temperature are mixtures at different composition ratios and may have similar molar area differences of 
. To translate the membrane area fractions, FA, in Fig. 5 to molar fractions, F
, we can deduce the shift to the leading order of 
as 
. For 
, this shifts all the data points in Fig. 5 by less than 5%. Thus, this first approximation does not modify significantly our phase boundary determinations. As a second approximation, we note that our phase balance analyses assume that the DLPC-rich and the DPPC-rich phase areas change with total lipid composition whereas the nature of the two phases, such as their compositions, remains unchanged. With respect to the phase-diagram (Fig. 6), this requires that the coexistence lines at [chol] = 0.0 be horizontal. Because the actual coexistence lines may be tilted slightly for the supported membrane (as indicated in Fig. 6, and see below), our phase-boundary values may also be only a close approximation. In summary, the above estimates for the phase boundaries along the DLPC and DPPC mixtures line without cholesterol appear robust both for GUV membranes and supported bilayers.
For the second aspect of the phase diagram, in the presence of cholesterol, we estimate the phase boundaries from AFM imaging data along the DLPC/DPPC line for DPPC = 0.6 and 0.7 to be similar but not identical to those seen in the original GUV phase diagram (Fig. 6). The domain structures at chol = 0.135 observed by AFM (Fig. 3 b) are consistent with region D of the GUV phase diagram between 0.16 < chol < 0.25, where nanoscopic phase separations were inferred to occur (Feigenson and Buboltz, 2001). Based on our data, phase boundaries on mica supported membranes should occur at two places, near chol 
0.13 and 0.3 (between chol = 0.2 and 0.4). However, the first phase boundary at chol 0.13 would be diffuse because transitional microscopic domain sizes were observed by AFM for both DPPC = 0.6 (Fig. 3 b) and 0.7 (data not shown). Therefore, region D in the original diagram is shifted to lower cholesterol values and the phase transition may not be abrupt; a non-first-order transition or continuous transition may occur between regions B and D. In this transition region, a noticeable increase in nanoscopic domains size (Fig. 3 b) indicates that 1), DPPC-rich domains are less likely to coalesce; 2), smaller domains, if they exist, have an increased tendency to fuse; and/or 3), there are fewer nucleation sites that can precipitate phase transitions. Conversely, domain sizes between chol = 0.189 and 0.40 have size differences of about 15 nm (data not shown) and we represent these and similar phenomena as a dotted line between chol = 0.2 and 0.4. The order and exact location of this phase boundary remains to be determined.
For the remainder of the phase diagram, we predict the existence of two-phase boundary paths connecting the GUV phase diagram and the AFM-modified phase diagram (Fig. 6, red dotted lines), and we depict a rotation of the entire phase-plane and a tilting of coexistence lines (Fig. 6, solid red lines on the mica-DPPC/DLPC plane). We denote the effect of mica as a representation of the interactions that modify the supported bilayers from the GUV membranes. In our AFM study, however, entropy suppression (see below) adds to the likelihood that a mica surface may shift the free-energy states in ways dependent upon the lipid mixture, as evident by the larger shift in the DLPC-rich phase, DPPC = 0.28 0.46 for chol = 0. This has the effect of rotating the phase plane as well as tilting the coexistence lines. In GUVs, because other factors such as the ionic strength of the buffer are constant, the DLPC-rich/DPPC-rich phase coexistence line appeared along the DPPC/DLPC line for chol = 0. The tilt in the phase-coexistence lines for the supported bilayer explains why we observed a gradual increase in domain size in the coexistence region when 0.46 DPPC 0.89 and chol = 0. When the composition of the lipid mixture changes along the line [chol] = 0, both the nature of the coexisting phases and the relative molar distribution of the two phases change. The apparent linearity of the data in our phase balance analyses (Fig. 5) and the lack of dramatic changes in the nanoscopic domain characteristics (Table 1), however, suggest that the tilting in the phase diagram is probably small, as we assumed for the coexistence boundary estimation presented above.
Entropy suppression in supported membrane
The main thrust of our work was to estimate the effects of a supporting substrate on a ternary phase diagram. The primary factor affecting phase behavior equilibrium in GUVs is the relative concentrations of DPPC, DLPC, and cholesterol. The observed nanoscopic domain formations and marked shifts in phase boundaries depend on interactions the aggregate of which must be attractive between the membrane and the solid (mica) surface. The mica surface provides an extra stabilizing effect and suppresses movement of the lipid molecules both within and outside of the membrane plane (entropy suppression). Because the DLPC-rich phase is fluid-like and the DPPC-rich phase is gel-like, we expect a greater loss of entropy due to membrane undulations for the DLPC-rich phase than for the DPPC-rich phase. Thus, the free energy of the DLPC-rich phase is shifted to a higher value relative to that of the DPPC-rich phase. Therefore, this entropic effect causes the DLPC-rich phase to be less stable than the DPPC-rich phase. Other forces that can hold membranes to a mica support include an electrostatic force (Egawa and Furusawa, 1999), hydrophobic and hydration forces, and van der Waals attraction forces (Ederth et al., 1998; Muresan and Lee, 2001; Parsegian and Evans, 1996). It is difficult to discriminate between the two phases in a three-component system on the bases of these force contributions. Therefore, we propose that in this system entropy suppression is sufficient to cause the phase shift that we have observed. In fact, it has already been demonstrated that by AFM a phase transition temperature shift to a higher temperature occurs in a mica-supported dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) bilayer (Tokumasu et al., 2002). A similar effect was observed for a DPPC bilayer (data not shown). All the features depicted in Fig. 6 are consistent with the expectation that entropy suppression from reduced membrane undulations is larger for the fluid-like phase than for the gel-like phase.
Beyond the rationale for entropy suppression induced by flat mica substrates, we recognize the possible effects of partial membrane coverage and geometric constraints on membrane properties. With partial membrane coverage, we have membrane patch edges that may directly alter membrane/mica interactions near the membrane edges or indirectly alter the free energy contributions at the spatial scale of patch sizes that are typically a few micrometers in our membrane ensembles. It is interesting that the DPPC-rich phase and not the DLPC-rich phase prefers membrane edges as shown in Fig. 2, a and c, perhaps reflecting a combination of factors. It is possible that domains rich in DPPC with longer acyl chains prefer membrane edges where semi-micelle-like structures could theoretically form to cover hydrophobic chains, minimizing the thermodynamic energy state, and reduce bare substrate/patch line tension (May, 2000). Indeed, line tension is a useful concept for understanding domain shapes (e.g., Muresan and Lee, 2001) and is relevant to our observations.
For the direct substrate-edge interactions, the characteristic length scale is probably not greater than the size of the nanoscopic domains, i.e., 40 nm. If that is the case, then, the relative area of the direct edge zones of our membrane patches can be estimated as,
 | (3) |
; MacKintosh and Lubensky, 1991). However, the supported bilayers in our experiments are often as large as our scan size of 5 µm. Therefore, nanoscopic domain size distributions per se should not depend on the size of the supported membranes we observed.
Our supported membranes were prepared in a monovalent ionic buffer, which is known to favor uniform and relatively weak membrane/mica attachments (Egawa and Furusawa, 1999). Membranes subjected to other environments may respond differently, which would affect the offset of the respective phase diagrams (cf. Fig. 6, in the mica support direction). The observed domain formation and phase diagram changes may be the consequence of different membrane-forming lipid mixtures interacting with a uniform support of the membrane along a rigid surface. Strong localized effects from the mica surface are probably not significant in this system because the quantity and appearance of the nanoscopic and microscopic domains are strongly dependent on the lipid mixture composition. In a previous study (Tokumasu et al., 2002), nonuniformities in local surface properties could induce a slight phase transition temperature shift within a single membrane, but were not strong enough to induce the generation of structural domains. What we have demonstrated here are the physical-chemical similarities and differences between a free vesicle system and a supported lipid bilayer that influence their lateral organization and membrane domain structure.
Biological implications and conclusion
In biological systems, cell membranes are often supported and interact with cytoskeletal proteins, neighboring membrane stacks, and extracellular matrices. In the case of a polarized membrane, apical and basolateral membranes interact differently with their immediate environments. For example, an apical membrane encounters extrinsic materials or agents, whereas basolateral membranes experience electrostatic repulsions/attractive forces and ionic screening effects mediated by intercellular fluids. These interactions affect native lipid phase behavior. Proteins, alcohol, and certain drugs can also alter membrane phase behavior and structure (Mou et al., 1994; Lasch et al., 1998; Hata et al., 2000). Cellular membranes are composed of a larger variety of lipids than the three-component system described here. Biological membrane heterogeneities, or membrane rafts, are functionally important, complex structures (Anderson and Jacobson, 2002; London and Brown, 2000). Nevertheless, it is useful to apply our AFM-derived phase diagram to supported cell membranes by substituting the mica-support axis with biologically relevant external agents and interactions. The direction and degree of phase diagram modifications will depend upon the net membrane charge, absolute interactive strength, membrane composition, and the degree of membrane confinement. The entropy suppression effects on lipid molecules by a solid support we report here are a reasonable first approximation of the phase behavior of native cell membranes.
Our direct observation and quantitation of nanoscopic domains together with a theoretical analysis provide detailed information on 1), domain formations of mixtures of DLPC, DPPC, and cholesterol; 2), the relationship between microscopic and nanoscopic domains; 3), the effect of a solid support on lipid phase behavior; and 4), some insights into the mechanisms behind these observations. The phase behavior and structural domain formation in an ionic environment detected by AFM approximates cell membrane behavior encountered in a native environment and points the way to an improved understanding of the physical chemical properties of cell membranes and their associated physiology.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
F.T. is a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellow in Biomedical and Behavioral Research at National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. G.W.F. received support from National Science Foundation Grant MCB-0077630.
Submitted on June 14, 2002; accepted for publication December 2, 2002.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Balgavy, P., M. Dubnickova, N. Kucerka, M. A. Kiselev, S. P. Yaradaikin, and D. Uhrikova. 2001. Bilayer thickness and lipid interface area in unilamellar extruded 1,2-diacylphosphatidylcholine liposomes: a small-angle neutron scattering study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1512:40–52.[Medline]
Bedzyk, M. J., D. H. Bilderback, G. M. Bommarito, M. Caffrey, and J. S. Schildkraut. 1988. X-ray standing waves: a molecular yardstick for biological membranes. Science. 241:1788–1791.
Braet, F., C. Seynaeve, R. De Zanger, and E. Wisse. 1998. Imaging surface and submembranous structures with the atomic force microscope: a study on living cancer cells, fibroblasts and macrophages. J. Microsc. 190:328–338.[Medline]
Brown, D. A., and E. London. 2000. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 275:17221–17224.
Buboltz, J. T., and G. W. Feigenson. 1999. A novel strategy for the preparation of liposomes: rapid solvent exchange. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1417:232–245.[Medline]
Bustamante, C., and D. Keller. 1995. Scanning Force Microscopy in Biology. Physics Today. 48:32–38.
Cevc, G., and D. Marsh. 1987. Phospholipid bilayers: physical principles and models. Wiley. New York.
Dietrich, C., L. A. Bagatolli, Z. N. Volovyk, N. L. Thompson, M. Levi, K. Jacobson, and E. Gratton. 2001. Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys. J. 80:1417–1428.
Diociaiuti, M., F. Bordi, A. Motta, A. Carosi, A. Molinari, G. Arancia, and C. Coluzza. 2002. Aggregation of Gramicidin A in Phospholipid Langmuir-Blodgett Monolayers. Biophys. J. 82:3198–3206.
Dufrene, Y. F., T. Boland, J. W. Schneider, W. R. Barger, and G. U. Lee. 1998. Characterization of the physical properties of model biomembranes at the nanometer scale with the atomic force microscope. Faraday Discuss. 111:79–94.[Medline]
Ederth, T., P. Claesson, and B. Liedberg. 1998. Self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on thin gold films as substrates for surface force measurements. Long-range hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic double-layer interactions. Langmuir. 14:4782–4789.
Egawa, H., and K. Furusawa. 1999. Liposome adhesion on mica surface studied by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir. 15:1660–1666.
Feigenson, G. W., and J. T. Buboltz. 2001. Ternary phase diagram of dipalmitoyl-PC/dilauroyl-PC/cholesterol: nanoscopic domain formation driven by cholesterol. Biophys. J. 80:2775–2788.
Giocondi, M. C., V. Vie, E. Lesniewska, J. P. Goudonnet, and C. Le Grimellec. 2000. In situ imaging of detergent-resistant membranes by atomic force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 131:38–43.[Medline]
Hata, T., H. Matsuki, and S. Kaneshina. 2000. Effect of local anesthetics on the bilayer membrane of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine: interdigitation of lipid bilayer and vesicle-micelle transition. Biophys. Chem. 87:25–36.[Medline]
Henderson, E., P. G. Haydon, and D. S. Sakaguchi. 1992. Actin filament dynamics in living glial cells imaged by atomic force microscopy. Science. 257:1944–1946.
Hwang, J., L. K. Tamm, T. S. Ramalingam, E. Betzig, and M. Edidin. 1995. Nanoscale complexity of phospholipid monolayers investigated by near- field scanning optical microscopy. Science. 270:610–614.
Jin, A. J., D. Huster, K. Gawrisch, and R. Nossal. 1999. Light scattering characterization of extruded lipid vesicles. Eur. Biophys. J. 28:187–199.[Medline]
Kaasgaard, T., O. G. Mouritsen, and K. Jorgensen. 2002. Lipid domain formation and ligand-receptor distribution in lipid bilayer membranes investigated by atomic force microscopy. FEBS Lett. 515:29–34.[Medline]
Kingsley, P. B., and G. W. Feigenson. 1979. The synthesis of perdeuterated phospholipid: 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine-d72. Chem. Phy. Lipids. 24:135–147.
Koenig, B. W., S. Krueger, W. J. Orts, C. F. Majkrzak, N. F. Berk, J. V. Silverton, and K. Gawrisch. 1996. Neutron Reflectivity and Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of a Lipid Bilayer in Water Adsorbed to the Surface of a Silicon Single Crystal. Langmuir. 12:1343–1350.
Lang, T., D. Bruns, D. Wenzel, D. Riedel, P. Holroyd, C. Thiele, and R. Jahn. 2001. SNAREs are concentrated in cholesterol-dependent clusters that define docking and fusion sites for exocytosis. EMBO J. 20:2202–2213.[Medline]
Lasch, P., C. P. Schultz, and D. Naumann. 1998. The influence of poly-(L-lysine) and porin on the domain structure of mixed vesicles composed of lipopolysaccharide and phospholipid: an infrared spectroscopic study. Biophys. J. 75:840–852.
London, E., and D. A. Brown. 2000. Insolubility of lipids in triton X-100: physical origin and relationship to sphingolipid/cholesterol membrane domains (rafts). Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1508:182–195.[Medline]
MacKintosh, F. C. 1994. Mixed Fluid Bilayers—Effects of Confinement. Phys. Rev. E. 50:2891–2897.
MacKintosh, F. C., and T. C. Lubensky. 1991. Orientational Order, Topology, and Vesicle Shapes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67:1169–1172.[Medline]
Magonov, S. N., V. Elings, and M.-H. Whangbo. 1997. Phase imaging and stiffness in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Sur. Sci. Lett. 375:L385–L391.
Marsh, D. 1990. Handbook of Lipid Bilayers. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
May, S. 2000. A molecular model for the line tension of lipid membranes. The European Physical Journal E. 3:37–44.
Milhiet, P. E., C. Domec, M. C. Giocondi, N. Van Mau, F. Heitz, and C. Le Grimellec. 2001. Domain formation in models of the renal brush border membrane outer leaflet. Biophys. J. 81:547–555.
Mou, J., J. Yang, C. Huang, and Z. Shao. 1994. Alcohol induces interdigitated domains in unilamellar phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochemistry. 33:9981–9985.[Medline]
Muller, D. J., J. B. Heymann, F. Oesterhelt, C. Moller, H. Gaub, G. Buldt, and A. Engel. 2000. Atomic force microscopy of native purple membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1460:27–38.[Medline]
Muresan, A. S., and K. Y. C. Lee. 2001. Shape evolution of lipid bilayer patches adsorbed on mica: An atomic force microscopy study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:852–855.
Nagao, E., and J. A. Dvorak. 1998. An integrated approach to the study of living cells by atomic force microscopy. J. Microsc. 191:8–19.[Medline]
Nagle, J. F., and S. Tristram-Nagle. 2000. Lipid bilayer structure. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:474–480.[Medline]
Ono, A., and E. O. Freed. 2001. Plasma membrane rafts play a critical role in HIV-1 assembly and release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:13925–13930.
Parsegian, V. A., and E. A. Evans. 1996. Long and short range intermolecular and intercolloidal forces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1:53–60.
Pencer, J., G. F. White, and F. R. Hallett. 2001. Osmotically induced shape changes of large unilamellar vesicles measured by dynamic light scattering. Biophys. J. 81:2716–2728.
Sheets, E. D., D. Holowka, and B. Baird. 1999. Critical role for cholesterol in Lyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of FcepsilonRI and their association with detergent-resistant membranes. J. Cell Biol. 145:877–887.
Sikes, H. D., and D. K. Schwartz. 1997. Two-dimensional melting of an anisotropic crystal observed at the molecular level. Science. 278:1604–1607.
Simons, K., and E. Ikonen. 1997. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 387:569–572.[Medline]
Stefanova, I., V. Horejsi, I. J. Ansotegui, W. Knapp, and H. Stockinger. 1991. GPI-anchored cell-surface molecules complexed to protein tyrosine kinases. Science. 254:1016–1019.
Swihart, A. H., J. M. Mikrut, J. B. Ketterson, and R. C. Macdonald. 2001. Atomic force microscopy of the erythrocyte membrane skeleton. J. Microsc. 204:212–225.[Medline]
Takeyasu, K., H. Omote, S. Nettikadan, F. Tokumasu, A. Iwamoto-Kihara, and M. Futai. 1996. Molecular imaging of Escherichia coli F0F1-ATPase in reconstituted membranes using atomic force microscopy. FEBS Lett. 392:110–113.[Medline]
Tokumasu, F., A. J. Jin, and J. A. Dvorak. 2002. Lipid membrane phase behaviour elucidated in real time by controlled environment atomic force microscopy. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo). 51:1–9.
Ushiki, T., J. Hitomi, T. Umemoto, S. Yamamoto, H. Kanazawa, and M. Shigeno. 1999. Imaging of living cultured cells of an epithelial nature by atomic force microscopy. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 62:47–55.[Medline]
Yuan, C., and L. J. Johnston. 2001. Atomic force microscopy studies of ganglioside GM1 domains in phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol bilayers. Biophys. J. 81:1059–1069.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C. Roduit, F. G. van der Goot, P. De Los Rios, A. Yersin, P. Steiner, G. Dietler, S. Catsicas, F. Lafont, and S. Kasas Elastic Membrane Heterogeneity of Living Cells Revealed by Stiff Nanoscale Membrane Domains Biophys. J., February 15, 2008; 94(4): 1521 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Hayakawa, F. Tokumasu, G. A. Nardone, A. J. Jin, V. A. Hackley, and J. A. Dvorak A Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Derived Lipid Inhibits Membrane Fusion by Modulating Lipid Membrane Domains Biophys. J., December 1, 2007; 93(11): 4018 - 4030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Richardson, L. J. Cummings, H. J. Harris, and P. O'Shea Toward a Mathematical Model of the Assembly and Disassembly of Membrane Microdomains: Comparison with Experimental Models Biophys. J., June 15, 2007; 92(12): 4145 - 4156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H. Abdulreda and V. T. Moy Atomic Force Microscope Studies of the Fusion of Floating Lipid Bilayers Biophys. J., June 15, 2007; 92(12): 4369 - 4378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Coban, J. Popov, M. Burger, D. Vobornik, and L. J. Johnston Transition from Nanodomains to Microdomains Induced by Exposure of Lipid Monolayers to Air Biophys. J., April 15, 2007; 92(8): 2842 - 2853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Ayuyan and F. S. Cohen Lipid Peroxides Promote Large Rafts: Effects of Excitation of Probes in Fluorescence Microscopy and Electrochemical Reactions during Vesicle Formation Biophys. J., September 15, 2006; 91(6): 2172 - 2183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Blanchette, W.-C. Lin, T. V. Ratto, and M. L. Longo Galactosylceramide Domain Microstructure: Impact of Cholesterol and Nucleation/Growth Conditions Biophys. J., June 15, 2006; 90(12): 4466 - 4478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Jin, K. Prasad, P. D. Smi |
) Areas obtained from GUV images after their 3-D areas were converted to 2-D projections. (•) Area fractions measured in AFM images. These plots were calculated as linear regressions and their x-axis intercepts at DLPC area fractions of 0 and 1 were considered as phase boundaries. We expect to see only a DLPC-rich phase at 
0.87 for GUV and 